Medical Education - Curriculum
Infected Blood Inquiry · Infected Blood Inquiry Final Report · Issued 20 May 2024 · Addressed to: NHS Education for Scotland, NHS England, GMC
Government responseUK Government: Accepted (May 2025)
DeliveryScottish Government says in progress (Mar 2026)
Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
The General Medical Council, and NHS Education for Scotland, Health Education and Improvement Wales, Northern Ireland Medical and Dental Training Agency and NHS England, should take steps to ensure that those “lessons to be learned” which relate to clinical practice should be incorporated in every doctor’s training.
Infected Blood Inquiry, Infected Blood Inquiry Final Report · 20 May 2024 Source PDF →
Published evidence summary
AI-generated evidence summary
An action log owned by Emma Watson of NHS Education for Scotland, as minuted by the Scottish Government in March 2026, recorded that funding had been agreed with the body to take forward recommendation 3 (The action log, Mar 2026). In November 2025, she reported that a group led by NHS England to address the recommendations had been disbanded due to funding constraints (Professor Emma Watson, Nov 2025). Earlier, the UK Government stated in May 2025 that the General Medical Council was surveying educational institutions and working with four-nation leaders to identify training gaps (Cabinet Office response, May 2025).
AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.
About this summary
Government response
●UK Government · Accepted · 14 May 2025
Medicine is constantly evolving and it is crucial that doctor’s training is kept up to date. The Inquiry’s May 2024 report is a valuable resource in learning the lessons of the past, recognising that those responsible for medical education have an important role in ensuring that this happens in practice, and a reminder that patient safety should be the central focus for everything. Patients, the public and those impacted by the tragic events described in the Inquiry should expect no less.
The General Medical Council (GMC)’s regulatory requirements for medical education and training in the UK feature learning in blood transfusion. These have been embodied in the GMC’s practical procedures for undergraduate education since 2009, the content map requirements that are part of the new Medical Licensing Assessment and in the postgraduate curricula that GMC approve. These checks and balances are underpinned by GMC standards for UK medical education and training, and in the generic professional skills frameworks that have safety and quality improvement at their core.
In terms of action taken, the GMC has continued to use its convening powers to ensure that all relevant stakeholders are working together to identify and share how the Inquiry is influencing reflection and action that will strengthen learning. The results of GMC’s survey of medical schools, medical royal colleges and faculties were reflected in the December 2024 update to Parliament and showed a range of activity designed to strengthen learning on the safe delivery of transfusions. The aim is to gather any further reflections on the Inquiry’s findings, details of current arrangements for training in blood transfusion and details of action that is being taken. To this end the GMC has requested updates from medical schools, medical royal colleges and faculties with the aim of feeding back to DHSC findings by the end of June 2025.
Stakeholder collaboration is being supported by the work NHS England’s Workforce Training and Education Directorate and NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) are coordinating. NHS England have kept GMC updated on developments. This is taking place with professional education leaders across the four nations and professions to jointly consider recommendations 3 and 7d. This broad-based group is completing work on deep dives into the professions to determine where the gaps are in undergraduate education, postgraduate training and across the established workforce. The work is underpinned by a number of sub-groups, either up and running or planned over this year, that are focussing on healthcare scientists, doctors and medical students, nursing, allied health and other professions. The discovery for healthcare science and medics is further ahead due to the surveys that have already been completed as part of Transfusion 2024, but others are not too far behind.
Overall, the four-nation group is making good progress and looking to implement accessible and impactful educational resources/learning for the gaps identified. Any recommendations arising from that may have regulatory implications, for example where changes are being proposed to postgraduate curricula. These can be escalated to the GMC through the established processes.
Extract from: Full Government Response to the Infected Blood Inquiry's May 2024 Report
Delivery
●Scottish Government says in progress · 24 Mar 2026
Action completed: Funding has been agreed with NES to take forward recommendation 3 and parts of recommendation 7.
From: Infected Blood Inquiry Report Oversight and Assurance Group minutes: March 2026, The action log (action owner Emma Watson
Earlier statements on delivery (0)
●Scottish Government · 11 Nov 2025
Emma reported that the NHS England-led group addressing recommendations 3(a) and (b) and 7(d), has been disbanded due to funding constraints.
From: Infected Blood Oversight and Assurance Group Minutes: November 2025, Professor Emma Watson
How this page is built
The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.