Visiting Restrictions Guidance
COVID-19 Inquiry · Module 3: Impact on Healthcare Systems · Issued 19 March 2026 · Addressed to: Department of Health and Social Care
Source — verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive should publish guidance for the implementation of visiting restrictions in hospitals in the event of a future pandemic. The guidance should identify the circumstances in which visiting restrictions should be introduced, escalated, decreased and removed alongside the measures and exemptions at each level. The guidance should be led by the following core principles: 1. Measures applied should be the least restrictive possible, both in terms of severity and the length of time for which they apply. 2. Restrictions should be decided upon and applied at the most local level possible. 3. Unless restrictions are applied at a specified level, trusts and health boards should take decisions on the severity of restrictions based on local risk assessments. 4. Communications with the public must clearly explain the measures in place and the reasons why restrictions apply. The guidance should be reviewed every three years in line with the Inquiry's Module 1 Report (Recommendation 4).
COVID-19 Inquiry, Module 3: Impact on Healthcare Systems · 19 Mar 2026 Source PDF →
Response — verbatim from government
●Scottish Government — initial response
No formal response published by this government.
Scottish Government · 19 Mar 2026
●Welsh Government — follow-up
No formal response published by this government.
Welsh Government · 19 Mar 2026
●Northern Ireland Executive — follow-up
No formal response published by this government.
Northern Ireland Executive · 19 Mar 2026
Evidence trail — what's actually happened since
- 19 Mar 2026 Status: Pending. No government response yet received. Module 3 report published 19 March 2026. Source →
Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.
How this page is built
Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.
This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.