Source · IMB Annual Report
Nottingham
Year: 2021
Published: 25 Aug 2021
Type: Prison · Cat B adult male and YOI
Population: 828
Recommendations: 6
Key concerns
Positive findings
This IMB report for HMP Nottingham covers a period entirely dominated by the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to severely restricted regimes with prisoners spending extended periods in cell and limited access to activities. While staff are commended for their commitment and efforts to mitigate the impact, significant concerns remain regarding the humane treatment of prisoners, particularly the extended cell confinement. Key issues include inadequate mental health provision leading to long segregation stays, the situation of IPP prisoners, and the lack of arrangements for second vaccine doses upon release.
Safety statistics
| Indicator | This year | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Deaths in custody | 2 | — |
| Self-harm incidents | 1,013 | 1,013 |
| ACCT cases opened | 1,020 | 1,314 |
| Prisoner assaults | 207 | 375 |
| Assaults on staff | 103 | 171 |
| Use of force | 1,122 | — |
Positive findings
The Board commends staff for their commitment to welfare during the pandemic, noting improved interpersonal interactions and effective problem-solving. A significant positive outcome was the reduction in drug availability due to lockdown and scanners, making prisoners feel safer. The prison maintained responsive offender management and healthcare, with staff offering supportive interventions and impactful family contact schemes, leading to fewer complaints in these areas. The Board also noted a sharp drop in use of force incidents following a whole-prison initiative.
Key concerns
Regime/Time Out of Cell
prisoners have sometimes been deprived of basic rights and confined to cell for much longer periods of time each day than would usually be regarded as acceptable.
Mental Health
Repeated
allocation of in-patient mental health facilities to prisoners does not meet their needs. We understand that this is the result of pressure on mental health services overall. In practice, this often results in individual prisoners spending very extended periods in segregation, as it is the only place they and others can be kept safe.
Mental Health
Repeated
A return to the practice of allocating all prisoners rejected for the secure mental health facility at Rampton to HMP Nottingham is both unwelcome and unreasonable.
Resettlement/Release
Repeated
address the ongoing situation in relation to IPP prisoners who are many years beyond their minimum term
Segregation
it can take many months for a solution to be found for those whose behaviour makes them an unattractive prospect to other establishments. This means they can be held at Nottingham for many months, often in segregation, without the programmes they need
Regime/Time Out of Cell
Repeated
The required separation of remand and convicted prisoners is so widely ignored throughout the prison estate that we suggest this is a matter requiring structural attention beyond the individual prison
Healthcare
The inability of the system to ensure that prisoners have a second vaccine appointment on release needs to be addressed
Recommendations
| # | Recommendation | Addressee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
We would ask the Minister to address the ongoing situation in relation to IPP prisoners who are many years beyond their minimum term (see paragraph 7.3).
Repeated
Response
I understand the Board’s concerns about prisoners having to continue to serve indeterminate sentences of Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) and the request for retrospective legislation to address this. The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act abolished the IPP sentence in late 2012, but this was not applied retrospectively. To re-sentence these individuals would result in prisoners who are still assessed as dangerous being released into the community and would expose the public to considerable risk of serious harm. I am, however, looking into this in the first weeks of my appointment. Although Covid-19 continues to present a unique set of challenges, Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) remains committed to doing all it can to support the progression of IPP prisoners to reduce their risk. The latest published national figures at the end of June 2021 show the unreleased IPP population standing at 1,722, which is a reduction from 1,969 at the end of June 2020 and the 6,000 at its highest in 2012. This demonstrates that opportunities remain available to IPP prisoners wishing to progress and despite the pandemic. To continue the progress already made, case file reviews have been expanded to include all short tariff prisoners irrespective of previous parole hearing outcome. This is in addition to those that have failed to make any progress after two or more post-tariff parole hearings. These reviews reinvigorate cases that are not progressing and identify appropriate individual progression pathways where necessary. HMPPS also continues to monitor Progression Regimes at four prisons across the country that are dedicated to supporting IPP prisoners struggling to achieve release via the usual routes. It is important to note, that as the number of IPP prisoners continues to decrease the proportion of those that remain in prison who have committed more serious offences and whose cases are complex grows. Prisoners must be willing to address these risks before the independent Parole Board can consider release which is why some prisoners have spent a number of years in custody after completing their tariff. This is not a simple task, but HMPPS continue to offer them the opportunities to reduce their identified risks. Every effort is also made to locate an IPP prisoner to a prison best placed to meet their sentence planning needs as promptly as is reasonably possible. However, transfers during a parole review would usually only take place to access a progression opportunity and does not disrupt an impending parole hearing date. Prisons will otherwise seek to progress IPP prisoners at the earliest opportunity following the conclusion of a parole review. It is recognised that the number of IPP prisoners at HMP Nottingham has remained relatively consistent due to some of the challenges being faced in arranging transfers which are addressed further in the attached annex. However, the North Midlands Prison Group is working with HMPPS Psychology Services to set out a strategy to support and care for the IPP prisoners located at prisons within the group. This strategy will ensure that appropriate opportunities are provided for IPP prisoners to progress towards release. |
Ministry of Justice | In progress |
| 2 |
A return to the practice of allocating all prisoners rejected for the secure mental health facility at Rampton to HMP Nottingham is both unwelcome and unreasonable and we would request the prison service to give this matter attention (see paragraph 5.4).
Repeated
Response
Many patients returning to prison from secure mental health facilities will do so to the nearest local prison, which was reiterated when NHS England & Improvement (NHSE&I) published new good practice guidance on 10 June 2021 - https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/guidance-for-the-transfer-and-remission-of-adult-prisoners-and-immigration-removal-centre-detainees-under-the-mental-health-act-1983. For this reason, HMP Nottingham will receive prisoners returning from Rampton Hospital with the exception of those returning to the Long Term High Security Estate (LTHSE), where separate arrangements exist to place the individual in the prison best placed to meet their security needs. It is acknowledged that returning to a local prison is not always the best approach from a patient and care perspective but enables swifter remission arrangements from hospital to be put in place. This allows hospital bed spaces and treatment to be offered to others quicker as under previous arrangements, returning the individual to the sending prison often resulted in delays or in some cases refusal. It also enables the Observation, Classification, and Allocation (OCA) departments in local prisons to determine the most suitable onward location for the prisoner and HMP Nottingham continues to attempt to arrange transfers for prisoners to return to either their previous prison or a suitable alternative site. Building on pilots run via the Offender Personality Disorder pathway, HMPPS had been undertaking a Task and Finish process to consider the current policy and practice on remission from secure hospital in order to make recommendations that fulfil both a security and care agenda. However, this work will take time to complete, as it was halted due to Covid-19 pandemic and any recommendations will need to be agreed with NHSE&I before any changes can be implemented and embedded. |
HMPPS | Noted |
| 3 |
Similarly, it can take many months for a solution to be found for those whose behaviour makes them an unattractive prospect to other establishments. This means they can be held at Nottingham for many months, often in segregation, without the programmes they need, and we would ask the prison service to find a solution which focuses on prisoner needs (see paragraph 5.4).
Response
Where HMP Nottingham is unable to meet the needs of a prisoner every effort is made to progress the individual to a prison with the appropriate facilities or programmes. Unfortunately, due to the complex needs and behaviour of some prisoners, segregation for their own safety or the safety of others may be necessary and can delay their progressive move. Segregation is always used as a last resort and following a robust discussion between the prison and healthcare team to support the individual and meet their presenting needs, whilst ensuring safety, vulnerability and risk are managed. Whilst it can be difficult to manage such individuals, their circumstances are regularly reviewed and in doing so input will be sought from a multidisciplinary team. The prison also continues to make every effort to encourage prisoners to engage with the regime and be part of the prison community. Authorisation for segregation beyond 42 days is provided by the Prison Group Director (PGD) acting on behalf of the Secretary of State and is only granted where it is necessary. On a monthly visit to the prison the PGD will visit the segregation unit and meet with all prisoners to monitor their health and wellbeing to ensure appropriate action is being taken to progress them out to normal location. Alternative pathways are available across the prison estate for the needs of specific individuals, such as the Offender Personality Disorder pathway which provides treatment services and remains an option for anyone who meets the entry requirement. All Offender Managers have access to psychological consultancy which can assist with determining if prisoners should be referred into treatment services, as well as helping in both sentence planning and behavioural management. It is also recognised that the speed at which transfers take place can be subject to space constraints in appropriate parts of the prison estate becoming available and measures to mitigate the spread of the Covid-19 virus has minimised inter-prison transfers throughout the pandemic. The complex needs of some prisoners do also continue to present a challenge to identify a suitable location and some prisons may not agree to accept a prisoner without them having had a stable period of behaviour. Whilst the role of HMPPS Population Management Unit is only to facilitate approved moves from one prison to another once agreement has been reached by both sites, where any transfer issues do occur the national allocation protocol has an escalation route through operational line management and senior management to try to resolve these. |
HMPPS | In progress |
| 4 |
The required separation of remand and convicted prisoners is so widely ignored throughout the prison estate that we suggest this is a matter requiring structural attention beyond the individual prison (see section 2).
Repeated
Response
The Board were previously made aware in 2018 that Prison Rule 7 (2) stipulates that unconvicted prisoners; (a) shall be kept out of contact with convicted prisoners as far as the Governor considers it can reasonably be done, unless and to the extent that they have consented to share residential accommodation or participate in any activity with convicted prisoners; and (b) shall under no circumstances be required to share a cell with a convicted prisoner. Prison Service Order (PSO) 4600 - ‘Unconvicted, Unsentenced and Civil Prisoners’ meets this rule by stipulating to Governors that unconvicted prisoners are not required to share a cell with a convicted prisoner unless their explicit consent is obtained. Unfortunately, prior to the new Governor arriving at HMP Nottingham convicted and unconvicted prisoners were mixed to ensure that the prison had the flexibility to maintain safety whilst continuing to meet demand up to its operational capacity. The new Governor will be reconfiguring the prison over the coming months to enable HMP Nottingham to meet the requirements of the Prison Rules and PSO 4600. However, this will remain subject to the ongoing national reconfiguration of the prison estate as sufficient capacity in the right place and at the right time is needed to support offender flows. |
HMPPS | In progress |
| 5 |
The inability of the system to ensure that prisoners have a second vaccine appointment on release needs to be addressed (6.1).
Response
The roll out of the Covid-19 vaccination programme led by the NHS has been rapid and is at the centre of the Government’s plan to enable life to return to normal. Whilst prisoners have not been vaccinated any faster or further than the general public in the community, HMPPS has worked closely with Healthcare colleagues to facilitate the roll out as smoothly as possible. For those prisoners who would be released prior to their second dose, this includes ensuring that they are registered with a GP on release or where they are already registered, that their medical information is transferred to their GP practice. For example, those prisoners being released into a Probation Approved Premises, would be supported to register with a GP via the Approved Premises induction programme. Processes were already in place before the Covid-19 pandemic to support prisoners in registering with a GP on release or allocating an NHS number where this was not recorded. However, pre-registration with a GP has increased in importance to support continued access to healthcare services and continuity of care and information has been provided to all prisons to highlight this priority. |
HMPPS | Implemented |
| 6 |
We hope that lessons learned during the lockdown period, such as in relation to the reduced circulation of drugs, will be used to inform the organisation of the prison when the restrictions are lifted, so that the overall experience of prisoners is improved.
Response
I note you have raised a local issue of concern about learning lessons to improve the organisation of the prison in your report which the Governor will continue to keep you aware of as work continues. |
Governor / Director | Noted |
Related inspections & investigations
13 May 2024
HMIP · Unannounced
Safety 2
· Respect 3
· Activity 1
· Release 2
Other reports for Nottingham
Report details
- Establishment
- Nottingham
- Type
- Prison · Cat B adult male and YOI
- Report year
- 2021
- Published
- 25 August 2021
- Responsible body
- HMP Nottingham
- Recommendations
- 6
- MoJ rating (2024/25)
- 1 — Serious concern
Population
| Population | 828 |
| Operational capacity | 1,060 |
| CNA (designed for) | 718 115% |
Service providers
Escort contractor
GEOAmey
Healthcare
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Learning and skills
People Plus Group
Maintenance
Amey
Resettlement
Derbyshire, Leicestershire, Nottinghamshire and Rutland Community Rehabilitation Company
Substance misuse treatment
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Visitor centre
PACT