Select Committee · Public Accounts Committee

Crown Court backlogs

Status: Closed Opened: 31 Oct 2024 Closed: 16 May 2025 4 recommendations 28 conclusions 1 report

In March 2022, the Committee found that the COVID-19 pandemic had exacerbated a growing backlog of cases waiting to be tried in the criminal courts, significantly affecting defendants, victims and witnesses. The report found that the Ministry of Justice’s (MoJ) meagre ambition to reduce the Crown Court case backlog by less than 8,000 cases by …

Clear

Reports

1 report
Title HC No. Published Items Response
12th Report - Crown Court backlogs HC 348 5 Mar 2025 32 Responded

Recommendations & Conclusions

17 items
2 Conclusion 12th Report - Crown Court backlogs Accepted

Reduce delayed or postponed serious sexual and violent offence hearings and protect victim support funding.

Long waits for cases to start, delays and the often–last–minute postponement of cases all have a significant impact on the victims of crime, particularly for victims of Rape and Serious Sexual Offences (RASSO) and violent crimes, seriously disrupting their lives, inflicting additional distress on people who have already experienced terrible …

Government response. The government agrees and commits to rolling over the Rape and Sexual Abuse Support Fund and maintaining ringfenced spending for community-based sexual violence and domestic abuse support in 2025/26. It also engages regularly with providers to improve victim support, but …
HM Treasury
3 Conclusion 12th Report - Crown Court backlogs Accepted

Improve data-driven forecasting of Crown Court cases to adapt court system processes.

For some time now, MoJ has been failing to adequately forecast increases in the number and mix of cases being sent to the Crown Court, reducing its ability to plan how the courts system may need to adapt to meet the varying caseload. MoJ carries out modelling to project likely …

Government response. The government agrees and commits to regularly reviewing its CJS projections to incorporate latest data, interventions, and evidence, and will keep its data use under continual review. Specific actions include developing the “OneCrown” single data pipeline and reviewing future demand …
HM Treasury
5 Conclusion 12th Report - Crown Court backlogs Accepted

Set out understanding of ineffective trial causes and required actions to address them.

The proportion of hearings that do not take place on the day they are scheduled (ineffective trials) remains far too high, and there are causes of ineffective trials that MoJ and HMCTS could be more active in addressing now. One in four trials do not take place on the day …

Government response. The government agrees and will provide the requested letter outlining its understanding of ineffective trial causes, professional capacity factors, impact of changes, and further required actions, alongside its Treasury Minute response.
HM Treasury
6 Conclusion 12th Report - Crown Court backlogs Accepted

Set out total spending and impact of investments on Crown Court backlog reduction.

MoJ could not tell us which of the actions it funded from nearly £500 million of additional funding it received through the 2021 Spending Review had the biggest impact on reducing the backlog, nor could it quantify what it expects the cost to be of dealing with the backlog now, …

Government response. The government agrees and will provide the requested letter detailing total spending since 2021 on reducing the Crown Court backlog, how additional funding was used for interventions, and the assessed impact of that investment, alongside its Treasury Minute response.
HM Treasury
7 Recommendation 12th Report - Crown Court backlogs Accepted

Assure accuracy of criminal justice datasets and set out scope for courts' digitisation.

Despite MoJ assuring us that it has rectified the processing errors that led to it publishing inaccurate Crown Court statistics, we remain concerned that other datasets within the criminal justice system may be affected by the same quality and accuracy issues. MoJ paused publication of Crown Court caseload data between …

Government response. The government agrees and outlines its scope for further digitisation and AI, including current trials of transcription and summarisation in tribunals, past AI knowledge management trials, and plans to decommission legacy systems by Spring 2027. Future expansion of AI and …
HM Treasury
8 Conclusion 12th Report - Crown Court backlogs Accepted

Ministry of Justice introduced various measures to address the Crown Court backlog.

MoJ has previously introduced measures to address the backlog, including those within the 2021 Criminal Justice Action Plan.17 MoJ described current work to manage the Crown Court caseload, including: • Increasing the number of sitting days to 108,500 this year. • Supporting the physical capacity of the courts estate by …

Government response. The government affirms its commitment to tackling the Crown Court backlog, outlining a range of measures including funding 110,000 Crown Court sitting days for 2025-26 (an increase from the previous year), increased court maintenance, ongoing judicial recruitment, and exploring legal …
HM Treasury
12 Conclusion 12th Report - Crown Court backlogs Accepted

Prolonged Crown Court waits, particularly for sex cases, contribute to increased victim attrition.

MoJ acknowledges that long waits in the Crown Court are bad for everyone, including defendants, victims and the system as a whole.25 MoJ noted particular concern for victims of sex cases, which are very complex and often take a long time to conclude.26 In September 2024, there were 11,574 open …

Government response. The government states that ineffective trials for sexual offences are declining and that judicial practices already prioritise serious sexual offences. It also highlights continued protected funding for VAWG support services and commits to improving victim support, though future actions are …
HM Treasury
14 Conclusion 12th Report - Crown Court backlogs Accepted

MoJ acknowledges lengthy waits for RASSO victims and implements specific support measures.

MoJ acknowledged that the long waits for RASSO victims is “not a particularly desirable situation” and outlined some measures in place to support these victims. These measures included: • investing £41 million in sexual violence and domestic violence advisors, and continuing to protect funding for victims (particularly for victims of …

Government response. The government agrees with the committee's conclusion, reiterating that judicial listing practices already prioritise serious sexual offences, and confirming continued protected funding for Violence Against Women and Girls support services for 2025/26. It also notes it cannot pre-empt the outcome …
HM Treasury
16 Conclusion 12th Report - Crown Court backlogs Accepted

Increasing remand lengths cause significant personal harm and risk of miscarriages of justice.

Written evidence submitted by His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons stated that the length of time that people are remanded for and the extent to which this is changing is information that is not in the public domain. The Inspectorate’s evidence also explained that “the increasing average length of time an …

Government response. The government commits to exploring initiatives to address time spent on remand and plans to develop and publish improved data on this by April 2027. It also highlights ongoing efforts to enhance court capacity and prioritise remand cases, and will …
HM Treasury
18 Conclusion 12th Report - Crown Court backlogs Accepted

Ministry of Justice struggled to manage planned increase in Crown Court caseload.

MoJ attributed the increasing backlog to a “significant increase” in the rate of new cases as a result of the recruitment of over 20,000 additional police officers since 2019, and to a change in the nature of the caseload to more complex cases.43 MoJ claimed that since the pandemic it …

Government response. The government agrees with the Committee's observation and is committed to regularly reviewing its projections for the Criminal Justice System, incorporating latest data, trends, and new interventions. They are also developing a 'OneCrown' single data pipeline and reviewing future demand …
HM Treasury
19 Conclusion 12th Report - Crown Court backlogs Accepted

Crown Court backlog growing because cases conclude slower than anticipated.

The NAO report found that MoJ regularly models projections of the size of the Crown Court’s outstanding caseload, and has previously used projections from this modelling to inform decision–making on policy development, resource planning and capacity requirements.47 This modelling includes factors such as incoming demand, case complexity, court capacity and …

Government response. The government commits to regularly reviewing its Crown Court caseload projections, incorporating the latest data, trends, and interventions, and continually reviewing its use of data and assumptions. This includes developing a 'OneCrown' single data pipeline to improve data quality and …
HM Treasury
20 Conclusion 12th Report - Crown Court backlogs Accepted

Ministry of Justice unable to forecast future Crown Court backlog, expects increase.

At our evidence session in January 2025, MoJ could not tell us what it forecast the backlog would be in 12 months’ time. It told us that it would not be right to predict what the backlog will be in a year’s time, as it does not publish projections, although …

Government response. The government agrees with the Committee's observation and is committed to regularly reviewing its projections for the Criminal Justice System, incorporating latest data, trends, and new interventions. They are also developing a 'OneCrown' single data pipeline and reviewing future demand …
HM Treasury
25 Conclusion 12th Report - Crown Court backlogs Accepted

Ineffective trials still caused by poor case preparation and prisoner transport failures.

We heard from HMCTS of other reasons for ineffective trials that would appear to have simple solutions.68 We heard how organisations contracted to transport prisoners fail to get all defendants from prison to court on time, incurring a financial penalty if the defendant arrives more than 15 minutes after the …

Government response. The government states it agrees with the Committee's conclusions and claims the underlying recommendation regarding issues causing ineffective trials, such as prisoner transport and case preparation, has been implemented as of April 2025, with further details provided in a separate …
HM Treasury
29 Conclusion 12th Report - Crown Court backlogs Accepted

Missed opportunity to fund maximum court sitting days exacerbated backlog

In evidence to the Justice Committee in November 2024, the Lady Chief Justice described how the concordat agreement with MoJ for 2024–25, agreed under the previous administration, had provided for 106,000 sitting days. She reported that in August HMCTS had then said the courts could actually sit up to a …

Government response. The government commits to funding 110,000 Crown Court sitting days in 2025-26, the highest allocation ever, and outlines various other ongoing initiatives such as judicial recruitment, increased legal aid funding, and court maintenance to reduce the backlog. It also states …
HM Treasury
30 Conclusion 12th Report - Crown Court backlogs Accepted

Crown Court caseload data previously unreliable due to Common Platform errors

MoJ confirmed that it had identified three factors that caused it to pause publication of its Crown Court caseload data from June to December 2024. It had found that case records in Common Platform (the new digital case management system for the criminal justice system) had been adversely affected through …

Government response. The government confirms the external review found confidence in Crown Court caseload statistics and details improvements made to magistrates’ caseload data measurement, including revisions due to identified issues in legacy systems. It also notes ongoing investigation for further remedial action …
HM Treasury
31 Conclusion 12th Report - Crown Court backlogs Accepted

Accuracy of criminal and civil court data, including remand population, remains questionable

Despite these assurances, we concur with a request from the Law Society of England and Wales in its written submission to us for confirmation from MoJ that other data and statistics across the criminal and civil courts are not similarly affected.87 Exemplifying this point, in correspondence to us after the …

Government response. The government confirms confidence in Crown Court caseload statistics and details improvements made to magistrates’ caseload data, noting previous overstatements due to legacy system issues and committing to further revisions for additional legacy cases in the future. It also states …
HM Treasury
32 Conclusion 12th Report - Crown Court backlogs Accepted

Common Platform system operation has vastly improved and is now reliable

We were relieved to hear from HMCTS that the operation of Common Platform has “vastly improved” over the last few years, describing it as a “a good and stable system”, and that HMCTS now has confidence in the system’s reliability.89 HMCTS told us that it introduced Common Platform gradually into …

Government response. The government confirms continued trials of AI in courts and tribunals, though scaling up is dependent on future Spending Review funding. It also outlines plans for further digitisation, including decommissioning legacy systems (Xhibit and Libra) by Spring 2027 to reduce …
HM Treasury

Oral evidence sessions

1 session
Date Witnesses
9 Jan 2025 Dame Antonia Romeo DCB · Ministry of Justice, Daniel Flury · HM Courts and Tribunals Service, Jerome Glass · Ministry of Justice, Nick Goodwin · HMCTS View ↗

Correspondence

3 letters
DateDirectionTitle
4 Sep 2025 To cttee Letter from the Chief Executive at HM Prison and Probation Service and the Chie…
19 May 2025 To cttee Letter from the Chief Executive of HM Courts & Tribunals Service relating to th…
27 Jan 2025 To cttee Letter from the Chief Executive at HM Courts and Tribunals Service relating to …