Inquiries · Recommendations

Public Inquiry Recommendations

1,814 tracked recommendations 35 inquiries 211 match current filters Page 2 of 5

Recommendations issued by UK statutory and non-statutory inquiries, with their tracked government response and supporting evidence.

Clear

Browse by inquiry

35 inquiries with tracked recs
Inquiry Recs Accepted
Mid Staffs Inquiry 290 281
Manchester Arena Inquiry 169 169
IICSA 107 96
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry 106
Grenfell Tower Inquiry 104 104
Infected Blood Inquiry 103 102
Hyponatraemia Inquiry 96 96
Fuller Inquiry 92 71
Leveson Inquiry 92 77
Vale of Leven Inquiry 75 75
Baha Mousa Inquiry 73 72
Southport Inquiry 67
RHI Inquiry 45 44
COVID-19 Inquiry 44 24
Morecambe Bay Investigation 44 44
Brook House Inquiry 33 28
Bichard Inquiry 31 31
Angiolini Inquiry 30 29
Post Office Horizon Inquiry 27 25
Jermaine Baker Inquiry 26 22
Edinburgh Tram Inquiry 24 21
Daniel Morgan Panel 23 21
Cranston Inquiry 18
Paterson Inquiry 17 15
HIA Inquiry 12 12
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry 11 11
Anthony Grainger Inquiry 9 9
Al-Sweady Inquiry 9 9
Hillsborough Panel 9 5
Fingerprint Inquiry 9 9
ICL Inquiry 7 6
Litvinenko Inquiry 5 5
Azelle Rodney Inquiry 3 3
Billy Wright Inquiry 3 3
Penrose Inquiry 1 1

Recommendations

211 of 1,814 · page 2 of 5
Code Recommendation Inquiry Response
R32 Balanced performance measures including restrictive practices
HSCTs should implement a comprehensive set of balanced performance measures across all services for people with learning disabilities, including those commissioned from …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R33 Statistical process control charts
To ensure meaningful interpretation of these trends, all HSCTs should adopt statistical process control (SPC) charts, as developed by Walter Shewhart in …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R34 Debriefing policies for aggressive behaviour and restraint
All HSCTs should develop two clear operational debriefing policies. The first should apply to both staff and people with learning disabilities and …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R35 Inpatient facilities on risk register
Given the elevated risk of inappropriate use of restrictive practices with individuals with learning disabilities and/or autistic people, BHSCT and all HSCTs …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R36 Seclusion as extraordinary intervention with serious event audit
Use of seclusion should be considered an extraordinary and exceptional intervention. Each intervention should be subject to a serious event audit, conducted …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R37 Human rights-based restrictive practices training
Education and training on the use of restrictive practices should be grounded in human rights principles and the dedicated human rights specialist …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R38 Clear pathways for raising concerns
People with learning disabilities and autistic people and their families should be provided with clear, written information outlining the available pathways for …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R39 Guidance on recording and presenting concerns
People with learning disabilities and autistic people and their families should be provided with a short description of how best to record …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R40 Record all complaints in electronic system
In HSCTs all complaints, regardless of whether they are resolved immediately at ward level, should be recorded in the Trust’s electronic complaints …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R41 Inform complainants of complaint management process
Complainants should immediately be informed of how their complaint will be managed (locally or through the corporate complaints process) along with a …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R42 Regular updates on complaint progress
Complainants must be regularly updated and informed of the progress of any investigation, including when the process concludes without a specific finding.
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R43 Red-rated complaints shared with all NEDs
All complaints managed at corporate level and rated as red (using the red, amber and green (RAG) rating matrix) should be shared …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R44 Proactive quality assurance beyond complaints
Complaints alone are a poor indicator of quality of care, particularly in a vulnerable population such as those admitted to MAH. A …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R45 Incident trend analysis on board dashboards
Incident reports of any violent or aggressive behaviour by either people with learning disabilities and autistic people or staff should be analysed …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R46 Lived experience feedback via external agency
Where people with learning disabilities can participate, the provider should actively seek their lived experience feedback in relation to staff attitudes and …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R47 Quarterly family feedback via external agency
The provider should actively seek family or carer feedback on the service user’s experience on a quarterly basis via an external agency …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R48 Holistic safeguarding governance review
HSCTs must review and improve governance of safeguarding to ensure that findings from different safeguarding investigations are considered holistically, synthesised and presented …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R49 CCTV in high-risk learning disability settings
Hospital settings for people with learning disabilities and autistic people are very high-risk environments for abuse and poor practice, partly because those …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R50 CCTV guidelines for residential and day services
Guidelines should be agreed in relation to providing CCTV systems in residential and day services where requested. Guidelines should be agreed by …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R51 CCTV in non-public areas only in best interests
The installation of CCTV in non-public areas should be considered only where this will be in the best interests of the individual …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R52 CCTV policies agreed with staff residents and families
Policies governing the use of CCTV should be agreed only after consultation with staff, residents and their families using the service.
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R53 CCTV viewing circumstances
Policies should include careful consideration of the circumstances in which the CCTV should be viewed; for example, that it should be viewed …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R54 Independent CCTV viewers
Viewers of the CCTV should be independent of the setting, i.e. not involved in day-to-day care of the residents.
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R55 External CCTV oversight
Oversight of the CCTV analysis should sit outside the setting in which the CCTV is recording, and should include audits of referrals …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R56 CCTV referral guidance for police
Policies should include clear guidance and definitions of behaviour and circumstances in which information should be passed to PSNI about possible offences.
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R57 Regulator access to CCTV
Policies should be clear about the circumstances in which a regulator, such as RQIA, could access the CCTV.
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R58 CCTV for staff training consideration
Those drafting the policy should consider whether CCTV could ever be used for staff training and, if so, how this would be …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R59 CCTV explained in accessible format
All service users and their families should have the CCTV explained to them in easily understood language and with easy access materials, …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R60 Staff CCTV training
All staff should receive training on the reasons for the use of CCTV and the processes for its analysis.
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R61 Statutory adult safeguarding function
Vulnerable children and adults are inherently more susceptible to abuse or neglect than other people. Adult safeguarding should be formally recognised as …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R62 Monthly safeguarding dashboard
Metrics on both child and adult safeguarding processes should be reported monthly via a safeguarding dashboard, with the same visibility and status …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R63 Peer-on-peer abuse in safeguarding metrics
Incidents of peer-on-peer abuse should be included in adult safeguarding metrics and included on a published safeguarding dashboard.
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R64 Safeguarding dashboard with screening decisions
The dashboard should include the number of allegations reported, together with the screening decision (referral to the Adult Safeguarding Gateway, referral to …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R65 Common safeguarding investigation standards
There should be common standards for the conduct of safeguarding investigations. These should be drafted and approved by the Northern Ireland Adult …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R66 Quarterly safeguarding file audit
A quarterly multidisciplinary audit of 10% of safeguarding files per ward or residential unit should be conducted. Findings must be integrated with …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R67 Independent review of systemic abuse conditions
Where there is evidence or suspicion of widespread abuse involving multiple staff and residents, focusing solely on individual perpetrators is insufficient. An …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R68 Cumulative risk assessment across protection plans
Protection plans should include an assessment of risks arising from the plan itself. Where multiple protection plans are in place for vulnerable …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R69 Needs-based staffing with acuity measures
Staffing should be based on service user needs rather than a fixed budget, using daily acuity measures designed specifically for units caring …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R70 Mandatory monthly clinical supervision
Clinical supervision (where individuals’ practice with individual patients is discussed) should be mandatory for all ward staff, including healthcare assistants, and should …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R71 Specialist training for healthcare assistants
All healthcare assistants working with people with learning disabilities and autistic people should be provided with training, which should include specialist learning …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R72 Review supervision models for commissioned services
SPPG must commission a review of the potential models for supervision of staff in private and third sector services commissioned by HSCTs, …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R73 Band 4 associate practitioners
Consideration should be given to enhancing the post of healthcare assistant by creating Band 4 associate practitioners in both hospital and community …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R74 Staffing review in safeguarding investigations
Consideration of staffing (including skill mix as well as total numbers) should be a mandatory part of safeguarding investigations in all settings.
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R75 Executive Director of Clinical and Social Care Governance
There must be understanding of both individual untoward events but also (and more importantly) systems and trends. Creating and maintaining effective governance …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R76 NED with clinical governance expertise
NEDs should be selected for their expertise across a range of skills and at least one should have extensive experience of clinical …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R77 Triennial Board governance reviews
The DoH Permanent Secretary should commission triennial reviews of each Board’s collective performance in clinical and social care governance.
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R78 Audit committee implementation tracking
HSCT Board audit committees should consider all internal audit recommendations and require directorates to provide updates on implementation three months, six months …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R79 Board member learning framework
The DoH should commission the HSC Leadership Centre to develop a learning framework for all Board members. All Trust Board directors should …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R80 NED for confidential staff reporting
Consideration should be given to the creation of a role for a NED in each HSCT with the specific remit to receive …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R81 Expert clinical governance advisory function
The DoH should establish an expert clinical/social governance advisory function to support providers.
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
‹ Prev Page 2 of 5 Next ›