COVID-M3.10 No Published Response

Healthcare Worker Support

COVID-19 Inquiry · Module 3: Impact on Healthcare Systems · Issued 19 March 2026 · Addressed to: Department of Health and Social Care

Source — verbatim from the inquiry

Inquiry recommendation

The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive, working with healthcare employers and professional bodies, should put in place plans to deliver effective support for healthcare workers at scale from the outset of a pandemic. Plans should cover the nature and level of support that will be provided during and after a pandemic. All four governments should develop a programme of peer support visits that can, from the outset of a pandemic, be targeted towards areas of acute hospitals under considerable strain. The purpose of the visits should be to support front-line staff, collect insights on the pressures that healthcare workers are facing and understand what further support they might need.

COVID-19 Inquiry, Module 3: Impact on Healthcare Systems · 19 Mar 2026 Source PDF →

Response — verbatim from government

Scottish Government — initial response

No formal response published by this government.

Scottish Government · 19 Mar 2026

Welsh Government — follow-up

No formal response published by this government.

Welsh Government · 19 Mar 2026

Northern Ireland Executive — follow-up

No formal response published by this government.

Northern Ireland Executive · 19 Mar 2026

Evidence trail — what's actually happened since

  • 19 Mar 2026 Status: Pending. No government response yet received. Module 3 report published 19 March 2026. Source →

Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.

How this page is built

Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.

This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.