Inquiries · Recommendations
Public Inquiry Recommendations
1,814 tracked recommendations
35 inquiries
211 match current filters
Page 1 of 5
Recommendations issued by UK statutory and non-statutory inquiries, with their tracked government response and supporting evidence.
Browse by inquiry
| Inquiry | Recs | Accepted |
|---|---|---|
| Mid Staffs Inquiry | 290 | 281 |
| Manchester Arena Inquiry | 169 | 169 |
| IICSA | 107 | 96 |
| Muckamore Abbey Inquiry | 106 | — |
| Grenfell Tower Inquiry | 104 | 104 |
| Infected Blood Inquiry | 103 | 102 |
| Hyponatraemia Inquiry | 96 | 96 |
| Fuller Inquiry | 92 | 71 |
| Leveson Inquiry | 92 | 77 |
| Vale of Leven Inquiry | 75 | 75 |
| Baha Mousa Inquiry | 73 | 72 |
| Southport Inquiry | 67 | — |
| RHI Inquiry | 45 | 44 |
| COVID-19 Inquiry | 44 | 24 |
| Morecambe Bay Investigation | 44 | 44 |
| Brook House Inquiry | 33 | 28 |
| Bichard Inquiry | 31 | 31 |
| Angiolini Inquiry | 30 | 29 |
| Post Office Horizon Inquiry | 27 | 25 |
| Jermaine Baker Inquiry | 26 | 22 |
| Edinburgh Tram Inquiry | 24 | 21 |
| Daniel Morgan Panel | 23 | 21 |
| Cranston Inquiry | 18 | — |
| Paterson Inquiry | 17 | 15 |
| HIA Inquiry | 12 | 12 |
| Scottish Hospitals Inquiry | 11 | 11 |
| Anthony Grainger Inquiry | 9 | 9 |
| Al-Sweady Inquiry | 9 | 9 |
| Hillsborough Panel | 9 | 5 |
| Fingerprint Inquiry | 9 | 9 |
| ICL Inquiry | 7 | 6 |
| Litvinenko Inquiry | 5 | 5 |
| Azelle Rodney Inquiry | 3 | 3 |
| Billy Wright Inquiry | 3 | 3 |
| Penrose Inquiry | 1 | 1 |
Recommendations
| Code | Recommendation | Inquiry | Response |
|---|---|---|---|
| COVID-M3.1 |
IPC Structures and Transmission Risk
The UK government must ensure that there is a body (equivalent to the UK Infection Prevention and Control Cell) in place ready …
|
COVID-19 Inquiry (2026) | No Published Response |
| COVID-M3.2 |
Visiting Restrictions Guidance
The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive should publish guidance for the implementation of visiting restrictions in hospitals …
|
COVID-19 Inquiry (2026) | No Published Response |
| COVID-M3.3 |
Fit-Testing Preparedness
The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive should work with employers, including health boards and trusts, to review …
|
COVID-19 Inquiry (2026) | No Published Response |
| COVID-M3.4 |
Data Systems for High-Risk Individuals
The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive must ensure that health data and digital systems have the capability …
|
COVID-19 Inquiry (2026) | No Published Response |
| COVID-M3.5 |
Scale Up Urgent and Emergency Care
The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive, in conjunction with organisations responsible for delivering services, should plan for …
|
COVID-19 Inquiry (2026) | No Published Response |
| COVID-M3.6 |
Scale Up Hospital Capacity
The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive should work with trusts and health boards to ensure that pandemic …
|
COVID-19 Inquiry (2026) | No Published Response |
| COVID-M3.7 |
ICU Resource Allocation Framework
The UK government and devolved administrations should publish a UK-wide framework setting out ethical and operational principles to guide the allocation of …
|
COVID-19 Inquiry (2026) | No Published Response |
| COVID-M3.8 |
Recording Healthcare Worker Deaths
The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive should work with their respective public health agencies and healthcare employers …
|
COVID-19 Inquiry (2026) | No Published Response |
| COVID-M3.9 |
Standardised Advance Care Planning
The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive, working with trusts and health boards, should establish and promote one …
|
COVID-19 Inquiry (2026) | No Published Response |
| COVID-M3.10 |
Healthcare Worker Support
The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive, working with healthcare employers and professional bodies, should put in place …
|
COVID-19 Inquiry (2026) | No Published Response |
| COVID-M4.1 |
Establish Pharmaceutical Expert Advisory Panel
The UK government should establish a standing pharmaceutical expert advisory panel, in consultation with the Department of Health and Social Care and …
|
COVID-19 Inquiry (2026) | No Response |
| COVID-M4.2 |
Formalise Community Vaccine Equity Networks
The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive should maintain networks with local communities to produce targeted vaccination strategies …
|
COVID-19 Inquiry (2026) | No Published Response |
| COVID-M4.3 |
Improve Vaccine Uptake Monitoring and Evaluation
Each of the four UK public health or health security agencies should work together to: maintain accurate, UK-wide insight into the state …
|
COVID-19 Inquiry (2026) | No Published Response |
| COVID-M4.4 |
Proportionate Access to Linked Healthcare Records
The UK government and devolved administrations should work together, with their respective health delivery services, to facilitate and coordinate regulatory bodies' access …
|
COVID-19 Inquiry (2026) | No Published Response |
| COVID-M4.5 |
Reform Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme
The UK government must reform the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme as soon as possible. The reform should include as a minimum: increasing …
|
COVID-19 Inquiry (2026) | No Response |
| 2 |
Police records under Public Records Act 1958
We recommend that the preservation of police records be reviewed to ensure that all such documents are treated as public records, held …
|
Hillsborough Panel (2012) | No Response |
| 5 |
Private owners encouraged to deposit records
We recommend that, once a copy of all material has been placed on a Digital Archive, private owners - including the FA …
|
Hillsborough Panel (2012) | No Response |
| 6 |
Editor-in-Chief for digital archive
We recommend the appointment of an Editor-in-Chief to oversee the presentation on the Digital Archive of documents relating to the disaster, and …
|
Hillsborough Panel (2012) | No Response |
| 7 |
Protocol for adding/removing archive material
We recommend the development of a protocol which identifies the criteria according to which material not disclosed by the Panel may be …
|
Hillsborough Panel (2012) | No Response |
| R1 |
Implementation monitoring group
The implementation of the following recommendations should be monitored by the DoH and progress should be reported to the DoH Permanent Secretary. …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R2 |
Public acceptance of recommendations within six months
The DoH should indicate publicly within six months of this report which recommendations it accepts and those it does not accept (and …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R3 |
Non-acceptance notification within three months
With the exception of Recommendations 88 and 89 (R88 & R89) any other organisation that does not accept a recommendation for which …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R4 |
Consultation before patient transfers
Prior to the decision to move a service user to a different facility there must be discussion with the staff regularly caring …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R5 |
Named person for care plans
Any service user with a learning disability should have a named person (a key individual) responsible for their care plans and this …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R6 |
Named person approval for transfers
The named person responsible for the care plan must both review and approve the preparation of anyone with a learning disability transferring …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R7 |
Independent living skills focus
While patients remain in hospital pending resettlement, there should be a focus on enhancing their independent living skills, tailored to their physical …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R8 |
Medication audit and NICE compliance
Medication should never be used simply to subdue people in the absence of other forms of treatment and good quality care. DoH …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R9 |
Integrated workforce plans
Each facility or service should have an integrated workforce plan that includes all allied health professionals (AHPs) and all staff involved in …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R10 |
Access to allied health professionals
It is critical for the wellbeing of people with learning disabilities and autistic people that they are well supported by, and have …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R11 |
Meaningful daily activities
Like anyone else, people with learning disabilities and autistic people require a variety of meaningful activities on a daily basis to enhance …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R12 |
Person-centred care plans with family involvement
Care plans must be live, person-centred documents. This requires joint ownership with people with learning disabilities and their families rather than simply …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R13 |
Full staff access to care plans
All staff involved in delivering care, including healthcare assistants (HCAs), must have full access to the care plan.
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R14 |
Restraint and seclusion observation records
Observation records detailing all use of restraint and seclusion should be completed by the individual observing. In HSCT facilities, if the observer …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R15 |
Independent care plan reviews
Care plans should be regularly evaluated to assess their impact on people’s wellbeing. This is the responsibility of the care team and …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R16 |
Missed care incident reporting
If a care plan cannot be delivered due to issues, such as staffing shortages, this should be recorded as ‘missed care’ using …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R17 |
Co-production training
Creating a co-produced care environment, where people with learning disabilities, families and professionals work collaboratively, requires a fundamental shift in practice. As …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R18 |
Co-production processes and clinical audit
Specific processes rather than policies should be designed to ensure there is good communication with families and carers to ensure co-production takes …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R19 |
Amend Quality Standards for shared decision-making
The 2006 Quality Standards for Health and Social Care should be amended to require HSC organisations to provide all people with learning …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R20 |
Independent advocacy for service users and families
Properly trained independent advocates should be made available to service users and families to support effective communication with staff and for raising …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R21 |
Human rights officer in learning disability services
All providers of learning disability services should appoint a human rights officer, as seen in Sheffield Health Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R22 |
Easy Read documents
All documents relevant to the service user’s experience and intended for their information must be made available in Easy Read format.
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R23 |
Regular property and finance compliance checks
All organisations taking responsibility for property and/or finance for people with learning disabilities and autistic people should institute regular checks of adherence …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R24 |
Clear records and disclosure policies
Policies must be specific as to records to be kept and for routes to disclosure for relevant family members and people with …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R25 |
Accessible financial records
The records kept must be easy to manage by staff and easily comprehensible to others, including people with learning disabilities and autistic …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R26 |
Six-monthly financial accounts to families
Information about the use of cash and other property and six-monthly accounts (or such period as appropriate upon discharge of the person) …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R27 |
RQIA assurance of property processes
RQIA should examine the provider organisation’s internal assurance processes and make recommendations where they are insufficient.
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R28 |
Restraint Reduction Network principles
The Restraint Reduction Network identifies six principles to avoid the use of restrictive practice. While there is evidence that some Trusts have …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R29 |
Psychology input to reduce restrictive practices
All facilities providing residential services for people with learning disabilities and autistic people should provide sufficient psychology input for each patient, to …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R30 |
NED champion for restraint reduction
HSCTs should appoint a non-executive director (NED) to act as a champion for restraint reduction, with a mandate to hold executive directors …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R31 |
Restraint education effectiveness metrics
The effectiveness of the education programme for staff in relation to restraint reduction should be measured through defined data metrics. This is …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
Page 1 of 5
Next ›