Inquiries · Recommendations

Public Inquiry Recommendations

1,814 tracked recommendations 35 inquiries 211 match current filters Page 1 of 5

Recommendations issued by UK statutory and non-statutory inquiries, with their tracked government response and supporting evidence.

Clear

Browse by inquiry

35 inquiries with tracked recs
Inquiry Recs Accepted
Mid Staffs Inquiry 290 281
Manchester Arena Inquiry 169 169
IICSA 107 96
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry 106
Grenfell Tower Inquiry 104 104
Infected Blood Inquiry 103 102
Hyponatraemia Inquiry 96 96
Fuller Inquiry 92 71
Leveson Inquiry 92 77
Vale of Leven Inquiry 75 75
Baha Mousa Inquiry 73 72
Southport Inquiry 67
RHI Inquiry 45 44
COVID-19 Inquiry 44 24
Morecambe Bay Investigation 44 44
Brook House Inquiry 33 28
Bichard Inquiry 31 31
Angiolini Inquiry 30 29
Post Office Horizon Inquiry 27 25
Jermaine Baker Inquiry 26 22
Edinburgh Tram Inquiry 24 21
Daniel Morgan Panel 23 21
Cranston Inquiry 18
Paterson Inquiry 17 15
HIA Inquiry 12 12
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry 11 11
Anthony Grainger Inquiry 9 9
Al-Sweady Inquiry 9 9
Hillsborough Panel 9 5
Fingerprint Inquiry 9 9
ICL Inquiry 7 6
Litvinenko Inquiry 5 5
Azelle Rodney Inquiry 3 3
Billy Wright Inquiry 3 3
Penrose Inquiry 1 1

Recommendations

211 of 1,814 · page 1 of 5
Code Recommendation Inquiry Response
COVID-M3.1 IPC Structures and Transmission Risk
The UK government must ensure that there is a body (equivalent to the UK Infection Prevention and Control Cell) in place ready …
COVID-19 Inquiry (2026) No Published Response
COVID-M3.2 Visiting Restrictions Guidance
The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive should publish guidance for the implementation of visiting restrictions in hospitals …
COVID-19 Inquiry (2026) No Published Response
COVID-M3.3 Fit-Testing Preparedness
The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive should work with employers, including health boards and trusts, to review …
COVID-19 Inquiry (2026) No Published Response
COVID-M3.4 Data Systems for High-Risk Individuals
The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive must ensure that health data and digital systems have the capability …
COVID-19 Inquiry (2026) No Published Response
COVID-M3.5 Scale Up Urgent and Emergency Care
The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive, in conjunction with organisations responsible for delivering services, should plan for …
COVID-19 Inquiry (2026) No Published Response
COVID-M3.6 Scale Up Hospital Capacity
The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive should work with trusts and health boards to ensure that pandemic …
COVID-19 Inquiry (2026) No Published Response
COVID-M3.7 ICU Resource Allocation Framework
The UK government and devolved administrations should publish a UK-wide framework setting out ethical and operational principles to guide the allocation of …
COVID-19 Inquiry (2026) No Published Response
COVID-M3.8 Recording Healthcare Worker Deaths
The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive should work with their respective public health agencies and healthcare employers …
COVID-19 Inquiry (2026) No Published Response
COVID-M3.9 Standardised Advance Care Planning
The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive, working with trusts and health boards, should establish and promote one …
COVID-19 Inquiry (2026) No Published Response
COVID-M3.10 Healthcare Worker Support
The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive, working with healthcare employers and professional bodies, should put in place …
COVID-19 Inquiry (2026) No Published Response
COVID-M4.1 Establish Pharmaceutical Expert Advisory Panel
The UK government should establish a standing pharmaceutical expert advisory panel, in consultation with the Department of Health and Social Care and …
COVID-19 Inquiry (2026) No Response
COVID-M4.2 Formalise Community Vaccine Equity Networks
The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive should maintain networks with local communities to produce targeted vaccination strategies …
COVID-19 Inquiry (2026) No Published Response
COVID-M4.3 Improve Vaccine Uptake Monitoring and Evaluation
Each of the four UK public health or health security agencies should work together to: maintain accurate, UK-wide insight into the state …
COVID-19 Inquiry (2026) No Published Response
COVID-M4.4 Proportionate Access to Linked Healthcare Records
The UK government and devolved administrations should work together, with their respective health delivery services, to facilitate and coordinate regulatory bodies' access …
COVID-19 Inquiry (2026) No Published Response
COVID-M4.5 Reform Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme
The UK government must reform the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme as soon as possible. The reform should include as a minimum: increasing …
COVID-19 Inquiry (2026) No Response
2 Police records under Public Records Act 1958
We recommend that the preservation of police records be reviewed to ensure that all such documents are treated as public records, held …
Hillsborough Panel (2012) No Response
5 Private owners encouraged to deposit records
We recommend that, once a copy of all material has been placed on a Digital Archive, private owners - including the FA …
Hillsborough Panel (2012) No Response
6 Editor-in-Chief for digital archive
We recommend the appointment of an Editor-in-Chief to oversee the presentation on the Digital Archive of documents relating to the disaster, and …
Hillsborough Panel (2012) No Response
7 Protocol for adding/removing archive material
We recommend the development of a protocol which identifies the criteria according to which material not disclosed by the Panel may be …
Hillsborough Panel (2012) No Response
R1 Implementation monitoring group
The implementation of the following recommendations should be monitored by the DoH and progress should be reported to the DoH Permanent Secretary. …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R2 Public acceptance of recommendations within six months
The DoH should indicate publicly within six months of this report which recommendations it accepts and those it does not accept (and …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R3 Non-acceptance notification within three months
With the exception of Recommendations 88 and 89 (R88 & R89) any other organisation that does not accept a recommendation for which …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R4 Consultation before patient transfers
Prior to the decision to move a service user to a different facility there must be discussion with the staff regularly caring …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R5 Named person for care plans
Any service user with a learning disability should have a named person (a key individual) responsible for their care plans and this …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R6 Named person approval for transfers
The named person responsible for the care plan must both review and approve the preparation of anyone with a learning disability transferring …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R7 Independent living skills focus
While patients remain in hospital pending resettlement, there should be a focus on enhancing their independent living skills, tailored to their physical …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R8 Medication audit and NICE compliance
Medication should never be used simply to subdue people in the absence of other forms of treatment and good quality care. DoH …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R9 Integrated workforce plans
Each facility or service should have an integrated workforce plan that includes all allied health professionals (AHPs) and all staff involved in …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R10 Access to allied health professionals
It is critical for the wellbeing of people with learning disabilities and autistic people that they are well supported by, and have …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R11 Meaningful daily activities
Like anyone else, people with learning disabilities and autistic people require a variety of meaningful activities on a daily basis to enhance …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R12 Person-centred care plans with family involvement
Care plans must be live, person-centred documents. This requires joint ownership with people with learning disabilities and their families rather than simply …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R13 Full staff access to care plans
All staff involved in delivering care, including healthcare assistants (HCAs), must have full access to the care plan.
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R14 Restraint and seclusion observation records
Observation records detailing all use of restraint and seclusion should be completed by the individual observing. In HSCT facilities, if the observer …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R15 Independent care plan reviews
Care plans should be regularly evaluated to assess their impact on people’s wellbeing. This is the responsibility of the care team and …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R16 Missed care incident reporting
If a care plan cannot be delivered due to issues, such as staffing shortages, this should be recorded as ‘missed care’ using …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R17 Co-production training
Creating a co-produced care environment, where people with learning disabilities, families and professionals work collaboratively, requires a fundamental shift in practice. As …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R18 Co-production processes and clinical audit
Specific processes rather than policies should be designed to ensure there is good communication with families and carers to ensure co-production takes …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R19 Amend Quality Standards for shared decision-making
The 2006 Quality Standards for Health and Social Care should be amended to require HSC organisations to provide all people with learning …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R20 Independent advocacy for service users and families
Properly trained independent advocates should be made available to service users and families to support effective communication with staff and for raising …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R21 Human rights officer in learning disability services
All providers of learning disability services should appoint a human rights officer, as seen in Sheffield Health Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R22 Easy Read documents
All documents relevant to the service user’s experience and intended for their information must be made available in Easy Read format.
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R23 Regular property and finance compliance checks
All organisations taking responsibility for property and/or finance for people with learning disabilities and autistic people should institute regular checks of adherence …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R24 Clear records and disclosure policies
Policies must be specific as to records to be kept and for routes to disclosure for relevant family members and people with …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R25 Accessible financial records
The records kept must be easy to manage by staff and easily comprehensible to others, including people with learning disabilities and autistic …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R26 Six-monthly financial accounts to families
Information about the use of cash and other property and six-monthly accounts (or such period as appropriate upon discharge of the person) …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R27 RQIA assurance of property processes
RQIA should examine the provider organisation’s internal assurance processes and make recommendations where they are insufficient.
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R28 Restraint Reduction Network principles
The Restraint Reduction Network identifies six principles to avoid the use of restrictive practice. While there is evidence that some Trusts have …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R29 Psychology input to reduce restrictive practices
All facilities providing residential services for people with learning disabilities and autistic people should provide sufficient psychology input for each patient, to …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R30 NED champion for restraint reduction
HSCTs should appoint a non-executive director (NED) to act as a champion for restraint reduction, with a mandate to hold executive directors …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R31 Restraint education effectiveness metrics
The effectiveness of the education programme for staff in relation to restraint reduction should be measured through defined data metrics. This is …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
Page 1 of 5 Next ›