Proportionate Access to Linked Healthcare Records
COVID-19 Inquiry · Module 4: Vaccines and Therapeutics · Issued 16 April 2026 · Addressed to: Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
Source — verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
The UK government and devolved administrations should work together, with their respective health delivery services, to facilitate and coordinate regulatory bodies' access to healthcare records in order to make the post-authorisation safety monitoring of new vaccines and therapeutics more efficient. In particular, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency should be granted specific and proportionate access to comprehensive and comparable data from across the four nations of the UK, including linked primary and secondary healthcare data records. This should include data on vaccines and therapeutics administration. This improved linkage must be accompanied by strong safeguards for patient confidentiality, which the Information Commissioner's Office should work with the four governments to ensure.
COVID-19 Inquiry, Module 4: Vaccines and Therapeutics · 16 Apr 2026 Source PDF →
Response — verbatim from government
●Scottish Government — initial response
No formal response published by this government.
Scottish Government · 16 Apr 2026
●Welsh Government — follow-up
No formal response published by this government.
Welsh Government · 16 Apr 2026
●Northern Ireland Executive — follow-up
No formal response published by this government.
Northern Ireland Executive · 16 Apr 2026
Evidence trail — what's actually happened since
- 16 Apr 2026 Status: Pending. No government response yet received. Module 4 report published 16 April 2026. Source →
Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.
How this page is built
Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.
This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.