Design Engagement Process
Edinburgh Tram Inquiry · Edinburgh Tram Inquiry Report · Issued 19 September 2023 · Addressed to: City of Edinburgh Council
Government responseCity of Edinburgh Council: Accepted (Dec 2023)
DeliveryNo statement from City of Edinburgh Council found
Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation, Chapter 25 Recommendation 16 (paragraph 25.228)
Immediately following the appointment of the designer, and throughout the design of the project, the designer should engage with the promoter and owner of the project, the procurement and project manager, the local planning authority, the utility companies and interested third parties owning land that may be affected by the project to clarify their design criteria. In such discussions throughout the design of the project the promoter and owner of the project should co-ordinate responses to the various stages of design and, in doing so, should take into account the competing interests of different parties and of various departments within any local authority exercising different statutory functions as well as the significance of the project in the context of the community as a whole and should provide all necessary assistance and clear and timeous instructions to the designer to avoid delays and additional expense. In that regard:
• prior to the appointment of the designer the local planning authority ought to produce sufficiently detailed design guidelines to enable the designer to take them into account from the outset when designing the tram network and to improve the prospects of obtaining the necessary consents and approvals without requiring repeated re-submission of designs that will result in delay to the project with resultant expense;
• throughout the project a collaborative approach should be adopted by the promoter and owner to achieve an early resolution of any design issues that arise; and
• the promoter and owner should assume primary responsibility for co-ordinating the local authority’s response and for negotiating the resolution of all issues to enable clear instructions to be issued to the designer and to avoid re-design of sections of the route following reconsideration of matters that have been resolved at an earlier stage.
Edinburgh Tram Inquiry, Edinburgh Tram Inquiry Report · 19 Sep 2023 Source PDF →
Published evidence summary
AI-generated evidence summary
In December 2023, Andrew Kerr, Chief Executive of the City of Edinburgh Council, recommended that it adopt the recommendation to produce detailed design guidance, collaborate with the designer, and coordinate responses to design queries, noting that the absence of a single point of contact prior to mediation had led to confusion regarding its position (Andrew Kerr response, Dec 2023). The record holds no update since the City of Edinburgh Council's response of December 2023 (Andrew Kerr response, Dec 2023).
Sources
AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.
About this summary
Government response
●City of Edinburgh Council · Accepted · 14 Dec 2023
The Inquiry Report identifies a difference in the approach taken by the Council to design before and after the Mar Hall mediation. Prior to the mediation there was not a single point of contact at the Council to coordinate the design responses and this led to confusion as to the Council’s position. In order to avoid this in future, Lord Hardie recommends that the Council produces detailed design guidance to assist design development, collaborate with the designer to resolve design issues and coordinate the response to design queries such that clear instructions can be given.
It is recommended that the Council should adopt this Recommendation.
Response document: Response to the Edinburgh Tram Inquiry (item 7.1)
Delivery
No statement on delivery from City of Edinburgh Council has been found in the sources searched. This is separate from the response above.
How this page is built
The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.