IBI-A-6b Accepted in Part

Exceptional Loss Evidence

Infected Blood Inquiry · Additional Report on Compensation · Issued 9 July 2025 · Addressed to: UK Government

Source — verbatim from the inquiry

Inquiry recommendation

The Cabinet Office consult on whether the evidential requirements for exceptional reduced earnings are likely to prove a barrier to people who have sufficient evidence that their eligibility for such an award could with confidence be established on a balance of probabilities, and if so to consider what if any provision might be introduced to enable them to access an award.

Infected Blood Inquiry, Additional Report on Compensation · 9 Jul 2025 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

Publicly available evidence relating to this recommendation:

- The Government stated in July 2025 that it accepted this recommendation in principle and would consult on the evidential requirements for Exceptional Loss awards through the supplementary route (Infected Blood Inquiry Additional Report: Government Response, Cabinet Office, July 2025).
- A consultation on proposed changes to the infected blood compensation scheme was opened on 24 November 2025 (Consultation: Proposed Changes to the Infected Blood Compensation Scheme, Cabinet Office, November 2025).

Response — verbatim from government

UK Government

The exceptional loss award which is part of the supplementary route provides additional compensation for those infected people who would have received higher pay if it were not for their infection. The Government commits to consult the community on the evidential requirements to access this award to ensure it is available for those intended within the limits of a tariff based scheme.

UK Government · 21 Jul 2025 Written response →

Evidence trail — what's actually happened since

  • 21 Jul 2025 14 April 2026 update: Government response (CP 1565) also addresses evidence concerns: "We understand from the consultation that some people are concerned that they will not be able to access this award if they do not have historic payslips. We will work with IBCA to ensure that communications are clear about the broad range of alternative evidence that people could use to show they are eligible for the Exceptional Loss award so that this is not a barrier." December 2025 regulations also removed the minimum earnings threshold for Exceptional Loss applications. Sources: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/changes-to-infected-blood-compensation-scheme-will-improve-support-for-victims; https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69ddf5fd7e2086c62da2f152/Government_response_to_consultation_on_proposed_changes_to_the_infected_blood_compensation_scheme__PDF_.pdf Source →
  • 15 Jan 2026 · IBCA Community Update As of 13 January 2026: 3,721 people asked to start claims, 3,546 begun process, 3,074 received offers totalling £2.47bn, 2,861 paid totalling £1.89bn. Third compensation regulations in force 31 December 2025. View source → Good Progress
  • 28 Oct 2025 · IBCA Independent Review IBCA has contacted 2,215 people to begin compensation claims; 1,934 started process. £812m+ paid via Horizon Shortfall Scheme. £11.8bn committed in Autumn Budget. View source → Reasonable Progress

Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.

How this page is built

Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.

This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.