Source · Ombudsman decisions

LGO Individual Decisions

40,244 total decisions 13,353 investigated 10,886 upheld 82% upheld of investigated Years: Jan 2022–Sep 2026

40,244 published decisions from the Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman. The Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman investigates complaints about councils and registered social care providers in England. Source: lgo.org.uk.

Decisions

40,244 records · Page 11 of 1610

Liverpool City Region Combined Authority · 26-000-738

Decision 25 August 2026Transport And HighwaysOutcome: Other

Subject: Public Transport

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Authority’s refusal to replace a lost annual travel pass. There is not enough evidence of fault to warrant investigation.

Leicester City Council · 26-001-572

Decision 25 August 2026Adult Care ServicesOutcome: Upheld

Subject: Domiciliary Care

Mrs A complains about the care provided to her father by a Council, a Trust and a ICB before his death. She also complains the Council failed to complete a continuing healthcare assessment. We will not investigate these complaints because there are no indications of …

Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council · 26-003-601

Decision 25 August 2026Transport And HighwaysOutcome: Other

Subject: Highway Repair And Maintenance

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about highway repair because any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement and there is another body better placed to consider this complaint.

Cumberland Council · 26-011-931

Decision 25 August 2026Environment And RegulationOutcome: Other

Subject: Refuse And Recycling

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint that the Council failed to inform her about a bin exchange scheme. The claimed injustice is not significant enough to warrant our involvement.

London Borough of Waltham Forest · 25-021-249

Decision 25 August 2026Children S Care ServicesOutcome: Other

Subject: Child Protection

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with an allegation of harm to a child. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, any injustice has already been remedied by the Council and there is …

London Borough of Haringey · 25-018-609

Decision 25 August 2026EducationOutcome: Other

Subject: Special Educational Needs

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of her child’s Education, Health and Care Plan because she has exercised her right of appeal to the First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability). There is not enough evidence of fault in …

Warwickshire County Council · 25-031-153

Decision 25 August 2026EducationOutcome: Other

Subject: School Transport

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about school transport because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (26 001 572b) · 26-001-572b

Decision 25 August 2026HealthOutcome: Other

Subject: Hospital Acute Services

Mrs A complains about the care provided to her father by a Council, a Trust and a ICB before his death. She also complains the Council failed to complete a continuing healthcare assessment. We will not investigate these complaints because there are no indications of …

London Borough of Hackney · 25-020-733

Decision 25 August 2026HousingOutcome: Other

Subject: Allocations

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Mr X missing out on an allocation of housing. This is because the events happened more than twelve months ago and so the complaint is now late.

Nottinghamshire County Council · 26-014-454

Decision 25 August 2026EducationOutcome: Other

Subject: School Transport

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a home to school transport application. There is not enough evidence of fault to warrant investigation.

Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames · 26-014-438

Decision 25 August 2026Benefits And TaxOutcome: Other

Subject: Council Tax

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council handled Mr X’s application for a council tax reduction, and his resulting complaint. Any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, and we could not add to the investigation the Council has …

Suffolk County Council · 26-002-534

Decision 25 August 2026EducationOutcome: Other

Subject: Special Educational Needs

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s data handling during a Tribunal appeal about her child’s Education, Health and Care Plan. This is because we cannot investigate matters Mrs X has already raised with the Tribunal to resolve. And, the Information …

London Borough of Croydon · 25-030-787

Decision 25 August 2026HousingOutcome: Other

Subject: Other

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint that the Council did not refund her rent that she says she overpaid in 2023. This is because the complaint is late with no good reason to investigate it now.

Nottingham City Council · 25-021-512

Decision 25 August 2026HousingOutcome: Other

Subject: Allocations

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s decision not to award her priority on its housing register. There is insufficient evidence of fault in how the Council reached its decision. We cannot consider Miss X’s complaints about disrepair or the Council’s …

Leeds City Council · 25-023-519

Decision 25 August 2026EducationOutcome: Upheld

Subject: Special Educational Needs

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of an Education, Health and Care Plan. Part of the complaint is late and there is no good reason for us to consider it now.

London Borough of Lewisham · 26-005-707

Decision 25 August 2026HousingOutcome: Other

Subject: Council House Sales And Leaseholders

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision not to re-investigate what took place in respect of Mr X’s right to buy purchase, as this is a matter for the court.

Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Council · 26-014-359

Decision 25 August 2026Other CategoriesOutcome: Other

Subject: Leisure And Culture

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council handled the closure of a public park. This is because we have decided any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

Stevenage Borough Council · 26-014-461

Decision 25 August 2026Environment And RegulationOutcome: Other

Subject: Other

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about damage caused to Mrs X’s property by the Council during works. Mrs X

Dorset Council · 26-014-205

Decision 25 August 2026Children S Care ServicesOutcome: Other

Subject: Other

Summary: We cannot investigate Miss X’s complaint about information the Council presented during court proceedings. The law prevents us from investigating matters which have been subject to court proceedings.

Basildon Borough Council · 26-012-106

Decision 25 August 2026Environment And RegulationOutcome: Other

Subject: Refuse And Recycling

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint that the Council failed to collect his garden waste in the year 2025/26 because the claimed injustice is not significant enough.

Cambridgeshire County Council · 25-016-183

Decision 25 August 2026EducationOutcome: Other

Subject: Special Educational Needs

Summary: We cannot investigate Miss X’s complaint about her son’s lack of education provision because Miss X has started court proceedings against the Council.

London Borough of Sutton · 25-024-807

Decision 25 August 2026Children S Care ServicesOutcome: Other

Subject: Looked After Children

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council's involvement with Miss X when she was a young person. The complaint is late and there is no good reason for us to investigate it now.

Derbyshire County Council · 25-024-880

Decision 25 August 2026Children S Care ServicesOutcome: Other

Subject: Child Protection

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about child protection action. The complaint has already been substantially upheld and investigation by the Ombudsman would not lead to a significantly different outcome.