Public Inquiry
Independent Inquiry into the Issues raised by Paterson
Status: Completed
Chair: Bishop Graham James
Established: Feb 2018
Report: Feb 2020
Commissioned by: Department of Health and Social Care
Inquiry into rogue surgeon Ian Paterson who performed unnecessary breast operations on hundreds of patients in NHS and private hospitals. Examined failures in healthcare regulation and patient safety.
Response breakdown
Evidence & impact
The Independent Inquiry into the Issues raised by Paterson examined the case of Ian Paterson, a breast surgeon who carried out unnecessary operations on hundreds of patients in NHS and private hospitals. The inquiry, chaired by Bishop Graham James, published 17 recommendations in February 2020 focusing on patient safety, consent processes, regulatory oversight, and redress mechanisms.
The government's December 2021 response accepted nine recommendations, accepted six in principle, rejected one, and kept one under consideration. The single rejected recommendation (12a) concerned automatic suspension of consultants under investigation, with the government stating this should remain a case-by-case decision based on risk assessment to avoid deterring reporting.
Published evidence indicates some concrete changes have emerged. NHS England published the National Quality Board Recall Framework in June 2022, developed with input from Paterson patients. Medical defence organisations launched a voluntary Code of Practice for discretionary indemnity in January 2025, though this falls short of the mandatory safety net recommended by the inquiry. The CQC has strengthened registration conditions and updated inspection methodologies, while professional bodies have revised guidance on patient communication and consent.
However, six years after publication, the implementation status shows 15 of 17 recommendations as 'awaiting action', with only one 'in progress'. Multiple recommendations accepted or accepted in principle show limited published evidence of completion. Work on improving data flows between regulators remains 'ongoing', embedding cooling-off periods is still being worked on with Royal Colleges, and decisions on legislative changes for consultant liability under practising privileges remain under consideration.
The government's approach appears characterised by accepting principles while deferring concrete implementation mechanisms. Several responses indicate ongoing consultations, monitoring of voluntary improvements, or work to address legal and data protection considerations, but published evidence of completed actions remains limited for most recommendations.
The government's December 2021 response accepted nine recommendations, accepted six in principle, rejected one, and kept one under consideration. The single rejected recommendation (12a) concerned automatic suspension of consultants under investigation, with the government stating this should remain a case-by-case decision based on risk assessment to avoid deterring reporting.
Published evidence indicates some concrete changes have emerged. NHS England published the National Quality Board Recall Framework in June 2022, developed with input from Paterson patients. Medical defence organisations launched a voluntary Code of Practice for discretionary indemnity in January 2025, though this falls short of the mandatory safety net recommended by the inquiry. The CQC has strengthened registration conditions and updated inspection methodologies, while professional bodies have revised guidance on patient communication and consent.
However, six years after publication, the implementation status shows 15 of 17 recommendations as 'awaiting action', with only one 'in progress'. Multiple recommendations accepted or accepted in principle show limited published evidence of completion. Work on improving data flows between regulators remains 'ongoing', embedding cooling-off periods is still being worked on with Royal Colleges, and decisions on legislative changes for consultant liability under practising privileges remain under consideration.
The government's approach appears characterised by accepting principles while deferring concrete implementation mechanisms. Several responses indicate ongoing consultations, monitoring of voluntary improvements, or work to address legal and data protection considerations, but published evidence of completed actions remains limited for most recommendations.
Reports & milestones
Reports
04 Feb 2020
17 tracked recs
Report of the Independent Inquiry into the Issues raised by Paterson
· Tracked recommendations
· PDF
Timeline
No milestones recorded.
Recommendations
| Code | Recommendation | Addressed to | Response | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
We recommend that there should be a single repository of the whole practice of consultants across England, setting out their practising privileges …
|
Department of Health and Social Care | Accepted in Part | View → |
| 2 |
We recommend that it should be standard practice that consultants in both the NHS and the independent sector should write to patients, …
|
Department of Health and Social Care | Accepted | View → |
| 3 |
We recommend that the differences between how the care of patients in the independent sector is organised and the care of patients …
|
Department of Health and Social Care | Accepted | View → |
| 4 |
We recommend that there should be a short period introduced into the process of patients giving consent for surgical procedures, to allow …
|
GMC | Accepted in Part | View → |
| 5 |
We recommend that CQC, as a matter of urgency, should assure itself that all hospital providers are complying effectively with up-to-date national …
|
CQC | Accepted | View → |
| 6a |
We recommend that information about the means to escalate a complaint to an independent body is communicated more effectively in both the …
|
Department of Health and Social Care | Accepted | View → |
| 6b |
We recommend that all private patients should have the right to mandatory independent resolution of their complaint.
|
Department of Health and Social Care | Accepted in Part | View → |
| 7 |
We recommend that the University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust board should check that all patients of Paterson have been recalled, and …
|
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS F… | Accepted | View → |
| 8 |
We recommend that Spire should check that all patients of Ian Paterson have been recalled, and to communicate with any who have …
|
Spire Healthcare | Accepted | View → |
| 9 |
We recommend that a national framework or protocol, with guidance, is developed about how recall of patients should be managed and communicated, …
|
NHS England | Accepted | View → |
| 10 |
We recommend that the Government should, as a matter of urgency, reform the current regulation of indemnity products for healthcare professionals in …
|
Department of Health and Social Care | Accepted in Part | View → |
| 11 |
We recommend that the government should ensure that the current system of regulation and the collaboration of the regulators serves patient safety …
|
Department of Health and Social Care | Accepted | View → |
| 12a |
We recommend that if, when a hospital investigates a healthcare professional's behaviour, including the use of an HR process, any perceived risk …
|
Department of Health and Social Care | Not Accepted | View → |
| 12b |
We recommend that if the healthcare professional also works at another provider, any concerns about them should be communicated to that provider.
|
Department of Health and Social Care | Accepted in Part | View → |
| 13 |
We recommend that the government addresses, as a matter of urgency, this gap in responsibility and liability.
|
Department of Health and Social Care | Accepted in Part | View → |
| 14 |
We recommend that when things go wrong, boards should apologise at the earliest stage of investigation and not hold back from doing …
|
Department of Health and Social Care | Accepted | View → |
| 15 |
We recommend that if the government accepts any of the recommendations set out above, it should make arrangements to ensure that these …
|
Department of Health and Social Care | Under Consideration | View → |
Parliamentary activity
2 debates
10 questions
10 statements
20 Apr 2026
Written Question
Health Services: Private Sector
Baroness Maclean of Redditch (Conservative)
Baroness Maclean of Redditch (Conservative)