IBI-9d Accepted

Haemophilia Centre Resources

Infected Blood Inquiry · Infected Blood Inquiry Final Report · Issued 20 May 2024 · Addressed to: UK Government

Source — verbatim from the inquiry

Inquiry recommendation

The necessary administrative and clinical resources should be provided by hospital trusts and boards, integrated care boards, and service commissioners to facilitate multi-disciplinary regional networks to discuss policy and practice in haemophilia and other inherited bleeding disorders care, provided they involve patients in their discussions.

Infected Blood Inquiry, Infected Blood Inquiry Final Report · 20 May 2024 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

Publicly available evidence relating to this recommendation:

- The Government's implementation dashboard records this recommendation as: Accepted in principle by the UK Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive. Accepted in full by the Scottish Government (Infected Blood Inquiry Recommendations Dashboard, Cabinet Office, May 2025).
- The Government stated in December 2024 that it recognised the need to develop and strengthen multi-disciplinary regional networks to discuss policy and practice in haemophilia and other inherited bleeding disorders (Government Response to the Infected Blood Inquiry, Cabinet Office, December 2024).
- No published evidence that administrative and clinical resources have been provided to establish regional networks has been identified to March 2026.

Response — verbatim from government

UK Government

UK Government

Recommendation 9d: The need to develop and strengthen multi-disciplinary regional networks to discuss policy and practice in haemophilia and other inherited bleeding disorders to improve patient care and support standardisation is supported by the clinical community. NHS England has drafted a proposed National Clinical Network Specification specifically for these networks, which would embed key new requirements for providers to participate in a networked model of care. This would require additional funding to implement, as is the case with other clinical network models, in recognition of the staff time required, and funding has not yet been identified.

Scottish Government

These recommendations have largely been implemented in Scotland.The Scottish Inherited Bleeding Disorders Network is an established managed clinical network which includes staff and patients and helps ensure learning and promotion of good practice across Scottish haemophilia centres in line with recommendation 9d).

Welsh Government

The Welsh Government is currently working with the Haemophilia Centres on their peer review findings to take forward any recommendations and implement changes as necessary.

Northern Ireland Executive

In Northern Ireland, Recommendations 9a) to 9d) are carried out as standard practice. The Belfast Health and Social Care Trust is is commissioned by the Department (through the Strategic Planning and Performance Group) to carry out this work and houses the Haemophilia Comprehensive Care Centre (CCC), which is the only centre in Northern Ireland; there are not any Haemophilia Treatment Centres (HTCs).

There is no Regional Network in Northern Ireland, and this is taken into consideration by Peer Review Teams while Peer Review Audits are carried out within both the Haemophilia Adult and Paediatric Services within the Trust.

UK Government · 14 May 2025 Written response →

Evidence trail — what's actually happened since

  • 15 Jan 2026 · IBCA Community Update As of 13 January 2026: 3,721 people asked to start claims, 3,546 begun process, 3,074 received offers totalling £2.47bn, 2,861 paid totalling £1.89bn. Third compensation regulations in force 31 December 2025. View source → Good Progress

Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.

How this page is built

Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.

This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.