Select Committee · Work and Pensions Committee

Safeguarding vulnerable claimants

Status: Closed Opened: 21 Jul 2023 Closed: 17 Sep 2025 22 recommendations 18 conclusions 4 reports

The predecessor Work and Pensions Committee opened an inquiry into safeguarding vulnerable claimants in July 2023, to examine how DWP supports vulnerable benefit claimants and whether its approach to safeguarding needs to change. There are many people who claim benefits from DWP who are considered vulnerable and in need of special care, support or protection …

Reports

4 reports
Title HC No. Published Items Response
Easy Read – 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Claimants HC 402 15 May 2025 0 Responded
Audio summary – 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Claima… HC 402 15 May 2025 0
1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Claimants HC 402 15 May 2025 40 Responded
BSL report summary – 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable C… HC 402 15 May 2025 0 Responded

Recommendations & Conclusions

40 items
1 Recommendation 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Accepted

DWP failures have resulted in hundreds of serious harms and deaths to claimants.

DWP provides essential services that act as a lifeline to millions of people each year, many of whom are vulnerable and require additional support to access them. For this reason, when mistakes are made, it is possible that the severest consequences can arise. Over several years there are known to …

Government response. The government accepted the recommendation, stating it is open to a statutory duty to safeguard vulnerable customers and has completed a consultation on a new DWP safeguarding approach. The Secretary of State will make a statement in the Autumn outlining …
Department for Work and Pensions
2 Conclusion 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Not Addressed

EHRC formal investigation into DWP’s treatment of disabled claimants is currently ongoing.

We note that in April 2022, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) and DWP were working to improve DWP’s treatment of disabled benefit claimants in accordance with a legally binding section 23 agreement. We further note that the EHRC launched a formal investigation into DWP in May 2024, which …

Government response. The government's response discusses its openness to a statutory safeguarding duty, consultation findings, and a future statement on DWP's new safeguarding approach, without directly addressing the Committee's conclusion about the ongoing EHRC investigation or its decision to defer recommendations.
Department for Work and Pensions
3 Conclusion 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Accepted

DWP lacks clear, public-facing safeguarding policy and strategy for claimants.

It is striking that despite being engaged with safeguarding on a daily basis, the Department has never had a clear and coherent, public facing safeguarding policy or strategy. For example, that when making an internet search for “DWP safeguarding policy” or “strategy”, there are no clear results from Government webpages. …

Government response. The government is open to a statutory safeguarding duty and the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions will make a statement in the Autumn outlining DWP's new safeguarding approach, which will include a clear intent to drive cultural change …
Department for Work and Pensions
4 Recommendation 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Accepted

Require Secretary of State to make statement on DWP's new safeguarding approach.

To signal a step-change to the public in the culture of the Department, and to improve accountability directly to Parliament, we recommend the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions make a statement to the House, setting out DWP’s new approach to safeguarding, at the conclusion of its current review. …

Government response. The government accepted the recommendation, stating that the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions will make a statement to the House in the Autumn, setting out DWP's new safeguarding approach, including a clear intent to drive cultural change and …
Department for Work and Pensions
5 Conclusion 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Accepted in Part

DWP's current safeguarding practice remains insufficient, requiring a new statutory duty.

The Department has said that whilst it does not have a statutory duty to safeguard vulnerable claimants, it recognises it has a responsibility to support them and does so through other means. We remain concerned, however, that current practice is insufficient, and that public trust is sorely damaged. We received …

Government response. The government stated it is open to introducing a statutory duty to safeguard vulnerable customers and will publish its new DWP safeguarding approach in the Autumn, which will include a clear statement of intent for cultural change.
Department for Work and Pensions
6 Recommendation 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Deferred

Introduce statutory duty for DWP to safeguard vulnerable claimants department-wide.

We recommend DWP introduce a statutory duty to safeguard vulnerable claimants that applies to the whole Department, and for which the Secretary of State is ultimately accountable. The duty should have regard to factors such as the wellbeing of vulnerable claimants and preventing harm, when exercising its functions. It should …

Government response. The government did not commit to introducing a statutory duty for safeguarding vulnerable claimants. Instead, it is engaging in a public consultation on safeguarding and establishing a Disability Advisory Panel, set to launch in summer 2025.
Department for Work and Pensions
7 Conclusion 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Acknowledged

DWP policy framework inadequately addresses vulnerable claimants beyond the disability service area.

DWP is more likely to prevent vulnerable claimants from experiencing harm if it first engages them in decision-making that affects them: their needs, the potential risks of proposals, and how those risks might be mitigated. We welcome the intention to introduce a trauma-informed policy framework and the work reviewing policy …

Government response. The government recognised the broad nature of vulnerability and stated that as part of a safeguarding review, it will consider publishing DWP's flexible definition of vulnerability.
Department for Work and Pensions
8 Recommendation 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Accepted

Introduce requirement for Chief Medical Adviser to assess health impact of all significant DWP policies.

We recommend that as a part of a systems-based approach to safeguarding, the Department introduce an explicit requirement that all significant new policies and policy changes, including those that fall outside the disability service area, are assessed by the Chief Medical Advisor’s team to understand their potential health impact on …

Government response. The government did not commit to the Chief Medical Advisor's team assessing all new policies for health impacts. Instead, it described existing ongoing efforts to improve accessibility, tailor services, and capture customer needs through updated processes and surveys.
Department for Work and Pensions
9 Conclusion 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Deferred

Chief Medical Adviser's policy impact assessments on benefit changes remain largely unpublished.

The Chief Medical Adviser (CMA) told us her team provided clinical advice to Ministers and was involved in assessing any potential policy changes put forward within White Papers or Green Papers; however, these assessments were not usually published, to enable Ministers to make decisions in a safe space. The Pathways …

Government response. The government did not commit to publishing the Chief Medical Advisor's assessment of proposals in the Pathways to Work Green Paper. The response focused on increasing engagement, staff training, and developing a trauma-informed approach.
Department for Work and Pensions
10 Recommendation 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Deferred

Publish Chief Medical Adviser's assessment of Pathways to Work Green Paper proposals.

In response to this report, we ask that DWP confirm that planned changes to health and disability benefits, set out in the Pathways to Work Green Paper, were prospectively assessed with respect to possible physical and mental 95 health impacts on claimants. We recommend DWP publish the Chief Medical Adviser’s …

Government response. The government did not confirm whether health and disability benefit changes were prospectively assessed for health impacts by the Chief Medical Advisor's team, nor did it commit to publishing any such assessment. Instead, it highlighted existing support services for claimants.
Department for Work and Pensions
11 Conclusion 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Accepted

DWP reform programme risks unintended consequences for vulnerable claimants without centering wellbeing.

DWP is undertaking a major programme of reform via its green and white papers and several long-term strategies and programmes. This work presents a significant opportunity to improve safeguarding for claimants across the social security system. However, DWP must be alert to unintended consequences that could put claimants at risk, …

Government response. The government did not explicitly commit to new mechanisms for incorporating lived experience in policy design or proactively identifying unintended consequences of reforms. The response focused on existing practices for communicating information to customers, checking for support needs, and providing …
Department for Work and Pensions
12 Recommendation 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Deferred

Introduce a systems-based approach to safeguarding across all DWP policies and operations.

We recommend the Department introduce a systems-based approach to safeguarding, at all levels of DWP and in all policies. A systems- based approach should consist of developing mechanisms to ensure that safeguarding is explicitly considered at each point in the development, implementation, monitoring and evaluation stages of all policies. This …

Government response. The government committed to considering the recommendation for a systems-based approach to safeguarding when the detailed departmental approach is outlined later in the Autumn, without making any specific commitments at this time.
Department for Work and Pensions
13 Conclusion 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Deferred

Set up a claimant lived experience reference group to shape DWP safeguarding policy.

To ensure that it incorporates the expertise of people with lived experience of the benefit system, DWP should set up a reference group similar to the Greater Manchester Disabled People’s Panel to help shape safeguarding policy. (Recommendation, Paragraph 51) Defining ‘vulnerability’ and identifying additional needs

Government response. The government did not commit to setting up a reference group of people with lived experience (claimants) to shape safeguarding policy. Instead, the response focused on using staff surveys, a Coaching Academy, and frontline staff feedback to inform improvements.
Department for Work and Pensions
14 Conclusion 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Deferred

Lack of clear DWP vulnerability definition hinders claimants from accessing additional support.

DWP’s existing description, or definition, of vulnerability in internal documentation encourages an open, flexible approach to determine when a claimant has additional support needs. However, the lack of a clear, consistent and public-facing definition of vulnerability could act as a barrier to understanding if and when individuals are entitled to …

Government response. The government acknowledges the issue and states its internal definition of vulnerability. It will consider publishing this definition as part of a safeguarding review, noting the need for flexibility.
Department for Work and Pensions
15 Recommendation 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Deferred

Formalise and publish a clear, consistent definition of vulnerability in all DWP public documents.

DWP should formalise its definition of vulnerability and undertake work to ensure it is clearly and consistently communicated in key public facing documents, including its ‘Advanced Customer Support: Delivering support and transformation to help DWP customers with additional support needs’ document, and its new approach to safeguarding, when published. The …

Government response. The government states its current definition of vulnerability and says it will consider publishing this definition as part of a safeguarding review, while being mindful of flexibility, rather than immediately formalising and publishing guidance.
Department for Work and Pensions
16 Recommendation 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Deferred

Add 'victims of domestic abuse' category to Universal Credit Additional Support Area.

We heard in evidence that when using the ‘Additional Support Area’ in Universal Credit, DWP officials are able to record support needs under the following eight categories: care leavers; armed forces; ex-offender; homeless or risk of homelessness; limited digital ability or accessibility; difficulties with English; drug and alcohol misuse; and …

Government response. The government did not commit to adding 'victims of domestic abuse' as a specific category in the Universal Credit 'Additional Support Area'. Instead, the response outlined DWP's ongoing engagement with and support for local and national Safeguarding Adults Boards.
Department for Work and Pensions
17 Conclusion 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Deferred

DWP's reliance on self-disclosure for vulnerable claimants is inadequate and needs proactive measures.

When it comes to identifying vulnerable claimants, the Department places too great an onus on self-disclosure. The nature of some vulnerabilities can make disclosure difficult. A lack of trust in the Department can further deter people from sharing their personal circumstances. Whilst DWP has sought to train staff to recognise …

Government response. The government responded to an unrelated point about the PHSO's MP filter and powers, stating DWP lacks the authority to change it and that it's a matter for Parliament.
Department for Work and Pensions
18 Recommendation 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Accepted

Introduce specific questions and a tick-box on benefit forms for vulnerability disclosure.

DWP should add a question to all benefit application forms that asks claimants if they would like to disclose anything about their personal circumstances, including medical or mental health concerns, that means they might need additional support, now or in the future. Forms should also include a simple tick-box, through …

Government response. The government states it is already driving continuous improvement in identifying customer needs and providing tailored support. It highlights existing measures such as updated call scripts, new questions in ESA online claims for alternative formats, and identification of support needs …
Department for Work and Pensions
19 Recommendation 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Deferred

Implement policy for staff to proactively check vulnerabilities, engage claimants, and provide targeted training.

DWP should also implement a new policy making clear that staff have a responsibility to check proactively for vulnerabilities and engage claimants in regular conversations where they can share any difficulties they may be experiencing. For example, if a claimant attended meetings with a support 97 worker advocating on their …

Government response. The government refers to its Green Paper and recent consultation on increasing engagement with claimants, stating it is currently considering responses to inform future policy development on this. It also highlights existing processes and training for staff to identify vulnerability, …
Department for Work and Pensions
20 Conclusion 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Deferred

Removal of face-to-face 'Help to Claim' creates inadequate support for vulnerable Universal Credit applicants.

Ensuring vulnerable people have support to access the benefits they are entitled to is an essential part of delivering equitable welfare provision and an effective safety net. Since the removal of Help to Claim’s face-to-face service in 2022 it has become more difficult for some individuals to apply for Universal …

Government response. The government responded to an unrelated point about the PHSO's role in DWP's internal learning processes, committing to publish findings from Internal Process Reviews to promote transparency.
Department for Work and Pensions
21 Recommendation 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Deferred

Ensure Jobcentres provide equivalent comprehensive support to claimants as 'Help to Claim' service.

DWP must ensure that Jobcentres can provide as thorough a service as used to be offered through Help to Claim. We recommend that, in its response to this report, DWP sets out where the support offered in Jobcentres and through home visits differs from that provided by Help to Claim. …

Government response. The government responded by outlining steps to improve transparency and oversight of serious cases through new appointments to boards, rather than addressing the specific recommendation about Jobcentre support equivalence.
Department for Work and Pensions
22 Conclusion 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Accepted

Vulnerable claimants lack awareness and information about available additional support and reasonable adjustments.

Some vulnerable claimants require reasonable adjustments and additional support throughout their benefit claim. These adjustments are crucial to ensuring that claimants can successfully engage with the system, receive the support they are entitled to, and reduce the risk of unmet needs escalating to serious harms. However, many claimants do not …

Government response. The government recognizes the importance of informing customers about support but, based on user research, has streamlined initial information, signposting additional details for customers to access when needed, and relies on DWP colleagues, training, and tools to identify and signpost …
Department for Work and Pensions
23 Recommendation 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Accepted

Provide claimants with detailed information about available additional support and train staff proactively.

Upon first applying to benefits, and at each review point, we recommend DWP staff provide claimants with detailed information about the additional support available to them, which must include an indicative list of possible reasons which might lead to an individual requiring this support. Frontline staff should also be trained …

Government response. The government declines to provide detailed upfront information, citing user research that it can overwhelm claimants. Instead, they state they signpost information and staff are trained and equipped to check for needs and signpost support, exercising professional judgment.
Department for Work and Pensions
24 Recommendation 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Deferred

Ensure safeguarding publication is accessible and develop additional support toolkits for claimants.

DWP must ensure its new ‘approach to safeguarding’ publication is easy to use, signposts relevant support organisations, and is available in a range of languages and alternative formats. DWP should also develop an additional support toolkit to accompany this publication, to ensure information relating to available support is not lost …

Government response. The government will consider the recommendation regarding its new safeguarding publication and accompanying toolkit when the details are outlined later in the Autumn. It notes that all DWP publications already comply with an Accessible Documents Policy for various formats.
Department for Work and Pensions
25 Conclusion 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Acknowledged

Inconsistent application of DWP policies like sanctions exacerbates claimant vulnerabilities and hardship.

Incorrectly applied, policies intended to drive claimant behaviour and deliver value for money, such as sanctions and deductions, can create and exacerbate vulnerabilities. While DWP has checks in place that are supposed to ensure this doesn’t happen, the application of these checks is inconsistent. This can leave claimants facing substantial …

Government response. The Coaching Academy will aim to professionalise employment support through accredited training and provide platforms to capture structured frontline feedback, which will inform continuous improvement in training and delivery of service.
Department for Work and Pensions
26 Conclusion 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Acknowledged

Overreliance on Work Coach discretion and inadequate training compromises DWP safeguarding policies.

The effectiveness of DWP policies that are supposed to protect claimants from harm is in large part contingent on Work Coaches applying discretion correctly and consistently. Discretion can be a valuable tool in the benefit system, but we are concerned that overreliance on discretion is placing an unreasonable burden on …

Government response. The Coaching Academy will aim to professionalise employment support through accredited training and provide platforms to capture structured frontline feedback, which will inform continuous improvement in training and delivery of service.
Department for Work and Pensions
27 Recommendation 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Deferred

Commission regular surveys to understand DWP staff views on safeguarding policies and workload

We recommend DWP commissions or undertakes a series of surveys to understand how staff feel about the Department’s safeguarding policies, practices and their overall workload. The surveys should include questions relating to views on training and guidance; familiarity and confidence with safeguarding policies; and culture relating to safeguarding, both within …

Government response. The government agrees surveys are valuable and states the new Coaching Academy will capture structured feedback through surveys. It will consider how best to use existing and new surveys to inform safeguarding policy and service delivery, rather than committing to …
Department for Work and Pensions
28 Conclusion 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Accepted

Insufficient understanding and capacity of ACSSLs hinders DWP's safeguarding effectiveness

Advanced Customer Support Senior Leaders (ACSSLs) form a core part of DWP’s safeguarding strategy and undertake significant public facing and operational roles. Despite ACSSLs playing a critical role in DWP’s approach 99 to safeguarding, there remains a lack of understanding, including amongst organisations that support claimants, about the work ACSSLs …

Government response. The government states current ACSSL resourcing levels are appropriate and additional roles were introduced to support them. They indicate ACSSLs actively promote their role and foster external relationships, and will continue to explore ways to increase their visibility.
Department for Work and Pensions
29 Recommendation 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Rejected

Improve awareness of ACSSLs' roles and expand their capacity across Great Britain

We recommend DWP work to improve awareness of the work that Advanced Customer Support Senior Leaders undertake, including by setting out a full description of their role when publishing their new approach to safeguarding, and by promoting case studies. As part of its review into safeguarding, the Department should also …

Government response. The government states current ACSSL resourcing is appropriate and additional roles were introduced, effectively rejecting the need to assess capacity or expand the number of ACSSLs. They commit to exploring ways to increase ACSSL visibility in future publications, but do …
Department for Work and Pensions
30 Recommendation 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Rejected

Create an external system for benefit advisers to directly refer claimant concerns to ACSSLs

The Department should also develop a more systematic route through which benefit advisers can contact ACSSLs directly, when and if they have a serious concern about a claimant. DWP should consider creating an external equivalent of the internal system it uses to allow DWP colleagues to refer cases for ACSSL …

Government response. The government rejected the recommendation for a new systematic route for benefit advisers to contact ACSSLs directly, stating that existing channels are sufficient and ACSSLs are not intended to replace frontline services. They highlighted existing ACSSL external relationships and rising …
Department for Work and Pensions
31 Conclusion 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Not Addressed

DWP inconsistently refers vulnerable claimants to appropriate external safeguarding agencies

Effective collaboration between partners is essential to understand the complex needs of some claimants, to understand if they are at risk, and to identify if any interventions are required to assure their safety. The Department has taken some steps to improve the way it works with other agencies, led by …

Government response. The government states it will continue to strengthen partnerships with Safeguarding Adult Boards and increase DWP representation (currently 80%), and plans to publish the joint Memorandum of Understanding. However, it does not directly address the committee's finding that the department …
Department for Work and Pensions
32 Recommendation 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Accepted in Part

Mandate DWP representation on Safeguarding Adult Boards and duty to refer vulnerable claimants

We recommend the Government make it a statutory requirement for all Safeguarding Adult Boards to include DWP representation. As part of its statutory safeguarding duty, DWP should also have a specified duty to refer vulnerable claimants to other agencies, including those which have a duty of care, to ensure their …

Government response. The government plans to publish the Memorandum of Understanding. They support increasing DWP representation on Safeguarding Adult Boards, with ACSSLs currently on 80%, but do not commit to making it a statutory requirement or establishing a specified duty to refer …
Department for Work and Pensions
33 Conclusion 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Deferred

MP filter deters vulnerable claimants from PHSO complaints, hindering DWP learning

Many of the people making a complaint against DWP are likely to be in a vulnerable situation. Having a robust, clear and accessible complaints procedure is therefore crucial to prevent failures from reoccurring and to provide those affected with a means of redress. We are concerned that some vulnerable claimants, …

Government response. DWP acknowledges the recommendation to remove the MP filter, but states it does not have the authority to make such changes as the current arrangements for the PHSO are set out in the Parliamentary Commissioner Act 1967 which is a …
Department for Work and Pensions
34 Recommendation 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Rejected

Remove the MP filter and grant PHSO power to investigate systemic issues proactively

We agree with the PHSO that the MP filter should be removed, and that the PHSO should be granted the power of initiative so that it can investigate known and systemic issues, more effectively support public services and extend access to justice to those least likely to complain, without a …

Government response. The DWP rejected the recommendation, stating it lacks the authority to remove the MP filter or grant the PHSO new powers, as these changes require primary legislation from Parliament. They also noted no clear evidence that removing the filter would …
Department for Work and Pensions
35 Conclusion 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Accepted

Unknown scale of deaths and serious harms among vulnerable claimants

We remain concerned that the true scale of deaths and serious harms of vulnerable claimants is currently unknown. As set out by the Chief Medical Advisor, we recognise the complexity of these cases and that being in receipt of benefits does not automatically imply culpability of the Department. However, we …

Government response. The Chief Medical Advisor is actively involved in departmental responses to Coroner-issued Prevention of Future Death reports, and a review is under consideration to strengthen this role. The role of the Caldicott Guardian was established in DWP in 2024 and …
Department for Work and Pensions
36 Recommendation 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Not Addressed

Devise a systematic way to record and annually publish serious harms and deaths

We recommend the Department work with its Chief Medical Advisor, DWP’s Caldicott Guardian, and coroners to devise a way to record more systematically all cases of serious harms and deaths where the individual affected was in receipt of working-age benefits. The Department should then commit to publishing this information annually …

Government response. The government noted the Chief Medical Advisor's existing involvement in public Coroner reports and stated it is reviewing and exploring how to strengthen their roles, and how the Caldicott Guardian will be included in ethical data considerations, but did not …
Department for Work and Pensions
37 Recommendation 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Accepted in Part

Ensure Caldicott Guardian inclusion in all future DWP service procurement processes

We welcome the action taken by the Chief Medical Advisor to appoint a Caldicott Guardian in order to aid transparency and to ensure DWP handles claimants’ data safely and ethically. However, we are concerns that due to other organisations, the protections offered by a Caldicott Guardian will not be seen …

Government response. The government states that the role of Caldicott Guardian is evolving and the department is currently exploring how the Guardian will be included in wider departmental ethical data considerations, including relevant commercial contracts.
Department for Work and Pensions
38 Conclusion 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Acknowledged

DWP's system for learning from serious harm cases remains opaque

If all other layers of safeguarding fail, and claimants experience harm as a consequence, it is essential that DWP learns from these cases. Furthermore, it is right that learning mechanisms are transparent, so that claimants and their families can understand what the Department is doing to prevent 101 these same …

Government response. DWP is committed to continuous learning to improve public services and recognizes its responsibility to learn when experiences for customers have fallen below expectations and to make changes that drive improvement. DWP plans to publish findings from Internal Process Reviews …
Department for Work and Pensions
39 Recommendation 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Accepted in Part

Improve transparency of DWP's serious mistake learning processes with the PHSO

DWP should work with the PHSO in the next six months to improve the transparency of the processes it uses to learn from serious mistakes and failures, including Internal Process Reviews, the Independent Case Examiner, and the Serious Case Panel. Greater transparency would improve accountability and drive learning. This would …

Government response. The government rejected the specific recommendation to work with the PHSO on transparency, stating it's DWP's own responsibility. However, DWP committed to fulfilling this responsibility by planning to publish findings from Internal Process Reviews to support transparency and improve understanding.
Department for Work and Pensions
40 Recommendation 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Cl… Rejected

Introduce an independent body to investigate serious harms in DWP case mishandlings

However, even if the Department improves transparency, we are still concerned that the process in DWP amount to it marking its own homework. Therefore, in the longer term, we recommend DWP introduce an independent body to investigate serious harms, to improve scrutiny and ensure appropriate action is taken when cases …

Government response. The government welcomes the recommendation but does not commit to introducing a new independent body to investigate serious harms. Instead, it highlights existing measures, such as an independent member on the Clinical Governance and Excellence Board and a Serious Case …
Department for Work and Pensions

Oral evidence sessions

8 sessions
Date Witnesses
12 Feb 2025 Dr Gail Allsopp · Department for Work and Pensions, Elizabeth Fairburn · Department for Work & Pensions, Neil Couling · Department for Work and Pensions, Sir Stephen Timms MP · Department for Work and Pensions View ↗
8 Jan 2025 Carri Swann · Child Poverty Action Group, Dr Antonia Dietmann · Department for Work and Pensions, Dr Gail Allsopp · Department for Work and Pensions, Minesh Patel · Mind, Sophie Francis-Cansfield · Women’s Aid, Tim Nicholls · National Autistic Society View ↗
26 Mar 2024 Elizabeth Fairburn · Department for Work & Pensions, Mims Davies MP · Department for Work and Pensions, Preeta Ramachandran · Department for Work & Pensions, The Viscount Younger of Leckie · Department for Work and Pensions View ↗
28 Feb 2024 Rebecca Hilsenrath · Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman, Rob Behrens · Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman View ↗
7 Feb 2024 Caroline Selman · Public Law Project, Jesse Nicholls · Matrix Law, William Ford · Osbornes Law View ↗
24 Jan 2024 Corin Hammersley · Advice & Benefits Service, Royal Borough of Greenwich, Dr Jeremy Dixon · University of Bath, Professor Michael Preston-Shoot · National Network for Chairs of Safeguarding Adults Boards, Professor Sally McManus · City University of London View ↗
13 Dec 2023 Ashley McDougall · National Audit Office, Brian Dow · Rethink Mental Illness, Daphne Hall · National Association of Welfare Rights Advisers (NAWRA), Jamie Thunder · Z2K (Zacchaeus 2000 Trust), Joshua Reddaway · National Audit Office View ↗
15 Nov 2023 Chloe Schendel-Wilson · The Disability Policy Centre, Henry Parkes · Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR), Nikki Bond · Money and Mental Health Policy Institute, Prof Ben Baumberg Geiger · King’s College London, Prof Lisa Scullion · University of Salford View ↗

Correspondence

13 letters
DateDirectionTitle
14 May 2025 Correspondence from the Minister for Social Security and Disability, relating t…
12 Mar 2025 Correspondence from the Minister for Social Security and Disability, responding…
26 Feb 2025 Correspondence to the Minister for Social Security and Disability, relating to …
26 Feb 2025 Correspondence from Neil Couling, Universal Credit, Senior Responsible Owner, D…
29 Jan 2025 Correspondence from the the Minister of State for Social Security and Disabilit…
23 Jan 2025 Correspondence with Dr Allsopp requesting further information following her app…
22 Jan 2025 Correspondence with Dr Dietman requesting further information following her app…
18 Dec 2024 Correspondence with the Minister for Social Security and Disability, relating t…
24 May 2024 Correspondence with the Minister for Disabled People, Health and Work and the P…
24 Apr 2024 Correspondence with the Chief Coroner relating to Safeguarding vulnerable claim…
24 Apr 2024 Correspondence from DWP Officials relating to Safeguarding vulnerable claimants
6 Mar 2024 Correspondence with Permanent Secretary relating to Safeguarding vulnerable cla…
25 Oct 2023 Correspondence with the Secretary of State relating to Internal Process Reviews…