Source · IMB Annual Report

Nottingham

Year: 2022 Published: 25 Jul 2022 Type: Prison · Cat B adult male and YOI establishment Population: 900 Recommendations: 3 Key concerns Positive findings

HMP Nottingham operated under pandemic restrictions for most of the reporting year, gradually easing, with effective governance despite management flux. While self-harm incidents decreased, violence between prisoners increased significantly. Key concerns include the ongoing situation for IPP prisoners, the lack of separation for remand and convicted prisoners, and inadequate mental health facilities, alongside regime restrictions and low education attendance.

Safety statistics

Incidents during reporting year
IndicatorThis yearPrevious
Deaths in custody3
Self-harm incidents8691,022
ACCT cases opened8181,020
Prisoner assaults262207
Assaults on staff89103
Use of force7651,122

Positive findings

The Board was impressed with the commitment to safety, the humane treatment ethos, and staff's willingness to listen. Management of pandemic restrictions was more refined than the previous year. Improvements include a new constant supervision policy, a sustained reduction in the use of force, and a decrease in prisoners transferred from Rampton Hospital. Resettlement staff made significant efforts to support prisoners, and family contact schemes like 'come dine with me' visits were highly praised.

Key concerns

11 items
Resettlement/Release Repeated Address the ongoing situation in relation to IPP prisoners who are many years beyond their minimum term.
Regime/Time Out of Cell Repeated The required separation of remand and convicted prisoners is so widely ignored throughout the prison estate that we suggest this is a matter requiring structural attention beyond the individual prison.
Safety A rise in violence between prisoners (15.7%) during the reporting year, with 262 assaults compared to 207 the previous year.
Mental Health Repeated Allocation of in-patient mental health facilities to prisoners does not meet their needs, often resulting in individual prisoners spending very extended periods in a prison segregation unit.
Mental Health Repeated Concerns about timely access to more suitable locations/services for prisoners requiring mental health transfers, with some remaining in segregation for sustained periods.
Estate/Conditions Repeated The issues related to cells being too cold and too hot on which we reported last year are unresolved.
Regime/Time Out of Cell The familiar periodic shortages of essential clothing items re-emerged early in 2022.
Healthcare Despite all the prison and healthcare teams’ efforts, vaccination rates (Covid and flu) were relatively low.
Education/Purposeful Activity Low education attendance, with only 51% of available places attended at one point.
Regime/Time Out of Cell Prisoners’ access to a key worker was limited and some prisoners told us they had never seen one.
Resettlement/Release Foreign nationals awaiting deportation had no idea what was going to happen to them and found it impossible to make meaningful contact with immigration/Home Office staff.

Recommendations

3 items · 2 repeated
#RecommendationAddresseeStatus
1 We would again ask the minister to address the ongoing situation in relation to IPP prisoners who are many years beyond their minimum term (see paragraph 7.3). Repeated
Response
I acknowledge the Board’s long-standing concern about the number of people who remain in prison beyond their tariff period. There are no current plans to change the legislation on the indeterminate sentence for public protection (IPP), including the licence period. It remains the case, to re-sentence these individuals would expose a considerable risk of serious harm to the public as they are still assessed as patently dangerous. Whilst it is our main priority to protect the public, HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) is committed to doing all it can to support these individuals in progressing towards a safe release. This commitment continues to be delivered through a bespoke and regularly refreshed IPP Action Plan. This also includes a work stream to oversee the specialist progression regimes that develop and test an individual’s ability to manage their risks in an environment of increasing freedom and responsibility. Following the publication of the Justice Committee’s report into the IPP sentence, HMPPS will be reviewing the IPP Action Plan taking account of the evidence presented in the publication, so HMPPS can be confident that they are focusing its resources and efforts on the right aspects of progression. These efforts have, in recent years, delivered a substantial reduction in the number of IPP prisoners who have never been released. That number stood at 1,492 at the end of June 2022. Those who are not successful in achieving release at their first post-recall parole review are considered by an IPP Progression Panel. These Panels provide a multi-disciplinary approach to ensuring that IPP prisoners are on the right progression pathway to secure their future, safe and successful re-release into the community. IPP Progression Panels are also used for those who have not yet achieved release where progress has stalled or a key point in the sentence has been reached. It is accepted that indeterminate sentenced prisoners should be located at the establishment best placed to meet their sentence planning needs in terms of interventions, and prisons will seek out suitable locations for those who are assessed as needing to access certain interventions in other prisons, as promptly as is reasonably possible. Indeterminate sentence prisoners may have their parole reviewed at least every two years, depending on the specifics of individual cases, and may transfer during a parole review if it is to access a progression opportunity and providing it does not disrupt an impending parole hearing date. Governors should seek progression opportunities at the earliest opportunity post conclusion of a parole review to increase the chances of a timely and successful transfer. I hope to reassure the Board that the staff at HMP Nottingham continue with their commitment to support the progression of IPP prisoners and a tracking system to monitor progress has been introduced.
Ministry of Justice In progress
2 The required separation of remand and convicted prisoners is so widely ignored throughout the prison estate that we suggest this is a matter requiring structural attention beyond the individual prison (see section 2). It was disappointing to have a high-profile announcement that this was to change, only for that decision to be reversed. Repeated
Response
Separation of Remand and Convicted Prisoners As outlined in last year’s response, Prison Rule 7 (2) and Prison Service Order 4600 - Unconvicted, Unsentenced and Civil Prisoners sets out the current requirements. The ambition of the prison’s senior management team is to ideally hold remand and convicted prisoners separately. However, this has to be balanced against a very busy Reception and Resettlement prison and other cohorts. The special unit designed for young adults to better cater for their needs has opened. We will continue to keep this under review.
HMPPS Noted
3 We hope that lessons learned during the lockdown period will be used to inform the organisation of the prison when the restrictions are lifted and that initiatives found to be beneficial can continue, so that the overall experience of prisoners is improved.
Response
Regarding support for those detained in custody, it is important to note that maintaining safety and the mental health and wellbeing of prisoners continues to be a priority. As identified by the Board, Covid-19 restrictions affected the delivery of the key worker scheme, HMPPS is now supporting establishments to resume regular key work sessions in the closed estate and is working closely with the Samaritans to support prisoners in emotional distress. Following a competition for funding, HMPPS will be renewing the Samaritans grant to provide £625,000 each year until March 2025 (primarily for the Listener Scheme delivery). Turning to some positives captured in your report, it was encouraging to read that you were impressed by the commitment of everyone at HMP Nottingham in maintaining their own and others’ safety during the pandemic. I was pleased to note there has been a reduction in the number of prisoners transferred from Rampton Hospital and spending long periods in segregation. Your comments about the new constant supervision policy, the library provision and the ‘come dine with me’ visiting initiative are appreciated. I note and welcome the Governor’s renewed focus on prisoner treatment and respect.
Governor / Director In progress

Applications to the IMB

CategoryCurrentPrevious
Accommodation (including transfers) 54 48
Benefits 0 0
Bullying and intimidation 2 1
Complaints 5 5
Discipline (including adjudications) 6 12
Discrimination 3 0
Drugs 0 0
Education 2 1
Employment/work 1 0
Healthcare 18 20
IPP/Progression 1 3
Legal 2 1
Money/pensions 0 0
Other 5 6
Property 19 13
Race relations 0 0
Regime 1 1
Relationships 0 0
Remand 0 0
Safeguarding 0 0
Security 2 0
Self-harm 0 0
Staff (attitudes, behaviour, competence) 14 11
Total 136 123
Visits 2 0
Welfare 1 1
Young adults 0 0

Related inspections & investigations

13 May 2024 HMIP · Unannounced Safety 2 · Respect 3 · Activity 1 · Release 2
PPO fatal incident Henry Benoi-Davies · Natural causes
PPO fatal incident Sandip Pabla
PPO fatal incident John Friend
PPO fatal incident William Hardacre
PPO fatal incident Reuben Rhodes
8 Apr 2026 PFD Jonathan Thornton · State Custody related deaths
3 May 2016 PFD Shalane Blackwood · State Custody related

Other reports for Nottingham

2025 Published 14 Jan 2026 · Self-harm 990 · Concerns
2024 Published 13 Nov 2024 · Self-harm 898 · Concerns
2023 Published 5 Dec 2023 Population 950 · Self-harm 712 · Concerns
2021 Published 25 Aug 2021 Population 828 · Self-harm 1,013 · Concerns
2020 Published 6 Aug 2020 Population 880 · Self-harm 1,024 · Concerns

Report details

Establishment
Nottingham
Type
Prison · Cat B adult male and YOI establishment
Report year
2022
Published
25 July 2022
Responsible body
HMP Nottingham
Recommendations
3
MoJ rating (2024/25)
1 — Serious concern

Population

Population900
Operational capacity1,060
CNA (designed for)718 125%

Service providers

Escort contractor
GEOAmey
Healthcare
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Learning and skills
PeoplePlus
Library
Nottingham City Council Library Service
Maintenance
Amey
Resettlement
Derbyshire, Leicestershire, Nottinghamshire and Rutland Community Rehabilitation Company
Substance misuse treatment
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Visitor centre
Pact

Source links