ETI-15 Accepted

Qualified Project Management

Edinburgh Tram Inquiry · Edinburgh Tram Inquiry Report · Issued 1 August 2023 · Addressed to: City of Edinburgh Council

Source — verbatim from the inquiry

Inquiry recommendation, Chapter 25 Recommendation 15 (paragraph 25.227)

In recognition of the various difficulties likely to be experienced in the design and construction of a light rail project through a city centre, the promoter and owner of the project should appoint as its procurement and project manager a company with suitably qualified and experienced permanent employees that has delivered a similar project successfully on time and within budget or can demonstrate that it will be able to do so.

Edinburgh Tram Inquiry, Edinburgh Tram Inquiry Report · 1 Aug 2023 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

Publicly available evidence relating to this recommendation:

- In November 2023, City of Edinburgh Council Leader Cammy Day stated that the Council broadly agreed with Lord Hardie's recommendations and noted improvements had been implemented for the successful delivery of the Trams to Newhaven project (City of Edinburgh Council response, November 2023).
- In a subsequent Council committee report (16 November 2023), the Council noted that the Trams to Newhaven project had demonstrated improved procurement and project management practices (City of Edinburgh Council Committee Report, 16 November 2023).
- No published formal framework requiring appointment of experienced permanent employees for light rail project management has been identified to March 2026.
How was this evidence gathered?
Evidence searched by Claude (Anthropic) on 10 Apr 2026
Checked data held on this site (government responses, progress updates, independent evidence)
This recommendation applies across many organisations. The evidence above reflects central policy activity; adoption in individual organisations may vary.

Response — verbatim from government

City of Edinburgh Council — initial response

Council Leader Cammy Day stated: 'We know that serious mistakes were made in the construction of the original tram line, which caused a great deal of disruption and concern for residents and businesses, as well as impacting the Council's reputation. Once again, I want to apologise for this.' The Council broadly agrees with Lord Hardie's recommendations but notes that since the original tram project, several processes and strategies have been put in place which helped successfully deliver the Trams to Newhaven line. The Council has not published a formal detailed response to individual recommendations. Source: Council news release, 2 November 2023.

City of Edinburgh Council · 2 Nov 2023 Written response →

City of Edinburgh Council — follow-up

The Inquiry Report highlights a number of instances where there was insufficient experience in delivery to give assurance that the project would be properly managed. The procurement and project management of a project is key to success and demonstrable experience should be secured as part of light rail delivery. It is recommended that the Council should adopt this Recommendation. Source: Chief Executive's report to Transport and Environment Committee, 16 November 2023. Note: City of Edinburgh Council statuses are drawn from the Chief Executive's report to the Transport and Environment Committee (16 November 2023), referred to the full Council on 14 December 2023. This report appears to have been formally adopted but independent confirmation has not been obtained.

City of Edinburgh Council · 16 Nov 2023 Written response →

Evidence trail — what's actually happened since

  • 2 Nov 2023 Initial status based on Scottish Government and City of Edinburgh Council responses to the Edinburgh Tram Inquiry Report (September 2023). Source →

Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.

How this page is built

Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.

This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.