Source · IMB Annual Report
Nottingham
AI-generated report summary HMP Nottingham is a Category B/YOI reception and resettlement prison facing significant challenges with safety, healthcare, and regime, exacerbated by high prisoner churn. The Board is concerned by increases in self-harm, assaults, and use of force, alongside the inappropriate detention of severely mentally ill prisoners due to a lack of specialist provisions. Time out of cell and purposeful activity remain limited, with healthcare access and property transfer issues also a source of numerous complaints.
Year: 2025
Published: 14 Jan 2026
Type: Prison · Cat Category B, YOI, predominantly C
Recommendations: 13
Key concerns
Positive findings
Safety statistics
| Indicator | This year | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Deaths in custody | 7 | — |
| Self-harm incidents | 990 | 898 |
| ACCT cases opened | 565 | 784 |
| Prisoner assaults | 347 | 296 |
| Assaults on staff | 137 | 114 |
| Use of force | 929 | 760 |
| Drug finds | 220 | — |
Positive findings
AI-generated summaryThe Board noted a well-managed and proactive safety team, responsive to concerns, and good staff-prisoner relationships. Efforts to address the needs of neurodivergent prisoners, led by the NSM, were commended, as was the work of experienced healthcare staff with complex mental health cases. The chaplaincy team provided strong support, and the prison’s visiting area was consistently welcoming and well-maintained.
Key concerns
Increase in the number of self-harm incidents.
We are also concerned about the increase in the number of assaults, both on prisoners and staff, since last year. It is noted that three prisoners with severe mental health problems account for 20 of the assaults on staff.
The number of use of force incidents has increased by over 20%, which is significant.
Staff refusing prisoners suitable access to Listeners.
Potential higher number of use of force incidents concerning prisoners from minority ethnic groups.
Prisoners with severe mental health issues being held in the prison, which does not have the staff or resources to safely manage them.
Severely mentally unwell prisoners detained in the care and separation unit for lengthy periods, which is not suitable or humane accommodation.
There continues to be a high number of complaints by prisoners about healthcare issues. Prisoners frequently tell the Board that they have not been able to get an appointment and that their complaints to the healthcare centre have not been dealt with, either within the expected timeframe or, often, at all.
Access to social care equipment remains a challenge and, significantly, access to appropriate prescribing of medication on entry to custody in the evenings and weekends is problematic.
There have, again, been instances where staff shortages have resulted in medication being administered late to prisoners, with the result that a dose due later the same day could not be given because of insufficient time between doses.
There have been examples of a lack of communication between the hospital and prison about treatment plans for prisoners’ post-surgery and hospital readmission arrangements for prisoners with terminal illnesses.
We noted last year that, for prisoners to initially receive medication they had been prescribed outside prison, it needs to have been prescribed within the previous four weeks, which prisoners find frustrating.
The lack of resilience in the healthcare leadership structure has continued during the reporting period, with the head of the department frequently absent, with no deputy in place.
Limited time out of cell, particularly for those not in education or work.
Time out of cell for prisoners continues to be limited, particularly for those not in education or work. Because of a lack of capacity on the wing for vulnerable prisoners (G wing), some of these VPS are housed on the induction wing, limiting their time out of cell.
Attendance in education and work continues to be below capacity.
The high churn and short period of time most prisoners spend in the prison before being transferred or released hampers the ability of the prison to deliver meaningful courses to assist prisoners, in the Board’s view.
The prison has been trying to increase the time prisoners spend out of their cells and activities available. However, a long-running national industrial dispute has meant that the pool tables have not been in use, which is frustrating for prisoners.
Lack of provision and suitable spaces to support prisoners wishing to learn to read on the wings.
Every wing has an allocated library slot each week, which is very popular (the library reports around 1300 visits each month), but we are concerned that there does not appear to be equal access for all. This is because not all wings have a system to enable prisoners to sign up for a visit and it is a much more ad-hoc arrangement on some wings.
It is disappointing that the Storytime Dads scheme (where prisoners record bedtime stories and messages for their children as audio or video) has been limited, due to staff absence. With only one member of staff trained to implement the programme, few prisoners have been able to use the scheme when they are absent. This impacts negatively on prisoners’ relationships with their children.
Prisoners continue to raise complaints about their property going missing when they transfer between prisons.
Early releases significantly impact the prison’s ability to put in place adequate resettlement programmes.
The Board has noted a higher number of prisoners being recalled for short periods (often 14 days). This places strain on the resources of the prison and its ability to manage prisoners’ safe release and resettlement.
3 Offender management, progression There remain a significant number of prisoners who are spending lengthy periods of time on remand or awaiting sentencing, due to delays in the court system. In addition, capacity issues across the prison estate have resulted in sentenced prisoners waiting for disproportionately long periods to be transferred to other establishments, where they can progress or be nearer their families.
Whilst it is reported that 160 out of 190 staff have completed training in neurodiversity, the Board has some concerns about how effectively staff are able to communicate with neurodivergent prisoners. For example, in an ACCT review that was observed by one IMB member, the officer carrying out the review talked quickly, used jargon and spoke a lot. The prisoner was compliant, but it appeared that he did not fully understand what was being said or asked of him.
In a repeat reference from last year’s report, how does the Governor plan to improve the transparency and objectivity of the incentives scheme so that there is greater clarity and confidence in the process for prisoners?
There have been various cleanliness issues reported on multiple wings during the year. The Board has noted inconsistency in the standard of cleaning, particularly in the shower areas on the wings, which are of variable standard, with some offering more privacy than others. Most have poor ventilation and some need to be refurbished or redecorated to bring them up to an appropriate standard.
There were frequent complaints from prisoners about the temperature on the wings. In particular, at times, the upper landings on D wing became very hot. The Board understands that the temperature is controlled centrally and that it is difficult to respond to particular issues. We observed that, on a couple of occasions, the CSU was exceptionally cold.
Prisoners have frequently reported shortages of essential items to the Board, particularly clothing.
The Board has noted complaints from prisoners about frequently not being given the meal they have chosen, which the prison acknowledges is due to the expected items not being delivered, such as, for example chicken being changed to beef.
Complaints about the quality and quantity of food.
Lunchtime food often served well before midday.
Depending on when a prisoner arrives at the establishment, there may be a two-week gap before they receive items they have ordered from the prison canteen, as they may have missed a cut-off point to order a canteen pack from reception.
Recommendations
As referenced in our previous report, we again raise with the Minister the issue of the wellbeing of prisoners who are severely mentally ill. The Board remains concerned at the length of time it takes for suitable places in secure mental health hospitals to become available. This means that severely unwell prisoners are having to be detained in the care and separation unit for lengthy periods, which is not suitable or humane accommodation for them. What is the Minister’s timeline for increasing the provision of secure specialist mental health spaces? If the Minister does not intend to address this issue urgently, can you explain the reason?
Government response
I recognise the Board’s concerns regarding increasing secure specialist mental health spaces. Further to my response to your last report, I am pleased to say that the Mental Health Bill received Royal Assent on 18 December 2025. We are working with health partners to create a robust implementation plan setting out the operational changes necessary to fulfil our commitment to commencing these reforms. Shortfalls and regional variation in bedspaces across low, medium, and high-secure mental health services are acknowledged and the NHS Secure Care Programme aims to refine pathways and reduce out-of-area placements. The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) and NHS England are also working to increase capacity in secure hospital beds and specialist prison units for high-risk individuals. However, building or commissioning additional secure beds requires significant capital investment and infrastructure planning and must follow robust data and commissioning cycles. Therefore, NHS England and HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) have begun mapping transfer pathways and barrier points within prisons, prison mental health teams, and secure units. In the interim it remains the case that the integrated Mental Health Service at HMP Nottingham will continue to identify and address the mental health needs of prisoners as would be the case in the community. Where these needs cannot be met in prison custody, referrals will be made to secure mental health hospitals.
Recommendation 2
When will the Minister consider earlier screening of such prisoners so that they can be placed in more specialist accommodation that is better able to meet their needs?
Government response
I can also understand the request for earlier screening to ensure timely transfer to secure hospital. The Mental Health Act introduces the statutory 28-day transfer target for moving severely unwell prisoners to hospital care, reducing delays that currently exacerbate risk. To focus on meeting the requirements of the legislation, NHS England have a national Mental Health & Justice Strategic Advisory Group which will report directly to Parliament. NHS-Led Provider Collaboratives for the Midlands also have newly developed action plans to accelerate prison transfers, which includes remodelling of bed capacity and care pathways as well as procurement of additional beds. Progress is being reported to the national group, and the Midlands Health and Justice Commissioning Team continues to engage with the commissioners and providers of secure mental health services bi-weekly to support the timely assessment and transfer of prisoners. In addition, the Board can be assured there is a commitment to early identification which was set out in NHS England’s Health & Justice Framework (2022–2025). This prioritises initial health assessments within 24 hours of arrival in custody, and integration of health professionals into reception teams for rapid triage. Earlier screening is already embedded in policy, and the legislative changes aim to make specialist placement faster and more consistent. Progress will be reviewed as part of the implementation of the new legislation and will be reinforced by digital health records and risk stratification tools to flag urgent cases for specialist accommodation. Prison’s will also continue to facilitate all necessary reviews and assessments to help expedite transfers to secure hospital.
Recommendation 3
When will the Minister consider and review the recall system? The high number of recalls places enormous pressure on the prison and the purpose and effectiveness of the system is questioned.
Government response
Regarding the challenges that high levels of recall can have on prisons. Both the Sentencing Act 2026, which received Royal Assent on 22 January 2026, and the Independent Review of Criminal Courts will have an impact on the prison population and will provide Courts with options to end the revolving door of less serious offenders. While recall remains an essential safeguard to protect the public when risk increases, the Sentencing Act implements the Independent Sentencing Review's recommendations for recall, by replacing the current short-term recalls for most Standard Determinate Sentence offenders with a fixed-term recall of 56 days, except for those who are excluded. This aims support rehabilitation and reduce the need for future recalls, providing more time to undertake a thorough review of an offender’s release plans and licence conditions, to ensure their needs and risk are managed. However, public protection will remain our priority and the decision to recall an offender on licensed supervision will continue to be taken where their risk escalates and the alternative controls available are no longer sufficient to safely manage the offender in the community.
Recommendation 4
What steps will the Minister take to reduce the prisoners who are convicted but not sentenced? It is predicted that a significant percentage will be released on receiving sentence, thus freeing up prison spaces.
Government response
The Board is also right to highlight concerns with the number of prisoners who are convicted but yet to be sentenced by the Courts. We know this is a cross-system challenge and there is no quick fix to the criminal courts crisis which requires collective action. The Government has already acted through increasing magistrates’ court sentencing powers. This is reducing the number of cases where convicted defendants need to be sent to the Crown Court for sentence to enable swifter justice. The Sentencing Act includes amendments to the Bail Act so that it applies where the court considers that there is no real prospect that the defendant will be sentenced to an immediate custodial sentence, as well as to defendants who have been convicted but are awaiting sentence. The Sentencing Act also provides the presumption against short sentences, which will limit the use of custodial remand where a sentence of immediate imprisonment is unlikely. In December 2025 the Deputy Prime Minister also announced a package of criminal court reforms designed to progress cases more quickly through the criminal courts and help ensure that those on remand are tried and sentenced more quickly.
Recommendation 5
When will the Minister invest in probation and resettlement services so that more time can be spent with prisoners to achieve better resettlement arrangements and reduce reoffending and recalls?
Government response
In terms of resettlement services, the Sentencing Act will reduce the amount of time most prisoners on standard determinate sentences will spend in custody to one third, with the remaining time of their sentence spent in the community under probation supervision. As a result, the probation operating model including the offender management in custody (OMiC) model are under review with a new OMiC model planned to begin implementation in summer 2026. A national review of Pre-Release Teams has also been launched to assess and improve service delivery for individuals preparing to leave custody. The next steps will focus on the future design, including resource modelling, digital integration, and alignment with broader reforms such as the Independent Sentencing Review, progression model, changes to fixed term recall and Our Future Probation Service Programme. In addition, the future Commissioned Rehabilitative Services contracts for men are currently being re-commissioned and will go live in 2027. A key improvement in this service will enhance the support for those in custody to address housing, financial and wider pre-release needs with a focus on enabling a smoother transition in the community to reduce the risk of reoffending.
Recommendation 6
Severely mentally unwell prisoners need quicker assessments and prompt transfers to appropriate hospital accommodation? How does the Prison Service plan to address this urgent issue?
Government response
Further to the Minister’s response, HMPPS remains committed to working in partnership with health and social care partners so that people in prison can access the equivalent standard and range of health and social care services as they would receive in the community. It remains the case that all health treatment in custody is the responsibility of NHS England and NHS Wales. However, joint oversight by NHS England, the Department for Health and Social Care, MoJ, and HMPPS will continue focusing on key improvement workstreams. These include improving data and monitoring through a new clinical template to track referral-to-transfer timeline to enable better identification of delays. A National Referrals Review which was launched in October 2023 to standardise the referrals process including forms and documentation is helping to eliminate obstructions. Enhancing Clinical Leadership to provide oversight across prison and hospital pathways and detailed mapping of transfer bottlenecks to support targeted interventions. All these measures aim to ensure severely mentally unwell prisoners are rapidly identified and transferred to secure hospital settings to reduce harmful delays.
Recommendation 7
How will the Prison Service reduce the churn, due to transfers between prisons, so that the prison has better opportunities to work with prisoners on education and training?
Government response
As the Minister response confirms the Independent Review of Criminal Courts and the Sentencing Act will have an impact on the prison population. The HMPPS Estate Configuration Review will be considering the implications of these which will inform future requirements for the entire prison estate at a strategic level, including offender flows and the functions of prisons. Given HMP Nottingham’s current function as a reception prison serving the courts, in the interim prisoners will continue to be transferred to training establishments as appropriate to meet their sentencing plan needs, given the activities, education, programmes and resettlement opportunities these can provide for sentenced prisoners. However, to help support prisoner education and training needs when being transferred, in October 2025 the new Prisoner Education Service (PES) was launched. This has provided significant investment in digital infrastructure to expand access to secure online education content, reducing the need for repeat assessments when transferred. It also provides newly introduced national screening tools to identify additional learning needs and will improve recording of previous achievements and tracking of learners’ progress. Common Awarding Organisation contracts have also been implemented for the most frequently used and employer recognised qualifications including English, maths, engineering, textiles and hospitality and catering to ensure that prisoners can continue learning as they transfer between prisons across the estate. In addition, in April 2025 a new Careers, Information and Guidance contract was launched to enable consistency between prisons and for prisoners transferring across the estate.
Recommendation 8
How does the Prison Service plan to ensure a more cohesive working relationship between the healthcare provider and the prison?
Government response
The National Partnership Agreement on Health and Social Care in England, set out the governance arrangements to improve health and care outcomes for people in prison and on probation when it was published in 2023. The Health and Justice Framework (2022–2025) also outlines strategic commitments including patient-centred care, mental health provision in custody, and improved technology integration. These established governance arrangements provide opportunities for Governors and Prison Group Directors to work with NHS Health and Justice Commissioners and providers on local healthcare delivery. Whilst the responsibility for the delivery of Healthcare Services at HMP Nottingham recently transferred to a new provider, Northants Foundation Healthcare Trust, the Board can be assured that detailed delivery plans, timelines, and accountability mechanisms are in place to ensure joint working and shared progress tracking. Although it is early in this partnership, relations are good and the signs of a focus on service delivery are encouraging.
Recommendation 9
How will the Governor continue to address the issue of self-harm and maintain the recent reduction in numbers?
Government response
Self-harm has increased again. The Board is pleased to note a downward trend towards the end of the reporting year (2024-2025). The Board has seen evidence of the prison analysing the data and implementing strategies to try to combat the increase.
Recommendation 10
When will the Governor monitor the increased use of force and investigate if there is increased force used on prisoners from ethnic minorities?
Recommendation 11
How does the Governor plan to work with the new healthcare provider, once the new contract starts, to deliver better healthcare for prisoners?
Government response
The National Partnership Agreement on Health and Social Care in England, set out the governance arrangements to improve health and care outcomes for people in prison and on probation when it was published in 2023. The Health and Justice Framework (2022–2025) also outlines strategic commitments including patient-centred care, mental health provision in custody, and improved technology integration. These established governance arrangements provide opportunities for Governors and Prison Group Directors to work with NHS Health and Justice Commissioners and providers on local healthcare delivery. Whilst the responsibility for the delivery of Healthcare Services at HMP Nottingham recently transferred to a new provider, Northants Foundation Healthcare Trust, the Board can be assured that detailed delivery plans, timelines, and accountability mechanisms are in place to ensure joint working and shared progress tracking. Although it is early in this partnership, relations are good and the signs of a focus on service delivery are encouraging.
Recommendation 12
What is the Governor’s timeline for increasing the uptake of prisoners’ purposeful activity and time out of their cells?
Government response
There has not been noticeable increase in purposeful activity. The prison is putting emphasis on trying to increase the number of prisoners attending education and work, which usually continues to be below capacity.
Recommendation 13
In a repeat reference from last year’s report, how does the Governor plan to improve the transparency and objectivity of the incentives scheme so that there is greater clarity and confidence in the process for prisoners?
Government response
Prisoners continue to relate their concerns to the Board about the unfairness of the process to the Board.
Applications to the IMB
| Category | Current | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Accommodation, including laundry, clothing, ablutions including single cell issues | 25 | 20 |
| Canteen, facility list, catalogues | 4 | 0 |
| Discipline, including adjudications, incentives scheme, sanctions | 23 | 6 |
| Equality | 5 | 5 |
| Finance, including pay, private monies, spends | 8 | 11 |
| Food and kitchens | 11 | 17 |
| Health, including physical, mental, social care | 46 | 52 |
| Letters, visits, telephones, public protection, restrictions | 20 | 36 |
| Miscellaneous | 17 | 21 |
| Property during transfer or in another facility | 18 | 16 |
| Property within the establishment | 24 | 22 |
| Purposeful activity, including education, work, training, time out of cell | 8 | 12 |
| Sentence management, including HDC (home detention curfew), ROTL (release on temporary licence), parole, release dates, recategorisation | 20 | 13 |
| Staff/prisoner concerns, including bullying | 35 | 41 |
| Transfers | 1 | 14 |
Related inspections & investigations
Safety 2
· Respect 3
· Activity 1
· Release 2
Henry Benoi-Davies · Natural causes
Jonathan Thornton · State Custody related deaths
Shalane Blackwood · State Custody related
Other reports for Nottingham
· Self-harm 898
· Concerns
Population 950
· Self-harm 712
· Concerns
Population 900
· Self-harm 869
· Concerns
Population 828
· Self-harm 1,013
· Concerns
Population 880
· Self-harm 1,024
· Concerns