Public Inquiry
Infected Blood Inquiry
Status: Completed
Chair: Sir Brian Langstaff
Established: Sep 2018
Report: May 2024
Commissioned by: Cabinet Office
Examining how thousands of NHS patients were infected with HIV and Hepatitis C through contaminated blood products in the 1970s and 1980s. Found the scandal could largely have been avoided and victims were failed by the NHS, government, and blood …
Response breakdown
Reports & milestones
Reports
Timeline
11 Jul 2017
Chair Appointed
Sir Brian Langstaff appointed as Chair.
30 Apr 2019
Hearings Begin
Public hearings commenced.
05 Apr 2023
Second Interim Re…
Second interim report with further compensation recommendations.
Recommendations
| Code | Recommendation | Addressed to | Response | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBI-1 |
My principal recommendation remains that a compensation scheme should be set up now
|
UK Government | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-2a |
A permanent memorial be established in the UK and consideration be given to memorials in each of Northern Ireland, Wales and Scotland. …
|
UK Government | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-2b |
A memorial be established at public expense, dedicated specifically to the children infected at Treloar’s school. The memorial should be such as …
|
UK Government | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-2c |
There should be at least three events, approximately six months apart, drawing together those infected and affected, the nature and timing of …
|
UK Government | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-3a |
The General Medical Council, and NHS Education for Scotland, Health Education and Improvement Wales, Northern Ireland Medical and Dental Training Agency and …
|
GMC UK Government | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-3b |
They should look favourably upon putting together a package of training materials, with excerpts from oral and written testimony, to underpin what …
|
GMC UK Government | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-3c |
The Inquiry website is maintained online
|
UK Government | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-4a(i) |
Duty of candour: A statutory duty of candour in healthcare should be introduced in Northern Ireland.
|
Northern Ireland Executive | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-4a(ii) |
Duty of candour: The operation of the duties of candour in healthcare in Scotland and in Wales should be reviewed, as it …
|
UK Government Scottish Government | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-4a(iii) |
Duty of candour: The review of the duty of candour currently under way in England should be completed as soon as practicable.
|
UK Government | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-4a(iv) |
Statutory duty of candour: The statutory duties of candour in England, Scotland, Wales (and Northern Ireland, when introduced) should be extended to …
|
UK Government | Accepted in Part | View → |
| IBI-4a(v) |
Statutory duty of candour: Individuals in leadership positions should be required by the terms of their appointment and by secondary legislation to …
|
UK Government | Accepted in Part | View → |
| IBI-4b |
Cultural Change: That a culture of defensiveness, lack of openness, failure to be forthcoming, and being dismissive of concerns about patient safety …
|
UK Government | Accepted in Part | View → |
| IBI-4c(i) |
Regulation: That external regulation of safety in healthcare be simplified. As a first step towards this, there should be a UK wide …
|
UK Government | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-4c(ii) |
Regulation: That the national healthcare administrations in England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales explore, and if appropriate, support the development and implementation …
|
UK Government | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-4d |
Patient Records: Before the end of 2027 there should be a formal audit, publicly reported, of the extent of success of digitisation …
|
UK Government | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-4e |
Coordination of patient records with devolved governments: Consideration should be given by the national healthcare administrations in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern …
|
UK Government | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-5a |
The Government should reconsider whether, in the light of the facts revealed by this Inquiry, it is sufficient to continue to rely …
|
UK Government | Accepted in Part | View → |
| IBI-5b |
If, on review, the Government considers that it is sufficient to rely on the current non-statutory duties in the Civil Service Code, …
|
UK Government | Accepted in Part | View → |
| IBI-5c |
The Government should consider the extent to which Ministers should be subject to a duty beyond their current duty to Parliament under …
|
UK Government | Accepted in Part | View → |
| IBI-6a(i) |
All patients who have contracted hepatitis via a blood transfusion or blood products should receive the following care: Those who have been …
|
UK Government | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-6a(ii) |
All patients who have contracted hepatitis via a blood transfusion or blood products should receive the following care: Those who have fibrosis …
|
UK Government | Accepted in Part | View → |
| IBI-6a(iii) |
All patients who have contracted hepatitis via a blood transfusion or blood products should receive the following care: Where there is any …
|
UK Government | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-6a(iv) |
All patients who have contracted hepatitis via a blood transfusion or blood products should receive the following care: Fibroscan technology should be …
|
UK Government | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-6a(v) |
All patients who have contracted hepatitis via a blood transfusion or blood products should receive the following care: Those who have had …
|
UK Government | Accepted in Part | View → |
| IBI-6a(vi) |
All patients who have contracted hepatitis via a blood transfusion or blood products should receive the following care: Those bodies responsible for …
|
UK Government | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-7a(i) |
In England, Hospital Transfusion Committees and transfusion practitioners take steps to ensure that consideration of tranexamic acid be on every hospital surgical …
|
UK Government | Accepted in Part | View → |
| IBI-7a(ii) |
In Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland offering the use of tranexamic acid should be considered a treatment of preference in respect of …
|
UK Government | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-7a(iii) |
Consideration be given to standardising and benchmarking transfusion performance between hospitals in order to deliver better patient blood management
|
UK Government | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-7b |
Review of progress towards the Transfusion 2024 recommendations: Progress in implementation of the Transfusion 2024 recommendations be reviewed, and next steps be …
|
UK Government | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-7c |
Transfusion laboratories: Transfusion laboratories should be staffed (and resourced) adequately to meet the requirements of their functions.
|
UK Government | Accepted in Part | View → |
| IBI-7d |
Training in Transfusion Medicine: That those bodies concerned with undergraduate and postgraduate training across the UK of those people who are, or …
|
UK Government | Accepted in Part | View → |
| IBI-7e |
Implementing SHOT reports: That all NHS organisations across the UK have a mechanism in place for implementing recommendations of Serious Hazard of …
|
UK Government | Accepted in Part | View → |
| IBI-7f(i) |
Establishing the outcome of every transfusion: That a framework be established for recording outcomes for recipients of blood components. That those records …
|
UK Government | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-7f(ii) |
Establishing the outcome of every transfusion: To the extent that the funding for digital transformation does not already cover the setting up …
|
UK Government | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-7f(iii) |
Establishing the outcome of every transfusion: That funding for the provision of enhanced electronic clinical systems in relation to blood transfusion be …
|
UK Government | Accepted in Part | View → |
| IBI-8a |
When doctors become aware that a patient has had a blood transfusion prior to 1996, that patient should be offered a blood …
|
UK Government NHS England | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-8b |
As a matter of routine, new patients registering at a practice should be asked if they have had such a transfusion.
|
UK Government NHS England | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-9a |
That peer review of haemophilia care should continue to occur as presently practised, with any necessary support being provided by NHS Trusts …
|
UK Government | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-9b |
That NHS Trusts and Health Boards should be required to deliberate on peer review findings and give favourable consideration to implementing the …
|
UK Government | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-9c |
A peer review of each centre should take place not less than once every five years.
|
UK Government | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-9d |
The necessary administrative and clinical resources should be provided by hospital trusts and boards, integrated care boards, and service commissioners to facilitate …
|
UK Government | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-9e |
Recombinant coagulation factor products should be offered in place of plasma-derived ones where clinically appropriate. Service commissioners should ensure that such treatment …
|
UK Government | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-9f |
That the National Haemophilia Database, run by the UKHCDO, merits the support of additional central funding.
|
UK Government | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-10a(i) |
A clinical audit should as a matter of routine include measures of patient satisfaction or concern, and these should be reported to …
|
UK Government | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-10a(ii) |
That the following charities receive funding specifically for patient advocacy: the UK Haemophilia Society; the Hepatitis C Trust; Haemophilia Scotland; the Scottish …
|
UK Government | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-10a(iii) |
That favourable consideration be given to other charities and organisations supporting people infected and affected that were granted core participant status (as …
|
UK Government | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-10a(iv) |
Particular consideration be given, together with the UK Thalassaemia Society and the Sickle Cell Society, to how the needs of patients with …
|
UK Government | Accepted in Part | View → |
| IBI-10a(v) |
Steps be taken to give greater prominence to the online Yellow Card system to those receiving drugs or biological products, or who …
|
UK Government | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-11a |
That a minister should retain the power to call an inquiry as the minister sees fit, in accordance with the Inquiries Act …
|
UK Government | Accepted in Part | View → |
| IBI-11b |
If there is sufficient support from within Parliament for there to be an inquiry, the question whether there should be one should …
|
UK Government | Accepted in Part | View → |
| IBI-11c |
If it appears to PACAC that there is sufficient concern to justify a public inquiry, either because what happened and why has …
|
UK Government | Accepted in Part | View → |
| IBI-11d |
If the minister disagrees with the recommendation, they must set out in detail and publish reasons for this disagreement which are sufficient …
|
UK Government | Accepted in Part | View → |
| IBI-12a |
Within the next 12 months, the Government should consider and either commit to implementing the recommendations which I make, or give sufficient …
|
UK Government | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-12b |
During that period, and before the end of this year – the Government should report back to Parliament as to the progress …
|
UK Government | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-12c |
This timetable should not interfere with earlier consideration and response to the Recommendations of the Second Interim Report of the Inquiry.
|
UK Government | Accepted | View → |
| IBI-12d |
The Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee (“PACAC”) should review both the progress towards responding to the Inquiry’s recommendations and, to the …
|
UK Government | Accepted in Part | View → |
| IBI-12e |
PACAC should accept the role in respect of any future statutory inquiry of reviewing the government’s timetable for consideration of recommendations, and …
|
UK Government | Accepted in Part | View → |
Parliamentary activity
52 debates
284 questions
45 statements
13 May 2026
Early Day Motion
Redress for people impacted by surgical mesh, sodium valproate and Primodos
Sarah Green (Liberal Democrat)
Sarah Green (Liberal Democrat)
14 Apr 2026
Written Ministerial Statement
Update on the Infected Blood Compensation Scheme
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour)
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour)
14 Apr 2026
Written Ministerial Statement
Update on the Infected Blood Compensation Scheme
Nick Thomas-Symonds (Labour)
Nick Thomas-Symonds (Labour)
Costs
| Period | Total | Inquiry legal | CP legal | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2025 (cum.) | £146,162,778 | £67,290,993 | £27,242,761 | link |
| Mar 2025 | £5,511,059 | £1,514,906 | £603,277 | link |
| Mar 2024 | £10,301,344 | £5,354,237 | £937,131 | link |
| Mar 2023 | £28,254,992 | £11,694,492 | £7,154,110 | link |
| Mar 2022 | £32,522,939 | £15,491,533 | £5,778,813 | link |
| Mar 2021 | £34,270,948 | £20,797,365 | £4,505,612 | link |
| Mar 2020 | £25,992,907 | £9,959,119 | £5,742,876 | link |
| Mar 2019 | £9,308,693 | £2,479,341 | £2,520,943 | link |