Recommendations & Conclusions
26 items
1
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
We welcome the Department’s focus on inclusive education; however, we are concerned about the absence of a Departmental definition of this and the subsequent lack of clarity about what ‘inclusive mainstream’ education looks like and means in practice for educators, education settings, pupils and families. We are also concerned that …
Read more
We welcome the Department’s focus on inclusive education; however, we are concerned about the absence of a Departmental definition of this and the subsequent lack of clarity about what ‘inclusive mainstream’ education looks like and means in practice for educators, education settings, pupils and families. We are also concerned that the Department does not appear to have a clear understanding of the timescale and level of investment that is needed to achieve a truly inclusive mainstream education system. (Conclusion, Paragraph 34)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the importance of inclusive education and outlines its 'Plan for Change,' including establishing an Expert Advisory Group for Inclusion, deploying RISE advisors, and incorporating an explicit focus on inclusion in Ofsted's new framework.
Read full response →
Department for Education
7
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
The SEND system is not delivering for children and young people or their families, with poor experiences and outcomes becoming the norm in many places across England. Rising need coupled with limited school resourcing, stretched local authority budgets and a mismatch between local authority responsibilities and their powers has resulted …
Read more
The SEND system is not delivering for children and young people or their families, with poor experiences and outcomes becoming the norm in many places across England. Rising need coupled with limited school resourcing, stretched local authority budgets and a mismatch between local authority responsibilities and their powers has resulted in a costly and adversarial system. Over a decade on from the 2014 reforms, the key challenges are evident: preparedness of the education workforce, lack of parental trust and confidence in the system, limited accountability across schools, 155 multi-academy trusts, NHS services and local authorities, disjointed working across the various agencies and families, limited capacity and the inadequacy and unsustainability of funding. (Conclusion, Paragraph 48)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the committee's report rightly highlights the deep-rooted issues within the SEND system. It states it is committed to reforming the system as part of its Plan for Change and is already taking action through investment in school places, improved teacher training, and …
Read full response →
Department for Education
17
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
Parents and carers must be actively and meaningfully involved in all processes that affect their child’s education, support, and overall wellbeing. This includes being fully informed and invited to participate in all relevant meetings where decisions about their child’s needs or provision are being discussed at the school and local …
Read more
Parents and carers must be actively and meaningfully involved in all processes that affect their child’s education, support, and overall wellbeing. This includes being fully informed and invited to participate in all relevant meetings where decisions about their child’s needs or provision are being discussed at the school and local authority level. Families should have access to independent advocacy to enable and strengthen their engagement in the process. Parental insights and lived experience are invaluable in shaping effective and appropriate support. Embedding parental involvement as a standard part of decision-making not only enhances transparency and trust but also leads to better-informed, more tailored outcomes for children and young people with SEND. Local authorities must actively engage and be properly equipped to support and respond to parental engagement in a positive way. This requires dedicated resourcing and ongoing training to ensure staff have the skills, capacity and confidence to work effectively with families, build trust, and act on their concerns in a timely and constructive way. These changes would need to be subject to a New Burdens Assessment to ensure that local authorities had the resources to support better parent and carer engagement. (Recommendation, Paragraph 102)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the importance of parental involvement and outlines engagement activities with stakeholders to shape reform proposals, followed by a formal consultation. However, it does not commit to providing independent advocacy, dedicated resourcing for local authorities, or a New Burdens Assessment as specifically recommended.
Read full response →
Department for Education
19
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
To avoid causing undue alarm and to help rebuild confidence and trust in the system, parents and carers must be fully engaged and any reforms must be implemented gradually and in a carefully phased manner. New approaches should first be piloted through a pathfinder model, allowing for thorough testing in …
Read more
To avoid causing undue alarm and to help rebuild confidence and trust in the system, parents and carers must be fully engaged and any reforms must be implemented gradually and in a carefully phased manner. New approaches should first be piloted through a pathfinder model, allowing for thorough testing in real-world settings before national rollout. This will provide an opportunity to identify potential challenges, address inefficiencies, consult with parents’ and carers’ groups and make necessary adjustments to ensure reforms are effective, practical, and responsive to the needs of children, young people, and their families. At all times, the Department for Education must have an effective communication strategy, regularly setting out the clear vision for change, and providing reassurance to all affected agencies and individuals that planned reforms are fully planned, coordinated, and funded. (Recommendation, Paragraph 108)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the need for partnership and engagement to shape reform proposals, outlining specific activities and a formal consultation. However, the response does not commit to piloting new approaches via a pathfinder model or to implementing reforms gradually and in a phased manner as …
Read full response →
Department for Education
26
Recommendation
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
To ensure accountability for inclusive practice, SEND expertise should be embedded within schools and multi-academy trust (MAT) governance structures, for example, by making it mandatory to appoint governors or trustees with specific responsibility for and relevant expertise (including lived experience) of SEND as we saw in Ontario. Without this, inclusive …
Read more
To ensure accountability for inclusive practice, SEND expertise should be embedded within schools and multi-academy trust (MAT) governance structures, for example, by making it mandatory to appoint governors or trustees with specific responsibility for and relevant expertise (including lived experience) of SEND as we saw in Ontario. Without this, inclusive education risks being sidelined at the strategic level, and outcomes for pupils with SEND will continue to be deprioritised. (Recommendation, Paragraph 129)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government is committed to improving inclusivity and expertise in mainstream schools, and created an Expert Advisory Group for Inclusion and a team of expert Regional Improvement for Standards and Excellence (RISE) advisors to work with schools.
Read full response →
Department for Education
27
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
Tribunals are an important feature of the accountability system, allowing families to challenge local authorities’ decisions regarding their children’s support; however, they should only need to be used as a last resort. We are deeply concerned by the number of local authorities found to have failed to meet their statutory …
Read more
Tribunals are an important feature of the accountability system, allowing families to challenge local authorities’ decisions regarding their children’s support; however, they should only need to be used as a last resort. We are deeply concerned by the number of local authorities found to have failed to meet their statutory obligations at the SEND Tribunal. A 97 per cent loss rate for Tribunal cases suggests a pattern of non-compliance which is unacceptable, particularly given that the entitlements of children and young people with SEND are clearly set out in the existing legislative framework. Greater efforts are needed to prevent cases from escalating to SEND 160 Tribunals by prioritising good partnership working with parents and carers, effective mediation and ensuring local authorities have the resources and the powers to fulfil their statutory obligations. (Conclusion, Paragraph 144)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges that the SEND system does not work for too many families, agrees with prioritising partnership working, and highlights the new SEND inspection framework launched in January 2023 to improve outcomes and local authority accountability.
Read full response →
Department for Education
30
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
The limited engagement of health services in the SEND system stems from a lack of robust and enforceable accountability mechanisms. Despite being a critical enabler of positive educational outcomes for children with SEND, health services are not held to the same standards of responsibility as education providers. To deliver on …
Read more
The limited engagement of health services in the SEND system stems from a lack of robust and enforceable accountability mechanisms. Despite being a critical enabler of positive educational outcomes for children with SEND, health services are not held to the same standards of responsibility as education providers. To deliver on the promise of inclusive education, the Department for Education and the Department of Health and Social Care must strengthen accountability frameworks to ensure health partners are fully integrated and responsive within the SEND system. (Conclusion, Paragraph 157)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the importance of health and social care engagement and states it will give full consideration to the committee's recommendations for strengthening accountability frameworks, while also noting ongoing work to improve access to community health services and early interventions.
Read full response →
Department for Education
31
Recommendation
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
There must be mandatory training for health commissioners on good practice in meeting the needs of children with SEND. (Recommendation, Paragraph 158)
Government response AI summary
The government is considering how to improve professional development for all teachers, including those teaching pupils with SEND, but commits to no specific action on mandatory training for health commissioners.
Read full response →
Department for Education
33
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
The Department for Education must significantly improve cross- departmental coordination with the Department of Health and Social Care and NHS England to establish clear, consistent accountability for SEND at the ICB level. Current arrangements are fragmented and lack clarity. Strengthening the role, authority, and visibility of the Senior Responsible Officer …
Read more
The Department for Education must significantly improve cross- departmental coordination with the Department of Health and Social Care and NHS England to establish clear, consistent accountability for SEND at the ICB level. Current arrangements are fragmented and lack clarity. Strengthening the role, authority, and visibility of the Senior Responsible Officer for SEND within ICBs is essential to ensure health services are fully held to account for their responsibilities. Without stronger oversight, health bodies will continue to operate without sufficient scrutiny or consequence. (Recommendation, Paragraph 160) Improving early years for lasting impact
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government highlights ongoing close work with DHSC and NHS England to improve access to community health services and early interventions, and refers to the new SEND inspection framework (launched Jan 2023) as a mechanism to improve accountability and outcomes at the LA and ICB …
Read full response →
Department for Education
37
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
To address inconsistency in the delivery of early years provision and the Special Educational Needs Inclusion Fund (SENIF), the Department for Education must establish a set of national inclusivity requirements for early years settings. These requirements should be backed by increased, funding to ensure providers are able to deliver inclusive …
Read more
To address inconsistency in the delivery of early years provision and the Special Educational Needs Inclusion Fund (SENIF), the Department for Education must establish a set of national inclusivity requirements for early years settings. These requirements should be backed by increased, funding to ensure providers are able to deliver inclusive practice in a sustainable way. At the same time, the Disability Access Fund should be reformed by removing its dependency on Disability Living Allowance. The 162 current eligibility criteria act as a barrier for many families, restricting uptake and undermining the fund’s effectiveness. Without these reforms, there is a risk that the system continues to perpetuate inequity and discourage inclusive practice at the earliest stage of education. (Recommendation, Paragraph 169)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the importance of early years SEND support and states it is working to embed inclusive practice and increase funding through existing strategies, but does not commit to establishing new national inclusivity requirements or reforming the Disability Access Fund.
Read full response →
Department for Education
38
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
Best Start Family Hubs and the expansion of childcare provision present a valuable opportunity to engage with families earlier and identify SEND needs at the earliest possible stage. We welcome the announcement that every Best Start Family Hub will have a SENCO. However, SEND awareness is not currently sufficiently embedded …
Read more
Best Start Family Hubs and the expansion of childcare provision present a valuable opportunity to engage with families earlier and identify SEND needs at the earliest possible stage. We welcome the announcement that every Best Start Family Hub will have a SENCO. However, SEND awareness is not currently sufficiently embedded amongst all early years staff, nor are there currently sufficient opportunities for early screenings that could facilitate timely support and referrals. We note the current inquiry at the time of publication of the Health Social Care Committee on ‘The First 1000 Days: a renewed focus’ and the further work we have agreed to undertake on early years, all of which should be taken full account of by the Government. (Conclusion, Paragraph 174)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the importance of early identification and SEND awareness, detailing its ongoing 'Best Start in Life' strategy, including funding Best Start Family Hubs with trained professionals and continuing funding for early language interventions like the NELI program until AY 2028/29.
Read full response →
Department for Education
47
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
We know that some young people in some areas will have a long-term need for home to school transport due to extremely limited public transport options in their local area or their individual needs. We are concerned about the impact that lack of statutory home to school transport for 16–19-year- …
Read more
We know that some young people in some areas will have a long-term need for home to school transport due to extremely limited public transport options in their local area or their individual needs. We are concerned about the impact that lack of statutory home to school transport for 16–19-year- olds with SEND has on the ability of these young people to access education. No young person should be locked out of education because of a transport need. Evidence also indicates a lack of adequate travel training for this age group in some areas, which increases reliance on home to school transport, creating significant barriers to attendance and participation in learning. (Conclusion, Paragraph 194)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the report and highlights its commitment to reforming the SEND system to deliver excellent, inclusive education.
Read full response →
Department for Education
49
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
While the Department’s update to the Initial Teacher Training and Early Career Framework is a positive move, it needs to go further to adequately prepare teachers to support pupils with SEND. SEND is still not fully integrated across all training modules, and there is a clear lack of focus on …
Read more
While the Department’s update to the Initial Teacher Training and Early Career Framework is a positive move, it needs to go further to adequately prepare teachers to support pupils with SEND. SEND is still not fully integrated across all training modules, and there is a clear lack of focus on how to apply this knowledge practically in the classroom. This shortfall risks leaving teachers unprepared to meet the needs of pupils with SEND effectively. (Conclusion, Paragraph 202)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the need for teachers to be better prepared for SEND, stating that the updated Initial Teacher Training and Early Career Framework (ITTECF) introduced in September 2025 includes enhanced statements on adaptive teaching and SEND, and commits to a full review of the …
Read full response →
Department for Education
53
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
Continuous professional development in SEND should not be viewed solely as a support mechanism for specialist SEND educators. When all teachers are trained to understand and respond to the needs of pupils with SEND, the entire workforce becomes more inclusive, adaptive, and confident in managing diverse classrooms. An essential skill …
Read more
Continuous professional development in SEND should not be viewed solely as a support mechanism for specialist SEND educators. When all teachers are trained to understand and respond to the needs of pupils with SEND, the entire workforce becomes more inclusive, adaptive, and confident in managing diverse classrooms. An essential skill set in the modern classroom, this not only improves outcomes for pupils with SEND but also supports teacher resilience and wellbeing, enhancing the learning 166 experience for all students by fostering a more empathetic, dynamic and flexible teaching environment. We have seen evidence that deploying this approach reduces the need for EHC plans. (Conclusion, Paragraph 210)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the importance of improving professional development for "all teachers" and highlights the ITTECF's enhanced SEND statements, aligning with the principle that all teachers need SEND training, but does not commit to making CPD continuous or mandatory for all beyond the early career …
Read full response →
Department for Education
56
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
Strong leadership on SEND is essential to delivering effective and inclusive education. Often the bulk of responsibility for SEND inclusion falls to a single SENCO and this should not be the case. Evidence shows that when senior leadership prioritises inclusion, this commitment permeates throughout the school, positively influencing staff attitudes …
Read more
Strong leadership on SEND is essential to delivering effective and inclusive education. Often the bulk of responsibility for SEND inclusion falls to a single SENCO and this should not be the case. Evidence shows that when senior leadership prioritises inclusion, this commitment permeates throughout the school, positively influencing staff attitudes and pupil experiences. Embedding SEND awareness and inclusion as a strategic focus at the highest-level drives culture change and ensures that inclusive practices are consistently implemented. (Conclusion, Paragraph 217)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government's response mentions the mandatory NPQ for SENCOs and a review of NPQ frameworks in 2025 to strengthen inclusive leadership practices, which aligns with the conclusion's emphasis on strong, strategic SEND leadership.
Read full response →
Department for Education
64
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
Many children with SEND and their families continue to have unsatisfactory experiences when navigating the SEND system, particularly in their interactions with local authority staff. These challenges are often rooted in a failure to work empathetically in partnership with parents and carers and demonstrate a limited understanding of the assessment …
Read more
Many children with SEND and their families continue to have unsatisfactory experiences when navigating the SEND system, particularly in their interactions with local authority staff. These challenges are often rooted in a failure to work empathetically in partnership with parents and carers and demonstrate a limited understanding of the assessment process and its significance. In some cases, local authority staff make poor or inadequate contributions to EHC plans, undermining their quality and failing to reflect the needs of the child. These issues not only erode trust in the system but also contribute to delays, disputes, and ultimately poorer outcomes for children and young people with SEND. (Conclusion, Paragraph 229)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges that the SEND system does not work for too many families and agrees on the importance of local authorities prioritising good partnership working, while also referencing the new SEND inspection framework.
Read full response →
Department for Education
65
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
Local authority staff require improved training on child development, SEND law, parent engagement and mediation, alongside changes in practice that strengthen accountability and foster more constructive relationships with parents and carers. This should include meaningful parental involvement at every stage of the decision-making process regarding a child’s needs and support. …
Read more
Local authority staff require improved training on child development, SEND law, parent engagement and mediation, alongside changes in practice that strengthen accountability and foster more constructive relationships with parents and carers. This should include meaningful parental involvement at every stage of the decision-making process regarding a child’s needs and support. Embedding a more collaborative and transparent approach would not only enhance trust and outcomes for families but also help alleviate the pressures contributing to staff burnout within local authorities. (Recommendation, Paragraph 230)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees on the importance of local authorities prioritising good partnership working with families, stating it will give full consideration to the committee's recommendations and referencing the new SEND inspection framework.
Read full response →
Department for Education
70
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
We have seen and heard evidence that delivering inclusive practice in education improves long term outcomes for children and young people with SEND which has wider benefits to the economy as well as costing less to deliver than expensive specialist placements. (Conclusion, Paragraph 253)
Read more
We have seen and heard evidence that delivering inclusive practice in education improves long term outcomes for children and young people with SEND which has wider benefits to the economy as well as costing less to deliver than expensive specialist placements. (Conclusion, Paragraph 253)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the report and highlights its commitment to reforming the SEND system to deliver excellent, inclusive education.
Read full response →
Department for Education
74
Recommendation
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
The National Funding Formula must ensure that funding for SEND is both fair and sufficient to meet the needs of children and young people across the country. While some geographical variation is to be expected, this should reflect the prevalence and relative level of need in each area. The formula …
Read more
The National Funding Formula must ensure that funding for SEND is both fair and sufficient to meet the needs of children and young people across the country. While some geographical variation is to be expected, this should reflect the prevalence and relative level of need in each area. The formula must guarantee that all local areas are equipped with the necessary resources to deliver consistent, high-quality SEND provision and support equitable outcomes for all learners. (Conclusion, Paragraph 259)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government outlined an increase of £4.2 billion in schools and high needs funding, committed to supporting local authorities with SEND deficits until 2027–28, and allocated £740 million for high needs capital, stating these measures will help improve SEND outcomes.
Read full response →
Department for Education
78
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
The current failure to embed Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) as a shared priority across government departments is not just a policy oversight, it is a profound injustice to some of the most vulnerable children in our society. It is evident that SEND is not sufficiently seen as a …
Read more
The current failure to embed Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) as a shared priority across government departments is not just a policy oversight, it is a profound injustice to some of the most vulnerable children in our society. It is evident that SEND is not sufficiently seen as a priority by the health system. The education system is increasingly shouldering the weight of responsibilities for supporting children and young people with SEND that should, in part, be met by health services. This chronic imbalance places unsustainable pressure on schools, multi- academy trusts and local authorities and undermines the principle of joint responsibility set out in the SEND Code of Practice. The erosion of funding to Integrated Care Boards (ICBs), alongside ongoing structural upheaval within the health sector, risk further weakening the capacity of health services to meet their statutory duties. If we are serious about improving outcomes for children with SEND, then coordinated investment, shared accountability, and genuine cross-departmental collaboration must become non- negotiable. Without it, the burden will continue to fall disproportionately on schools and local authorities, compromising outcomes for children and placing additional strain on an already stretched education system. (Conclusion, Paragraph 275) 172
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the need for shared working across education, health, and care services, describing ongoing collaboration to improve access to community health services and ensure allied health professionals are effectively deployed. They also mention a new SEND inspection framework and state they will give …
Read full response →
Department for Education
79
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
SEND should be identified as a priority across the health system and ongoing NHS restructuring must be used as an opportunity to strengthen the role and accountability of health services in supporting children and young people with SEND. This includes ensuring that ICBs are fully engaged in local SEND systems, …
Read more
SEND should be identified as a priority across the health system and ongoing NHS restructuring must be used as an opportunity to strengthen the role and accountability of health services in supporting children and young people with SEND. This includes ensuring that ICBs are fully engaged in local SEND systems, with clearly defined responsibilities and mechanisms for joint planning and delivery. The seniority, authority and visibility of senior responsible officers for SEND within ICBs must be increased. (Recommendation, Paragraph 276)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the importance of partnership between education, health, and care services and describes ongoing collaboration to improve access to community health services. They mention a new SEND inspection framework covering LAs and ICBs, but do not commit to specifically increasing the seniority or …
Read full response →
Department for Education
82
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
Guidance on the delegation of healthcare responsibilities within schools and multi-academy trusts remains weak. There is insufficient clarity on how and when healthcare tasks can be appropriately and safely assigned to school or multi-academy trust staff, what training and safeguards should accompany such delegation, and ultimately where responsibility lies between …
Read more
Guidance on the delegation of healthcare responsibilities within schools and multi-academy trusts remains weak. There is insufficient clarity on how and when healthcare tasks can be appropriately and safely assigned to school or multi-academy trust staff, what training and safeguards should accompany such delegation, and ultimately where responsibility lies between education and health services. This lack of direction creates uncertainty for schools and multi-academy trusts, risking inconsistency and unsafe practices in the delivery of health interventions for pupils. (Conclusion, Paragraph 284)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the report and highlights its commitment to reforming the SEND system to deliver excellent, inclusive education.
Read full response →
Department for Education
86
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
If the Department for Education expands the use of resource bases to increase specialist provision within mainstream schools and multi- academy trusts, it must set out a detailed implementation plan. This plan should clearly specify how resource bases should be staffed, including required qualifications, expertise, and staff-to-pupil ratios to ensure …
Read more
If the Department for Education expands the use of resource bases to increase specialist provision within mainstream schools and multi- academy trusts, it must set out a detailed implementation plan. This plan should clearly specify how resource bases should be staffed, including required qualifications, expertise, and staff-to-pupil ratios to ensure all children with SEND receive appropriate support. The Department must also define mandatory standards of good practice for resource bases, covering, physical facilities and equipment and good practice approaches to integration with the wider school or multi-academy trust community. By establishing these standards and holding schools and multi-academy trusts accountable for meeting them, the Department can ensure that the expansion of resource bases delivers high-quality, consistent, and inclusive provision, meeting the needs of children with SEND while strengthening inclusion across mainstream education. (Recommendation, Paragraph 305)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government notes that many mainstream settings already provide specialist provision through SEN units and resourced provision and states they would like to explore how to make these practices more widespread. However, they do not commit to setting out a detailed implementation plan with specified …
Read full response →
Department for Education
87
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
The allocation of £740 million in high needs capital funding for 2025–26 is a welcome investment and reflects a growing recognition of the urgent need to expand and improve SEND provision. However, this funding should be seen as a starting point rather than a solution. One-off or short-term funding cycles …
Read more
The allocation of £740 million in high needs capital funding for 2025–26 is a welcome investment and reflects a growing recognition of the urgent need to expand and improve SEND provision. However, this funding should be seen as a starting point rather than a solution. One-off or short-term funding cycles make it difficult for local authorities and providers to plan, commission, and deliver the specialist and inclusive provision needed to meet rising need. We have heard consistent evidence highlighting the need for longer-term, multi-year funding settlements to support more strategic and sustainable planning at the local level. (Conclusion, Paragraph 310) 174
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the important role of the £740 million high needs capital funding for 2025–26 as a core investment. They state they will provide more detail on their approach across the spending review period in due course, without explicitly committing to longer-term, multi-year funding …
Read full response →
Department for Education
89
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
We welcome the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill, particularly the proposed reforms that give local authorities a greater role in key decision- making areas such as the establishment of new schools, oversight of admissions, and the placement of pupils. These changes represent a positive step toward restoring strategic oversight at …
Read more
We welcome the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill, particularly the proposed reforms that give local authorities a greater role in key decision- making areas such as the establishment of new schools, oversight of admissions, and the placement of pupils. These changes represent a positive step toward restoring strategic oversight at the local level. Empowering local authorities in these areas is essential for improving coordination across the system, addressing local sufficiency gaps, and reducing reliance on costly out-of-area or independent placements. Currently, without this, local authorities have been unable to ensure that sufficient and suitable provision is available for children and young people with SEND in their area. (Conclusion, Paragraph 312)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the report and highlights its commitment to reforming the SEND system to deliver excellent, inclusive education.
Read full response →
Department for Education
94
Conclusion
5th Report - Solving the SEND Crisis
Acknowledged
The data currently collected and available to the DfE on both mainstream and specialist SEND need is limited and inconsistent. Comprehensive data at the local, regional and national level is essential to assessing the sufficiency of capacity and determining funding allocations for education settings. (Conclusion, Paragraph 321)
Read more
The data currently collected and available to the DfE on both mainstream and specialist SEND need is limited and inconsistent. Comprehensive data at the local, regional and national level is essential to assessing the sufficiency of capacity and determining funding allocations for education settings. (Conclusion, Paragraph 321)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government thanks the committee for its recommendations, stating it will carefully consider them while engaging with stakeholders before publishing its SEND system plans in the forthcoming Schools White Paper.
Read full response →
Department for Education