Select committee: Work and Pensions Committee

Recommendation 23

1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Claimants Published 15 May 2025 Addressed to Department for Work and Pensions
Recommendation (the committee's words)
Upon first applying to benefits, and at each review point, we recommend DWP staff provide claimants with detailed information about the additional support available to them, which must include an indicative list of possible reasons which might lead to an individual requiring this support. Frontline staff should also be trained to offer additional support measures proactively when they become aware of a claimant’s circumstances. DWP should also add to its Additional Support Area a mechanism through which DWP staff can record that they have provided claimants with such information. (Recommendation, Paragraph 93) 98

From: Work and Pensions Committee, 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Claimants (HC 402), 15 May 2025

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 22 July 2025 (deadline 15 July 2025).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The Government has responded in full only to those recommendations outside the scope of the consultation on a new safeguarding approach, with the others being "considered alongside the consultation", the outcome of which "will be published in the Autumn".

  • On a statutory safeguarding duty, the Government is "open to" it. The Secretary of State "will make a statement to the House in the Autumn" setting out DWP's new approach to safeguarding.
  • It does not intend to publish the Chief Medical Advisor's team advice on the Pathways to Work changes, saying it remains advice to the Secretary of State and that "a single document does not exist".
  • On Help to Claim, DWP states it "has found no shortfall" in support following the transition, citing jobcentre support and the Visiting Service.
  • On the PHSO's powers, DWP "acknowledges" the recommendation but says it lacks authority to make such changes. Any change "would require primary legislation" and is "a matter for Parliament".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error