COVID-M4.3 No Published Response

Improve Vaccine Uptake Monitoring and Evaluation

COVID-19 Inquiry · Module 4: Vaccines and Therapeutics · Issued 16 April 2026 · Addressed to: UK Health Security Agency

Source — verbatim from the inquiry

Inquiry recommendation

Each of the four UK public health or health security agencies should work together to: maintain accurate, UK-wide insight into the state of vaccine uptake and hesitancy; and understand the measures proven to be effective in increasing uptake across the four nations of the UK. There should be collaboration and some standardisation in the agreed approach across the four nations for monitoring and publishing routine vaccine uptake and vaccine confidence levels in order to better understand regional variations and patterns. Each nation should set and regularly review its minimum acceptable standards of vaccine uptake, which would trigger targeted uptake campaigns if not reached. The effectiveness of vaccine uptake campaigns should be evaluated against clear, standardised measures. This includes retrospective analysis of the Covid-19 uptake campaigns, as well as evaluation of routine vaccination uptake campaigns.

COVID-19 Inquiry, Module 4: Vaccines and Therapeutics · 16 Apr 2026 Source PDF →

Response — verbatim from government

Scottish Government — initial response

No formal response published by this government.

Scottish Government · 16 Apr 2026

Welsh Government — follow-up

No formal response published by this government.

Welsh Government · 16 Apr 2026

Northern Ireland Executive — follow-up

No formal response published by this government.

Northern Ireland Executive · 16 Apr 2026

Evidence trail — what's actually happened since

  • 16 Apr 2026 Status: Pending. No government response yet received. Module 4 report published 16 April 2026. Source →

Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.

How this page is built

Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.

This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.