Select committee: Justice Committee

Fraud and the Justice System

Closed Opened 2 Dec 2021 Closed 14 Sep 2023 20 recommendations 23 conclusions
Inquiry scope (the committee's words)
This short inquiry sought to examine the ability of the Justice System to effectively prosecute fraud cases. The Committee was particularly interested in how the system is set up to tackle lower-level frauds, that are often not serious enough to be considered by the Serious Fraud Office but have a significant impact on the public. We sought to understand the plans that the Government and bodies working in the Justice System have to tackle rising instances of fraud. Read the call for evidence to find out more about the inquiry .

Where it stands

The inquiry is closed, opened 2 December 2021.

The committee has published 1 report, most recently Fourth Report - Fraud and the Justice System on 18 October 2022.

The government's response

Published 11 January 2023. The deadline was 18 December 2022.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The Government welcomes the report and sets out its response to its recommendations, agreeing on several points, including victim support, Action Fraud and tech charters, while saying other matters, such as sentencing guidelines, are for others to decide.

  • On victim support, the Government "agrees that it is imperative that all victims of fraud receive enough support and advice". NECVCU coverage is to reach 40 of 43 forces at Level 1 and 34 of 43 at Level 2 "from April 2023", with work continuing with the remaining forces.
  • On Action Fraud, it is replacing the service "in 2024" and providing £30 million to City of London Police over three years. A new reporting tool and website will be launched "in 2023". On staffing, it says this "may require more staff, or it may require better use of technology".
  • On a failure to prevent fraud offence, the Government is working across Government to consider the Law Commission's paper and "determine a case" for strengthening corporate criminal liability, "including the creation of an offence for failure to prevent fraud".
  • It does not commit to dedicated economic crime courts, saying they "would not in itself increase overall capacity". On sentencing guidelines, it says it is "for the Council to consider the response". It agrees that further charters with tech companies matter, and intends to launch a tech and online charter "next year".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error

Recommendations and conclusions 43 shown

1: Epidemic of fraud is increasing, accelerating during pandemic, with no reversal in sight.

Conclusion · Fourth Report - Fraud and the Justice System · Addressed to Ministry of Justice

Concluded (the committee's words)
There is currently an epidemic of fraud in England and Wales. The level of fraud has been increasing year on year and this growth accelerated during the pandemic to an unprecedented level. As the country emerges from the Covid-19 pandemic, there are no signs of a reversal in the upward trend.

Link to this item · Read this item

4: Dedicated Ministerial portfolio crucial for unified, accountable approach to tackling fraud.

Conclusion · Fourth Report - Fraud and the Justice System · Addressed to Ministry of Justice

Concluded (the committee's words)
Fraud and other forms of economic crime need to sit within a Ministerial portfolio that allows the postholder to prioritise this increasingly important area of work, and who can draw together parts of government and private sector companies to create a unified approach to tackling fraud. This should also be in such a way as will give the issue more publicly visible political and governmental ownership and accountability.

Link to this item · Read this item

5: Prioritise fraud victim support for most vulnerable; train responders to identify needs.

Conclusion · Fourth Report - Fraud and the Justice System · Addressed to Ministry of Justice

Concluded (the committee's words)
Fraud crimes do not impact victims equally and due to limitations in victim support capacity, efforts to support victims of fraud should be focused on those who need it most. It is therefore vital that responders to these crimes have the training and experience required to identify who may need further support and can direct them to services which can provide this aid.

Link to this item · Read this item

7: Set minimum standard of care for fraud victims across all police forces by 2023.

Recommendation · Fourth Report - Fraud and the Justice System · Addressed to Ministry of Justice

Recommended (the committee's words)
The Government should set a minimum standard of care that a victim of fraud can expect to receive when reporting a crime and ensure that all 43 police forces in England and Wales are working with victim care units to provide victims with effective support by the end of 2023.

Link to this item · Read this item

8: Victims experience significant difficulty reporting fraud due to unclear processes.

Conclusion · Fourth Report - Fraud and the Justice System · Addressed to Ministry of Justice

Concluded (the committee's words)
Many victims of fraud find it difficult to know how to report the crime. It needs to be made much clearer to victims how they can report a crime, as the current lack of clarity brings added distress to the process. We acknowledge that increasing awareness of Action Fraud will place increased pressure on the already stretched reporting service, but it is vital that victims feel able to report their crimes both for the individual to feel that they are being listened to, and also to help build a national picture of fraud crimes.

Link to this item · Read this item

10: Implement immediate steps to improve fraud reporting mechanisms and case progression for victims.

Recommendation · Fourth Report - Fraud and the Justice System · Addressed to Ministry of Justice

Recommended (the committee's words)
Individual police forces do not have the capacity to manage the volume of fraud reports made and so it is vital that there is an effective reporting service that is victim-focused and can deal consistently with reports and progress cases swiftly to a resolution, all while keeping the victim updated on the actions being taken. Action Fraud has not proved itself to be fit for these purposes and is not sufficiently resourced to meet the growing and varied challenges of fraud. Action Fraud is due to be replaced in 2024; however, victims should not have to wait until then before they begin to see an improvement to the mechanisms for reporting fraud and monitoring the progress of their cases. The Government should take steps now to address these issues.

Link to this item · Read this item

12: Action Fraud and successor services require sufficient staffing to support victims effectively.

Conclusion · Fourth Report - Fraud and the Justice System · Addressed to Ministry of Justice

Concluded (the committee's words)
Sufficient staffing needs to be put in place to ensure Action Fraud and its successor service can provide a high-quality service to victims, keeping them updated on the progress of their case and directing them to appropriate support services where required.

Link to this item · Read this item

13: Planned Action Fraud replacement focuses on technology, neglecting victim experience improvements.

Conclusion · Fourth Report - Fraud and the Justice System · Addressed to Ministry of Justice

Concluded (the committee's words)
We welcome the Government’s plans to replace Action Fraud with a new service in 2024; however, we understand from the Government’s evidence to our inquiry that the planned changes are focused on the technology underpinning the service, primarily improving the analytical tools applied when a crime is reported rather than improving customer experience. While this is an important development, changes to the service also clearly need to bring about improvements in the victim’s experience of reporting a fraud crime.

Link to this item · Read this item

14: Action Fraud's successor must prioritise victim experience with trained support staff.

Conclusion · Fourth Report - Fraud and the Justice System · Addressed to Ministry of Justice

Concluded (the committee's words)
While we welcome the Government’s commitment to replace Action Fraud with a new service better able to record and disseminate information about a crime, the service also needs to focus on victim experience, ensuring there are trained individuals staffing Action Fraud’s successor who can assess the needs and vulnerabilities of victims and direct them to appropriate resources.

Link to this item · Read this item

15: Introduce legislative changes to allow flexible compensation order value adjustments for victims.

Recommendation · Fourth Report - Fraud and the Justice System · Addressed to Ministry of Justice

Recommended (the committee's words)
The Government should introduce changes to compensation order legislation to allow for flexibility in altering the order value if a criminal is later found to have assets of greater value which can be used to compensate victims of their crimes. This would bring practice into line with that already in place for the amendment of confiscation orders to allow for increased asset recovery.

Link to this item · Read this item

16: Preventing fraud should be paramount, alongside maximising asset recovery for victims.

Conclusion · Fourth Report - Fraud and the Justice System · Addressed to Ministry of Justice

Concluded (the committee's words)
We are wary of placing too great an emphasis on the compensation of victims. We do not want to give criminals carte blanche to commit their crimes just because victims can be reimbursed, since their crimes will continue to have a significant financial impact on the UK economy, as well as millions of banking customers, even if these losses are not borne by the defrauded individuals directly. The main focus should be on ensuring these crimes are prevented where possible; however, Fraud and the Justice System 39 maximising the recovery of assets for victim compensation should be a priority for investigatory bodies once they become aware of a crime having taken place.

Link to this item · Read this item

17: Multiple police command chains for fraud cases create confusion and pass responsibility.

Conclusion · Fourth Report - Fraud and the Justice System · Addressed to Ministry of Justice

Concluded (the committee's words)
Within policing, there are various chains of command when it comes to tackling fraud cases, with investigations being conducted at a local level but with central bodies, namely the City of London Police and the National Economic Crime Centre, having responsibility for the overall approach to combatting fraud. This can create confusion and lead to the passing of responsibility for fraud cases between forces and other police organisations.

Link to this item · Read this item

18: Ensure agreements define fraud responsibilities and support between police forces and central bodies.

Recommendation · Fourth Report - Fraud and the Justice System · Addressed to Ministry of Justice

Recommended (the committee's words)
The Government should ensure agreements are in place between the City of London Police, the National Economic Crime Centre, and local police forces to outline responsibilities in relation to fraud and also highlight the support available to local forces working within fraud from centralised bodies.

Link to this item · Read this item

19: Fraud lacks police investigative priority due to absence of performance accountability data.

Conclusion · Fourth Report - Fraud and the Justice System · Addressed to Ministry of Justice

Concluded (the committee's words)
Fraud is not an investigative priority for police forces, partly because it is not a crime type for which forces are held accountable for their performance. Fraud statistics are not included in local and regional performance data despite most of these crimes still being investigated at the local and regional level. Without this data it is impossible to identify weaknesses in the response to these crimes and boost investigations of fraud crimes.

Link to this item · Read this item

20: Fraud currently lacks Strategic Policing Requirement status and comprehensive performance data publication.

Recommendation · Fourth Report - Fraud and the Justice System · Addressed to Ministry of Justice

Recommended (the committee's words)
Fraud should be made a Strategic Policing Requirement to focus effort and resources on combatting this crime type. Additionally, performance data should be collected, monitored, and published at local and regional levels, as is done for other crime types, to ensure law enforcement bodies are held accountable for their progress in tackling fraud.

Link to this item · Read this item

21: Fraud receives disproportionately low police funding and officer allocation despite prevalence.

Recommendation · Fourth Report - Fraud and the Justice System · Addressed to Ministry of Justice

Recommended (the committee's words)
Fraud accounts for more than 40% of all crime yet receives only around 2% of police funding. Out of the 20,000 new police officers being recruited, only 380 are planned to be deployed in the response to fraud. If the Government is serious in its ambition to reduce fraud, it needs to ensure it is allocated sufficient resourcing within police budgets to help identify and prosecute crimes as well as prevent these crimes from occurring.

Link to this item · Read this item

23: Police training inadequately addresses technology-exploiting fraud crimes and evolving offending methods.

Conclusion · Fourth Report - Fraud and the Justice System · Addressed to Ministry of Justice

Concluded (the committee's words)
Fraud crimes can be easy to spot in many cases if a police officer has adequate awareness of technological developments, but can be missed in the absence of such knowledge. The training of police remains focused on more traditional crime types whereas there is clearly a need for it to keep pace with the changing nature of offending.

Link to this item · Read this item

25: Dedicated economic crime courts would address complex fraud cases and backlog.

Conclusion · Fourth Report - Fraud and the Justice System · Addressed to Ministry of Justice

Concluded (the committee's words)
We have heard compelling proposals for dedicated economic crime courts to ensure there are judges with the right skills to oversee what can often be lengthy and sometimes complex cases. This would also help address the backlog in fraud cases, which are not always seen as a priority for listing. We support the steps the Government is taking in this direction.

Link to this item · Read this item

26: Pilot establishment of dedicated economic crime courts in collaboration with the Judiciary.

Recommendation · Fourth Report - Fraud and the Justice System · Addressed to Ministry of Justice

Recommended (the committee's words)
The Government should work with the Judiciary to pilot the establishment of economic crime courts. If the pilots are successful, these types of court should be established around the country to reflect the geographic diversity in the crimes being perpetrated.

Link to this item · Read this item

27: Application of disclosure rules is problematic in digital fraud cases, requiring clearer guidelines.

Recommendation · Fourth Report - Fraud and the Justice System · Addressed to Ministry of Justice

Recommended (the committee's words)
Our inquiry heard of problems with the application of disclosure rules which can result in significant amounts of police and prosecution time being spent redacting and disclosing vast amounts of material that turns out to be unnecessary to the case eventually pursued. We are not convinced that the underlying disclosure legislation is the problem but rather there needs to be clearer guidelines on how this legislation should operate in cases with significant amounts of digital material.

Link to this item · Read this item

29: Early engagement between police, prosecution, and defence is beneficial, hindered by legal aid.

Conclusion · Fourth Report - Fraud and the Justice System · Addressed to Ministry of Justice

Concluded (the committee's words)
Greater engagement between the police, prosecution and defence has been highlighted as best practice for determining the scope of prosecutions and helping conclude cases in a timely manner. A key barrier to this engagement has been the lack of legal aid funding, and so we welcome the Government’s recent commitments in relation to ensuring this early engagement is incentivised through the legal aid schemes.

Link to this item · Read this item

30: Current sentencing guidelines inadequately address emotional and psychological impact of fraud crimes.

Conclusion · Fourth Report - Fraud and the Justice System · Addressed to Ministry of Justice

Concluded (the committee's words)
The loss of a comparatively small amount of money can have a greater impact on one individual than the loss of a greater amount on another. The current sentencing guidelines do not recognise this and therefore overlook the emotional and psychological impact that fraud crimes can have on their victims.

Link to this item · Read this item

32: Effective fraud prevention requires robust public and private sector cooperation.

Conclusion · Fourth Report - Fraud and the Justice System · Addressed to Ministry of Justice

Concluded (the committee's words)
Our inquiry has repeatedly heard that the most effective way to tackle fraud is to prevent it occurring in the first place. This requires co-operation across the private and public sectors, with the Government using its convening power to unite stakeholders around the ambition to reduce fraud. The relaunch of the Joint Fraud Taskforce is a good start, bringing stakeholders together to discuss a common approach to fraud, and the Committee welcomes the intention to produce a new Fraud Action Plan.

Link to this item · Read this item

33: Upcoming Fraud Action Plan needs clear roles for public and private sectors.

Recommendation · Fourth Report - Fraud and the Justice System · Addressed to Ministry of Justice

Recommended (the committee's words)
Government should continue to bring together the public and private sectors and ensure that the upcoming Fraud Action Plan sets out its ambition for tackling fraud, how this will be achieved, and the roles and responsibilities each industry has within a unified response to fraud.

Link to this item · Read this item

34: Tech and telecom companies show insufficient engagement preventing fraud on their platforms.

Recommendation · Fourth Report - Fraud and the Justice System · Addressed to Ministry of Justice

Recommended (the committee's words)
We acknowledge that telecommunications and tech companies are taking steps to improve their response to fraud, however they remain platforms through which the majority of frauds impacting the general public are conducted. There still appears to be a lack of engagement on this subject from those sectors, not least amongst the telecommunications companies. Fraudsters may be using increasingly sophisticated technologies and methodologies to conduct their crimes but we are not convinced that the largest companies in those sectors do not have the capabilities to increase their efforts to tackle these changes and prevent frauds, particularly in paid-for- advertising, from appearing on their systems. Fraud may not have a significant impact on the bottom-line of those companies, however they have a duty of care to their users to ensure everything possible is being done to design frauds out of their systems in order to protect the public.

Link to this item · Read this item

36: Establish charters with social media and tech companies to ensure fraud accountability.

Recommendation · Fourth Report - Fraud and the Justice System · Addressed to Ministry of Justice

Recommended (the committee's words)
The Government should prioritise putting in place charters with the social media and tech companies to capture their commitments and responsibilities in relation to tackling fraud, and to enable them to be held to account by government for their progress in this respect.

Link to this item · Read this item

37: Failure to prevent fraud' offence could improve corporate behaviour and prevention efforts.

Conclusion · Fourth Report - Fraud and the Justice System · Addressed to Ministry of Justice

Concluded (the committee's words)
The ‘failure to prevent’ offence for bribery has had success in driving better corporate behaviours. A similar offence for failure to prevent fraud being perpetrated using a company’s platforms would not only aid prosecution for these failures but focus private sector effort on designing fraud out of companies’ systems.

Link to this item · Read this item

39: Concern exists regarding perceived GDPR restrictions on data sharing for fraud prevention.

Recommendation · Fourth Report - Fraud and the Justice System · Addressed to Ministry of Justice

Recommended (the committee's words)
We are concerned to hear that there is a perception that legislation such as GDPR is preventing the sharing of information and intelligence across sectors where frauds were suspected. Data-sharing laws should not restrict the sharing of information for law enforcement purposes, or where this information could prevent a fraudster being able to move to a new bank or platform to continue their crimes.

Link to this item · Read this item

40: Provide update and proposals to broaden data sharing for effective fraud combatting.

Recommendation · Fourth Report - Fraud and the Justice System · Addressed to Ministry of Justice

Recommended (the committee's words)
The Government should provide an update of its review of the legislation in respect of the sharing of data with a Specified Anti-Fraud Organisation. The Government should also look more broadly at the operation of data-sharing legislation with regard to the tackling of fraud and bring forward proposals to ensure data can be shared for the purposes of combatting fraud as soon as possible.

Link to this item · Read this item

41: Online Safety Bill offers crucial opportunity to strengthen fraud prevention on platforms.

Conclusion · Fourth Report - Fraud and the Justice System · Addressed to Ministry of Justice

Concluded (the committee's words)
We welcome the opportunity the Online Safety Bill presents to require companies to do more to prevent frauds from being perpetrated on their platforms, and to strengthen the obligations of companies to ensure the safety of their online users.

Link to this item · Read this item

42: Current fraud prevention campaigns lack sufficient resources to effectively raise public awareness.

Conclusion · Fourth Report - Fraud and the Justice System · Addressed to Ministry of Justice

Concluded (the committee's words)
Key to the prevention of fraud is increasing public awareness of these crimes and the steps people can take to avoid being victimised. Although campaigns are currently run by the Financial Conduct Authority and its partners, these do not have the level of resources required to proliferate messages about fraud and fraud prevention among the general public. The

Link to this item · Read this item

Reports

1 report

Oral evidence sessions

4 sessions

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

Date Session and witnesses Source
20 Apr 2022
Oral evidence session
Rt Hon Damian Hinds MP · Ministry of Justice
View ↗
22 Mar 2022
Oral evidence session
Duncan Tessier · Home Office, Katy Worobec · UK Finance, Luke Taylor · Centre for Social Justice (CSJ), Lulu Freemont · Tech UK, Rt Hon Damian Hinds MP · Home Office
View ↗
15 Mar 2022
Oral evidence session
Mark Fenhalls QC · Bar Council
View ↗
22 Feb 2022
Oral evidence session
Dame Vera Baird · Victims’ Commissioner for England and Wales, Mark Shelford · Avon and Somerset and Economic and Cybercrime Lead of the Association of Police and Crime Commissioners, Mike Haley · CIFAS, Rob Jones · National Economic Crime Centre, Temporary Commander Clinton Blackburn · City of London Police’s Economic Crime Directorate
View ↗

Who gave evidence

12 witnesses

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

WitnessOrganisationSessions
Dame Vera Baird · Victims' Commissioner Victims’ Commissioner for England and Wales 1
Duncan Tessier · Director of Economic Crime Home Office 1
Katy Worobec · Managing Director for Economic Crime UK Finance 1
Luke Taylor · Senior Researcher Centre for Social Justice (CSJ) 1
Lulu Freemont · Head of Digital Regulation Tech UK 1
Mark Fenhalls QC · Chair Bar Council 1
Mark Shelford · Police and Crime Commissioner Avon and Somerset and Economic and Cybercrime Lead of the Association of Police and Crime Commissioners 1
Mike Haley · Chief Executive Officer CIFAS 1
Rob Jones · Interim Director General National Economic Crime Centre 1
Rt Hon Damian Hinds MP · Minister for Prisons and Probation Ministry of Justice 1
Rt Hon Damian Hinds MP · Minister for Security and Borders Home Office 1
Temporary Commander Clinton Blackburn · Head City of London Police’s Economic Crime Directorate 1