Select committee: Work and Pensions Committee

Conclusion 26

1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Claimants Published 15 May 2025 Addressed to Department for Work and Pensions
Conclusion (the committee's words)
The effectiveness of DWP policies that are supposed to protect claimants from harm is in large part contingent on Work Coaches applying discretion correctly and consistently. Discretion can be a valuable tool in the benefit system, but we are concerned that overreliance on discretion is placing an unreasonable burden on time-poor Work Coaches and increasing the risk of safeguarding policies and procedures not being followed properly. Furthermore, we are mindful that for discretion to be applied effectively, frontline staff must feel confident in applying safeguarding measures. Our survey results suggested that a sizeable minority of DWP staff do not feel they received adequate safeguarding training to enable them to deal with safeguarding issues. (Conclusion, Paragraph 111)

From: Work and Pensions Committee, 1st Report – Safeguarding Vulnerable Claimants (HC 402), 15 May 2025

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 22 July 2025 (deadline 15 July 2025).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The Government has responded in full only to those recommendations outside the scope of the consultation on a new safeguarding approach, with the others being "considered alongside the consultation", the outcome of which "will be published in the Autumn".

  • On a statutory safeguarding duty, the Government is "open to" it. The Secretary of State "will make a statement to the House in the Autumn" setting out DWP's new approach to safeguarding.
  • It does not intend to publish the Chief Medical Advisor's team advice on the Pathways to Work changes, saying it remains advice to the Secretary of State and that "a single document does not exist".
  • On Help to Claim, DWP states it "has found no shortfall" in support following the transition, citing jobcentre support and the Visiting Service.
  • On the PHSO's powers, DWP "acknowledges" the recommendation but says it lacks authority to make such changes. Any change "would require primary legislation" and is "a matter for Parliament".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error