Recommendations & Conclusions
95 items
1
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
We welcome the Department’s focus on inclusive education; however, we are concerned about the absence of a Departmental definition of this and the subsequent lack of clarity about what ‘inclusive mainstream’ education looks like and means in practice for educators, education settings, pupils and families. We are also concerned that …
Read more
We welcome the Department’s focus on inclusive education; however, we are concerned about the absence of a Departmental definition of this and the subsequent lack of clarity about what ‘inclusive mainstream’ education looks like and means in practice for educators, education settings, pupils and families. We are also concerned that the Department does not appear to have a clear understanding of the timescale and level of investment that is needed to achieve a truly inclusive mainstream education system. (Conclusion, Paragraph 34)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the importance of inclusive education and outlines its 'Plan for Change,' including establishing an Expert Advisory Group for Inclusion, deploying RISE advisors, and incorporating an explicit focus on inclusion in Ofsted's new framework.
Read full response →
Department for Education
2
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Not Addressed
It is unacceptable that a clear definition of inclusive education is still lacking. The Department must publish a definition of inclusive education and rationale for this vision alongside examples of good practice across different phases of education and settings within the next 3 months. Continued ambiguity undermines progress and accountability. …
Read more
It is unacceptable that a clear definition of inclusive education is still lacking. The Department must publish a definition of inclusive education and rationale for this vision alongside examples of good practice across different phases of education and settings within the next 3 months. Continued ambiguity undermines progress and accountability. (Recommendation, Paragraph 35)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government details its commitment to reforming the SEND system and improving inclusivity through various initiatives but does not commit to publishing a departmental definition of inclusive education, rationale, or examples within the requested three months.
Read full response →
Department for Education
3
Recommendation
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted in Part
An inclusive mainstream education system must be underpinned by several key elements, all of which we would expect to be included in the Department’s definition at a level of detail sufficient to enable professionals and families to have a clear understanding of the Government’s approach: • education settings and environments …
Read more
An inclusive mainstream education system must be underpinned by several key elements, all of which we would expect to be included in the Department’s definition at a level of detail sufficient to enable professionals and families to have a clear understanding of the Government’s approach: • education settings and environments must be accessible, safe, and designed to meet a wide range of sensory and physical needs; • teachers and teaching assistants and other support staff should have the expertise, training, and confidence to support diverse learners, underpinned by regular access to embedded specialist professionals; • the curriculum must be flexible, relevant, and reflect the representation of young people with SEND; and the Government must ensure the curriculum itself and the assessment of it reflect and accommodate their needs; 154 • accountability systems must examine and prioritise the progress and outcomes of all pupils, on a rounded set of indicators which include but are not limited to academic attainment, so that inclusion is embedded as an essential component of quality for all settings. The proportion of pupils with SEND should be published and compared with other local schools and multi-academy trusts, to act as a disincentive to exclusionary practices; and • critically, good inclusive practice must always ensure rigorous, systemic approaches to understanding the individual needs of every child and delivering personalised support. (Recommendation, Paragraph 36)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government has established an Expert Advisory Group for Inclusion and deployed Regional Improvement for Standards and Excellence (RISE) advisors to improve inclusive practice. It is also implementing an explicit focus on inclusion in Ofsted's new framework and making inclusive practice standard in early years …
Read full response →
Department for Education
4
Recommendation
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Not Addressed
The UK is a signatory member of the UNCRPD (UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) since 2008. It would be helpful in developing any definition of inclusive education for the Department for Education to draw on the principles and substantive materials in relevant articles of this Convention. …
Read more
The UK is a signatory member of the UNCRPD (UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) since 2008. It would be helpful in developing any definition of inclusive education for the Department for Education to draw on the principles and substantive materials in relevant articles of this Convention. This should include Article 24 on education, Article 25 on health and others, for example, Article 30 on participation in cultural life, recreation, leisure and sport. It may also be helpful for the Government to consider the UN general comment number 4 on Article 24 - the right to inclusive education, as well as the UNICEF report (2017) expanding on these issues in practice. (Recommendation, Paragraph 37)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The Government is committed to reforming the SEND system to deliver an excellent, inclusive education for every child and young person with a world class curriculum and highly trained, expert staff at every phase of learning.
Read full response →
Department for Education
5
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Deferred
The Department must urgently assess the funding required to implement meaningful reforms to SEND provision. There must be a clear plan for how the Department will work towards this level of investment in the short and medium term, which aligns with the timeline for SEND reforms. (Recommendation, Paragraph 38)
Read more
The Department must urgently assess the funding required to implement meaningful reforms to SEND provision. There must be a clear plan for how the Department will work towards this level of investment in the short and medium term, which aligns with the timeline for SEND reforms. (Recommendation, Paragraph 38)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government details current and future funding allocations for SEND, including an increase of £4.2 billion by 2028-29 and £740 million in high needs capital for 2025-26, and will extend the Statutory Override for local authority deficits. However, it defers setting out a clear plan …
Read full response →
Department for Education
6
Recommendation
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted
As part of delivering a fully inclusive mainstream, the Government must set out how it will deliver, over time, a system in which highly skilled professionals, including educational psychologists and speech and language therapists, are less tied up in undertaking assessments and writing reports and more effectively deployed in delivering …
Read more
As part of delivering a fully inclusive mainstream, the Government must set out how it will deliver, over time, a system in which highly skilled professionals, including educational psychologists and speech and language therapists, are less tied up in undertaking assessments and writing reports and more effectively deployed in delivering the support children need. It should be clear what professional skills and expertise an inclusive mainstream school should be able to draw on, and how this expertise will be made available. (Recommendation, Paragraph 39)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government commits to working with DHSC and NHS England to improve access to community health services and ensure allied health professionals are more effectively deployed. It is investing over £31 million to train over 600 new educational psychologists and has introduced a degree apprenticeship …
Read full response →
Department for Education
7
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
The SEND system is not delivering for children and young people or their families, with poor experiences and outcomes becoming the norm in many places across England. Rising need coupled with limited school resourcing, stretched local authority budgets and a mismatch between local authority responsibilities and their powers has resulted …
Read more
The SEND system is not delivering for children and young people or their families, with poor experiences and outcomes becoming the norm in many places across England. Rising need coupled with limited school resourcing, stretched local authority budgets and a mismatch between local authority responsibilities and their powers has resulted in a costly and adversarial system. Over a decade on from the 2014 reforms, the key challenges are evident: preparedness of the education workforce, lack of parental trust and confidence in the system, limited accountability across schools, 155 multi-academy trusts, NHS services and local authorities, disjointed working across the various agencies and families, limited capacity and the inadequacy and unsustainability of funding. (Conclusion, Paragraph 48)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the committee's report rightly highlights the deep-rooted issues within the SEND system. It states it is committed to reforming the system as part of its Plan for Change and is already taking action through investment in school places, improved teacher training, and …
Read full response →
Department for Education
8
Recommendation
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted in Part
It is essential that the Department addresses these challenges if it is going to succeed in making mainstream education inclusive and fixing the broken SEND system. The Department must involve stakeholders in reforms and begin to consult with parent-led organisations now. It should set out a clear timeline for SEND …
Read more
It is essential that the Department addresses these challenges if it is going to succeed in making mainstream education inclusive and fixing the broken SEND system. The Department must involve stakeholders in reforms and begin to consult with parent-led organisations now. It should set out a clear timeline for SEND reforms and report on progress at least on an annual basis. (Recommendation, Paragraph 49) Securing inclusive education
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government commits to extensive stakeholder engagement now, including with parent-led organisations, through a Ministerial development group, regional/online sessions, and roundtables. Further details on SEND reforms will be set out in a Schools White Paper early in the new year, which will include a formal …
Read full response →
Department for Education
9
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted in Part
The current inconsistency in SEN support and ordinarily available provision across England is unacceptable and results in deeply inequitable experiences for children and young people with SEND. The lack of consistent good practice in SEN support, driven by insufficiently clear and specific guidance and inconsistent interpretations of ‘best endeavours’ are …
Read more
The current inconsistency in SEN support and ordinarily available provision across England is unacceptable and results in deeply inequitable experiences for children and young people with SEND. The lack of consistent good practice in SEN support, driven by insufficiently clear and specific guidance and inconsistent interpretations of ‘best endeavours’ are causing delays in identifying needs, inadequate support, and an overreliance on EHC plans. This not only undermines trust in the system but also places unnecessary strain on families. National standards must be introduced without delay to establish clear, enforceable expectations while allowing for local flexibility where appropriate. (Conclusion, Paragraph 72)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the need for consistency and commits to improving inclusivity and expertise in mainstream schools. It has established an Expert Advisory Group for Inclusion and deployed Regional Improvement for Standards and Excellence (RISE) advisors to disseminate effective inclusive practice and help schools improve, …
Read full response →
Department for Education
10
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted
Insufficient funding and resources and a mismatch between local authority responsibilities and powers negatively impacts the adequacy of ordinarily available provision and SEN support. We have heard from school leaders and SENCOs that without sufficient resources, settings are struggling to provide the high quality, consistent support necessary to achieve inclusive …
Read more
Insufficient funding and resources and a mismatch between local authority responsibilities and powers negatively impacts the adequacy of ordinarily available provision and SEN support. We have heard from school leaders and SENCOs that without sufficient resources, settings are struggling to provide the high quality, consistent support necessary to achieve inclusive mainstream education. (Conclusion, Paragraph 73)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government responds to the observation about insufficient funding by detailing its significant investments in schools and high needs funding, including an increase of £4.2 billion by 2028-29, £740 million in high needs capital for 2025-26, and support for local authorities managing SEND deficits.
Read full response →
Department for Education
11
Recommendation
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted in Part
The Department for Education should publish a unified national framework for ordinarily available provision and SEN support. This should offer clear, evidence-led guidance and include practical, real-world examples tailored to educators and educational settings, ensuring that all practitioners have access to quality-assured strategies and interventions. (Recommendation, Paragraph 74)
Read more
The Department for Education should publish a unified national framework for ordinarily available provision and SEN support. This should offer clear, evidence-led guidance and include practical, real-world examples tailored to educators and educational settings, ensuring that all practitioners have access to quality-assured strategies and interventions. (Recommendation, Paragraph 74)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government has not committed to publishing a unified national framework but is working to improve inclusivity and expertise through other means. These include deploying RISE advisors to disseminate effective practice, making inclusive practice standard in early years, funding training for early years SENCOs, delivering …
Read full response →
Department for Education
12
Recommendation
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Not Addressed
The Department should publish statutory requirements mandating the minimum resources, specialist expertise, and equipment that every educational setting must have access to as a part of their offer of SEN support and in order to deliver an inclusive education. This will establish a clear, enforceable baseline covering staffing, training, physical …
Read more
The Department should publish statutory requirements mandating the minimum resources, specialist expertise, and equipment that every educational setting must have access to as a part of their offer of SEN support and in order to deliver an inclusive education. This will establish a clear, enforceable baseline covering staffing, training, physical materials, and assistive technologies. This will also ensure that all schools and multi- 156 academy trusts are adequately equipped to support children and young people with SEND through ordinarily available provision and SEN support, reducing the need for EHC plans. (Recommendation, Paragraph 75)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government's response details initiatives to improve inclusivity and expertise through RISE advisors, SENCO training, and strengthening teacher training, but it does not commit to publishing statutory requirements mandating minimum resources, specialist expertise, and equipment for educational settings as requested.
Read full response →
Department for Education
13
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted
Current levels of EHC plans are unsustainable; however, the solution to this cannot be to remove the statutory entitlements from a system which lacks accountability in many other areas and in which parents already have so little trust and confidence. We have heard throughout our inquiry from parents, schools, and …
Read more
Current levels of EHC plans are unsustainable; however, the solution to this cannot be to remove the statutory entitlements from a system which lacks accountability in many other areas and in which parents already have so little trust and confidence. We have heard throughout our inquiry from parents, schools, and the Department for Education that the increased need for EHC plans is due to support not being provided through ordinarily available provision and SEN support, leading to a lack of trust from parents. We have also seen that for many children and young people with less complex needs, high quality support can be provided without a plan. While some pupils will always need an EHC plan, evidence indicates that mainstream schools and multi-academy trusts practising real inclusivity generate fewer EHC plans, as they meet more students’ needs effectively without them. (Conclusion, Paragraph 92)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the importance of early intervention, noting it is central to the early years agenda and the Best Start in Life strategy. It outlines ongoing actions to make inclusive practice standard, increase funding for providers, fund Best Start Family hubs, and provide early …
Read full response →
Department for Education
14
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted
Support should be provided as soon as a need is identified, rather than only once an EHC plan is in place. This would bring England in line with good practice found internationally, for example in in Ontario, Canada, where entitlement is based on need rather than lengthy assessment processes. Such …
Read more
Support should be provided as soon as a need is identified, rather than only once an EHC plan is in place. This would bring England in line with good practice found internationally, for example in in Ontario, Canada, where entitlement is based on need rather than lengthy assessment processes. Such a change would prevent the current situation in which many children receive little or no effective support while waiting for an EHC plan and would ensure timely intervention that can improve outcomes and reduce escalation of need. The Department’s SEND reforms must not be based on any withdrawal of statutory entitlements for children and young people with SEND. The Department must instead set out plans for reform which increase accountability across the whole of the SEND system, so that many more parents and carers can be confident that their children’s needs will be met regardless of whether they have a diagnosis or EHC plan. (Recommendation, Paragraph 93)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government states it is already making changes to improve early support for children with SEND through initiatives like embedding inclusive practice, increasing funding, funding family hubs, and early language interventions. They will continue to ensure access to proven programmes.
Read full response →
Department for Education
15
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Deferred
Where EHC plans are issued, they carry a statutory duty which must be delivered in full. To make this a reality, the Department for Education should strengthen the ability of local authorities to meet these obligations by ensuring that the necessary levers are in place to compel other services, for …
Read more
Where EHC plans are issued, they carry a statutory duty which must be delivered in full. To make this a reality, the Department for Education should strengthen the ability of local authorities to meet these obligations by ensuring that the necessary levers are in place to compel other services, for example, NHS services, and commissioners such as local Integrated Healthcare Boards (ICBs). This must include coordinated action with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government to address wider pressures on local authority budgets and capacity, so that councils are properly equipped to deliver the provision set out in every EHC plan. (Recommendation, Paragraph 94) 157 Restoring parent trust and confidence
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the importance of accountability and will work with the Ombudsman and Tribunal to define their roles in a reformed SEND system. They also commit to giving full consideration to the Committee's recommendations on strengthening local authority powers and cross-departmental coordination.
Read full response →
Department for Education
16
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted
Parents and carers of children and young people with SEND often feel excluded from the processes that affect their children’s education and support. However, meaningful and collaborative parental involvement is essential to the success of the SEND system. When parents and carers are actively engaged in the planning, decision-making, and …
Read more
Parents and carers of children and young people with SEND often feel excluded from the processes that affect their children’s education and support. However, meaningful and collaborative parental involvement is essential to the success of the SEND system. When parents and carers are actively engaged in the planning, decision-making, and delivery of support, both satisfaction and outcomes improve significantly. Engagement fosters greater trust, transparency, and confidence in the system, and helps build constructive, collaborative relationships between families, professionals, support and advice services including SENDIASS. Ensuring parents and carers are treated as equal partners in any process must be a fundamental feature of any reformed SEND system. (Conclusion, Paragraph 101)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government shares the view on the importance of parental involvement and outlines plans for extensive engagement through a Ministerial development group, regional and online sessions, and ministerial roundtables. This engagement will inform future reforms and will be followed by a formal consultation after a …
Read full response →
Department for Education
17
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
Parents and carers must be actively and meaningfully involved in all processes that affect their child’s education, support, and overall wellbeing. This includes being fully informed and invited to participate in all relevant meetings where decisions about their child’s needs or provision are being discussed at the school and local …
Read more
Parents and carers must be actively and meaningfully involved in all processes that affect their child’s education, support, and overall wellbeing. This includes being fully informed and invited to participate in all relevant meetings where decisions about their child’s needs or provision are being discussed at the school and local authority level. Families should have access to independent advocacy to enable and strengthen their engagement in the process. Parental insights and lived experience are invaluable in shaping effective and appropriate support. Embedding parental involvement as a standard part of decision-making not only enhances transparency and trust but also leads to better-informed, more tailored outcomes for children and young people with SEND. Local authorities must actively engage and be properly equipped to support and respond to parental engagement in a positive way. This requires dedicated resourcing and ongoing training to ensure staff have the skills, capacity and confidence to work effectively with families, build trust, and act on their concerns in a timely and constructive way. These changes would need to be subject to a New Burdens Assessment to ensure that local authorities had the resources to support better parent and carer engagement. (Recommendation, Paragraph 102)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the importance of parental involvement and outlines engagement activities with stakeholders to shape reform proposals, followed by a formal consultation. However, it does not commit to providing independent advocacy, dedicated resourcing for local authorities, or a New Burdens Assessment as specifically recommended.
Read full response →
Department for Education
18
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted
Children and young people with SEND, and their families, have little trust and confidence in the SEND system, often shaped by adverse experiences. Inadequate communication and engagement from the Department with parents and carers and their organisations about future reforms, as well as media speculation, has further undermined parental trust …
Read more
Children and young people with SEND, and their families, have little trust and confidence in the SEND system, often shaped by adverse experiences. Inadequate communication and engagement from the Department with parents and carers and their organisations about future reforms, as well as media speculation, has further undermined parental trust in the Department for Education and in the future SEND system. It is wholly unacceptable that families already under considerable pressure should face additional anxiety and disruption. While there is widespread recognition among parents and carers that reform is necessary, there remains deep concern about the form these changes will take and whether they will lead to meaningful and lasting improvements. (Conclusion, Paragraph 107) 158
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the need for partnership and outlines specific engagement activities, including a Ministerial development group, regional and online sessions, and ministerial roundtables, to rebuild trust and inform future reforms, followed by a formal consultation.
Read full response →
Department for Education
19
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
To avoid causing undue alarm and to help rebuild confidence and trust in the system, parents and carers must be fully engaged and any reforms must be implemented gradually and in a carefully phased manner. New approaches should first be piloted through a pathfinder model, allowing for thorough testing in …
Read more
To avoid causing undue alarm and to help rebuild confidence and trust in the system, parents and carers must be fully engaged and any reforms must be implemented gradually and in a carefully phased manner. New approaches should first be piloted through a pathfinder model, allowing for thorough testing in real-world settings before national rollout. This will provide an opportunity to identify potential challenges, address inefficiencies, consult with parents’ and carers’ groups and make necessary adjustments to ensure reforms are effective, practical, and responsive to the needs of children, young people, and their families. At all times, the Department for Education must have an effective communication strategy, regularly setting out the clear vision for change, and providing reassurance to all affected agencies and individuals that planned reforms are fully planned, coordinated, and funded. (Recommendation, Paragraph 108)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the need for partnership and engagement to shape reform proposals, outlining specific activities and a formal consultation. However, the response does not commit to piloting new approaches via a pathfinder model or to implementing reforms gradually and in a phased manner as …
Read full response →
Department for Education
20
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted
We have heard that accountability pressures relating to narrower measures of attainment and behaviour may incentivise schools and multi-academy trusts to adopt non-inclusive practices in order to meet narrow performance metrics. The introduction of the new Ofsted inspection framework presents a valuable opportunity to shift this dynamic. By placing greater …
Read more
We have heard that accountability pressures relating to narrower measures of attainment and behaviour may incentivise schools and multi-academy trusts to adopt non-inclusive practices in order to meet narrow performance metrics. The introduction of the new Ofsted inspection framework presents a valuable opportunity to shift this dynamic. By placing greater emphasis on inclusion and the experiences and progression of all learners, the framework has the potential to ensure that schools and multi-academy trusts are more meaningfully held to account for the inclusivity and accessibility of the education they deliver, thereby promoting a more equitable and supportive environment for every student. (Conclusion, Paragraph 118)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government states that Ofsted's new inspection framework, effective since November, includes an explicit focus on inclusion. It also highlights the new SEND inspection framework launched in January 2023, which aims to improve outcomes for children with SEND and refine the framework.
Read full response →
Department for Education
21
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted
The Department must urgently engage with Ofsted to ensure that the inclusion criterion within the new inspection framework is robust, measurable, and reflective of the experiences of all pupils, particularly, those with SEND. This should include incorporating metrics such as the proportion of pupils with SEND on roll, their attendance …
Read more
The Department must urgently engage with Ofsted to ensure that the inclusion criterion within the new inspection framework is robust, measurable, and reflective of the experiences of all pupils, particularly, those with SEND. This should include incorporating metrics such as the proportion of pupils with SEND on roll, their attendance rates, exclusion figures, school swaps, progression and attainment and other indicators of engagement and outcomes, to provide a clearer picture of how effectively schools and multi-academy trusts are supporting these learners. It is important that the new framework does not disadvantage schools with high levels of SEND pupils, particularly in disadvantaged areas, by contextualising quantitative indicators with qualitative evidence, recognising systemic barriers, and balancing accountability with constructive support to avoid disproportionate pressure on teachers’ workloads. (Recommendation, Paragraph 119)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government confirms Ofsted's new framework, effective since November, explicitly focuses on inclusion and that a new SEND inspection framework was launched in January 2023. The Department continues to work with Ofsted/CQC to refine the framework in line with wider SEND reforms, indicating ongoing engagement …
Read full response →
Department for Education
22
Recommendation
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Not Addressed
The Department for Education should introduce mandatory, comprehensive SEND training for all Ofsted inspectors. The success of the new framework depends on inspectors having a deep understanding of SEND, including how to identify, assess, and evaluate inclusive practice. Without this 159 expertise, there is a significant risk that inspections will …
Read more
The Department for Education should introduce mandatory, comprehensive SEND training for all Ofsted inspectors. The success of the new framework depends on inspectors having a deep understanding of SEND, including how to identify, assess, and evaluate inclusive practice. Without this 159 expertise, there is a significant risk that inspections will be inconsistent, fail to identify gaps in provision, and ultimately undermine the objectives of the framework. (Recommendation, Paragraph 120)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government stated Ofsted's new framework focuses on inclusion and highlighted the new SEND inspection framework launched in 2023, with ongoing work to refine it, but did not address the recommendation for mandatory SEND training for all inspectors.
Read full response →
Department for Education
23
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted
Area SEND inspections should engage with parents across the locality to gather the perspective of parents of children with SEND on the admissions policies and inclusive practices of local authorities, schools and multi- academy trusts in the area. (Recommendation, Paragraph 122)
Read more
Area SEND inspections should engage with parents across the locality to gather the perspective of parents of children with SEND on the admissions policies and inclusive practices of local authorities, schools and multi- academy trusts in the area. (Recommendation, Paragraph 122)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government notes that a new SEND inspection framework launched in January 2023. A recent review identified a need for greater family involvement, and the Department is continuing to work with Ofsted/CQC to refine the framework, implying that parental engagement will be strengthened.
Read full response →
Department for Education
24
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted
We have heard about significant variability in the provision of SEN support and inconsistencies in the implementation of EHC plans across education settings. The limitations of the Local Government Ombudsman’s powers mean there is insufficient accountability for the delivery of SEND support, as well as other aspects of school-based provision. …
Read more
We have heard about significant variability in the provision of SEN support and inconsistencies in the implementation of EHC plans across education settings. The limitations of the Local Government Ombudsman’s powers mean there is insufficient accountability for the delivery of SEND support, as well as other aspects of school-based provision. This has led to repeated failures to meet children’s needs. This is a serious and unacceptable accountability gap that must be closed if inclusive mainstream education is to be a reality. (Conclusion, Paragraph 127)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the issues raised regarding accountability and states they will work closely with the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman and the Tribunal to determine their roles within a reformed SEND system.
Read full response →
Department for Education
25
Recommendation
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Deferred
The Government must extend the powers of the Local Government Ombudsman to cover complaints about the delivery of EHC plans, SEN support and other appropriate inclusive education for children with SEND in schools, multi-academy trusts and other education settings. This would strengthen accountability, provide families with a clearer route to …
Read more
The Government must extend the powers of the Local Government Ombudsman to cover complaints about the delivery of EHC plans, SEN support and other appropriate inclusive education for children with SEND in schools, multi-academy trusts and other education settings. This would strengthen accountability, provide families with a clearer route to redress, and help ensure that statutory responsibilities are met consistently across the system. Without this change, serious shortcomings in support will continue to go unaddressed. (Recommendation, Paragraph 128)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government will work closely with the Ombudsman and Tribunal to determine their roles in a reformed SEND system, but does not commit to extending the Ombudsman's powers as recommended.
Read full response →
Department for Education
26
Recommendation
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
To ensure accountability for inclusive practice, SEND expertise should be embedded within schools and multi-academy trust (MAT) governance structures, for example, by making it mandatory to appoint governors or trustees with specific responsibility for and relevant expertise (including lived experience) of SEND as we saw in Ontario. Without this, inclusive …
Read more
To ensure accountability for inclusive practice, SEND expertise should be embedded within schools and multi-academy trust (MAT) governance structures, for example, by making it mandatory to appoint governors or trustees with specific responsibility for and relevant expertise (including lived experience) of SEND as we saw in Ontario. Without this, inclusive education risks being sidelined at the strategic level, and outcomes for pupils with SEND will continue to be deprioritised. (Recommendation, Paragraph 129)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government is committed to improving inclusivity and expertise in mainstream schools, and created an Expert Advisory Group for Inclusion and a team of expert Regional Improvement for Standards and Excellence (RISE) advisors to work with schools.
Read full response →
Department for Education
27
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
Tribunals are an important feature of the accountability system, allowing families to challenge local authorities’ decisions regarding their children’s support; however, they should only need to be used as a last resort. We are deeply concerned by the number of local authorities found to have failed to meet their statutory …
Read more
Tribunals are an important feature of the accountability system, allowing families to challenge local authorities’ decisions regarding their children’s support; however, they should only need to be used as a last resort. We are deeply concerned by the number of local authorities found to have failed to meet their statutory obligations at the SEND Tribunal. A 97 per cent loss rate for Tribunal cases suggests a pattern of non-compliance which is unacceptable, particularly given that the entitlements of children and young people with SEND are clearly set out in the existing legislative framework. Greater efforts are needed to prevent cases from escalating to SEND 160 Tribunals by prioritising good partnership working with parents and carers, effective mediation and ensuring local authorities have the resources and the powers to fulfil their statutory obligations. (Conclusion, Paragraph 144)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges that the SEND system does not work for too many families, agrees with prioritising partnership working, and highlights the new SEND inspection framework launched in January 2023 to improve outcomes and local authority accountability.
Read full response →
Department for Education
28
Recommendation
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted
The SEND Tribunal must remain as a backstop of the accountability process. The Department for Education and Department of Health and Social Care must systematically monitor SEND Tribunal outcomes and identify local authorities that repeatedly fail to comply with their statutory duties. The Government should mandate the framework for reporting …
Read more
The SEND Tribunal must remain as a backstop of the accountability process. The Department for Education and Department of Health and Social Care must systematically monitor SEND Tribunal outcomes and identify local authorities that repeatedly fail to comply with their statutory duties. The Government should mandate the framework for reporting SEND Tribunal data and undertake focused work with poor performing local authorities to understand why they are so often failing to uphold their statutory duties and support them through resourcing and targeted intervention, including specialised training, to address underlying issues and ensure that the rights of children and young people with SEND are upheld. The SEND White Paper should explicitly identify and set out plans to address any structural or resource-related barriers to effective support. (Recommendation, Paragraph 145)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the SEND Tribunal's role as a backstop and refers to the new SEND inspection framework, launched in January 2023, as its approach to monitoring local area performance and taking action for non-compliance, rather than committing to new systematic monitoring or data framework …
Read full response →
Department for Education
29
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted
The outcomes of SEND Tribunal cases must be factored into area SEND inspections, with clear scrutiny of how repeated non-compliance reflects the quality and effectiveness of local provision. Where local authorities fail to uphold their statutory duties, this should directly lower their inspection rating. Ongoing failure must have clear consequences …
Read more
The outcomes of SEND Tribunal cases must be factored into area SEND inspections, with clear scrutiny of how repeated non-compliance reflects the quality and effectiveness of local provision. Where local authorities fail to uphold their statutory duties, this should directly lower their inspection rating. Ongoing failure must have clear consequences if accountability is to mean anything. (Recommendation, Paragraph 150)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government highlights the new SEND inspection framework (launched Jan 2023) for improving accountability and outcomes, noting DfE can act when local areas fail duties, and states DfE continues to refine the framework in line with wider SEND reforms, without explicitly confirming that tribunal outcomes …
Read full response →
Department for Education
30
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
The limited engagement of health services in the SEND system stems from a lack of robust and enforceable accountability mechanisms. Despite being a critical enabler of positive educational outcomes for children with SEND, health services are not held to the same standards of responsibility as education providers. To deliver on …
Read more
The limited engagement of health services in the SEND system stems from a lack of robust and enforceable accountability mechanisms. Despite being a critical enabler of positive educational outcomes for children with SEND, health services are not held to the same standards of responsibility as education providers. To deliver on the promise of inclusive education, the Department for Education and the Department of Health and Social Care must strengthen accountability frameworks to ensure health partners are fully integrated and responsive within the SEND system. (Conclusion, Paragraph 157)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the importance of health and social care engagement and states it will give full consideration to the committee's recommendations for strengthening accountability frameworks, while also noting ongoing work to improve access to community health services and early interventions.
Read full response →
Department for Education
31
Recommendation
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
There must be mandatory training for health commissioners on good practice in meeting the needs of children with SEND. (Recommendation, Paragraph 158)
Government response AI summary
The government is considering how to improve professional development for all teachers, including those teaching pupils with SEND, but commits to no specific action on mandatory training for health commissioners.
Read full response →
Department for Education
32
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Deferred
The powers of the SEND Tribunal should be extended to allow it to issue binding recommendations to health services, not just education providers. This would ensure that when a failure to deliver a health provision specified in an EHC plan occurs, health bodies are legally obligated to take corrective action. …
Read more
The powers of the SEND Tribunal should be extended to allow it to issue binding recommendations to health services, not just education providers. This would ensure that when a failure to deliver a health provision specified in an EHC plan occurs, health bodies are legally obligated to take corrective action. This should include the introduction of a statutory duty on health services to respond to Tribunal decisions within a defined timeframe, with clear consequences for non-compliance. (Recommendation, Paragraph 159) 161
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government notes that SEND Tribunal decisions for health services are currently non-binding but usually followed, and states it will give full consideration to extending the Tribunal's powers to issue binding recommendations to health services.
Read full response →
Department for Education
33
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
The Department for Education must significantly improve cross- departmental coordination with the Department of Health and Social Care and NHS England to establish clear, consistent accountability for SEND at the ICB level. Current arrangements are fragmented and lack clarity. Strengthening the role, authority, and visibility of the Senior Responsible Officer …
Read more
The Department for Education must significantly improve cross- departmental coordination with the Department of Health and Social Care and NHS England to establish clear, consistent accountability for SEND at the ICB level. Current arrangements are fragmented and lack clarity. Strengthening the role, authority, and visibility of the Senior Responsible Officer for SEND within ICBs is essential to ensure health services are fully held to account for their responsibilities. Without stronger oversight, health bodies will continue to operate without sufficient scrutiny or consequence. (Recommendation, Paragraph 160) Improving early years for lasting impact
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government highlights ongoing close work with DHSC and NHS England to improve access to community health services and early interventions, and refers to the new SEND inspection framework (launched Jan 2023) as a mechanism to improve accountability and outcomes at the LA and ICB …
Read full response →
Department for Education
34
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted
ELSEC and NELI are positive initiatives, but far more must be done to sustain and build on the progress they are achieving. Without ongoing commitment and resources, any gains risk being temporary and insufficient to address long-term needs. (Conclusion, Paragraph 164)
Read more
ELSEC and NELI are positive initiatives, but far more must be done to sustain and build on the progress they are achieving. Without ongoing commitment and resources, any gains risk being temporary and insufficient to address long-term needs. (Conclusion, Paragraph 164)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government commits to continuing fully funded access to the NELI programme until AY 2028/29, funding specialist early language leads, and ensuring education and healthcare providers collaborate on evidence-based early interventions, indicating ongoing commitment and resources.
Read full response →
Department for Education
35
Recommendation
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted in Part
A national rollout of ELSEC and NELI is essential and should be accompanied by comprehensive, long-term funding and resources to meet the scale of children’s speech and language needs. In addition, the Government should undertake further work to understand where the balance of resource should sit between early years and …
Read more
A national rollout of ELSEC and NELI is essential and should be accompanied by comprehensive, long-term funding and resources to meet the scale of children’s speech and language needs. In addition, the Government should undertake further work to understand where the balance of resource should sit between early years and reception in order to ensure it is able to achieve its goal of 75 per cent of 5-year-olds in England to have a good level of development by 2028. (Recommendation, Paragraph 165)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government commits to continuing fully funded access to the NELI programme until AY 2028/29 and funding specialist early language leads. However, an independent evaluation of the ELSEC programme is underway to inform future decisions, and the recommendation for further work on resource balance between …
Read full response →
Department for Education
36
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted
There is a clear need to improve the consistency and effectiveness of the SENIF across early years provision. At present, practice varies significantly between local authorities, with differences in how funding is managed and allocated. This means there is inconsistency in access to early years SEND support. Such variation undermines …
Read more
There is a clear need to improve the consistency and effectiveness of the SENIF across early years provision. At present, practice varies significantly between local authorities, with differences in how funding is managed and allocated. This means there is inconsistency in access to early years SEND support. Such variation undermines the principle of equitable access to early education and can place additional pressure on providers in areas with less generous or less flexible SENIF arrangements. In addition, the eligibility criteria for the Disability Access Fund limits its effectiveness. Tying this funding to Disability Living Allowance, creates an unnecessary barrier to eligibility that risks excluding the very children the funding was created to help and shifts the burden of unmet need onto providers and families. (Conclusion, Paragraph 168)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government commits to increasing funding for providers to support children with SEND and making improvements to how funding is allocated as part of wider SEND reforms, aiming to improve inclusion and early intervention.
Read full response →
Department for Education
37
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
To address inconsistency in the delivery of early years provision and the Special Educational Needs Inclusion Fund (SENIF), the Department for Education must establish a set of national inclusivity requirements for early years settings. These requirements should be backed by increased, funding to ensure providers are able to deliver inclusive …
Read more
To address inconsistency in the delivery of early years provision and the Special Educational Needs Inclusion Fund (SENIF), the Department for Education must establish a set of national inclusivity requirements for early years settings. These requirements should be backed by increased, funding to ensure providers are able to deliver inclusive practice in a sustainable way. At the same time, the Disability Access Fund should be reformed by removing its dependency on Disability Living Allowance. The 162 current eligibility criteria act as a barrier for many families, restricting uptake and undermining the fund’s effectiveness. Without these reforms, there is a risk that the system continues to perpetuate inequity and discourage inclusive practice at the earliest stage of education. (Recommendation, Paragraph 169)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the importance of early years SEND support and states it is working to embed inclusive practice and increase funding through existing strategies, but does not commit to establishing new national inclusivity requirements or reforming the Disability Access Fund.
Read full response →
Department for Education
38
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
Best Start Family Hubs and the expansion of childcare provision present a valuable opportunity to engage with families earlier and identify SEND needs at the earliest possible stage. We welcome the announcement that every Best Start Family Hub will have a SENCO. However, SEND awareness is not currently sufficiently embedded …
Read more
Best Start Family Hubs and the expansion of childcare provision present a valuable opportunity to engage with families earlier and identify SEND needs at the earliest possible stage. We welcome the announcement that every Best Start Family Hub will have a SENCO. However, SEND awareness is not currently sufficiently embedded amongst all early years staff, nor are there currently sufficient opportunities for early screenings that could facilitate timely support and referrals. We note the current inquiry at the time of publication of the Health Social Care Committee on ‘The First 1000 Days: a renewed focus’ and the further work we have agreed to undertake on early years, all of which should be taken full account of by the Government. (Conclusion, Paragraph 174)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the importance of early identification and SEND awareness, detailing its ongoing 'Best Start in Life' strategy, including funding Best Start Family Hubs with trained professionals and continuing funding for early language interventions like the NELI program until AY 2028/29.
Read full response →
Department for Education
39
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted
The Department for Education must ensure that Best Start Family Hubs incorporate routine SEND screening and awareness as a core part of their early years services, supported by targeted training for staff and childcare providers to enhance early identification and referral. Additionally, dedicated funding must be allocated within childcare expansion …
Read more
The Department for Education must ensure that Best Start Family Hubs incorporate routine SEND screening and awareness as a core part of their early years services, supported by targeted training for staff and childcare providers to enhance early identification and referral. Additionally, dedicated funding must be allocated within childcare expansion and Family Hub budgets specifically to support SEND-related training for early years staff and families of children with SEND, resources, and integrated multi- agency working, ensuring sustainable and effective early intervention. (Recommendation, Paragraph 175)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government highlights its existing 'Best Start in Life' strategy, which includes funding Family Hubs with trained professionals, early language interventions, and ongoing funding for SENCO training, but does not commit to introducing routine SEND screening or a new dedicated, ring-fenced funding stream for SEND-related …
Read full response →
Department for Education
40
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted
The commitment for every Best Start Family Hub to have a dedicated SENCO should be embedded within the SEND workforce strategy and extend to educational psychologists and speech and language therapists. (Recommendation, Paragraph 176)
Government response AI summary
The government accepts the recommendation by detailing significant investment of over £31 million to train 600 more educational psychologists by 2025, and states it is working with DHSC and NHS England to improve access to speech and language therapy, affirming support for these roles within …
Read full response →
Department for Education
41
Recommendation
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted
There is a need to increase access to CPD and ensure that staff from all agencies in every early years setting has the expertise to undertake the effective early identification of SEND needs. Through the Best Start in Life strategy the Government should also ensure that there is a strong …
Read more
There is a need to increase access to CPD and ensure that staff from all agencies in every early years setting has the expertise to undertake the effective early identification of SEND needs. Through the Best Start in Life strategy the Government should also ensure that there is a strong and consistent framework for building SEND capacity and good practice in early years settings through the deployment of educational psychologists, speech and language therapists and other specialists in training the workforce. From September 2025, 80 per cent of the funding for early years providers will come from the Government, and the Department should introduce a new set of inclusivity requirements for all early years settings, provide the foundation for greater inclusivity across all early years settings. (Recommendation, Paragraph 177) 163 Post-16
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government details its existing 'Best Start in Life' strategy, including ongoing training for early years SENCOs, and significant investment in training additional educational psychologists, along with work to improve access to speech and language therapy, but does not commit to introducing a new set …
Read full response →
Department for Education
42
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Rejected
The post-16 condition of funding, whereby students who have not achieved a grade 4 or above in GCSE English and maths are effectively repeatedly required to take GCSE resits in those subjects as part of their programme of study, must be reformed. Despite a modest rise in overall attainment over …
Read more
The post-16 condition of funding, whereby students who have not achieved a grade 4 or above in GCSE English and maths are effectively repeatedly required to take GCSE resits in those subjects as part of their programme of study, must be reformed. Despite a modest rise in overall attainment over the past ten years, the progression rate from age 16 to 19 remains low, with 72 per cent of those who did not achieve grade 4 at 16 still not achieving that grade by 19. This policy can be demoralising for students and a huge strain on colleges and their staff. Whilst ensuring that students continue to make progress in literacy and numeracy, an alternative approach is necessary. (Conclusion, Paragraph 186)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government rejects the need to reform the post-16 English and maths resit policy, stating that students must continue to be supported under the condition of funding, and will strengthen this requirement for 2025/26 by setting minimum teaching hours and reducing the provider opt-out tolerance.
Read full response →
Department for Education
43
Recommendation
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted in Part
The Government must introduce a three-route model for those who have not attained grade 4 GCSE in maths and/or English based on their level of attainment at age 16 and their chosen post-16 qualification/employment pathway: • Students who, based on their GCSE results at age 16 and prior attainment, have …
Read more
The Government must introduce a three-route model for those who have not attained grade 4 GCSE in maths and/or English based on their level of attainment at age 16 and their chosen post-16 qualification/employment pathway: • Students who, based on their GCSE results at age 16 and prior attainment, have a realistic prospect of achieving grade 4 in maths and/or English should be supported to work towards those qualifications. • Vocational courses of study, for which the English and maths content required can be easily identified, should have that content built into the curriculum. Students taking courses with embedded English and maths content which have been rigorously quality assured could then, in consultation with employers, be considered for exemption from the requirement to re-sit English and maths GCSE. • Students who, based on past performance, are very unlikely to attain grade 4 in maths and/or English despite multiple resits and who would benefit from pursuing a functional skills qualification in maths and/or English—for example, focused on financial literacy, debt and interest and household budgeting—should be supported to achieve a pass in that form of qualification. (Recommendation, Paragraph 187)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government commits to a package of reforms to break the cycle of unnecessary resits, including offering new Level 1 stepping stone qualifications and changes to the accountability framework, but does not adopt the specific three-route model proposed by the committee, stating a consultation will …
Read full response →
Department for Education
44
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted
Greater policy focus is required on further education provision for young people with SEND. At present, both FE and SEND policy frameworks give limited consideration to the specific needs of learners post-16, and funding arrangements often fail to provide adequate resources to meet those needs. This lack of targeted attention …
Read more
Greater policy focus is required on further education provision for young people with SEND. At present, both FE and SEND policy frameworks give limited consideration to the specific needs of learners post-16, and funding arrangements often fail to provide adequate resources to meet those needs. This lack of targeted attention and investment contributes to significant gaps in provision and support, leaving many of these young people effectively overlooked within the education system. Without dedicated and sufficient funding for SEN support beyond the age of 16, mainstream further 164 education settings will struggle to provide the adjustments, specialist staff, and tailored resources necessary to meet learners’ needs and achieve good outcomes. This is incompatible with the Government’s vision for inclusive mainstream education. Without targeted reform and investment, the FE sector risks falling behind other parts of the education system. (Conclusion, Paragraph 189)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the need for greater policy focus on post-16 SEND provision, stating its recently published Post-16 Education and Skills White Paper commits to improving support for students with SEND, including investment in specialist advice and expanded mental health services in colleges, and supporting …
Read full response →
Department for Education
45
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Rejected
The Department for Education should introduce a dedicated and ring- fenced funding stream for SEN support beyond the age of 16. This would enable further education providers to recruit and retain specialist staff, provide tailored learning resources, and make the reasonable adjustments necessary to meet the diverse needs of learners …
Read more
The Department for Education should introduce a dedicated and ring- fenced funding stream for SEN support beyond the age of 16. This would enable further education providers to recruit and retain specialist staff, provide tailored learning resources, and make the reasonable adjustments necessary to meet the diverse needs of learners with SEND. Such investment is essential to ensuring that mainstream FE provision is genuinely inclusive and that young people with SEND have equitable opportunities to succeed. (Recommendation, Paragraph 190)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government rejects the recommendation for a dedicated and ring-fenced funding stream for post-16 SEN support, instead highlighting existing overall increases in unringfenced schools and high needs funding, and the unringfenced nature of high needs capital funding for local authorities.
Read full response →
Department for Education
46
Recommendation
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted
When Ofsted considers the accountability of post-16 education settings, it should ensure a stronger focus on inclusivity and outcomes for young people with SEND. (Recommendation, Paragraph 191)
Government response AI summary
Ofsted has set out an explicit focus on inclusion in their new framework, gathering evidence on factors from school culture to assessment of need which came into effect on 10 November.
Read full response →
Department for Education
47
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
We know that some young people in some areas will have a long-term need for home to school transport due to extremely limited public transport options in their local area or their individual needs. We are concerned about the impact that lack of statutory home to school transport for 16–19-year- …
Read more
We know that some young people in some areas will have a long-term need for home to school transport due to extremely limited public transport options in their local area or their individual needs. We are concerned about the impact that lack of statutory home to school transport for 16–19-year- olds with SEND has on the ability of these young people to access education. No young person should be locked out of education because of a transport need. Evidence also indicates a lack of adequate travel training for this age group in some areas, which increases reliance on home to school transport, creating significant barriers to attendance and participation in learning. (Conclusion, Paragraph 194)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the report and highlights its commitment to reforming the SEND system to deliver excellent, inclusive education.
Read full response →
Department for Education
48
Recommendation
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Not Addressed
The Department should review home to school transport and identify costs across regions. Additionally, the Department must mandate that all local authorities provide travel training programmes for young people with SEND in this age group to promote independence and safe travel where this is appropriate. Statutory transport provision should be …
Read more
The Department should review home to school transport and identify costs across regions. Additionally, the Department must mandate that all local authorities provide travel training programmes for young people with SEND in this age group to promote independence and safe travel where this is appropriate. Statutory transport provision should be guaranteed based on clear criteria such as distance from education settings, level of need, and other relevant factors to ensure no young person is unfairly disadvantaged. We welcome the acknowledgement in the Government’s fair funding review of the need for comprehensive costings for current and future home to school transport need. The Department for Education must work with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government and the Department for Transport as they prepare to introduce a bespoke formula to recognise Home to School transport costs. As part of this collaboration, the Department should ensure that there is transparency around how 165 outcomes are measured and reported. We support the recommendation of the Transport Select Committee with regard to the provision of bus passes for under 22-year-olds. (Recommendation, Paragraph 195) Equipping the workforce
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the report and highlights its commitment to reforming the SEND system to deliver excellent, inclusive education, but does not address the specifics of reviewing or mandating home to school transport.
Read full response →
Department for Education
49
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
While the Department’s update to the Initial Teacher Training and Early Career Framework is a positive move, it needs to go further to adequately prepare teachers to support pupils with SEND. SEND is still not fully integrated across all training modules, and there is a clear lack of focus on …
Read more
While the Department’s update to the Initial Teacher Training and Early Career Framework is a positive move, it needs to go further to adequately prepare teachers to support pupils with SEND. SEND is still not fully integrated across all training modules, and there is a clear lack of focus on how to apply this knowledge practically in the classroom. This shortfall risks leaving teachers unprepared to meet the needs of pupils with SEND effectively. (Conclusion, Paragraph 202)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the need for teachers to be better prepared for SEND, stating that the updated Initial Teacher Training and Early Career Framework (ITTECF) introduced in September 2025 includes enhanced statements on adaptive teaching and SEND, and commits to a full review of the …
Read full response →
Department for Education
50
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Deferred
The Department for Education must implement a continuous review and update cycle for the ITT and ECF to keep training relevant and effective. It must urgently increase the number of ITT placements and explore the viability of mandating every teacher to complete a placement in a specialist setting during ITT …
Read more
The Department for Education must implement a continuous review and update cycle for the ITT and ECF to keep training relevant and effective. It must urgently increase the number of ITT placements and explore the viability of mandating every teacher to complete a placement in a specialist setting during ITT or ECF. Without practical, hands-on experience supporting children and young people with SEND, teachers will remain ill- equipped to meet their needs. (Recommendation, Paragraph 203)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government defers the implementation of a continuous review cycle for ITT and ECF to a full review in 2027, and does not address the urgent increase in ITT placements or exploring mandatory specialist placements.
Read full response →
Department for Education
51
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted in Part
The Department should provide comprehensive training within ITT and clear guidance for schools, multi-academy trusts and education staff on delivering inclusive education practice. This will ensure that all settings understand their legal obligations and are equipped to make the necessary accommodations to support pupils with SEND effectively. Embedding this knowledge …
Read more
The Department should provide comprehensive training within ITT and clear guidance for schools, multi-academy trusts and education staff on delivering inclusive education practice. This will ensure that all settings understand their legal obligations and are equipped to make the necessary accommodations to support pupils with SEND effectively. Embedding this knowledge is crucial for promoting inclusive practices, preventing discrimination, and fostering environments where every child can thrive. (Recommendation, Paragraph 204)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government has introduced the Early Career Teacher Entitlement (ECTE) and the Initial Teacher Training and Early Career Framework (ITTECF) with enhanced SEND statements, and committed to providing targeted support for ECTs in special schools, partially addressing the need for training. A full review of …
Read full response →
Department for Education
52
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Not Addressed
It is deeply concerning that SEND-specific continuing professional development (CPD) is not mandatory. The education workforce must be consistently equipped with up-to-date, evidence-based knowledge through ongoing CPD to ensure an inclusive mainstream with high-quality support for children and young people with SEND. (Conclusion, Paragraph 209)
Read more
It is deeply concerning that SEND-specific continuing professional development (CPD) is not mandatory. The education workforce must be consistently equipped with up-to-date, evidence-based knowledge through ongoing CPD to ensure an inclusive mainstream with high-quality support for children and young people with SEND. (Conclusion, Paragraph 209)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government's response focuses on early career teacher frameworks and a future review, failing to address the committee's specific concern about SEND-specific continuing professional development (CPD) not being mandatory for the broader education workforce.
Read full response →
Department for Education
53
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
Continuous professional development in SEND should not be viewed solely as a support mechanism for specialist SEND educators. When all teachers are trained to understand and respond to the needs of pupils with SEND, the entire workforce becomes more inclusive, adaptive, and confident in managing diverse classrooms. An essential skill …
Read more
Continuous professional development in SEND should not be viewed solely as a support mechanism for specialist SEND educators. When all teachers are trained to understand and respond to the needs of pupils with SEND, the entire workforce becomes more inclusive, adaptive, and confident in managing diverse classrooms. An essential skill set in the modern classroom, this not only improves outcomes for pupils with SEND but also supports teacher resilience and wellbeing, enhancing the learning 166 experience for all students by fostering a more empathetic, dynamic and flexible teaching environment. We have seen evidence that deploying this approach reduces the need for EHC plans. (Conclusion, Paragraph 210)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the importance of improving professional development for "all teachers" and highlights the ITTECF's enhanced SEND statements, aligning with the principle that all teachers need SEND training, but does not commit to making CPD continuous or mandatory for all beyond the early career …
Read full response →
Department for Education
54
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Not Addressed
SEND CPD should be made mandatory to ensure that all educators are equipped to meet the diverse needs of children and young people with SEND. This could be achieved through a nationally recognised supplementary qualification in SEND that all existing teachers must complete within a defined timeframe (e.g. three years), …
Read more
SEND CPD should be made mandatory to ensure that all educators are equipped to meet the diverse needs of children and young people with SEND. This could be achieved through a nationally recognised supplementary qualification in SEND that all existing teachers must complete within a defined timeframe (e.g. three years), similar to the Early Career Framework but focused on inclusion and SEND best practice; or through the incorporation of mandatory SEND modules into existing CPD requirements; or through performance management frameworks, ensuring ongoing engagement and application in classroom settings. (Recommendation, Paragraph 211)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government's response outlines updates to early career training frameworks and future reviews but does not commit to making SEND-specific continuing professional development (CPD) mandatory for all educators as recommended.
Read full response →
Department for Education
55
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Not Addressed
We welcome the introduction of the new National Professional Qualification (NPQ) for SENCOs as a positive step towards enhancing the leadership and expertise of SEND provision in schools and multi-academy trusts. However, further action is urgently needed. The scale of the challenges facing SENCOs including excessive workloads, insufficient time to …
Read more
We welcome the introduction of the new National Professional Qualification (NPQ) for SENCOs as a positive step towards enhancing the leadership and expertise of SEND provision in schools and multi-academy trusts. However, further action is urgently needed. The scale of the challenges facing SENCOs including excessive workloads, insufficient time to carry out their statutory duties, and a lack of support requires immediate attention. (Conclusion, Paragraph 216)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government's response highlights the mandatory NPQ for SENCOs and a review of its content and delivery in 2025, but does not address the urgent challenges of excessive SENCO workloads, insufficient time, or lack of support.
Read full response →
Department for Education
56
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
Strong leadership on SEND is essential to delivering effective and inclusive education. Often the bulk of responsibility for SEND inclusion falls to a single SENCO and this should not be the case. Evidence shows that when senior leadership prioritises inclusion, this commitment permeates throughout the school, positively influencing staff attitudes …
Read more
Strong leadership on SEND is essential to delivering effective and inclusive education. Often the bulk of responsibility for SEND inclusion falls to a single SENCO and this should not be the case. Evidence shows that when senior leadership prioritises inclusion, this commitment permeates throughout the school, positively influencing staff attitudes and pupil experiences. Embedding SEND awareness and inclusion as a strategic focus at the highest-level drives culture change and ensures that inclusive practices are consistently implemented. (Conclusion, Paragraph 217)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government's response mentions the mandatory NPQ for SENCOs and a review of NPQ frameworks in 2025 to strengthen inclusive leadership practices, which aligns with the conclusion's emphasis on strong, strategic SEND leadership.
Read full response →
Department for Education
57
Recommendation
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted
To strengthen leadership on SEND, the Department should, in the short term, mandate that at least one member of the Senior Leadership Team in every school and every multi-academy trust holds SENCO qualifications. (Recommendation, Paragraph 218)
Government response AI summary
The government states that the NPQ for SENCOs, now mandatory, addresses the recommendation by providing essential knowledge and skills for SENCOs in mainstream schools.
Read full response →
Department for Education
58
Recommendation
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Not Addressed
The Department should also publish guidance on appropriate SENCO- to-pupil ratios and develop a national strategy to ensure these ratios are achieved consistently across schools and multi-academy trusts. (Recommendation, Paragraph 219)
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the report and highlights its commitment to reforming the SEND system to deliver excellent, inclusive education, but does not address the call to publish guidance on SENCO-to-pupil ratios.
Read full response →
Department for Education
59
Recommendation
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Not Addressed
Within four years, the Department should introduce a requirement for all new headteachers to hold a SEND-specific qualification. Ensuring that SEND expertise is embedded at the highest levels of school or multi- 167 academy trust leadership will promote strategic oversight, improve the quality of inclusive practice, and better meet the …
Read more
Within four years, the Department should introduce a requirement for all new headteachers to hold a SEND-specific qualification. Ensuring that SEND expertise is embedded at the highest levels of school or multi- 167 academy trust leadership will promote strategic oversight, improve the quality of inclusive practice, and better meet the needs of pupils with SEND. (Recommendation, Paragraph 220)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the report and highlights its commitment to reforming the SEND system to deliver excellent, inclusive education, but does not address the recommendation to require SEND-specific qualifications for new headteachers.
Read full response →
Department for Education
60
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Deferred
Learning support assistants and teaching assistants are integral to the effective delivery of SEND support and resourcing their deployment properly can help reduce the need for expensive specialist placements. To sustain and strengthen their contribution, improvements are urgently needed in the recruitment, training, CPD and retention of this workforce. We …
Read more
Learning support assistants and teaching assistants are integral to the effective delivery of SEND support and resourcing their deployment properly can help reduce the need for expensive specialist placements. To sustain and strengthen their contribution, improvements are urgently needed in the recruitment, training, CPD and retention of this workforce. We are particularly concerned by evidence that many LSAs and TAs lack adequate SEND-specific training to perform their roles safely and effectively. (Conclusion, Paragraph 223)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government states that the newly established School Support Staff Negotiating Body (SSSNB) will advise on suitable training and career progression routes for TAs and LSAs, thereby deferring action on these improvements and the concern about SEND-specific training.
Read full response →
Department for Education
61
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Deferred
SEND content should be an integral part of teaching assistant training, and they should be provided with regular opportunities for CPD and peer support. This could be through incentivised or ring-fenced funding for schools and multi-academy trusts to release teaching assistants and learning support assistants for SEND CPD, removing practical …
Read more
SEND content should be an integral part of teaching assistant training, and they should be provided with regular opportunities for CPD and peer support. This could be through incentivised or ring-fenced funding for schools and multi-academy trusts to release teaching assistants and learning support assistants for SEND CPD, removing practical barriers to participation and ensuring consistent take-up across the sector. (Recommendation, Paragraph 224)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government defers action on ensuring SEND content in TA training, providing regular CPD, and offering incentivised funding to the new School Support Staff Negotiating Body (SSSNB), which will advise on suitable training routes.
Read full response →
Department for Education
62
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted in Part
The Department should issue guidance on teaching assistant-to-pupil ratios and urgently address the worsening crisis in recruiting and retaining TAs and learning support assistants to ensure these ratios can be met. These professionals are vital to the delivery of inclusive education, yet their contribution continues to be undervalued and under-supported. …
Read more
The Department should issue guidance on teaching assistant-to-pupil ratios and urgently address the worsening crisis in recruiting and retaining TAs and learning support assistants to ensure these ratios can be met. These professionals are vital to the delivery of inclusive education, yet their contribution continues to be undervalued and under-supported. A robust and comprehensive strategy is urgently required. This must include: • A clear career progression framework with opportunities to develop specialist expertise and the opportunity for some TAs to progress to qualified teacher status. • Competitive pay increases that reflect the skill, responsibility, and complexity of their roles. • Expanded and better-promoted apprenticeship pathways to attract new entrants and diversify the workforce. • Clearer communication to schools, multi-academy trusts and stakeholders about the distinct functions, expectations, and career progression routes within TA and LSA roles. (Recommendation, Paragraph 225)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government commits to addressing competitive pay increases for TAs and LSAs through the new School Support Staff Negotiating Body (SSSNB), which will also advise on career progression routes. However, it does not address issuing guidance on TA-to-pupil ratios, expanding apprenticeship pathways, or clearer communication …
Read full response →
Department for Education
63
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted
These measures are essential. Without decisive action, the system will continue to lose experienced staff, leaving vulnerable pupils without the support they need and deserve. (Recommendation, Paragraph 226) 168
Government response AI summary
The government is establishing the School Support Staff Negotiating Body (SSSNB) through the Employment Rights Bill to negotiate pay, terms, and advise on training and career progression for support staff, aiming to address recruitment and retention challenges.
Read full response →
Department for Education
64
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
Many children with SEND and their families continue to have unsatisfactory experiences when navigating the SEND system, particularly in their interactions with local authority staff. These challenges are often rooted in a failure to work empathetically in partnership with parents and carers and demonstrate a limited understanding of the assessment …
Read more
Many children with SEND and their families continue to have unsatisfactory experiences when navigating the SEND system, particularly in their interactions with local authority staff. These challenges are often rooted in a failure to work empathetically in partnership with parents and carers and demonstrate a limited understanding of the assessment process and its significance. In some cases, local authority staff make poor or inadequate contributions to EHC plans, undermining their quality and failing to reflect the needs of the child. These issues not only erode trust in the system but also contribute to delays, disputes, and ultimately poorer outcomes for children and young people with SEND. (Conclusion, Paragraph 229)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges that the SEND system does not work for too many families and agrees on the importance of local authorities prioritising good partnership working, while also referencing the new SEND inspection framework.
Read full response →
Department for Education
65
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
Local authority staff require improved training on child development, SEND law, parent engagement and mediation, alongside changes in practice that strengthen accountability and foster more constructive relationships with parents and carers. This should include meaningful parental involvement at every stage of the decision-making process regarding a child’s needs and support. …
Read more
Local authority staff require improved training on child development, SEND law, parent engagement and mediation, alongside changes in practice that strengthen accountability and foster more constructive relationships with parents and carers. This should include meaningful parental involvement at every stage of the decision-making process regarding a child’s needs and support. Embedding a more collaborative and transparent approach would not only enhance trust and outcomes for families but also help alleviate the pressures contributing to staff burnout within local authorities. (Recommendation, Paragraph 230)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees on the importance of local authorities prioritising good partnership working with families, stating it will give full consideration to the committee's recommendations and referencing the new SEND inspection framework.
Read full response →
Department for Education
66
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted
Shortages of educational psychologists and allied health professionals, including speech and language therapists, occupational therapists, and physiotherapists are significantly undermining the availability and quality of SEND support. These workforce gaps delay assessments, restrict access to essential interventions, and place additional pressure on schools and multi- academy trusts to fill specialist …
Read more
Shortages of educational psychologists and allied health professionals, including speech and language therapists, occupational therapists, and physiotherapists are significantly undermining the availability and quality of SEND support. These workforce gaps delay assessments, restrict access to essential interventions, and place additional pressure on schools and multi- academy trusts to fill specialist roles they are not equipped to provide. In addition, the shortages have resulted in far too many highly skilled professionals being deployed predominantly in undertaking assessments and writing reports rather than working directly and therapeutically with children and young people. This has to change, for the benefit of professionals who are becoming harder to retain, and in order to deliver a genuinely inclusive system in which access to support is available for every child who needs it. (Conclusion, Paragraph 239)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government is investing over £31 million to train 600 more educational psychologists by 2025, promoting degree apprenticeships for speech and language therapists, and working to improve access and effective deployment of allied health professionals.
Read full response →
Department for Education
67
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted in Part
The DfE and DHSC should urgently develop a joint SEND workforce plan to address shortages and build capacity across education, health, and care services. This should include explicit measures to deliver a shift in the deployment of educational psychologists, speech and language therapists and other allied health professionals away from …
Read more
The DfE and DHSC should urgently develop a joint SEND workforce plan to address shortages and build capacity across education, health, and care services. This should include explicit measures to deliver a shift in the deployment of educational psychologists, speech and language therapists and other allied health professionals away from undertaking assessments and writing reports and towards greater deployment in education settings, delivering therapeutic support for children and upskilling early years practitioners, teachers and support staff. This will enable professionals to concentrate on delivering frontline support. Such an approach would help 169 retain skilled practitioners within the system and encourage those who have left the profession, often due to excessive paperwork and limited direct engagement to return. (Recommendation, Paragraph 240) Getting to a sustainable model of funding
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government is working with DHSC and NHS England to improve access to health services and ensure more effective deployment of allied health professionals away from bureaucracy. They are investing over £31 million to train 600 more educational psychologists by 2025 and promoting degree apprenticeships …
Read full response →
Department for Education
68
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted
It is clear that the current levels of funding provided to schools and multi- academy trusts are inadequate to support the effective inclusion of pupils with SEND. The notional £6,000 threshold is insufficient to deliver good SEN support, placing unsustainable pressure on school budgets. The Department cannot reasonably expect inclusive …
Read more
It is clear that the current levels of funding provided to schools and multi- academy trusts are inadequate to support the effective inclusion of pupils with SEND. The notional £6,000 threshold is insufficient to deliver good SEN support, placing unsustainable pressure on school budgets. The Department cannot reasonably expect inclusive education to be realised without a significant increase in investment. Adequate and sustained resourcing is essential to ensure that mainstream schools, multi-academy trusts and teaching staff are properly equipped to be inclusive. However, the Government does not appear to have a realistic understanding of the scale of investment required to deliver a genuinely inclusive education system. Without acknowledging and addressing the true level of resource needed, efforts to improve outcomes for pupils with SEND risk falling short. (Conclusion, Paragraph 249)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government highlights a £4.2 billion increase in overall schools and high needs funding by 2028–29, extends the Statutory Override for local authorities until 2027–28, and is providing £740 million high needs capital for 2025–26, with further details on deficit support to follow.
Read full response →
Department for Education
69
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Not Addressed
The current £6,000 notional threshold is outdated and inadequate. It must be automatically uprated each year in line with inflation to prevent further erosion of support for pupils with SEND. This is a necessary correction to address years of chronic underfunding. This funding should also be ringfenced to ensure it …
Read more
The current £6,000 notional threshold is outdated and inadequate. It must be automatically uprated each year in line with inflation to prevent further erosion of support for pupils with SEND. This is a necessary correction to address years of chronic underfunding. This funding should also be ringfenced to ensure it is used exclusively for supporting pupils with SEND and to improve the transparency and accountability of the resources schools and multi-academy trusts are committing to deliver inclusivity. However, these measures alone will not be enough to create the change desperately needed in this failing system. The Department must set a clear trajectory towards a more sustainable and equitable funding model that is informed by, and able to deliver, the Department’s definition of inclusive mainstream education. (Recommendation, Paragraph 250)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government's response highlights overall funding increases and support for local authorities but does not address the specific recommendations to uprate the £6,000 notional threshold with inflation, ringfence the funding, or set a clear trajectory for a new funding model.
Read full response →
Department for Education
70
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
We have seen and heard evidence that delivering inclusive practice in education improves long term outcomes for children and young people with SEND which has wider benefits to the economy as well as costing less to deliver than expensive specialist placements. (Conclusion, Paragraph 253)
Read more
We have seen and heard evidence that delivering inclusive practice in education improves long term outcomes for children and young people with SEND which has wider benefits to the economy as well as costing less to deliver than expensive specialist placements. (Conclusion, Paragraph 253)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the report and highlights its commitment to reforming the SEND system to deliver excellent, inclusive education.
Read full response →
Department for Education
71
Recommendation
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Not Addressed
The Government should undertake a rigorous cost-benefit analysis to understand the short- and long-term economic benefits of investing in a fully inclusive education system. (Recommendation, Paragraph 254)
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the report and highlights its commitment to reforming the SEND system to deliver excellent, inclusive education, but does not address the call for a cost-benefit analysis.
Read full response →
Department for Education
72
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted
Funding must be strategically deployed to deliver the best outcomes for children and young people with SEND. This should include prioritised investment in early intervention. Timely and targeted support is essential 170 and can prevent some needs such as speech and language and SEMH needs from escalating, reducing long-term costs …
Read more
Funding must be strategically deployed to deliver the best outcomes for children and young people with SEND. This should include prioritised investment in early intervention. Timely and targeted support is essential 170 and can prevent some needs such as speech and language and SEMH needs from escalating, reducing long-term costs to the system, and improving educational and life outcomes. Prioritising early support in such areas not only represents better value for money but also aligns with a preventative, rather than reactive, approach to SEND provision. Ensuring that schools, multi-academy trusts and services are resourced to identify and meet speech and language and SEMH needs at the earliest stage should be a central principle of any funding reform. However, the Department must recognise that while early intervention plays a crucial role in supporting children with disabilities, it is not a solution for all needs. Some children will require consistent, long-term support throughout their lives. Where this is the case, it is essential that adequate and sustained funding and resources are in place to ensure these children receive the ongoing support they need to thrive. (Conclusion, Paragraph 255)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government is prioritising early intervention through its Best Start in Life strategy, increasing funding for early years providers, extending funding for the Nuffield Early Language Intervention until 2028/29, and funding specialist early language leads.
Read full response →
Department for Education
73
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted in Part
The High Needs Block should be refocused to enable and incentivise earlier intervention. Currently, a significant proportion of this funding is directed towards supporting high-cost, specialist provision once needs have escalated. While such provision is vital for some, a more preventative approach is needed to reduce long-term need and improve …
Read more
The High Needs Block should be refocused to enable and incentivise earlier intervention. Currently, a significant proportion of this funding is directed towards supporting high-cost, specialist provision once needs have escalated. While such provision is vital for some, a more preventative approach is needed to reduce long-term need and improve outcomes. Redirecting a greater share of High Needs funding towards early identification and support within mainstream settings and through multi- agency services will help address emerging needs and ensure that good support is put in place at the outset. (Recommendation, Paragraph 256)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government details specific investments in early intervention programs and strategies, including funding for early language leads and extending proven programs, but does not explicitly commit to refocusing or redirecting High Needs Block funding as recommended.
Read full response →
Department for Education
74
Recommendation
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
The National Funding Formula must ensure that funding for SEND is both fair and sufficient to meet the needs of children and young people across the country. While some geographical variation is to be expected, this should reflect the prevalence and relative level of need in each area. The formula …
Read more
The National Funding Formula must ensure that funding for SEND is both fair and sufficient to meet the needs of children and young people across the country. While some geographical variation is to be expected, this should reflect the prevalence and relative level of need in each area. The formula must guarantee that all local areas are equipped with the necessary resources to deliver consistent, high-quality SEND provision and support equitable outcomes for all learners. (Conclusion, Paragraph 259)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government outlined an increase of £4.2 billion in schools and high needs funding, committed to supporting local authorities with SEND deficits until 2027–28, and allocated £740 million for high needs capital, stating these measures will help improve SEND outcomes.
Read full response →
Department for Education
75
Recommendation
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Not Addressed
A comprehensive review of the National Funding Formula is urgently needed to ensure funding is allocated fairly and reflects the real level of need across the country. The current formula fails to address historic underfunding, ignores rising inflation, does not account for regional differences in cost and need and ignores …
Read more
A comprehensive review of the National Funding Formula is urgently needed to ensure funding is allocated fairly and reflects the real level of need across the country. The current formula fails to address historic underfunding, ignores rising inflation, does not account for regional differences in cost and need and ignores hidden pockets of deprivation. These gaps are driving deep and persistent inequalities in SEND provision. Any credible funding system must correct these failures and provide a stable, needs-based foundation for support. (Recommendation, Paragraph 260)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government highlighted an increase of £4.2 billion in schools and high needs funding, committed to supporting local authorities with SEND deficits, and allocated £740 million for high needs capital, but did not commit to a comprehensive review of the National Funding Formula.
Read full response →
Department for Education
76
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Deferred
The extension of the statutory override until 2027/28 is a welcome step, but it remains a temporary measure in response to the ongoing financial instability facing local authorities across England. Reducing deficits is essential to achieving long-term financial sustainability however, this 171 cannot be done at the expense of local …
Read more
The extension of the statutory override until 2027/28 is a welcome step, but it remains a temporary measure in response to the ongoing financial instability facing local authorities across England. Reducing deficits is essential to achieving long-term financial sustainability however, this 171 cannot be done at the expense of local authorities fulfilling their legal obligations to children and young people with SEND. Any permanent solution must involve coordinated, cross-departmental action between the Department for Education, HM Treasury, the Department for Work and Pensions and the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government to address the systemic funding challenges within local government. (Conclusion, Paragraph 267)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the need to support local authorities in managing SEND system deficits and reiterates the extension of the Statutory Override until 2027–28, stating that further details on plans for historic deficits will be set out in the upcoming Local Government Finance Settlement.
Read full response →
Department for Education
77
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted
We believe that a reset of local authority finances through a partial write- off of SEND-related deficits could provide a necessary step towards long- term stability. However, this must be approached with care, recognising the progress made by some local authorities through the Delivering Better Value in SEND programme and …
Read more
We believe that a reset of local authority finances through a partial write- off of SEND-related deficits could provide a necessary step towards long- term stability. However, this must be approached with care, recognising the progress made by some local authorities through the Delivering Better Value in SEND programme and Safety Valve agreements, and the contributions already made by some local authorities from their General Fund towards SEND over and above contributions from their High Needs education block. It is essential that the Department for Education engages meaningfully with local government representatives to develop a fair and transparent approach that supports improvement while ensuring accountability. The Department must provide further detail on this in the upcoming SEND white paper due in Autumn 2025. (Recommendation, Paragraph 268) Building stronger partnerships
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government will work with local authorities to manage SEND system deficits and will extend the Statutory Override until 2027-28. Further details on supporting local authorities with historic and accruing deficits will be provided through the upcoming Local Government Finance Settlement.
Read full response →
Department for Education
78
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
The current failure to embed Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) as a shared priority across government departments is not just a policy oversight, it is a profound injustice to some of the most vulnerable children in our society. It is evident that SEND is not sufficiently seen as a …
Read more
The current failure to embed Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) as a shared priority across government departments is not just a policy oversight, it is a profound injustice to some of the most vulnerable children in our society. It is evident that SEND is not sufficiently seen as a priority by the health system. The education system is increasingly shouldering the weight of responsibilities for supporting children and young people with SEND that should, in part, be met by health services. This chronic imbalance places unsustainable pressure on schools, multi- academy trusts and local authorities and undermines the principle of joint responsibility set out in the SEND Code of Practice. The erosion of funding to Integrated Care Boards (ICBs), alongside ongoing structural upheaval within the health sector, risk further weakening the capacity of health services to meet their statutory duties. If we are serious about improving outcomes for children with SEND, then coordinated investment, shared accountability, and genuine cross-departmental collaboration must become non- negotiable. Without it, the burden will continue to fall disproportionately on schools and local authorities, compromising outcomes for children and placing additional strain on an already stretched education system. (Conclusion, Paragraph 275) 172
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the need for shared working across education, health, and care services, describing ongoing collaboration to improve access to community health services and ensure allied health professionals are effectively deployed. They also mention a new SEND inspection framework and state they will give …
Read full response →
Department for Education
79
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
SEND should be identified as a priority across the health system and ongoing NHS restructuring must be used as an opportunity to strengthen the role and accountability of health services in supporting children and young people with SEND. This includes ensuring that ICBs are fully engaged in local SEND systems, …
Read more
SEND should be identified as a priority across the health system and ongoing NHS restructuring must be used as an opportunity to strengthen the role and accountability of health services in supporting children and young people with SEND. This includes ensuring that ICBs are fully engaged in local SEND systems, with clearly defined responsibilities and mechanisms for joint planning and delivery. The seniority, authority and visibility of senior responsible officers for SEND within ICBs must be increased. (Recommendation, Paragraph 276)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the importance of partnership between education, health, and care services and describes ongoing collaboration to improve access to community health services. They mention a new SEND inspection framework covering LAs and ICBs, but do not commit to specifically increasing the seniority or …
Read full response →
Department for Education
80
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted in Part
Bringing education and health more closely together should be supported by an evidence led approach, drawing on the role of NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) to produce new SEND guidelines and intervention pathways. (Recommendation, Paragraph 277)
Read more
Bringing education and health more closely together should be supported by an evidence led approach, drawing on the role of NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) to produce new SEND guidelines and intervention pathways. (Recommendation, Paragraph 277)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees that reforms should be evidence-based and refers to the 10-Year Health Plan and an independent evaluation of the Early Language Support for Every Child programme to inform future decisions. However, they do not commit to specifically drawing on NICE to produce new …
Read full response →
Department for Education
81
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Not Addressed
Crucially, this must be backed by appropriate financial investment from the health sector to meet statutory duties, provide timely access to therapies and assessments, and contribute equitably to joint commissioning arrangements. All areas should have a robust and fully operational partnership arrangement in place by autumn 2026. This should be …
Read more
Crucially, this must be backed by appropriate financial investment from the health sector to meet statutory duties, provide timely access to therapies and assessments, and contribute equitably to joint commissioning arrangements. All areas should have a robust and fully operational partnership arrangement in place by autumn 2026. This should be underpinned by clear governance and shared accountability. (Recommendation, Paragraph 278)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government states it is working with DHSC and NHS England to improve access to community health services and ensure allied health professionals are effectively deployed. However, the response does not address the recommendation for appropriate financial investment from the health sector or the establishment …
Read full response →
Department for Education
82
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
Guidance on the delegation of healthcare responsibilities within schools and multi-academy trusts remains weak. There is insufficient clarity on how and when healthcare tasks can be appropriately and safely assigned to school or multi-academy trust staff, what training and safeguards should accompany such delegation, and ultimately where responsibility lies between …
Read more
Guidance on the delegation of healthcare responsibilities within schools and multi-academy trusts remains weak. There is insufficient clarity on how and when healthcare tasks can be appropriately and safely assigned to school or multi-academy trust staff, what training and safeguards should accompany such delegation, and ultimately where responsibility lies between education and health services. This lack of direction creates uncertainty for schools and multi-academy trusts, risking inconsistency and unsafe practices in the delivery of health interventions for pupils. (Conclusion, Paragraph 284)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the report and highlights its commitment to reforming the SEND system to deliver excellent, inclusive education.
Read full response →
Department for Education
83
Recommendation
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Not Addressed
The Department for Education and the Department of Health and Social Care should issue joint statutory guidance clarifying how and when healthcare responsibilities can safely be delegated in schools and multi- academy trusts. This should be produced in collaboration with school and multi-academy trust leaders and health and education unions …
Read more
The Department for Education and the Department of Health and Social Care should issue joint statutory guidance clarifying how and when healthcare responsibilities can safely be delegated in schools and multi- academy trusts. This should be produced in collaboration with school and multi-academy trust leaders and health and education unions and set out clear lines of accountability between education and health services, minimum training requirements for school staff, and safeguards to ensure consistent and safe delivery of health interventions for pupils. (Recommendation, Paragraph 285)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the report and highlights its commitment to reforming the SEND system to deliver excellent, inclusive education, but does not address the need for joint statutory guidance.
Read full response →
Department for Education
84
Recommendation
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted
The Department of Health and Social Care must urgently appoint a dedicated national SEND lead to drive accountability and coordination across the health system. This role must be empowered and mandated to provide coherent strategic leadership on the delivery of health- related SEND duties, forge robust partnerships with education and …
Read more
The Department of Health and Social Care must urgently appoint a dedicated national SEND lead to drive accountability and coordination across the health system. This role must be empowered and mandated to provide coherent strategic leadership on the delivery of health- related SEND duties, forge robust partnerships with education and 173 care sectors, and ensure that the needs of children and young people with SEND are embedded in the heart of health policy, planning, and workforce development from senior officials to frontline services. (Recommendation, Paragraph 289)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The Department is working to improve access to community health services for children with SEND and ensure allied health professionals are more effectively deployed, but does not directly address the need for a national SEND lead.
Read full response →
Department for Education
85
Recommendation
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Deferred
The Government should place a clear statutory duty on health services, including ICBs and NHS providers, to ensure their full and accountable participation in the planning, commissioning, and delivery of SEND provision. This duty must align with the Children and Families Act 2014 and the SEND Code of Practice, which …
Read more
The Government should place a clear statutory duty on health services, including ICBs and NHS providers, to ensure their full and accountable participation in the planning, commissioning, and delivery of SEND provision. This duty must align with the Children and Families Act 2014 and the SEND Code of Practice, which emphasises joint commissioning and integrated working. Strengthening statutory responsibilities for health is key to ensuring timely access to assessments, therapies, and interventions, and uphold the principle of a coordinated, child-centred approach to SEND support. (Recommendation, Paragraph 290) Expanding capacity within the SEND system
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the essential role of ongoing health and social care engagement and notes the non-binding nature of SEND Tribunal decisions for health bodies. They do not commit to placing a clear statutory duty on health services but state they will give full consideration …
Read full response →
Department for Education
86
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
If the Department for Education expands the use of resource bases to increase specialist provision within mainstream schools and multi- academy trusts, it must set out a detailed implementation plan. This plan should clearly specify how resource bases should be staffed, including required qualifications, expertise, and staff-to-pupil ratios to ensure …
Read more
If the Department for Education expands the use of resource bases to increase specialist provision within mainstream schools and multi- academy trusts, it must set out a detailed implementation plan. This plan should clearly specify how resource bases should be staffed, including required qualifications, expertise, and staff-to-pupil ratios to ensure all children with SEND receive appropriate support. The Department must also define mandatory standards of good practice for resource bases, covering, physical facilities and equipment and good practice approaches to integration with the wider school or multi-academy trust community. By establishing these standards and holding schools and multi-academy trusts accountable for meeting them, the Department can ensure that the expansion of resource bases delivers high-quality, consistent, and inclusive provision, meeting the needs of children with SEND while strengthening inclusion across mainstream education. (Recommendation, Paragraph 305)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government notes that many mainstream settings already provide specialist provision through SEN units and resourced provision and states they would like to explore how to make these practices more widespread. However, they do not commit to setting out a detailed implementation plan with specified …
Read full response →
Department for Education
87
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
The allocation of £740 million in high needs capital funding for 2025–26 is a welcome investment and reflects a growing recognition of the urgent need to expand and improve SEND provision. However, this funding should be seen as a starting point rather than a solution. One-off or short-term funding cycles …
Read more
The allocation of £740 million in high needs capital funding for 2025–26 is a welcome investment and reflects a growing recognition of the urgent need to expand and improve SEND provision. However, this funding should be seen as a starting point rather than a solution. One-off or short-term funding cycles make it difficult for local authorities and providers to plan, commission, and deliver the specialist and inclusive provision needed to meet rising need. We have heard consistent evidence highlighting the need for longer-term, multi-year funding settlements to support more strategic and sustainable planning at the local level. (Conclusion, Paragraph 310) 174
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the important role of the £740 million high needs capital funding for 2025–26 as a core investment. They state they will provide more detail on their approach across the spending review period in due course, without explicitly committing to longer-term, multi-year funding …
Read full response →
Department for Education
88
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Deferred
The Department for Education should develop and implement a comprehensive capital investment strategy for SEND. This strategy should provide clarity over future funding streams, enable better forecasting and planning, and support the development of high-quality, fit-for- purpose settings across both mainstream and specialist provision. (Recommendation, Paragraph 311)
Read more
The Department for Education should develop and implement a comprehensive capital investment strategy for SEND. This strategy should provide clarity over future funding streams, enable better forecasting and planning, and support the development of high-quality, fit-for- purpose settings across both mainstream and specialist provision. (Recommendation, Paragraph 311)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the important role of capital funding and the £740 million for 2025–26. However, they do not commit to developing and implementing a comprehensive capital investment strategy for SEND, stating only that more detail on their approach across the spending review period will …
Read full response →
Department for Education
89
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
We welcome the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill, particularly the proposed reforms that give local authorities a greater role in key decision- making areas such as the establishment of new schools, oversight of admissions, and the placement of pupils. These changes represent a positive step toward restoring strategic oversight at …
Read more
We welcome the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill, particularly the proposed reforms that give local authorities a greater role in key decision- making areas such as the establishment of new schools, oversight of admissions, and the placement of pupils. These changes represent a positive step toward restoring strategic oversight at the local level. Empowering local authorities in these areas is essential for improving coordination across the system, addressing local sufficiency gaps, and reducing reliance on costly out-of-area or independent placements. Currently, without this, local authorities have been unable to ensure that sufficient and suitable provision is available for children and young people with SEND in their area. (Conclusion, Paragraph 312)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the report and highlights its commitment to reforming the SEND system to deliver excellent, inclusive education.
Read full response →
Department for Education
90
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Accepted in Part
The Department for Education should expand specialist SEND provision by investing in high-quality specialist state schools and mainstream resource bases and other mainstream provision. This should be achieved through shifting funding from some independent specialist school provision to better value for money state specialist school provision. This will help meet …
Read more
The Department for Education should expand specialist SEND provision by investing in high-quality specialist state schools and mainstream resource bases and other mainstream provision. This should be achieved through shifting funding from some independent specialist school provision to better value for money state specialist school provision. This will help meet rising need, support inclusive mainstream education, and reduce reliance on costly or distant placements. This expansion must be aligned with robust local planning and forecasting, ensuring that new provision is responsive to patterns of demand and delivered in a way that reduces pressure on over- capacity special schools and minimises reliance on distant or expensive independent placements. (Conclusion, Paragraph 313)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the vital role of special schools and specialist post-16 provision, and states a commitment to improving support across the system. They also express a desire to explore how to make widespread the practices of mainstream settings delivering specialist provision through SEN units …
Read full response →
Department for Education
91
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Deferred
As part of the expansion of specialist SEND, the highest-performing state specialist schools should be designated as Centres of Excellence. These schools would play a leading role in supporting the development of expertise across other schools, local authorities or multi-academy trusts by providing training, sharing best practice, and offering targeted …
Read more
As part of the expansion of specialist SEND, the highest-performing state specialist schools should be designated as Centres of Excellence. These schools would play a leading role in supporting the development of expertise across other schools, local authorities or multi-academy trusts by providing training, sharing best practice, and offering targeted support to meet complex and specialist needs across the system. (Recommendation, Paragraph 314)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government thanks the committee and states it will carefully consider the recommendations while engaging with stakeholders, ahead of publishing its SEND system plans in the Schools White Paper in the new year.
Read full response →
Department for Education
92
Recommendation
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Deferred
The Government should continue to review whether local authorities have the necessary powers to fulfil their legal obligations to children and young people with SEND in order to address the mismatch between powers and responsibilities which has arisen as a consequence of previous reforms. (Recommendation, Paragraph 315) 175
Read more
The Government should continue to review whether local authorities have the necessary powers to fulfil their legal obligations to children and young people with SEND in order to address the mismatch between powers and responsibilities which has arisen as a consequence of previous reforms. (Recommendation, Paragraph 315) 175
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government states it appreciates the committee's consideration and will respond to their recommendations concerning improving local authority accountability, including matters related to the SEND tribunal.
Read full response →
Department for Education
93
Recommendation
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Deferred
As it seeks to expand the capacity of specialist state schools and deliver inclusive mainstream schools, the Government should monitor and report on an annual basis on the number of pupils with SEND in mainstream schools, in specialist independent schools and specialist state schools. (Recommendation, Paragraph 316)
Read more
As it seeks to expand the capacity of specialist state schools and deliver inclusive mainstream schools, the Government should monitor and report on an annual basis on the number of pupils with SEND in mainstream schools, in specialist independent schools and specialist state schools. (Recommendation, Paragraph 316)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government thanks the committee and states it will carefully consider the recommendations while engaging with stakeholders, ahead of publishing its SEND system plans in the Schools White Paper in the new year.
Read full response →
Department for Education
94
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
The data currently collected and available to the DfE on both mainstream and specialist SEND need is limited and inconsistent. Comprehensive data at the local, regional and national level is essential to assessing the sufficiency of capacity and determining funding allocations for education settings. (Conclusion, Paragraph 321)
Read more
The data currently collected and available to the DfE on both mainstream and specialist SEND need is limited and inconsistent. Comprehensive data at the local, regional and national level is essential to assessing the sufficiency of capacity and determining funding allocations for education settings. (Conclusion, Paragraph 321)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government thanks the committee for its recommendations, stating it will carefully consider them while engaging with stakeholders before publishing its SEND system plans in the forthcoming Schools White Paper.
Read full response →
Department for Education
95
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Deferred
To plan effectively for future capacity and ensure the right support is in place, the Department must take a data driven approach, developing a more robust understanding of need by systematically gathering and analysing relevant, high-quality data. This should include a national SEND data strategy that requires local authorities and …
Read more
To plan effectively for future capacity and ensure the right support is in place, the Department must take a data driven approach, developing a more robust understanding of need by systematically gathering and analysing relevant, high-quality data. This should include a national SEND data strategy that requires local authorities and education settings to collect and report standardised, high-quality data on levels of need, current provision, capacity, and projected demand. This would require clear definitions and metrics for identifying and categorising SEND across mainstream and specialist settings and mandatory annual data submissions aligned with school and local authority planning cycles. (Recommendation, Paragraph 322) 176
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government thanks the committee and states it will carefully consider the recommendations while engaging with stakeholders, ahead of publishing its SEND system plans in the Schools White Paper in the new year.
Read full response →
Department for Education