Select committee: Education Committee
Fourth Report - Careers Education, Information, Advice and Guidance
HC 54
Published 29 June 2023
Education Committee Careers Education, Information, Advice and Guidance (CEIAG) Report on parliament.uk ↗
At a glance5 recommendations and 38 conclusions · Government response published 21 September 2023 (deadline 29 August 2023)
The government's response
Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.
The government says it welcomes the report and "accept[s] fully or in part the majority of the Committee's recommendations", and says that where it does not fully accept one, it has an alternative existing or planned approach.
- On a new strategy, it agrees there is "a strong case" and intends to publish a Strategic Action Plan for Careers in 2024, setting clear measurable outcomes and dates.
- It does not accept additional numerical Gatsby Benchmark targets, saying they risk "encouraging a tick-box approach".
- It is "not persuaded" that it should suggest a proportion of time for Careers Leaders, and "does not agree" with ringfencing funding for careers advisers, saying schools and colleges are best placed to decide their own arrangements.
- It agrees to update the careers statutory guidance in spring 2024 to set an expectation that schools and colleges self-report against the Gatsby Benchmarks annually, while avoiding mandating Compass.
What the committee recommended 43
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Sources
- Fourth Report - Careers Education, Information, Advice and Guidance ↗The committee's report, HC 54, parliament.uk
- Fifth Special Report - Careers Education, Information, Advice and Guidance: Government response to the Committee’s Fourth Report ↗The government's response, 21 September 2023, parliament.uk
Recommendations and conclusions 43
-
1
Careers education system lacks clear strategy and shows slow progress on benchmarks Conclusion (the committee's words)The system of careers education, information, advice and guidance has undergone many changes over the past decade. It appears that the right framework is broadly in place, but there is a lack of a clear overarching strategy and stated outcomes. Progress towards meeting the Gatsby benchmarks has been slow, with schools and colleges only meeting just over half of them on average. Furthermore, the system of self-reporting means that we do not have a full picture of how many are being achieved.
-
2
Publish updated Careers Strategy by end of 2024 with clear outcomes and Gatsby targets Recommendation (the committee's words)The Department should publish an updated Careers Strategy, developed in consultation with other Departments and relevant stakeholders, by the end of 2024. This should include clear, measurable outcomes and dates by which these should be achieved, including targets for increasing the number of schools achieving the Gatsby benchmarks in full.
-
3
Ensure Ofsted upholds strong focus on CEIAG provision and Gatsby benchmarks in inspections Conclusion (the committee's words)High-quality CEIAG provision is an essential part of pupils’ personal development and should be a core part of the Ofsted framework. The Department must ensure that Ofsted is upholding a strong focus on CEIAG provision when inspecting schools, in particular looking at schools’ achievement of the Gatsby benchmarks.
-
4
Update statutory guidance to mandate Compass tool reporting for all secondary schools and colleges Conclusion (the committee's words)The Department should update its statutory guidance to make reporting through the Compass tool compulsory for all secondary schools and colleges, and work with the Careers and Enterprise Company to ensure that they are providing the support and resources needed to do this.
-
5
Careers and Enterprise Company achieving positive results but requiring full expansion of Careers Hubs. Conclusion (the committee's words)The Careers and Enterprise Company appears to have made improvements over the past few years and is achieving positive results, particularly through the expansion of Careers Hubs. 90% of schools and colleges are now part of a Careers Hub: we would like to see this expanded to all schools and colleges as soon as possible to ensure consistency of provision across the country.
-
6
Careers Leaders struggling with insufficient allocated time and resources in schools and colleges. Conclusion (the committee's words)Careers Leaders are much needed in schools and colleges, but many are struggling to fulfil their responsibilities effectively due to lack of time amid competing pressures, and almost half have less than a day per week allocated to their role. This is a crucial role that must be given the appropriate time and resource.
-
7
Mandate Careers and Enterprise Company ensures 100% school participation in Careers Hubs by 2024 with sufficient funding. Conclusion (the committee's words)The Department should set an objective for the Careers and Enterprise Company to ensure that 100% of schools and colleges are part of Careers Hubs by the end of 2024, and must provide the CEC with the appropriate resources and funding to achieve this.
-
8
Update statutory guidance suggesting appropriate time for Careers Leaders and mandate publishing allocations. Conclusion (the committee's words)The Department should update its statutory guidance to suggest an appropriate proportion of time that Careers Leaders should be given to fulfil their role and should require schools and colleges to publish information on the time they have allocated to the role on their website. It should ensure that the Careers and Enterprise Company Careers Education, Information, Advice and Guidance 49 is collecting and publishing data from schools and colleges on the proportion of time that Careers Leaders have to fulfil their role and whether Careers Leaders feel this is sufficient.
-
9
National Careers Service website failing to target or be effectively used by young people. Conclusion (the committee's words)The National Careers Service website is theoretically available to young people from the age of 13, but in practice is not targeted at or being used by them. Fewer than 10% of 18–19-year-olds had used it in 2018 and none of the young people we spoke to had heard of it. While we accept that schools and colleges have the main responsibility for CEIAG provision a high-quality, accessible website offering information and guidance is essential to complement their work and offer an alternative to young people outside of school or college.
-
10
Adapt National Careers Service website content for under-18s or establish an accessible alternative platform. Conclusion (the committee's words)The Department should either work with DWP to ensure that the National Careers Service website has content appropriate and accessible to young people under 18 or create an alternative to the National Careers Service website which is accessible to and useful to young people. In the meantime, it should update the National Careers Service website to provide links to suggested websites which are more appropriate for those aged under 18.
-
11
Current CEIAG provision is fragmented, causing confusion, gaps, and overlaps. Conclusion (the committee's words)There is a broad consensus that the current structure of CEIAG provision is fragmented, causes confusion, and creates gaps and overlaps. We do not believe that creating a single, all-age body is necessary at this stage, but agree with Professor Sir John Holman and others that there needs to be more alignment between the existing organisations and that areas of overlap should be removed.
-
12
Bring existing CEIAG delivery bodies under a single strategic umbrella, ensuring full alignment. Recommendation (the committee's words)The Department should follow the recommendation set by Professor Sir John Holman to bring the existing delivery bodies under a single strategic umbrella function, sharing a common strategic framework and coordinating local services. We ask the Minister to update us on his planned reforms in this area and provide us with a timeline for implementing them. We recommend that these should go further than simply bringing together websites: the Department should take an in-depth look at the governance and functions of the different bodies to ensure that their work is fully aligned and that any areas of overlap are addressed, coordinating with other Government Departments such as the Department for Work and Pensions.
-
13
Inadequate CEIAG funding causing significant disparities and gaps in provision for schools. Conclusion (the committee's words)The Department’s expenditure on CEIAG provision is around £5,000 per school— falling far short of the estimated £38,000 to £76,000 needed to achieve the Gatsby benchmarks. The expectation on schools and colleges to pay for CEIAG out of their already stretched budgets is causing significant disparities in provision, and we have heard that schools are only spending £2 per pupil on careers. This has led to gaps in support for certain activities, in particular access to independent careers advisers and for schools to achieve the Quality in Careers Standard.
-
14
Pilot direct funding programme for careers advisers through the Careers and Enterprise Company. Conclusion (the committee's words)The Department should pilot a programme of funding careers advisers directly through the CEC, rather than requiring schools and colleges to buy in this support from their existing budgets.
-
15
Provide one-off funding to schools failing Gatsby benchmarks to improve CEIAG provision. Recommendation (the committee's words)To target those most in need of improvement, we recommend that the Department should make one-off developmental funding available to schools and colleges who 50 Careers Education, Information, Advice and Guidance have the lowest record of achieving the Gatsby benchmarks to support them to improve their CEIAG provision, setting out clear objectives and conditions of receiving this funding.
-
16
Integrate CEIAG provision support into education investment area packages for pilot development. Conclusion (the committee's words)The Department should include support for CEIAG provision in the package available to education investment areas and priority education investment areas and use this to develop pilots in these areas to explore what works best.
-
17
Expand scaled-up support for primary school careers education to benefit all children nationally. Conclusion (the committee's words)Starting careers education early is essential to broadening children’s horizons and showing them the full range of opportunities in the world of work. The Department has so far been taking an approach of relatively small-scale pilot programmes to test approaches, which appear to have been making a positive start, but support should be scaled up as soon as possible to ensure that the whole country can benefit.
-
18
Evaluate primary school careers programme after one year and scale up nationally if effective. Conclusion (the committee's words)The Department should evaluate the success of its careers programme for primary schools after its first year, and if it has been shown to have a positive impact, scale it up to cover all areas of England. In doing so the Department should consider working with the full range of providers who have demonstrated their ability to provide effective programmes in this space.
-
19
Develop tailored Gatsby benchmarks for primary schools and provide guidance to meet them. Conclusion (the committee's words)Additionally, the Department should work with the Gatsby Foundation to develop a tailored set of benchmarks for careers education in primary schools and provide guidance and resources through the Careers and Enterprise Company to support schools to meet them.
-
20
Despite improvements, teacher training and curriculum links for careers education remain inadequate. Conclusion (the committee's words)We have heard some strong examples of careers being successfully embedded into the curriculum and the situation is improving, with 70% of schools and colleges fully achieving the relevant Gatsby benchmark, up from 38% in 2018. However, more support and guidance must be put in place to enable this: currently, teachers lack the training and support they need to be able to do this effectively, and the curriculum itself does not provide explicit links to relevant careers.
-
21
Launch consultation on integrating careers education into all levels of teacher training effectively. Conclusion (the committee's words)The Department should launch a consultation on how best to incorporate careers education into different levels of teacher training, including for primary school teachers, looking at every level including initial teacher training and Early Career Frameworks, National Professional Qualifications and CPD.
-
22
Provide teachers with more opportunities to experience modern workplaces across diverse sectors. Conclusion (the committee's words)There is a clear need to explore ways in which teachers can gain familiarity with the world of work in sectors relevant to the subjects they teach, in order to be able to pass this knowledge on to their pupils. We look forward to hearing more details of the Department’s upcoming pilot to connect teachers with businesses: the Department should use this opportunity to provide more teachers with experience of modern workplaces across a range of sectors.
-
23
Engage CEIAG professionals and employers when developing model curricula for career links. Conclusion (the committee's words)In the Department’s work to develop model curricula, it must engage with CEIAG professionals and employer representatives to ensure that links to relevant career paths and examples from the world of work are incorporated.
-
24
Insufficient access to high-quality work experience for disadvantaged young people persists nationally. Conclusion (the committee's words)Too many young people are missing out on high-quality work experience placements, particularly the most disadvantaged and those living outside large cities. Increasing access is crucial to opening up opportunities for young people across the country: virtual and hybrid placements can play a key role here, but should not be prioritised at the expense of in-person experiences.
-
25
Administrative requirements create barriers for schools arranging work experience placements. Conclusion (the committee's words)We have heard that administrative requirements, particularly concerns around safeguarding, may form a barrier to schools being able to arrange work experience placements. Safeguarding is an essential aspect of every school and college’s work. The opportunity for young people to experience the workplace and access the benefits that such placements offer is also crucial. We welcome the Minister’s agreement that access should be as easy as possible and his commitment to help schools overcome any barriers.
-
26
Consult on administrative requirements for work experience to reduce burdens on schools. Conclusion (the committee's words)The Department should consult on the administrative requirements for schools and employers to provide work experience and consider whether any requirements can be removed or lightened without compromising the safety and wellbeing of pupils. It must work with the Careers and Enterprise Company to ensure that these requirements are communicated clearly to schools and employers, along with clarity on what is not required.
-
27
Develop a toolkit defining meaningful work experience for Gatsby benchmark objectives. Conclusion (the committee's words)The goals set out in the Gatsby benchmark of experiences of the workplace provide a useful framework for schools to follow, but schools must ensure that opportunities are of high quality and tailored to pupils’ individual needs and aspirations rather than following a ‘tick-box’ approach to organising placements. The Department should work with the Careers and Enterprise Company to develop a toolkit setting out what constitutes meaningful work experience to count towards the Gatsby benchmark objectives and ensure that this is shared with Careers Leaders in schools and colleges.
-
28
Develop a national platform for schools and employers to collaborate on work experience. Conclusion (the committee's words)The Department should develop a national platform for work experience placements, which includes virtual opportunities, allowing schools and employers to collaborate over finding and organising placements. It should work with the Careers and Enterprise Company to ensure that Careers Hubs are promoting work experience opportunities and offering the right support to schools.
-
29
Robust system for monitoring provider access legislation compliance currently absent. Conclusion (the committee's words)The new provider access legislation is an important step in the right direction to ensure that pupils are hearing about the full range of post-16 options available. We look forward to seeing the impact of these reforms, but we are concerned that there currently does not seem to be a robust system of monitoring compliance.
-
30
Schools are incentivised to bias pupils towards academic routes over vocational pathways. Conclusion (the committee's words)Simply informing pupils of the options available is not enough to tackle the fundamental bias towards academic routes still seen in many schools. As long as 52 Careers Education, Information, Advice and Guidance schools are incentivised to steer pupils towards academic paths and to celebrate university admissions over apprenticeship or work outcomes, this problem is likely to remain.
-
31
Track compliance with provider access legislation and ensure consistent Ofsted application across schools. Conclusion (the committee's words)The Department should directly track compliance with the new provider access legislation and ensure that the appropriate action, as set out in the statutory guidance, is taken when schools are failing to comply. We recognise that Ofsted is not awarding “outstanding” grades to schools not complying with the Baker Clause—it must now ensure that this is being applied consistently across all schools to the new provider access legislation.
-
32
Develop solutions to counter school incentives biasing pupils towards academic routes. Conclusion (the committee's words)The Department should develop potential solutions to the problem of schools being incentivised to encourage pupils to follow academic routes. As a first step, it must ensure that Ofsted are giving appropriate weight to employment and vocational routes when looking at destinations data and pupils’ preparedness for their next steps, and that schools are actively promoting apprenticeships as a positive destination alongside universities.
-
33
Pilot programmes for disadvantaged pupils risk creating a postcode lottery of CEIAG support. Conclusion (the committee's words)It is essential that disadvantaged pupils and those from minority ethnic backgrounds receive high-quality CEIAG provision and have access to the full range of opportunities available to their peers. While the Department and the CEC’s approach of trialling programmes in local areas is a sensible way of testing policy proposals and prioritising disadvantage, this risks creating a postcode lottery of support and is not a long-term solution to reducing the disadvantage gap in CEIAG provision.
-
34
Evaluate pilot programmes for disadvantaged pupils and timeline national rollout for effective schemes. Conclusion (the committee's words)The Department must evaluate the impact of its pilot programmes targeting disadvantaged pupils and those from minority ethnic groups and set out a timeline for when it expects the programmes to be rolled out nationally, where they are proven to be effective.
-
35
SEND pupils receive insufficient careers guidance; the SEND Improvement Plan missed an opportunity. Conclusion (the committee's words)It is clear that pupils with SEND have particular need of high-quality, tailored CEIAG provision, and worrying that these young people are more than twice as likely as their peers to have received no careers guidance at all. It is positive that the Department is piloting extending Supported Internships to pupils without an EHCP, but the SEND Improvement Plan was a missed opportunity to further improve CEIAG provision for this group.
-
36
Collect and publish data on SENCO careers training, ensuring all are fully trained. Conclusion (the committee's words)The Department should work with the CEC to collect and publish data on the proportion of SENCOs who have undertaken careers training, and set out the steps it intends to take to ensure that all SENCOs are fully trained and working with Careers Leaders with a school or college.
-
37
Roll out successful Supported Internships pilot for SEND pupils without EHCPs nationwide. Conclusion (the committee's words)Four years ago, our predecessor Committee highlighted the gaps in access to Supported Internships for pupils with SEND without an EHCP. We welcome the Department’s Careers Education, Information, Advice and Guidance 53 pilot to extend the programme as announced in the Spring Budget and recommend that this should be rolled out to cover all areas of the country if the pilot is proved to be successful.
-
38
Ensure explicit focus on careers advice within Pupil Premium Plus funding criteria for disadvantaged groups. Recommendation (the committee's words)Pupils in care and young carers are likely to face additional barriers to accessing CEIAG and moving into employment, but there appears to be limited understanding of how these groups access and navigate the CEIAG system, and little targeted support in place for this group. It is positive that the Department has expanded its pilot of extending Pupil Premium Plus funding to young people in further education, but we would like to see more of an explicit focus on careers advice and guidance in the funding criteria.
-
39
Scale up Pupil Premium Plus funding nationwide and mandate careers advice provision by local authorities. Conclusion (the committee's words)The Department must scale up its programme of expanded Pupil Premium Plus funding to cover all areas of the country and ensure that, as a condition of receiving the funding, local authorities are providing young people with access to careers advice.
-
40
Conduct research into young carers' CEIAG barriers and implement targeted support programmes. Conclusion (the committee's words)The Department should conduct research into the experience of CEIAG among young carers and the barriers they face. Following this, it should use its learning from its existing pilot programmes for disadvantaged groups to put in place targeted support for this group.
-
41
Pupils outside mainstream education lack CEIAG access due to delayed register. Recommendation (the committee's words)There is a clear need for support enabling pupils outside mainstream education to access careers advice and guidance. The rising number of pupils being educated at home risks more and more young people being locked out of access to CEIAG provision, and the much-awaited register of pupils not in school is still lacking, with no clear timeframe for this to be delivered.
-
42
Develop and advertise CEIAG support for young people outside mainstream education. Conclusion (the committee's words)The Department must develop a system of support for young people outside of mainstream education to access CEIAG, either through improvements to the National Careers Service or through the Careers and Enterprise Company. This should be clearly advertised and proactively targeted to ensure that young people and their families are aware of and able to access the support.
-
43
Deliver register of pupils not in school and implement duty for home-educated pupils' CEIAG support. Conclusion (the committee's words)The Department must deliver on its commitment to introduce a register of pupils not in school by the end of the year, and should use this to gather more data on the characteristics of these pupils and how best to target support. The proposed duty on local authorities to provide support to home educating families, as set out in the draft Schools Bill, should be implemented alongside this and used to ensure that local authorities and/or Local Enterprise Partnerships can support CEIAG provision for home educated pupils.