Recommendations & Conclusions
35 items
1
Conclusion
Sixth Report - Parliamentary and Health…
Accepted
The Committee considers the objectives of the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) Strategy for 2022–25 to be appropriate to achieve the aims of “becoming an even more modern and vibrant Ombudsman service”. This includes promoting greater awareness of the PHSO’s services, providing a high quality, empathetic and timely service, …
Read more
The Committee considers the objectives of the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) Strategy for 2022–25 to be appropriate to achieve the aims of “becoming an even more modern and vibrant Ombudsman service”. This includes promoting greater awareness of the PHSO’s services, providing a high quality, empathetic and timely service, and continuously improving the organisation. We welcome the reference to international benchmarks in the Strategy for the first time, the emphasis on data, and the organisation’s plans to gather direct feedback from service users and members the public. However, while it is included in the 2022–23 Business Plan, the absence of any reference to how the organisation will cope with the ongoing impacts of Covid-19 and high levels of cases brought to the PHSO is regrettable. The ambition to promote awareness and accessibility of the PHSO’s role and service is positive and welcome, but the Strategy does not set out how the organisation would cope with potentially increased service demand.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The PHSO is absorbing an increase in demand for its service, and its plans for implementing the 2022-25 Corporate Strategy will drive efficiencies, enhance service, and ensure a user-focused approach by increasing efficiency, introducing new mechanisms, and identifying systemic cases.
Read full response →
2
Conclusion
Sixth Report - Parliamentary and Health…
Acknowledged
We agree with the Peer Review Panel that the PHSO should provide clear reporting in an accessible format on delivering the Corporate Strategy for 2022–25 and that the PHSO should put in place detailed plans for dealing with the potential service demand implications of its increased public awareness and accessibility. …
Read more
We agree with the Peer Review Panel that the PHSO should provide clear reporting in an accessible format on delivering the Corporate Strategy for 2022–25 and that the PHSO should put in place detailed plans for dealing with the potential service demand implications of its increased public awareness and accessibility. In its response to this Report, the PHSO should provide further information on how an empathetic and timely service will be delivered if service demand increases due to such measures. The PHSO should also provide an update on its progress in establishing a panel of users and members of the public to provide feedback on the PHSO’s services, including how regularly the panel will be consulted and its expected outputs. (Paragraph 16) PHSO casework and productivity
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government says PHSO is absorbing an increase in demand and outlines planned actions including increasing efficiency, introducing mechanisms to respond to increases in demand, and identifying systemic cases, as well as establishing a new Public Engagement Advisory Group.
Read full response →
3
Conclusion
Sixth Report - Parliamentary and Health…
Accepted
The Committee recognises that the PHSO has made significant efforts to cope with the huge pressures placed on its services as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic. We note that the backlog of cases has been reduced significantly and welcome the ambition to completely clear the queue of unallocated cases …
Read more
The Committee recognises that the PHSO has made significant efforts to cope with the huge pressures placed on its services as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic. We note that the backlog of cases has been reduced significantly and welcome the ambition to completely clear the queue of unallocated cases by the end of the 2022–23 business year. Equally, we are encouraged by the ambitions of the casework improvement programme and implementing the end-to-end review of casework processes to drive efficiencies and improve service quality. However, whilst we cannot generalise from individuals’ experiences with the PHSO’s service, there were a number of pieces of written evidence received by the Committee during this inquiry highlighting that perceived poor handling of cases remains a significant concern from service users. This includes details of lengthy investigations, poor communication by complaint handlers, sudden change of caseworker mid-investigation, loss of records, and issues with the complexity of the complaints process. The changes resulting from the end-to-end review of casework process, including changes to complaint forms, while positive, are relatively minor compared to the scale of these perceived issues. (Paragraph 33) Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman Scrutiny 2021–22 35
Show less
Government response AI summary
The PHSO has already made improvements to aspects of the casework process, including the casework management IT system, forms, letters and templates, learning resources for caseworkers, and revised training and guidance. They are evaluating a test of call recording and transcription of casework discussions, and …
Read full response →
4
Recommendation
Sixth Report - Parliamentary and Health…
Acknowledged
In its response to this Report, the PHSO should provide a detailed account of the changes being taken forward as a result of the end-to-end review of casework and the casework improvement programme, with examples of how this will improve a complainant’s ‘user journey’ and how it will review what …
Read more
In its response to this Report, the PHSO should provide a detailed account of the changes being taken forward as a result of the end-to-end review of casework and the casework improvement programme, with examples of how this will improve a complainant’s ‘user journey’ and how it will review what further improvements may be required.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government states that they have already made improvements to several aspects of the casework process, including casework management (IT) system; forms, letters and templates; learning resources for caseworkers; and revised training and guidance for caseworkers, and are evaluating call recording and transcription of casework …
Read full response →
5
Conclusion
Sixth Report - Parliamentary and Health…
Acknowledged
The Committee accepts that some mechanism for prioritising the number of health complaints is needed and notes that there is international precedent for doing so. Nevertheless, we remain concerned with the continued approach of not processing complaints at Levels 1 and 2 on the severity of injustice scale, and the …
Read more
The Committee accepts that some mechanism for prioritising the number of health complaints is needed and notes that there is international precedent for doing so. Nevertheless, we remain concerned with the continued approach of not processing complaints at Levels 1 and 2 on the severity of injustice scale, and the lack of ambition to return to the previous patterns of complaint-handling. We note that in the past 18 months around 1,500 cases have not been taken forward as a result of this approach and that the PHSO has decided to continue with this prioritisation method until the end of the business year 2022–23
Show less
Government response AI summary
The PHSO considers all complaints, and uses a proportional approach, and will review the methods applied to the casework process to ensure it is dynamic and able to adapt to the levels of demand for its service.
Read full response →
6
Recommendation
Sixth Report - Parliamentary and Health…
Accepted
We are concerned by the number of Level 1 and 2 cases that are not being considered by the PHSO due to the approach of prioritising health complaints using the severity of injustice scale. We recommend that the PHSO sets out in its response to this Report the evidence base …
Read more
We are concerned by the number of Level 1 and 2 cases that are not being considered by the PHSO due to the approach of prioritising health complaints using the severity of injustice scale. We recommend that the PHSO sets out in its response to this Report the evidence base for continuing with this approach for another business year and provides detail on how this decision compares to other ombudsman institutions, both domestically and internationally. Furthermore, we request that an explanation of the criteria being used to make a final decision on the future approach at the end of the business year is provided to the Committee.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The PHSO states they consider all complaints, but for less serious NHS complaints, they will consider whether they can resolve the complaint promptly and if not, they will not take those complaints further. They also state that a proportional approach to deciding which cases to …
Read full response →
7
Recommendation
Sixth Report - Parliamentary and Health…
Acknowledged
The Committee welcomes the improvements the PHSO has made to its website to give clarity on how complaints will be considered using the severity of injustice scale. However, as indicated in the PHSO’s response to the Committee’s PHSO Scrutiny 2020–21 Report in May 2022, the PHSO should report back to …
Read more
The Committee welcomes the improvements the PHSO has made to its website to give clarity on how complaints will be considered using the severity of injustice scale. However, as indicated in the PHSO’s response to the Committee’s PHSO Scrutiny 2020–21 Report in May 2022, the PHSO should report back to the Committee in its response to this Report on whether more detailed information could be provided on its website to give members of the public and Members of Parliament an indication of how long it may take for a case to be considered.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the improvements to the website and will review the content to see if further improvements can be made to explain their process and the complainant journey, whilst ensuring that the website remains succinct, accessible and easy to navigate, also exploring technological solutions.
Read full response →
8
Conclusion
Sixth Report - Parliamentary and Health…
Acknowledged
The increased use and focus on developing the PHSO’s mediation capacity as a means to speed up casework is extremely welcome. However, considering the Ombudsman said that there is the potential to resolve 25% of cases by mediation rather than investigation, the scale of its use in the 2021–22 period …
Read more
The increased use and focus on developing the PHSO’s mediation capacity as a means to speed up casework is extremely welcome. However, considering the Ombudsman said that there is the potential to resolve 25% of cases by mediation rather than investigation, the scale of its use in the 2021–22 period to resolve less than 0.1% of cases is very disappointing.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The PHSO aims to double the number of mediations again in 2023-24, has trained more caseworkers, and will start publishing outcomes of complaints resolved through mediation; however, they state that complainant availability and the need for systemic investigations are limiting factors.
Read full response →
9
Recommendation
Sixth Report - Parliamentary and Health…
Accepted in Part
The Committee appreciates that there are issues to address with the use of mediation, such as the fact that the PHSO cannot publish the details of parties’ engagement through private mediation. However, finding solutions to these issues should be a priority for the PHSO in order to improve its overall …
Read more
The Committee appreciates that there are issues to address with the use of mediation, such as the fact that the PHSO cannot publish the details of parties’ engagement through private mediation. However, finding solutions to these issues should be a priority for the PHSO in order to improve its overall efficiency and quality of service. The Committee should develop a plan for how mediation capability will be built up within the organisation, with a target date for when the PHSO expects to be able to resolve 25% of cases by mediation.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The PHSO aims to double the number of mediations again in 2023-24, has trained more caseworkers, and will start publishing outcomes of complaints resolved through mediation, but does not commit to the specific 25% target due to complainant availability and the need for systemic investigations.
Read full response →
10
Conclusion
Sixth Report - Parliamentary and Health…
Acknowledged
The Committee is concerned by the fact that the PHSO has not met any of its targets for the overall section Service Charter scores in the 2021–22 financial year. The Committee had previously understood that the scores were expected to improve as waiting times for cases to be allocated and …
Read more
The Committee is concerned by the fact that the PHSO has not met any of its targets for the overall section Service Charter scores in the 2021–22 financial year. The Committee had previously understood that the scores were expected to improve as waiting times for cases to be allocated and closed were reduced. However, during 36 Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman Scrutiny 2021–22 the oral evidence session in November 2022, it was reiterated that the main driver of higher customer satisfaction is whether a case has been upheld regardless of the quality of customer service. If the latter is true, it is clear that the current mechanism for collecting customer feedback through the Service Charter is unsatisfactory.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government states that staff turnover has stabilised and that they continue to prioritise developing PHSO's people to ensure they remain an attractive employer.
Read full response →
11
Recommendation
Sixth Report - Parliamentary and Health…
Accepted
The PHSO should update the Committee on the outcomes of the review of how the PHSO obtains feedback from service users, including the Service Charter, and what changes will be put in place as a result. The Committee understands that the PHSO is awaiting data from an independent research agency …
Read more
The PHSO should update the Committee on the outcomes of the review of how the PHSO obtains feedback from service users, including the Service Charter, and what changes will be put in place as a result. The Committee understands that the PHSO is awaiting data from an independent research agency to determine whether survey data can be split by those cases upheld and not upheld; we would urge this work to be prioritised, and expect an update on both these areas of work in its response to this Report. (Paragraph 41) Staff management and training
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government has redesigned the complainant satisfaction survey based on recommendations from an independent research agency, tested it with users, and will roll it out in May 2023. They will publish the data coming from the new survey later in the year, disaggregated by case …
Read full response →
12
Conclusion
Sixth Report - Parliamentary and Health…
Acknowledged
The Committee commends the pace in which the PHSO has increased its number of caseworkers across 2021–22 and developed a 10-month training academy to support their induction and development in these roles. The Committee welcomes the continued investment in training and development opportunities across the organisation, including the accreditation scheme …
Read more
The Committee commends the pace in which the PHSO has increased its number of caseworkers across 2021–22 and developed a 10-month training academy to support their induction and development in these roles. The Committee welcomes the continued investment in training and development opportunities across the organisation, including the accreditation scheme for senior caseworkers, the establishment of four Parliamentary focus teams, and the ongoing Quality Programme to continuously improve casework management. However, we also note the slight increase in staff turnover in 2021–22 and believe this should be monitored closely. Furthermore, we agree with the Peer Review Panel’s conclusion that further changes should be put in place to improve casework management, including how staff communicate with complainants.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government states that the increase in staff turnover in 2021-22 was in-line with national trends following the pandemic and that turnover has now stabilized. They continue to prioritize developing PHSO's people and are committed to continuous improvement and learning.
Read full response →
13
Recommendation
Sixth Report - Parliamentary and Health…
Acknowledged
In light of the increase in staff turnover in 2021–22, we reiterate our call from the Committee’s PHSO Annual Scrutiny Report 2020–21 for the PHSO to consider other development opportunities to encourage staff retention. Whilst the development of a 10-month training academy for new caseworkers is welcome, the PHSO must …
Read more
In light of the increase in staff turnover in 2021–22, we reiterate our call from the Committee’s PHSO Annual Scrutiny Report 2020–21 for the PHSO to consider other development opportunities to encourage staff retention. Whilst the development of a 10-month training academy for new caseworkers is welcome, the PHSO must ensure there is minimal loss to institutional knowledge and the quality and pace of casework management is not impacted by staff turnover. The Committee would welcome further information on how the newly-established four Parliamentary focus teams mentioned in the Annual Report and Accounts for 2021–22 will improve performance in handling Parliamentary cases. Furthermore, while the Ombudsman told the Committee in November 2022 that the Peer Review Panel’s recommendations in relation to casework management will be implemented incrementally, in its response to this Report, the PHSO should set out exactly what changes will be put in place and to what timetable.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the importance of staff retention and outlines steps taken such as training, staff surveys, and monitoring turnover, but makes no specific commitments to address the PHSO's loss of institutional knowledge or casework management pace.
Read full response →
14
Conclusion
Sixth Report - Parliamentary and Health…
Accepted
The Committee welcomed in its PHSO Scrutiny 2020–21 Report the positive steps that the PHSO has taken to improve the use of clinical advice in investigations. It is encouraging to see that this work has not lost momentum, with 23 of 25 of the recommendations from the “Donaldson Review” now …
Read more
The Committee welcomed in its PHSO Scrutiny 2020–21 Report the positive steps that the PHSO has taken to improve the use of clinical advice in investigations. It is encouraging to see that this work has not lost momentum, with 23 of 25 of the recommendations from the “Donaldson Review” now implemented, and the development of a Clinical Advice Quality Framework underway.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government states that they have completed implementation of all recommendations made by the Donaldson Review into PHSO’s approach to clinical advice and have a framework for assuring the quality of clinical advice.
Read full response →
15
Recommendation
Sixth Report - Parliamentary and Health…
Accepted
The PHSO should clarify how the Clinical Advice Quality Framework will improve trust and confidence in the quality and standards of the PHSO’s casework, what changes Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman Scrutiny 2021–22 37 have been made to date, and how success will be measured. Furthermore, whilst we acknowledge the …
Read more
The PHSO should clarify how the Clinical Advice Quality Framework will improve trust and confidence in the quality and standards of the PHSO’s casework, what changes Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman Scrutiny 2021–22 37 have been made to date, and how success will be measured. Furthermore, whilst we acknowledge the challenges associated with the outstanding recommendations from the Donaldson Review, the PHSO should reach a decision as soon as possible on whether to take forward naming clinical advisers in decision reports and sharing provisional reports with advisers, given the review was published four years ago.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The PHSO has completed implementation of all recommendations from the Donaldson Review. Provisional views are shared with clinical advisors. They will not take forward naming clinical advisers due to concerns about safety and security, and the risk of giving disproportionate weight to their evidence.
Read full response →
16
Conclusion
Sixth Report - Parliamentary and Health…
Acknowledged
The Committee welcomes the positive results of the staff survey, which saw increases in scores in headline areas, such as leadership and managing change, inclusion, and learning and development. The only headline score to deteriorate was related to pay and benefits, which the Committee recognises reflects similar trends across the …
Read more
The Committee welcomes the positive results of the staff survey, which saw increases in scores in headline areas, such as leadership and managing change, inclusion, and learning and development. The only headline score to deteriorate was related to pay and benefits, which the Committee recognises reflects similar trends across the public sector and wider economy, alongside difficulties in recruiting in areas such as digital and programming. The Committee also welcomes the continued positive statistics on the diversity of the PHSO’s workforce, particularly in terms of gender and Asian, Black, Mixed Ethnicity and Other Ethnicity Group representation, and the culture of diversity and inclusion the leadership team are seeking to embed in the organisation. However, we note the under representation of employees aged over 50 compared to the population benchmark.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The PHSO notes that the current labour market is challenging, but they have successfully recruited to roles which have historically been difficult to fill. They do not have plans to target applicants who are over the age of 50 as workforce data shows that they …
Read full response →
17
Recommendation
Sixth Report - Parliamentary and Health…
Acknowledged
The PHSO should report back to the Committee on how the organisation intends to continue to attract and retain staff, including those in technical digital roles and those who are over the age of 50, in light of wider trends across the public sector and economy relating to pay and …
Read more
The PHSO should report back to the Committee on how the organisation intends to continue to attract and retain staff, including those in technical digital roles and those who are over the age of 50, in light of wider trends across the public sector and economy relating to pay and benefits and labour market demographics.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the challenges of the current labour market but does not plan to target applicants over 50, citing good representation in the PHSO workforce, and states the review of pay and grading will help them remain competitive.
Read full response →
18
Recommendation
Sixth Report - Parliamentary and Health…
Acknowledged
The PHSO should report back to the Committee in its response to this Report on the viability of breaking down a wider variety of staff diversity data by grade in its Annual Report and Accounts, as it already does for the gender of senior managers. (Paragraph 58) Value for money
Read more
The PHSO should report back to the Committee in its response to this Report on the viability of breaking down a wider variety of staff diversity data by grade in its Annual Report and Accounts, as it already does for the gender of senior managers. (Paragraph 58) Value for money
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the importance of understanding the protected characteristics of their workforce and are planning a campaign to raise the benefits of staff declaring this information with the aim of having as complete data as possible and will report this, for the grades where …
Read full response →
19
Recommendation
Sixth Report - Parliamentary and Health…
Acknowledged
The Committee is pleased that the PHSO was able to secure an increased budget in the 2021 Spending Review to cope with the increased demand on its service as a result of the pandemic. This has had a positive impact on its casework improvement programme. However, we are concerned that …
Read more
The Committee is pleased that the PHSO was able to secure an increased budget in the 2021 Spending Review to cope with the increased demand on its service as a result of the pandemic. This has had a positive impact on its casework improvement programme. However, we are concerned that the wider economic pressures across the public sector are likely to impact the organisation and urge the PHSO to consider potential mitigations for any real-term reductions to its budget for 2023–
Show less
Government response AI summary
The PHSO is absorbing an increase in demand and managing inflationary pressures by implementing the 2022-25 Corporate Strategy to drive efficiencies in the casework process and enhance the service, as well as reviewing corporate functions to release resources.
Read full response →
20
Recommendation
Sixth Report - Parliamentary and Health…
Acknowledged
The PHSO should put in place robust plans to deliver further efficiencies across the organisation and report back to the Committee next year on any work taken forward in this regard.
Government response AI summary
The PHSO outlines plans to implement the 2022–25 Corporate Strategy, increase efficiency, introduce new mechanisms to respond to demand, identify and progress systemic cases, and ensure reports meet high accessibility standards but does not commit to specific or new efficiency targets or plans.
Read full response →
21
Conclusion
Sixth Report - Parliamentary and Health…
Accepted
In the Committee’s PHSO Annual Scrutiny Report 2020–21, we called for a Peer Review of the PHSO to be undertaken as soon as possible. We are pleased that this took place in 2022 and reported before our annual scrutiny session. The Committee welcomes that the PHSO was the first body …
Read more
In the Committee’s PHSO Annual Scrutiny Report 2020–21, we called for a Peer Review of the PHSO to be undertaken as soon as possible. We are pleased that this took place in 2022 and reported before our annual scrutiny session. The Committee welcomes that the PHSO was the first body to undergo a review by an accredited Panel, and in line with our previous recommendation, the Panel included a member with auditor experience. The Committee notes the positive results of the Peer Review, as well as areas identified for improvement. Although the Peer Review Panel 38 Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman Scrutiny 2021–22 did not provide any in-depth value-for-money analysis of the PHSO’s service, it has helpfully identified areas where the organisation is performing well and where it could improve in the future. We therefore support and encourage the continued use of periodic peer reviews to assess the effectiveness of the PHSO.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government is committed to embedding the peer review recommendations, taking action on coaching/training, communication, publishing cases, anonymisation, and reducing queues in 2023-24, and progressing outstanding actions through the 2022-23 Corporate Strategy by 2025, including digital updates and IT system integration with the NHS.
Read full response →
22
Conclusion
Sixth Report - Parliamentary and Health…
Accepted
The Committee was disappointed to learn that some of the data provided by the PHSO to inform the Committee’s PHSO Scrutiny 2020–21 Report had been revised unjustifiably ahead of this year’s inquiry, preventing easy comparability between reports. For the Committee to accurately fulfil its responsibilities to assess the performance of …
Read more
The Committee was disappointed to learn that some of the data provided by the PHSO to inform the Committee’s PHSO Scrutiny 2020–21 Report had been revised unjustifiably ahead of this year’s inquiry, preventing easy comparability between reports. For the Committee to accurately fulfil its responsibilities to assess the performance of the PHSO, it is vital that the PHSO collects and publishes accurate and consistent data going forward.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The PHSO states that it conducts a thorough review of all performance data annually and that data provided to the Committee is quality assured to the highest standard, explaining the circumstances around the data revision.
Read full response →
23
Recommendation
Sixth Report - Parliamentary and Health…
Accepted
It is unsatisfactory that data provided to this Committee has been subsequently revised. The PHSO should report back to the Committee on what steps it is taking to quality assure its data before it is published and used by the Committee.
Government response AI summary
The PHSO states that it conducts a thorough review of all performance data annually and that data provided to the Committee is quality assured to the highest standard, explaining the circumstances around the data revision.
Read full response →
24
Conclusion
Sixth Report - Parliamentary and Health…
Accepted
The Committee notes the benefits that hybrid working has brought to the PHSO, notably the ability to increase its workforce by 20% without expanding its office footprint. However, the impact of hybrid working on organisational productivity, culture, and employee wellbeing should be continually monitored, and the requirement to be in …
Read more
The Committee notes the benefits that hybrid working has brought to the PHSO, notably the ability to increase its workforce by 20% without expanding its office footprint. However, the impact of hybrid working on organisational productivity, culture, and employee wellbeing should be continually monitored, and the requirement to be in the office 40% of the time revised as necessary.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The PHSO has robust performance management systems and continually seeks feedback on the impact of business changes on workforce productivity and wellbeing, including on hybrid working, through staff engagement mechanisms and the annual Staff Survey.
Read full response →
25
Conclusion
Sixth Report - Parliamentary and Health…
Accepted
The PHSO should provide an update in its response to this Report regarding what tools and infrastructure have been upgraded to support hybrid working, as mentioned in the Business Plan for 2022–23. The Committee would also appreciate information on what the PHSO is doing to continually monitor the impact of …
Read more
The PHSO should provide an update in its response to this Report regarding what tools and infrastructure have been upgraded to support hybrid working, as mentioned in the Business Plan for 2022–23. The Committee would also appreciate information on what the PHSO is doing to continually monitor the impact of the requirement to work in the office 40% of the time on organisational productivity, culture, and employee wellbeing.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The PHSO states that following the decision to maintain hybrid working, they have made some updates to systems to maximize productivity, including integrated telephone and ICT systems, simplified login process and remote connectivity, enhanced office wireless networks and piloting the further capability offered by Microsoft …
Read full response →
26
Recommendation
Sixth Report - Parliamentary and Health…
Acknowledged
The Committee firmly agrees with need for legislative change of the PHSO. It has been seven years since the draft Public Service Ombudsman Bill was presented by the Government. Given that there is widespread consensus on the need to reduce the complexity of the ombudsman system in England and to …
Read more
The Committee firmly agrees with need for legislative change of the PHSO. It has been seven years since the draft Public Service Ombudsman Bill was presented by the Government. Given that there is widespread consensus on the need to reduce the complexity of the ombudsman system in England and to bring the legislation in line with international best practice, the Government’s reluctance to address this long-standing issue is unacceptable.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government welcomes the recommendation and states that it is actively raising the matter of Ombudsman reform with the Government, parliamentarians and wider stakeholders.
Read full response →
27
Conclusion
Sixth Report - Parliamentary and Health…
Rejected
The Government has delayed legislative reform for too long and the Committee is particularly disappointed by the Government’s refusal to set out a legislative timetable before the end of this year. Regardless of other pressures on the Government’s legislative programme, ombudsman reform needs to be prioritised. Work to introduce a …
Read more
The Government has delayed legislative reform for too long and the Committee is particularly disappointed by the Government’s refusal to set out a legislative timetable before the end of this year. Regardless of other pressures on the Government’s legislative programme, ombudsman reform needs to be prioritised. Work to introduce a Bill should not have to wait until the next Parliament. (Paragraph 82) Impact on other organisations
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government does not consider fundamental ombudsman reform a priority or that legislation is the answer, but is content to keep it under review and look at specific proposals on a case by case basis.
Read full response →
28
Conclusion
Sixth Report - Parliamentary and Health…
Accepted
The Committee welcomes the PHSO’s progress in developing the NHS and UK Central Government Complaint Standards, in close collaboration with partner organisations. We are encouraged by the number of organisations that have volunteered to adopt the Standards. We agree that the Complaint Standards initiative has the potential to significantly reduce …
Read more
The Committee welcomes the PHSO’s progress in developing the NHS and UK Central Government Complaint Standards, in close collaboration with partner organisations. We are encouraged by the number of organisations that have volunteered to adopt the Standards. We agree that the Complaint Standards initiative has the potential to significantly reduce pressures on the PHSO’s services Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman Scrutiny 2021–22 39 by addressing more complaints on the frontline. We look forward to hearing from the PHSO on good practice, as well as areas for improvement as the Standards are adopted into the working practices of organisations.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government welcomes the Committee's support and will report on progress embedding the Complaint Standards in its first twelve months of operation, publishing feedback, best practice, training, support, and guidance early in 2024-25.
Read full response →
29
Recommendation
Sixth Report - Parliamentary and Health…
Acknowledged
The Committee is encouraged by five organisations that have volunteered to adopt the UK Central Government Complaint Standards. We urge the PHSO to continue to engage with Government Departments and public sector organisations to increase this figure, and to report back to the Committee on how proportionate monitoring and reporting …
Read more
The Committee is encouraged by five organisations that have volunteered to adopt the UK Central Government Complaint Standards. We urge the PHSO to continue to engage with Government Departments and public sector organisations to increase this figure, and to report back to the Committee on how proportionate monitoring and reporting on the Standards could be delivered. As an early adopter of the Standards, the Cabinet Office should play a role in working with other Government departments and public bodies to sign up to the Standards by the end of 2023.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government is supportive of the complaint standards and, assuming they are shown to be working in practice, the Cabinet Office should play a role in working with other departments to encourage their adoption.
Read full response →
30
Conclusion
Sixth Report - Parliamentary and Health…
Accepted
The PHSO’s ability to lay reports before Parliament regarding thematic failings and instances of non-compliance with its recommendations should be a powerful mechanism to bring cases to the attention of parliamentarians, and for the subjects of those reports to be properly and fully held to account. However, it seems that …
Read more
The PHSO’s ability to lay reports before Parliament regarding thematic failings and instances of non-compliance with its recommendations should be a powerful mechanism to bring cases to the attention of parliamentarians, and for the subjects of those reports to be properly and fully held to account. However, it seems that this system is not working effectively if PHSO reports laid before Parliament are ignored by the addressees of such reports.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The PHSO maintains a program of regular engagement with Parliament and shares information about key themes in complaints with Select Committee clerks. In rare cases of non-compliance, the PHSO has statutory powers to bring a case to Parliament's attention.
Read full response →
31
Conclusion
Sixth Report - Parliamentary and Health…
Acknowledged
Whilst the Committee discharges its scrutiny role by examining the overall administration of the PHSO and its Annual Report and Accounts on a regular basis, it should be for departmental Select Committees to scrutinise the relevant thematic PHSO reports laid before Parliament that relate to their subject areas.
Read more
Whilst the Committee discharges its scrutiny role by examining the overall administration of the PHSO and its Annual Report and Accounts on a regular basis, it should be for departmental Select Committees to scrutinise the relevant thematic PHSO reports laid before Parliament that relate to their subject areas.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the Ombudsman's work and the challenges it faces, including dealing with backlogs and increasing service demand, while noting the committee's request for robust plans for further efficiencies.
Read full response →
32
Recommendation
Sixth Report - Parliamentary and Health…
Accepted
We recommend that the PHSO increases its engagement with departmental Select Committees to encourage them to scrutinise PHSO reports laid before Parliament, particularly when those reports relate to findings against individual departments and public bodies under their remit.
Read more
We recommend that the PHSO increases its engagement with departmental Select Committees to encourage them to scrutinise PHSO reports laid before Parliament, particularly when those reports relate to findings against individual departments and public bodies under their remit.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government states that PHSO maintains a programme of regular engagement with Parliament, including Select Committees, and shares information with Select Committee clerks about key themes or recurring issues identified in complaints.
Read full response →
33
Conclusion
Sixth Report - Parliamentary and Health…
Acknowledged
The Committee supports the PHSO’s work in promoting its services within vulnerable and marginalised communities. We welcome the PHSO’s ambition to identify barriers to access, offer guidance to organisations, and increase awareness of its services with MPs and stakeholders. We support the suggestion from the Peer Review Panel to publish …
Read more
The Committee supports the PHSO’s work in promoting its services within vulnerable and marginalised communities. We welcome the PHSO’s ambition to identify barriers to access, offer guidance to organisations, and increase awareness of its services with MPs and stakeholders. We support the suggestion from the Peer Review Panel to publish details of the PHSO’s outreach work.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government will update the Committee on the Outreach program as it progresses, focusing on building trust and engagement with communities that rarely complain.
Read full response →
34
Recommendation
Sixth Report - Parliamentary and Health…
Accepted
Ahead of the next annual scrutiny hearing, the PHSO should provide an update to the Committee on progress with its outreach activities and any evidence of its impact on the diversity of complainants and types of complaints it receives. We would welcome clarification on whether complainant diversity data in the …
Read more
Ahead of the next annual scrutiny hearing, the PHSO should provide an update to the Committee on progress with its outreach activities and any evidence of its impact on the diversity of complainants and types of complaints it receives. We would welcome clarification on whether complainant diversity data in the Annual Report and Accounts could be used to assess whether correlations exist between complainants’ backgrounds, the types of complaint they make, and their routes to complain.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The PHSO will update the Committee on the progress of its Outreach programme ahead of the next scrutiny inquiry, focusing on building trust and engagement with communities that rarely complain, and will explore options for gathering additional information about complainants to understand barriers to complaining.
Read full response →
35
Recommendation
Sixth Report - Parliamentary and Health…
Accepted
We also welcome the PHSO’s efforts to engage with MPs and their staff on the use of its services, but we believe that still more could be done in this space. The PHSO should increase its engagement with staff based in MPs’ constituency offices in particular to improve awareness of …
Read more
We also welcome the PHSO’s efforts to engage with MPs and their staff on the use of its services, but we believe that still more could be done in this space. The PHSO should increase its engagement with staff based in MPs’ constituency offices in particular to improve awareness of its services amongst those who deal directly with referrals, including providing relevant training on mediation services. (Paragraph 103) 40 Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman Scrutiny 2021–22 7 Priorities for Scrutiny As in our previous reports, this section sets out the Committee’s priorities for scrutiny of the PHSO for the year 2021–22. Table 2: Areas of scrutiny Area of scrutiny Example of expected Areas of particular interest evidence PHSO Corporate Strategy Written evidence from the Organisational priorities, for 2022–25 PHSO and service users. and how these compare to previous years. PHSO Corporate Strategy Delivery of the Strategy, PHSO Business Plan assessed alongside the annual Business Plan and Peer Review Report Covid-19 recovery. PHSO casework Casework and staff data Impact of Covid-19 on performance in the Annual Report and service delivery and Accounts casework management. Service Charter scores Quantity, quality, and timeliness of investigations. Written evidence from service users and Implementation of the organisations casework improvement programme Peer Review Report Mediation capabilities Changes in Service Charter scores Staff management and Staff survey scores Numbers of staff and training turnover Written evidence from the PHSO Training opportunities available to staff Annual Report and Accounts, employee data Staff views on learning and including diversity development Diversity of the workforce Use of clinical advice Value for money PHSO Annual Report and Findings of the Peer Review Accounts Changes in budget and Peer Review Report spending Written evidence from Impact of hybrid working PHSO and service users Modernisation and reform Parliamentary and Healt
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the PACAC's role in encouraging engagement and are piloting activities with MPs' offices, including bespoke training and constituency visits based on feedback from a recent event, and will report back to PACAC on the impact of this work during the next scrutiny …
Read full response →