Public Inquiry

Edinburgh Tram Inquiry

Completed · Chair: Lord Hardie · Established July 2014 · Commissioned by Scottish Government

Public inquiry into why the Edinburgh Trams project was delivered late, over budget, and with a reduced scope.

More about this inquiry

Public inquiry into why the Edinburgh Trams project was delivered late, over budget, and with a reduced scope. The project cost £776m against an original estimate of £375m and took 5 years longer than planned.

Where it stands

Public hearings were held on 59 days between September 2017 and May 2018.

Edinburgh Tram Inquiry Report was published on 19 September 2023.

The most recent government response on the record is Response to the Edinburgh Tram Inquiry (item 7.1), dated 14 December 2023.

Government response (24 recommendations)

Delivery (the addressees’ latest statements)

  • No statement from Scottish Government found in the sources searched 17
  • No statement from City of Edinburgh Council found in the sources searched 7

Record checked against the sources 31 January 2026. Latest activity 14 December 2023.

Latest on the recommendations

All 24 recommendations

Reports

Reports and timeline

Recent milestones

  • Inquiry Closed1 September 2026
  • Government Response31 January 2024
  • Final Report Published19 September 2023
Full timeline

Costs

£13,200,000

Reported cost Costs in detail

Parliament

2

mentions in Parliament Parliamentary activity

Recommendations

7 shown (filtered)
Clear filters

ETI-1: Public Inquiry Efficiency

Under consideration · No statement from Scottish Government found

Recommended

Scottish Ministers should undertake a review of public inquiries to determine the most cost-effective method of avoiding delay in the establishment of an inquiry, including consideration of establishing a dedicated unit within the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service and publishing regularly updated guidance for people involved in the establishment and progress of public inquiries.

Since then (summary written by this site)

In November 2023, Màiri McAllan, Cabinet Secretary for Transport, Net Zero and Just Transition, stated to the Scottish Parliament that ministers were "working through all of these recommendations", adding that additional guidance on the efficient establishment and delivery of public inquiries was in development and had been shared with recent inquiries (Màiri McAllan response, Nov 2023). The record holds no update since the Scottish Government's response of November 2023 (Màiri McAllan response, Nov 2023).

Addressed to Scottish Government · Full record

ETI-2: Inquiry Independence

Under consideration · No statement from Scottish Government found

Recommended

In any event Scottish Ministers should not appoint as the sponsor of any public inquiry any department, agency or other government organisation where it, or any of its employees, has had any involvement in the project or other event giving rise to the establishment of the public inquiry.

Since then (summary written by this site)

In November 2023, Cabinet Secretary for Transport, Net Zero and Just Transition Màiri McAllan stated that the Scottish Government was working through the recommendations, adding that "additional guidance similar to that suggested is already in development" regarding the establishment and delivery of public inquiries and had been shared with recent inquiries as they were established (Màiri McAllan response, Nov 2023). The record holds no update since the Scottish Government's response of November 2023 (Màiri McAllan response, Nov 2023).

Addressed to Scottish Government · Full record

ETI-3: Staffing Guidance

Under consideration · No statement from Scottish Government found

Recommended

The guidance mentioned in the first recommendation should include: advice concerning the circumstances in which civil servants in the inquiry team may properly transfer to posts, other than promoted posts, within other government departments or agencies; which positions within the administration of a public inquiry may be filled by the employment of agency staff; and whether longer-term contracts as temporary civil servants are more appropriate for particular positions that cannot be filled by permanent civil servants.

Since then (summary written by this site)

In November 2023, Cabinet Secretary for Transport, Net Zero and Just Transition Màiri McAllan stated to the Scottish Parliament that the Scottish Government was "working through all of these recommendations" (Màiri McAllan response, Nov 2023). The Minister reported in November 2023 that additional guidance regarding the efficient establishment and delivery of public inquiries was already in development and had been shared with recent inquiries as they were established (Màiri McAllan response, Nov 2023).

Addressed to Scottish Government · Full record

ETI-10: Joint Working Group with COSLA

Under consideration · No statement from Scottish Government found

Recommended

In the interests of protecting the public purse and maximising the benefits from public expenditure on major projects, the Scottish Ministers should contemplate establishing a joint working group consisting of officials in Transport Scotland and representatives of the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities (“COSLA”) to consider how best to take advantage of: • tolerating the risk of cost overrun that is always a possibility in risk assessments by including all public-sector light rail projects in the portfolio of large projects undertaken by the Scottish Government, including those to be constructed wholly within the geographical boundaries of a single local authority; • the greater experience within Transport Scotland of managing major projects in the public sector; and • the necessary skills and expertise within Transport Scotland to deliver the project on time and within budget.

Since then (summary written by this site)

In November 2023, the Cabinet Secretary for Transport, Net Zero and Just Transition, Màiri McAllan, stated that the Scottish Government would "consider that recommendation on a case-by-case basis", noting that while its focus on light rail limited applicable cases, evidence regarding the separation of roles also remained relevant (Màiri McAllan response, Nov 2023). The record holds no update since the Scottish Government's response of November 2023 (Màiri McAllan response, Nov 2023).

Addressed to Scottish Government · Full record

ETI-22: Civil Sanctions for Misleading Reports

Under consideration · No statement from Scottish Government found

Recommended

Where a company, including an ALEO, knowingly submits a report or other information to local authority officials that is misleading by reason of the inclusion of false statements or the omission of relevant facts or where such officials knowingly submit misleading information to councillors, whether or not councillors act upon that information, the Scottish Ministers should consider whether there should be an appropriate sanction in damages against the relevant individuals within the company responsible for the false statements or omission of relevant facts, as well as against the company itself, and against the relevant local authority officials involved in misleading councillors.

Since then (summary written by this site)

In November 2023, Màiri McAllan, Cabinet Secretary for Transport, Net Zero and Just Transition, stated that ministers were giving "careful consideration" to the recommendation, noting the view that the civil law of delictual liability might already provide for such sanctions but confirming that they would continue to consider the matter (Màiri McAllan response, Nov 2023). The record holds no update since the Scottish Government's response of November 2023 (Màiri McAllan response, Nov 2023).

Addressed to Scottish Government · Full record

ETI-23: Criminal Sanctions for Misleading Information

Under consideration · No statement from Scottish Government found

Recommended

In addition to any civil liability arising from any sanction introduced in accordance with Recommendation 22, the Scottish Ministers should consider whether there is a need for a statutory criminal offence involving strict liability once it is established that the information and/or report was misleading by reason of the inclusion of false statements or the omission of relevant facts.

Since then (summary written by this site)

In November 2023, Màiri McAllan, Cabinet Secretary for Transport, Net Zero and Just Transition, stated that consideration was being given to creating a statutory criminal offence, noting an initial view that provision might already exist under the criminal common law of fraud (Màiri McAllan response, Nov 2023). The Minister confirmed that work to consider the recommendation would continue (Màiri McAllan response, Nov 2023). The record holds no update since the Scottish Government's response of November 2023 (Màiri McAllan response, Nov 2023).

Addressed to Scottish Government · Full record

ETI-24: Duty of Disclosure Legislation

Under consideration · No statement from Scottish Government found

Recommended

The Scottish Ministers should also give consideration to the need for legislation to impose a similar duty of disclosure to that owed by policyholders to their insurers upon a company, its directors, employees or consultants and upon a local authority and its officials towards representatives of OGC or of Audit Scotland undertaking any review of a publicly funded project. Any such legislation should determine the appropriate civil and/or criminal sanctions to be imposed for breach of the duty of disclosure.

Since then (summary written by this site)

Speaking to the Scottish Parliament in November 2023, Màiri McAllan, Cabinet Secretary for Transport, Net Zero and Just Transition, stated that ministers would continue to "very carefully consider each of the recommendations", noting where action had already been taken or reflected best practice and identifying where further steps could be taken (Màiri McAllan response, Nov 2023). The record holds no update since the Scottish Government's response of November 2023 (Màiri McAllan response, Nov 2023).

Addressed to Scottish Government · Full record

Reports and timeline

Timeline

Inquiry Announced

Scottish Ministers established an inquiry into the Edinburgh Tram Project.

Source

Chair and Terms of Reference announced

Source

Chair appointed by letter

Source

First preliminary hearing

Source

Oral evidence hearings begin

Source

Oral evidence ends

Source

Oral closing submissions concluded

Source

Final Report Published

Report published with 24 recommendations.

Source

Show all 10 milestones

Government Response

Scottish Government response to recommendations.

Inquiry Closed

Lord Hardie notified the First Minister that the inquiry had ended and published an explanatory note.

Source

Parliamentary activity

2 mentions since Mar 2003

European Tram Driver Championship

Early Day Motion House of Commons Christine Jardine · Liberal Democrat

Said: That this House congratulates Edinburgh Trams Drivers Emma White and Jason Moffat on their selection to represent Edinburgh Tram Driver Championship in Warsaw; recognises the skill, expertise and dedication required to compete in the championship which brings together tram drivers from across Europe and beyond; …

EDINBURGH TRAM NETWORK

Early Day Motion House of Commons Mark Lazarowicz · Labour

Said: That this House welcomes the announcement by the Scottish Executive of funding of ú375 million for the proposed Edinburgh tram network; and urges elected representatives at all levels of government in Scotland to put their backing behind these proposals which will benefit the wider Scottish …

View all 2 mentions →

Evidence & impact

AI-generated · 26 Mar 2026
The Edinburgh Tram Inquiry, chaired by Lord Hardie, examined the planning and construction of Edinburgh's tram system, which experienced significant cost overruns and delays. The inquiry published 24 recommendations in August 2023 focusing on project governance, management practices, and legal reforms.

The Scottish Government accepted 14 recommendations (58%), accepted 7 in principle (29%), and placed 3 under consideration (12%). In its November 2023 response, the Government stated that enhanced procedures for documentation management had been embedded within government and that guidance for establishing inquiries was already in development. The Government noted its commitment to collaborative working through the Verity House agreement, whilst maintaining that responsibility for project delivery remains with councils.

City of Edinburgh Council's Chief Executive reported to the Transport and Environment Committee in November 2023, recommending acceptance of several recommendations. Council Leader Cammy Day acknowledged that "serious mistakes were made in the construction of the original tram line" and noted that processes implemented since the original project had helped deliver the successful Trams to Newhaven extension.

The Council reported that scrutiny of ALEOs had "significantly improved" following reviews in 2012 and 2016, resulting in formalised observer roles and increased committee scrutiny. Training on the Member/Officer Protocol was being delivered to senior officers to clarify the distinction between officer and councillor roles.

Three recommendations regarding civil damages provisions and criminal offences for misleading evidence to inquiries remain under consideration by the Scottish Government, which noted that existing remedies may already exist under delictual liability and fraud law.

Whilst both the Scottish Government and City of Edinburgh Council provided initial responses accepting most recommendations, published evidence of specific implementation actions remains limited for many recommendations, particularly those relating to project management expertise requirements, governance structures, and stakeholder co-location practices.
Reforms attributed to this inquiry · AI-generated- Enhanced procedures for minute-taking and documentation management embedded within Scottish Government and Civil Service (Scottish Government statement, November 2023)
- Improved scrutiny arrangements for Arms Length External Organisations (ALEOs) by City of Edinburgh Council, including formalised observer roles and regular committee reporting following 2012 and 2016 reviews
- Member/Officer Protocol training delivered to senior officers at City of Edinburgh Council to clarify distinction between officer and councillor roles
- Guidance for efficient establishment of inquiries developed and shared with recent inquiries (Scottish Government statement, November 2023)
Unfinished business · AI-generated- Recommendations on civil damages provisions and criminal statutory offences for misleading evidence to inquiries remain under consideration by Scottish Government
- No published evidence of action on recommendations regarding project management expertise requirements for light rail projects
- No published evidence of progress on recommendations for governance structure guidance and role clarity in major projects
- No published evidence regarding recommendations on co-location of project stakeholders
- No published evidence of updates to guidance on best practices for light rail delivery, despite Scottish Government stating it already operates in line with best practices

Key facts

Duration: 12 years, 1 month Total reported cost: £13.2m Witnesses: 85 Hearing days: 59 Core participants: 14 Documents disclosed: 6,000,000 Report pages: 961