IBI-7f(i) Accepted

Transfusion Outcome Framework

Infected Blood Inquiry · Infected Blood Inquiry Final Report · Issued 20 May 2024 · Addressed to: UK Government

Source — verbatim from the inquiry

Inquiry recommendation

Establishing the outcome of every transfusion:

That a framework be established for recording outcomes for recipients of blood components. That those records be used by NHS bodies to improve transfusion practice (including by providing such information to haemovigilance bodies). Success in achieving this will be measured by the extent to which the SHOT reports for the previous three years show a progressive reduction in incidents of incorrect blood component transfusions measured as a proportion of the number of transfusions given.

Infected Blood Inquiry, Infected Blood Inquiry Final Report · 20 May 2024 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

Publicly available evidence relating to this recommendation:

- The Government's implementation dashboard records this recommendation as: Accepted in principle by the UK Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive. Accepted in full by the Scottish Government (Infected Blood Inquiry Recommendations Dashboard, Cabinet Office, May 2025).
- The Government stated in December 2024 that implementing a framework for recording outcomes for recipients of blood components was particularly challenging, requiring substantial investment and working across four nations with multiple system partners (Government Response to the Infected Blood Inquiry, Cabinet Office, December 2024).
- No published framework for recording transfusion recipient outcomes has been identified to March 2026.

Response — verbatim from government

UK Government

UK Government

Implementing these sub recommendations is particularly challenging and requires substantial investment, as it involves working across the four nations and with multiple system partners.

To support an effective long term implementation plan that minimises complexity, a design team is currently undertaking mapping of clinical pathways, the requirements of digitisation along the pathway, interoperability and the employment of standards. Careful consideration needs to be given to the digital maturity of local organisations. Interdependencies will need to be mapped against other large digital initiatives and systems to be implemented.

Scottish Government

The existing ‘Account for Blood’ system already helps Scottish Health Boards to monitor outcomes for transfusion patients. SNBTS is working with its digital colleagues in NHS National Services Scotland (NSS), with help from the Haematology and Transfusion clinical network, to amend this system to ensure it can deliver the key elements envisaged by recommendation 7f) i. Separately the Scottish Government is working with SNBTS and NSS, with help from the Haematology and Transfusion clinical network, to help identify the gaps in current digital systems provision in the transfusion process within the Health Boards. This will then be developed into an outline business case to consider the most appropriate options for digitisation, which will be discussed in detail with all the Health Boards.

Welsh Government

A Digital working group consisting of Welsh Government officials, Welsh Blood Service, BHNOG and Digital Health & Care Wales (DHCW) has been established and has developed a roadmap outlining the interdependencies of current national IT programmes to meet this recommendation in full including timelines and costing required. Data accessibility to allow monitoring and benchmarking via the National Data Resource (NDR) is also underway, this work is supported through a proof of concept for clinical benchmarking within a data dashboard for Preoperative anaemia management for major surgery that will include red cell transfusions.

Northern Ireland Executive

As part of an extensive programme of transformation and modernisation of the Health and Social Care System (HSC) in Northern Ireland, the Pathology Blueprint Programme, a new regional pathology management structure, will provide a digital roadmap and the introduction of digital interoperability across the whole local system and digitalisation of pathology services through three electronic systems for blood transfusions: on the clinical side, a regional Electronic Patient Record (EPR) will create a single digital care record for every citizen in Northern Ireland who receives health and social care; for laboratories and blood banks, the WinPath Core Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) will significantly improve the delivery of key clinical diagnostic services; and the new Blood Production and Tracking (BPaT) solution will integrate blood production and tracking information to provide a fully functioning regional electronic vein-to-vein donor management, blood production and tracking system.

Once fully developed and integrated, these solutions will lead to an improved ability to ascertain patient outcomes for those receiving a transfusion, and will be paramount in providing one safe effective interface for clinical staff to ensure the right blood goes to the right patient. Moreover, service users will have access to all the relevant pathology data, including blood transfusion outcomes.

The Department of Health is currently engaging with Data Management colleagues within the Department and HSC Trusts to assess the extent to which this recommendation is already being carried out amid these ongoing developments.

UK Government · 14 May 2025 Written response →

Evidence trail — what's actually happened since

  • 15 Jan 2026 · IBCA Community Update As of 13 January 2026: 3,721 people asked to start claims, 3,546 begun process, 3,074 received offers totalling £2.47bn, 2,861 paid totalling £1.89bn. Third compensation regulations in force 31 December 2025. View source → Good Progress

Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.

How this page is built

Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.

This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.