Source · IMB Annual Report

Nottingham

Year: 2020 Published: 6 Aug 2020 Type: Prison · Cat B adult male establishment and young offender inst Population: 880 Recommendations: 5 Key concerns Positive findings

HMP Nottingham saw overall improvements in fairness and safety during the reporting year, including a reduction in violence against staff and deaths in custody. However, self-harm incidents rose significantly, and concerns persist regarding long delays for mental health transfers and the high number of prisoners released without accommodation. The Board also highlighted issues with purposeful activity uptake and the key worker scheme's inconsistent implementation.

Safety statistics

Incidents during reporting year
IndicatorThis yearPrevious
Deaths in custody1
Self-harm incidents1,024502
ACCT cases opened1,3141,499
Prisoner assaults375341
Assaults on staff171244

Positive findings

The Board welcomes overall improvements in the prison's running, leading to better fairness and progress in reducing stress, self-harm, and violence. There was a significant drop in property-related complaints and improvements in ACCT processes and mental health service referral times. Violence against staff and fires decreased, and the quantity of circulating drugs appeared to reduce. The prison strengthened equality and diversity management, leading to quicker resolution of discrimination incidents and improved provision for disabled prisoners and those with protected characteristics. Healthcare also reported marked improvements in missed appointments and better management of appointments for vulnerable prisoners.

Key concerns

16 items
Mental Health Repeated Difficulties encountered in transferring prisoners with severe mental health issues to an environment where they can be effectively treated.
Resettlement/Release Repeated The number of prisoners released without accommodation, and the inadequacy of bail hostel accommodation availability, preventing prisoners from securing home detention curfew (HDC) for which they might otherwise have been eligible.
Estate/Conditions Difficulties within the service of moving prisoners for whom a category B local prison is not an appropriate location on to parts of the estate more appropriate to their categorisation, sentence plans or personal circumstances.
Safety Concerns regarding the wider circumstance of a falling population of those convicted of a sexual offence, resulting in wings for these prisoners also being used to house prisoners who are vulnerable because of other issues.
Education/Purposeful Activity Many prisoners who do not participate [in purposeful activity], with opportunities often unsuitable for those on remand or with short sentences, or not considered worthwhile by prisoners.
Safety The prevalence of acts of self-harm continued to be a considerable concern to the Board, and levels of self-harm rose in the second half of the reporting year.
Safety Incidents of violence against prisoners have remained stubbornly high.
Substance Misuse The new mix of prisoners on the vulnerable prisoner wing has meant that there are now drugs circulating there, which in the past has not, to our knowledge, been the case.
Regime/Time Out of Cell Some prisoners spent many days, and sometimes weeks, in the FNC, which meant that they could not access normal regime activities.
Other Repeated Delays to the registration of PIN telephone numbers.
Other Mail not being delivered because of indications of contamination on the Rapiscan drug detection equipment.
Food/Catering Isolated instances where efforts to cut costs have resulted in reduced food quantities, and led to prisoner complaints.
Food/Catering Repeated The management of serveries requires sustained attention to prevent unfairness.
Other Repeated The provisioning of kit and equipment has been a persistent source of complaint.
Staffing The key worker scheme was vulnerable to staff being diverted to other operational roles and prisoners often reporting not having one or rarely seeing them.
Segregation Repeated Many people with mental health problems and/or personality disorders are placed in the segregation unit because there is no alternative place to keep them and others safe while they are in the prison.

Recommendations

5 items · 2 repeated
#RecommendationAddresseeStatus
1 Yet again, we remain concerned about the difficulties encountered in transferring prisoners with severe mental health issues to an environment where they can be effectively treated. Once again, the Board would like to see greater availability of more suitable locations for these prisoners. Repeated
Response
It is unfortunate and regrettable that transferring prisoners with severe mental health issues to specialist care continues to be a concern. Local NHS England Commissioners also acknowledge the concerns of the Board. Further to last year’s response, work is being scoped with colleagues in NHS England Specialised Commissioning to follow up closely those patients that are on the transfer list and the work is progressing with Terms of Reference being scoped. Meetings were planned for August 2020 to agree the facilitation of fortnightly calls with all case managers to review those individuals who are awaiting transfer. Ultimately the issue of transferring prisoners within the 14 day (soon to be 28 day) timeframe is a combination of Health and Justice having close liaison with specialised commissioning to ensure patients have a timely transfer, and working closely with Provider Collaboratives such as IMPACT. These measures are however subject to capacity of secure hospital placements/beds across the country. NHS England conducted a nationally coordinated demand and capacity review of adult medium and low secure services looking at regional intentions in terms of configuration of beds by service with the ambition to ensure that secure in-patient services are situated in the correct geographical location and are delivering the right type of service in a timely manner. This was specifically in relation to mental illness and personality disorder services, aligning with other national work focussing on secure learning disability and autism services, which reflects the ambition in the long-term plan. National and regional teams in NHS England and NHS Improvement are working closely with NHS-led Provider Collaboratives as the vehicle for the delivery of these changes. The Provider Collaboratives for adult medium and low secure services give local ownership to providers for the whole pathway, including the interface with the criminal justice system, and resource for their own populations, enabling them to make commissioning decisions to improve and integrate services. Additionally, NHS England’s work to improve the system for transfers and remissions involves developing new performance metrics. It includes a strategic reporting tool to monitor patients being assessed under the Mental Health Act, tracking the assessment and waiting periods for transfer and will allow Commissioners to identify exceptional cases within prisons and act where necessary. The Board will be pleased to know that the 2011 Prison Transfer and Remission Guidance has now been refreshed and amended following a comprehensive consultation process during summer 2019 and is awaiting publication as the planned release was impacted by the Covid-19 pandemic.
Other In progress
2 We also report the significant Board concern in relation to the number of prisoners released without accommodation, and the inadequacy of bail hostel accommodation availability, preventing prisoners from securing home detention curfew (HDC) for which they might otherwise have been eligible. This situation results from failings in the wider community and is beyond the control of the prison and the CRC, and we therefore refer the matter specifically to the minister to raise within government. Repeated
Response
Turning to the Board’s concerns around prisoners released without accommodation and bail hostel availability, I would like to assure you that it is a priority for the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) to ensure that offenders find somewhere safe and secure to live following their release from custody. We are working closely across Government to access the elements that are not directly within our control. The Government published its Rough Sleeping Strategy in August 2018, launching a £100 million initiative to reduce and ultimately eliminate rough sleeping across England. As part of this strategy, MoJ and Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, are investing approximately £6.4 million in a pilot scheme to help ex-offenders secure suitable accommodation from three prisons, namely HMPs Pentonville, Bristol and Leeds. The pilot is focusing on male prisoners who have been sentenced to 36 months or less and who have been identified as having a risk of homelessness. The pilot has been operating since August 2019. A little over 300 individuals were enrolled onto the pilot which concluded at the end of July. Subject to evaluation, we will use the lessons from the pilot to inform future provision of accommodation for offenders through the new Probation model. I can also confirm that HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) is well underway to developing an Accommodation Framework that sets out both the agency’s and its partners responsibilities and a framework for how to build on success and work collaboratively to ensure offenders are able to access and maintain settled accommodation. In light of the Covid-19 pandemic, the Government has now decided that there is a need to provide accommodation for a larger cohort of prison leavers. The MoJ has secured appropriate funding for a time-limited period to support the provision of accommodation for all individuals released from prison during this period who are at risk of homelessness. Subject to funding, other cohorts can also be considered such as current residents in Approved Premises and Bail Accommodation Support Services that are at risk of homelessness. Whilst this initiative is an immediate response to support prison leavers at risk of homelessness during this period, the MoJ is keen to utilise the learning gathered from this scheme to help develop longer-term improvements. HMPPS and MoJ will draw on that learning as we develop and roll out our wider reforms to probation services.
Other In progress
3 We note with concern the difficulties within the service of moving prisoners for whom a category B local prison is not an appropriate location on to parts of the estate more appropriate to their categorisation, sentence plans or personal circumstances. The Board would like to see service-wide efforts to address these difficulties.
Response
Progressive transfers of prisoners are subject to space in the appropriate part of the prison estate becoming available. The speed of transfers reflects this constraint and HMPPS fully understands the Board’s concerns around this matter. The Agency recognises that there is currently an imbalance of places within the estate as there are too many local places and too few training and resettlement places. To address this, HMPPS is reconfiguring the adult male estate and is simplifying the organisation of prisons into three key functions: reception, training and resettlement. New offender flows will be introduced to move men to the right prison at the right time, and for some men this will include spending a longer time in a resettlement prison closer to home. Transitioning of the estate has already begun. In 2019, HMP Woodhill began its transition from a Core Local Prison to a Category B training prison with a Category A trial function and specialist units. At the beginning of February 2020, HMP Manchester started its transition from a Core Local Prison to a Category B training prison with a Category A remand function. When both prisons have fully transitioned this will add approximately 1300 Category B training places to the estate. Additionally, on 1 January 2020 HMP Haverigg in Cumbria changed from a Category C prison, capable of holding up to 268 Category C men, to a Category D open prison initially holding up to 458 Category D men with the potential to increase to 570. This change has provided extra capacity in the adult male open estate, including for men convicted of sexual offences. The newly built prisons at Wellingborough and Glen Parva will also deliver a further 3,360 Category C resettlement places.
HMPPS In progress
4 We have concerns regarding the wider circumstance of a falling population of those convicted of a sexual offence, resulting in wings for these prisoners also being used to house prisoners who are vulnerable because of other issues. Given that this is a service-wide circumstance, it may be an area that merits strategic reconsideration by the Director-General of Prisons.
Response
As mentioned above, reconfiguration of the estate will help with better utilisation of specialist wings across all prisons. However, it remains a challenge to maintain sufficient numbers of offence-related vulnerable prisoners in appropriate wings and, owing to population pressures, if capacity exists then prisons will have to use that space accordingly. Furthermore, HMPPS is unable to plan for or predict how many offence-related vulnerable prisoners will be transferred from the courts and therefore it is a balancing act of keeping the roll at capacity whilst having the right prisoners on specialist wings.
HMPPS In progress
5 While we have noted improvements in the availability of purposeful activity (education, training and work) and understand the constraints of a local prison without training status, we do note that there remain many prisoners who do not participate. We acknowledge that often the opportunities available are not suitable for those on remand or with short sentences, or they are not considered worthwhile by prisoners. The Board wonders if the opportunities that are more appropriate and popular could be expanded to benefit more prisoners. Governor / Director

Applications to the IMB

CategoryCurrentPrevious
Accommodation (including transfers) 45 38
Communications 37 36
Discrimination (Other) 3 5
Discrimination (Protected Characteristics) 2 3
Food 23 19
Healthcare 48 68
IEP, awards and incentives 4 6
Pay and debt 30 32
Property 25 57
Security 10 16
Segregation 13 15
Sentence calculation 11 17
Staff conduct 4 6
TOTALS 279 346
Unspecified 7 9
Visits 16 14
Work, vocational training & education 1 3

Related inspections & investigations

13 May 2024 HMIP · Unannounced Safety 2 · Respect 3 · Activity 1 · Release 2
PPO fatal incident Henry Benoi-Davies · Natural causes
PPO fatal incident Sandip Pabla
PPO fatal incident John Friend
PPO fatal incident William Hardacre
PPO fatal incident Reuben Rhodes
8 Apr 2026 PFD Jonathan Thornton · State Custody related deaths
3 May 2016 PFD Shalane Blackwood · State Custody related

Other reports for Nottingham

2025 Published 14 Jan 2026 · Self-harm 990 · Concerns
2024 Published 13 Nov 2024 · Self-harm 898 · Concerns
2023 Published 5 Dec 2023 Population 950 · Self-harm 712 · Concerns
2022 Published 25 Jul 2022 Population 900 · Self-harm 869 · Concerns
2021 Published 25 Aug 2021 Population 828 · Self-harm 1,013 · Concerns

Report details

Establishment
Nottingham
Type
Prison · Cat B adult male establishment and young offender inst
Report year
2020
Published
6 August 2020
Responsible body
HMP Nottingham
Recommendations
5
MoJ rating (2024/25)
1 — Serious concern

Population

Population880
Operational capacity1,060
CNA (designed for)718 123%

Service providers

Escorting
GEOAmey
Healthcare
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Learning and skills
People Plus Group
Maintenance
Amey
Resettlement
Derbyshire, Leicestershire, Nottinghamshire and Rutland Community Rehabilitation Company
Substance misuse
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Visitors centre
Prison Advice and Care Trust (PACT)

Source links