Public Inquiry

Edinburgh Tram Inquiry

Status: Completed Chair: Lord Hardie Established: Oct 2014 Report: Sep 2023 Commissioned by: Scottish Government

Public inquiry into why the Edinburgh Trams project was delivered late, over budget, and with a reduced scope. The project cost £776m against an original estimate of £375m and took 5 years longer than planned.

Response breakdown

24 recommendations total
58%
29%
12%
14 (58%)Accepted
7 (29%)Accepted in Part
3 (12%)Under Review

Data last updated: 16 Nov 2023 · Source · Data verified: 31 Jan 2026 (Claude)

Evidence & impact

AI-generated · 26 Mar 2026
The Edinburgh Tram Inquiry, chaired by Lord Hardie, examined the planning and construction of Edinburgh's tram system, which experienced significant cost overruns and delays. The inquiry published 24 recommendations in August 2023 focusing on project governance, management practices, and legal reforms.

The Scottish Government accepted 14 recommendations (58%), accepted 7 in principle (29%), and placed 3 under consideration (12%). In its November 2023 response, the Government stated that enhanced procedures for documentation management had been embedded within government and that guidance for establishing inquiries was already in development. The Government noted its commitment to collaborative working through the Verity House agreement, whilst maintaining that responsibility for project delivery remains with councils.

City of Edinburgh Council's Chief Executive reported to the Transport and Environment Committee in November 2023, recommending acceptance of several recommendations. Council Leader Cammy Day acknowledged that "serious mistakes were made in the construction of the original tram line" and noted that processes implemented since the original project had helped deliver the successful Trams to Newhaven extension.

The Council reported that scrutiny of ALEOs had "significantly improved" following reviews in 2012 and 2016, resulting in formalised observer roles and increased committee scrutiny. Training on the Member/Officer Protocol was being delivered to senior officers to clarify the distinction between officer and councillor roles.

Three recommendations regarding civil damages provisions and criminal offences for misleading evidence to inquiries remain under consideration by the Scottish Government, which noted that existing remedies may already exist under delictual liability and fraud law.

Whilst both the Scottish Government and City of Edinburgh Council provided initial responses accepting most recommendations, published evidence of specific implementation actions remains limited for many recommendations, particularly those relating to project management expertise requirements, governance structures, and stakeholder co-location practices.

Key facts

Duration: 8 years, 10 months Total cost: £13.2m Witnesses: 100 Hearing days: 160 Core participants: 7 Documents disclosed: 6,000,000 Report pages: 961

Reports & milestones

Reports

01 Aug 2023 24 tracked recs Edinburgh Tram Inquiry Report · Tracked recommendations · PDF

Timeline

05 Jun 2014 Inquiry Announced Scottish Ministers established an inquiry into the Edinburgh Tram Project. · Source
03 Jul 2014 Chair Appointed Lord Hardie appointed as Chair.
08 Sep 2014 Terms of Referenc… Inquiry to examine why project was delayed and over budget.
09 Mar 2017 Hearings Begin Evidence hearings commenced.
12 Sep 2023 Final Report Publ… Report published with 24 recommendations. · Source
31 Jan 2024 Government Respon… Scottish Government response to recommendations.

Recommendations

24 shown (filtered)
Clear
Code Recommendation Addressed to Response
ETI-1
Scottish Ministers should undertake a review of public inquiries to determine the most cost-effective method of avoiding delay in the establishment of …
Scottish Government Accepted in Part View →
ETI-2
In any event Scottish Ministers should not appoint as the sponsor of any public inquiry any department, agency or other government organisation …
Scottish Government Accepted in Part View →
ETI-3
The guidance mentioned in the first recommendation should include: advice concerning the circumstances in which civil servants in the inquiry team may …
Scottish Government Accepted in Part View →
ETI-4
In reporting the cost of a public inquiry Scottish Ministers should report its net cost to the public purse, after discounting expenditure …
Scottish Government Accepted in Part View →
ETI-5
Where the Business Case for any future light rail project is based upon an assumption that, prior to the award of the …
Scottish Government Accepted View →
ETI-6
All versions of the Business Case, including any Business Case required as a result of altered assumptions, should include an assessment of …
Scottish Government Accepted View →
ETI-7
The assessment of risk at each stage mentioned in Recommendation 6 should be the subject of a peer review by external consultants …
Scottish Government Accepted View →
ETI-8
The existing Guidance on optimism bias was based on empirical data available almost two decades ago and should be revised to take …
Scottish Government Accepted in Part View →
ETI-9
The identification and management of risk should be an integral part of the governance of all major public-sector contracts in future. In …
Scottish Government Accepted View →
ETI-10
In the interests of protecting the public purse and maximising the benefits from public expenditure on major projects, the Scottish Ministers should …
Scottish Government Accepted in Part View →
ETI-11
The Scottish Ministers and local authorities responsible for funding light rail projects should be mindful at all times of their obligation to …
Scottish Government Accepted in Part View →
ETI-12
For reasons of transparency and accountability for public expenditure, the Scottish Ministers should keep minutes of: • the nature and content of …
Scottish Government Accepted View →
ETI-13
The procurement strategy for any future light rail project should make adequate provision for the uncertainties concerning the location of utilities and …
Scottish Government Accepted View →
ETI-14
Although some participants in the Inquiry criticised the use of MUDFA to divert utilities in advance of the infrastructure works and advocated …
Scottish Government Accepted View →
ETI-15
In recognition of the various difficulties likely to be experienced in the design and construction of a light rail project through a …
City of Edinburgh Council Accepted View →
ETI-16
Immediately following the appointment of the designer, and throughout the design of the project, the designer should engage with the promoter and …
City of Edinburgh Council Accepted View →
ETI-17
The governance structure for the delivery of a major project such as a light rail scheme should follow the published guidance and …
City of Edinburgh Council Accepted View →
ETI-18
As part of their investigations, representatives of OGC undertaking an independent “readiness review” of a publicly funded project and representatives of any …
City of Edinburgh Council Accepted View →
ETI-19
At all stages of the project there should be a collaborative approach to delivering it. This should include the co-location of representatives …
City of Edinburgh Council Accepted View →
ETI-20
The directors, employees and consultants of the company responsible for the procurement and delivery of the project as project managers, including an …
City of Edinburgh Council Accepted View →
ETI-21
Local authority officials should be mindful at all times of the distinction in roles between them and councillors, who are solely responsible …
City of Edinburgh Council Accepted View →
ETI-22
Where a company, including an ALEO, knowingly submits a report or other information to local authority officials that is misleading by reason …
Scottish Government Under Consideration View →
ETI-23
In addition to any civil liability arising from any sanction introduced in accordance with Recommendation 22, the Scottish Ministers should consider whether …
Scottish Government Under Consideration View →
ETI-24
The Scottish Ministers should also give consideration to the need for legislation to impose a similar duty of disclosure to that owed …
Scottish Government Under Consideration View →