Public Inquiry

Infected Blood Inquiry

Status: Completed Chair: Sir Brian Langstaff Established: Sep 2018 Report: May 2024 Commissioned by: Cabinet Office

Examining how thousands of NHS patients were infected with HIV and Hepatitis C through contaminated blood products in the 1970s and 1980s. Found the scandal could largely have been avoided and victims were failed by the NHS, government, and blood …

Response breakdown

103 recommendations total
72%
27%
74 (72%)Accepted
28 (27%)Accepted in Part
1 (1%)Under Review

Reports & milestones

Reports

29 Jul 2022 1 tracked rec First Interim Report · Tracked recommendations · PDF
05 Apr 2023 18 tracked recs Second Interim Report · Tracked recommendations · PDF

Timeline

11 Jul 2017 Inquiry Announced Prime Minister Theresa May announced a public inquiry. · Source
11 Jul 2017 Chair Appointed Sir Brian Langstaff appointed as Chair.
25 Jul 2018 Terms of Referenc… Terms of Reference published. · Source
30 Apr 2019 Hearings Begin Public hearings commenced.
19 Jul 2022 First Interim Rep… Interim report on compensation framework. · Source
05 Apr 2023 Second Interim Re… Second interim report with further compensation recommendations.
20 May 2024 Final Report Publ… Final report published finding decades of cover-up. · Source
21 May 2024 Government Apology Prime Minister issued full apology in Parliament. · Source

Recommendations

28 shown (filtered)
Clear
Code Recommendation Addressed to Response
IBI-4a(iv)
Statutory duty of candour: The statutory duties of candour in England, Scotland, Wales (and Northern Ireland, when introduced) should be extended to …
UK Government Accepted in Part View →
IBI-4a(v)
Statutory duty of candour: Individuals in leadership positions should be required by the terms of their appointment and by secondary legislation to …
UK Government Accepted in Part View →
IBI-4b
Cultural Change: That a culture of defensiveness, lack of openness, failure to be forthcoming, and being dismissive of concerns about patient safety …
UK Government Accepted in Part View →
IBI-5a
The Government should reconsider whether, in the light of the facts revealed by this Inquiry, it is sufficient to continue to rely …
UK Government Accepted in Part View →
IBI-5b
If, on review, the Government considers that it is sufficient to rely on the current non-statutory duties in the Civil Service Code, …
UK Government Accepted in Part View →
IBI-5c
The Government should consider the extent to which Ministers should be subject to a duty beyond their current duty to Parliament under …
UK Government Accepted in Part View →
IBI-6a(ii)
All patients who have contracted hepatitis via a blood transfusion or blood products should receive the following care: Those who have fibrosis …
UK Government Accepted in Part View →
IBI-6a(v)
All patients who have contracted hepatitis via a blood transfusion or blood products should receive the following care: Those who have had …
UK Government Accepted in Part View →
IBI-7a(i)
In England, Hospital Transfusion Committees and transfusion practitioners take steps to ensure that consideration of tranexamic acid be on every hospital surgical …
UK Government Accepted in Part View →
IBI-7c
Transfusion laboratories: Transfusion laboratories should be staffed (and resourced) adequately to meet the requirements of their functions.
UK Government Accepted in Part View →
IBI-7d
Training in Transfusion Medicine: That those bodies concerned with undergraduate and postgraduate training across the UK of those people who are, or …
UK Government Accepted in Part View →
IBI-7e
Implementing SHOT reports: That all NHS organisations across the UK have a mechanism in place for implementing recommendations of Serious Hazard of …
UK Government Accepted in Part View →
IBI-7f(iii)
Establishing the outcome of every transfusion: That funding for the provision of enhanced electronic clinical systems in relation to blood transfusion be …
UK Government Accepted in Part View →
IBI-10a(iv)
Particular consideration be given, together with the UK Thalassaemia Society and the Sickle Cell Society, to how the needs of patients with …
UK Government Accepted in Part View →
IBI-11a
That a minister should retain the power to call an inquiry as the minister sees fit, in accordance with the Inquiries Act …
UK Government Accepted in Part View →
IBI-11b
If there is sufficient support from within Parliament for there to be an inquiry, the question whether there should be one should …
UK Government Accepted in Part View →
IBI-11c
If it appears to PACAC that there is sufficient concern to justify a public inquiry, either because what happened and why has …
UK Government Accepted in Part View →
IBI-11d
If the minister disagrees with the recommendation, they must set out in detail and publish reasons for this disagreement which are sufficient …
UK Government Accepted in Part View →
IBI-12d
The Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee (“PACAC”) should review both the progress towards responding to the Inquiry’s recommendations and, to the …
UK Government Accepted in Part View →
IBI-12e
PACAC should accept the role in respect of any future statutory inquiry of reviewing the government’s timetable for consideration of recommendations, and …
UK Government Accepted in Part View →
IBI-A-4a
People infected with Hepatitis B or C who have received a course of treatment with or based on interferon should be recognised …
UK Government Accepted in Part View →
IBI-A-4b
The Government reconsider whether to maintain its rejection in February 2025 of the recommendations of Sir Robert Francis KC and advice from …
UK Government Accepted in Part View →
IBI-A-5a
The approach of the Infected Blood Psychology Service is adopted so that both a diagnosis made by a psychiatric professional and a …
UK Government Accepted in Part View →
IBI-A-6a
"x" be removed from the equation set out in Regulation 7.
UK Government Accepted in Part View →
IBI-A-6b
The Cabinet Office consult on whether the evidential requirements for exceptional reduced earnings are likely to prove a barrier to people who …
UK Government Accepted in Part View →
IBI-A-7a
Where there is evidence that an individual was the victim of unethical research practices IBCA should be authorised to make an unethical …
UK Government Accepted in Part View →
IBI-A-7b
When considering the evidence IBCA applies the wider definition of research explained in the Infected Blood Inquiry Additional Report chapter on Unethical …
UK Government Accepted in Part View →
IBI-A-8a
The Minister give consideration to there being a supplementary route for people affected. This could include opening the supplemental award for severe …
UK Government Accepted in Part View →

Parliamentary activity

386 mentions since Sep 2017
52 debates 284 questions 45 statements
15 Jun 2026 Early Day Motion Infected Blood Inquiry compensation
Lisa Smart (Liberal Democrat)
19 May 2026 Written Question Infected Blood Inquiry: Costs
Mike Wood (Conservative)
13 May 2026 Early Day Motion Redress for people impacted by surgical mesh, sodium valproate and Primodos
Sarah Green (Liberal Democrat)
14 Apr 2026 Written Ministerial Statement Update on the Infected Blood Compensation Scheme
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour)
14 Apr 2026 Written Ministerial Statement Update on the Infected Blood Compensation Scheme
Nick Thomas-Symonds (Labour)
View all 386 mentions →

Costs

Total: £146,162,778
Period Total Inquiry legal CP legal Source
Mar 2025 (cum.) £146,162,778 £67,290,993 £27,242,761 link
Mar 2025 £5,511,059 £1,514,906 £603,277 link
Mar 2024 £10,301,344 £5,354,237 £937,131 link
Mar 2023 £28,254,992 £11,694,492 £7,154,110 link
Mar 2022 £32,522,939 £15,491,533 £5,778,813 link
Mar 2021 £34,270,948 £20,797,365 £4,505,612 link
Mar 2020 £25,992,907 £9,959,119 £5,742,876 link
Mar 2019 £9,308,693 £2,479,341 £2,520,943 link