R28 Response Pending

Restraint Reduction Network principles

Muckamore Abbey Inquiry · Muckamore Abbey Hospital Inquiry Report · Issued 18 June 2026 · Addressed to: Northern Ireland Executive

Source — verbatim from the inquiry

Inquiry recommendation

The Restraint Reduction Network identifies six principles to avoid the use of restrictive practice. While there is evidence that some Trusts have adopted these principles, further action is needed to ensure the principles are fully embedded. These principles must be embedded in policies and practices. The principles are: i. Organisational commitment – led by executive directors ii. Performance monitoring – using metrics to track restrictive practices iii. Human rights-based education – comprehensive training for staff iv. Personalised reduction plans – tailored strategies for individual patients v. Service user involvement – engaging patients in shaping restraint reduction strategies vi. Post-incident support and learning – structured debriefing and reflection for both patients and staff

Muckamore Abbey Inquiry, Muckamore Abbey Hospital Inquiry Report · 18 Jun 2026 Source PDF →

Response — verbatim from government

No formal government response recorded

The Index has not yet recorded a verbatim government response to this recommendation.

Evidence trail — what's actually happened since

  • 18 Jun 2026 Report published 18 June 2026. No formal government response published. R2 requires DoH to indicate within six months which recommendations it accepts.

Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.

How this page is built

Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.

This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.