IBI-12d

PACAC Oversight of Implementation

Infected Blood Inquiry · Infected Blood Inquiry Final Report · Issued 20 May 2024 · Addressed to: UK Government

Government responseUK Government: Accepted in part (May 2025)

DeliveryCabinet Office says in progress (Jul 2025)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

The Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee (“PACAC”) should review both the progress towards responding to the Inquiry’s recommendations and, to the extent that they are accepted, implementing those recommendations.

Infected Blood Inquiry, Infected Blood Inquiry Final Report · 20 May 2024 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

AI-generated evidence summary

The Inquiry asked that a parliamentary committee review progress on responding to and implementing recommendations. Nick Thomas-Symonds, Paymaster General and Minister for the Cabinet Office, stated to the House of Commons in July 2025 that he had asked the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee (PACAC) to scrutinise implementation of recommendations, describing action on implementation but not on progress towards responding to recommendations (Nick Thomas-Symonds, Jul 2025). Sir Brian Langstaff, Chair of the Infected Blood Inquiry, stated in oral evidence to the committee in June 2026 that following up recommendations was a role for a body such as the committee rather than an inquiry itself (Sir Brian Langstaff, Jun 2026). The Minister stated that it is for the committee to outline how it will approach that work (Nick Thomas-Symonds, Jul 2025).

Sources

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 5 Oct 2026.

Government response

●UK Government · Accepted in part · 14 May 2025

Words of: UK Government, Full Government Response to the Infected Blood Inquiry's May 2024 Report (CP 1318), presented to Parliament by the Minister for the Cabinet Office, 14 May 2025

The Government accepts the principles behind recommendations 12d) and 12e), and notes that they are for Parliament to consider. Alongside the UK Government's response to the House of Lords Statutory Inquiries Committee report, the UK Government is actively considering where there is scope for wider reforms to the frameworks within which inquiries are set up, run and concluded. As part of this, the UK Government will also examine how best to ensure more effective transparency and accountability around the response to inquiry recommendations and the implementation of those which are accepted. The Government will update Parliament as this work progresses.

Next Steps

As progress continues to be made against the Inquiry’s recommendations, the relevant government leads will report on the recommendations for which they are responsible. We are committed to transparency and accountability, and will be publishing the Government’s progress via a publicly accessible dashboard in due course, which will be regularly updated as progress is made.

Extract from: Full Government Response to the Infected Blood Inquiry's May 2024 Report

Delivery

●Cabinet Office says in progress · 21 Jul 2025

I am pleased to confirm that I have asked the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee to take on the role of scrutinising implementation of the inquiry’s recommendations in the May 2024 and July 2025 reports. It is for the Committee to outline how it will approach that work, but I trust that it will see fit to follow the example of the inquiry through scrutiny of the design and delivery of compensation.

From: Infected Blood Inquiry: Additional Report

What other bodies have found

In their own words. These do not change the delivery statement above.

●Infected Blood Inquiry · 30 Jun 2026

I do not think it is for an inquiry to follow up recommendations itself and see whether they have been implemented. That is a role for a body such as this, which is why I recommended that PACAC should take on that role.

From: Oral evidence: Inquiry into the recommendations of the Infected Blood Inquiry (Stage 1)

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.