Public Inquiry

Independent Inquiry into the Issues raised by Paterson

Status: Completed Chair: Bishop Graham James Established: Feb 2018 Report: Feb 2020 Commissioned by: Department of Health and Social Care

Inquiry into rogue surgeon Ian Paterson who performed unnecessary breast operations on hundreds of patients in NHS and private hospitals. Examined failures in healthcare regulation and patient safety.

Response breakdown

17 recommendations total
53%
35%
9 (53%)Accepted
6 (35%)Accepted in Part
1 (6%)Not Accepted
1 (6%)Under Review

Evidence & impact

AI-generated · 26 Mar 2026
The Independent Inquiry into the Issues raised by Paterson examined the case of Ian Paterson, a breast surgeon who carried out unnecessary operations on hundreds of patients in NHS and private hospitals. The inquiry, chaired by Bishop Graham James, published 17 recommendations in February 2020 focusing on patient safety, consent processes, regulatory oversight, and redress mechanisms.

The government's December 2021 response accepted nine recommendations, accepted six in principle, rejected one, and kept one under consideration. The single rejected recommendation (12a) concerned automatic suspension of consultants under investigation, with the government stating this should remain a case-by-case decision based on risk assessment to avoid deterring reporting.

Published evidence indicates some concrete changes have emerged. NHS England published the National Quality Board Recall Framework in June 2022, developed with input from Paterson patients. Medical defence organisations launched a voluntary Code of Practice for discretionary indemnity in January 2025, though this falls short of the mandatory safety net recommended by the inquiry. The CQC has strengthened registration conditions and updated inspection methodologies, while professional bodies have revised guidance on patient communication and consent.

However, six years after publication, the implementation status shows 15 of 17 recommendations as 'awaiting action', with only one 'in progress'. Multiple recommendations accepted or accepted in principle show limited published evidence of completion. Work on improving data flows between regulators remains 'ongoing', embedding cooling-off periods is still being worked on with Royal Colleges, and decisions on legislative changes for consultant liability under practising privileges remain under consideration.

The government's approach appears characterised by accepting principles while deferring concrete implementation mechanisms. Several responses indicate ongoing consultations, monitoring of voluntary improvements, or work to address legal and data protection considerations, but published evidence of completed actions remains limited for most recommendations.

Reports & milestones

Reports

Timeline

No milestones recorded.

Recommendations

17 shown
Code Recommendation Addressed to Response
1
We recommend that there should be a single repository of the whole practice of consultants across England, setting out their practising privileges …
Department of Health and Social Care Accepted in Part View →
2
We recommend that it should be standard practice that consultants in both the NHS and the independent sector should write to patients, …
Department of Health and Social Care Accepted View →
3
We recommend that the differences between how the care of patients in the independent sector is organised and the care of patients …
Department of Health and Social Care Accepted View →
4
We recommend that there should be a short period introduced into the process of patients giving consent for surgical procedures, to allow …
GMC Accepted in Part View →
5
We recommend that CQC, as a matter of urgency, should assure itself that all hospital providers are complying effectively with up-to-date national …
CQC Accepted View →
6a
We recommend that information about the means to escalate a complaint to an independent body is communicated more effectively in both the …
Department of Health and Social Care Accepted View →
6b
We recommend that all private patients should have the right to mandatory independent resolution of their complaint.
Department of Health and Social Care Accepted in Part View →
7
We recommend that the University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust board should check that all patients of Paterson have been recalled, and …
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS F… Accepted View →
8
We recommend that Spire should check that all patients of Ian Paterson have been recalled, and to communicate with any who have …
Spire Healthcare Accepted View →
9
We recommend that a national framework or protocol, with guidance, is developed about how recall of patients should be managed and communicated, …
NHS England Accepted View →
10
We recommend that the Government should, as a matter of urgency, reform the current regulation of indemnity products for healthcare professionals in …
Department of Health and Social Care Accepted in Part View →
11
We recommend that the government should ensure that the current system of regulation and the collaboration of the regulators serves patient safety …
Department of Health and Social Care Accepted View →
12a
We recommend that if, when a hospital investigates a healthcare professional's behaviour, including the use of an HR process, any perceived risk …
Department of Health and Social Care Not Accepted View →
12b
We recommend that if the healthcare professional also works at another provider, any concerns about them should be communicated to that provider.
Department of Health and Social Care Accepted in Part View →
13
We recommend that the government addresses, as a matter of urgency, this gap in responsibility and liability.
Department of Health and Social Care Accepted in Part View →
14
We recommend that when things go wrong, boards should apologise at the earliest stage of investigation and not hold back from doing …
Department of Health and Social Care Accepted View →
15
We recommend that if the government accepts any of the recommendations set out above, it should make arrangements to ensure that these …
Department of Health and Social Care Under Consideration View →

Parliamentary activity

22 mentions since Feb 2020
2 debates 10 questions 10 statements
15 Jun 2026 Written Question Health Services: Standards
Baroness Maclean of Redditch (Conservative)
20 Apr 2026 Written Question Surgery
Baroness Maclean of Redditch (Conservative)
20 Apr 2026 Written Question Health Services: Private Sector
Baroness Maclean of Redditch (Conservative)
20 Apr 2026 Written Question Hospitals: Consultants
Baroness Maclean of Redditch (Conservative)
20 Apr 2026 Written Question Hospitals: Consultants
Baroness Maclean of Redditch (Conservative)
View all 22 mentions →