Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Jonathan Thornton

Ref: 2026-0200 Date: 8 Apr 2026 Coroner: Alexandra Pountney Area: Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Responses identified: 3 / 5 View PDF

Information sharing barriers between the Community Forensic Team and prison healthcare, as well as between prison healthcare and operational prison staff, were identified as concerns. The limited and broad categorisation of alerts on NOMIS/DPS was also raised as an issue.

Date 8 Apr 2026
56-day deadline 3 Jun 2026
Responses identified 3 of 5
State Custody related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
Information sharing barriers between the Community Forensic Team and prison healthcare, as well as between prison healthcare and operational prison staff, were identified as concerns. The limited and broad categorisation of alerts on NOMIS/DPS was also raised as an issue.
View full coroner's concerns
Information sharing between the CFT and Prison Healthcare. During the course of the inquest, I heard that there had been various barriers to information sharing between the community forensic team and prison healthcare.  There  was  no  formal  system  in  place  for  the  handover  of information between these teams at the time of Jonathan’s death or at the conclusion of the inquest. Prison Healthcare staff were often unavailable or uncontactable for handover meetings. The handover of information between CFT and Prison Healthcare is vital for the risk assessment and management of prisoners who are known to the CFT (often some of the most complex and high-risk prisoners).

I am concerned that the lack of formal information sharing between the two departments gives rise to a risk of future death. Information sharing between Prison Healthcare and Operational Prison Staff. This case illustrated  a  lack  of  communication  and  information  sharing between Prison Healthcare and the Operational Prison Staff which was concerning to me.

I heard evidence that Prison Healthcare had in place a quasi ‘watch and wait’ plan for monitoring a potentially high-risk inmate. Not only was this plan not communicated to all of the healthcare team, but it   relied upon reporting of deterioration in behaviours from operational prison staff who were completely unaware that (i) they were being tasked with this role; and (ii) what to look for. Furthermore, the operational prison staff told me that having a broad understanding (within the confines of confidentiality) of a prisoner’s mental health risks and triggers would improve the safety and security of the prison for the officers and prisoners. It would enable them to properly assess and manage risk, but that there was no effective mechanism in place by which to achieve this. I am concerned that the lack of formal information sharing between the two departments gives rise to a risk of future death.   Categorisation and visibility of alerts on NOMIS/DPS I heard that NOMIS/DPS has preset categorisation of alerts.

The categories are limited and broad. This means that ‘violent’ prisoners – regardless of the particulars of that violence – will all be categorised together. This case illustrated quite clearly that there are certain categories of offender who require better particularisation of their risk. In this case, that was those prisoners with a history of assaulting fellow inmates. I was told that unless a prisoner  has  assaulted  a  cellmate,  which  would  be  subject  to  its  own assessment, the operational prison staff would not necessarily know whether their violent behaviour was aimed at prison officers, other prisoners or simply a genera violent behaviour linked to their offending. Clearly, each of these categories  gives  rise  to  a  particular  risk  within  a  prison  setting.         

I  am concerned that if more detailed categorisation and/or information is not provided to the operational prison staff within NOMIS/DPS alerts, with clear visibility, this gives rise to a risk of future death. I understand that this is controlled nationally.   Moreover,  I  understand  that  the  Healthcare  Staff  are  unable  to  view NOMIS/DPS alerts. This gives rise to the same risk

Responses

3 respondents
Northampton Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
8 Apr 2026 PDF
Action Taken

Since taking over healthcare services at HMP Nottingham in November 2025, the Trust has implemented regular information-sharing processes including daily briefings, SIM meetings, drug strategy discussions, and ongoing communications within the prison. They defer to the MoJ regarding NOMIS/DPS alerts but will collaborate if needed. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Ms Pountney RE: Regulation 28 Report Concerning Jonathan Mark Thornton We write in response to your Prevention of Future Deaths Regulation 28 (‘Report’) dated 8 April 2026 concerning the death of Jonathan Mark Thornton on 12 July 2024. Before responding to the matters of concern you have included within your Report, I would like to express my condolences to Mr Thornton’s family and loved ones. From your Report, we understand that you have concerns about information sharing between the community forensic and prison healthcare teams; information sharing between the prison healthcare team and operational prison staff; and categorisation and visibility of alerts on National Offender Management Information System / Digital Prison Services (NOMIS / DPS). You have asked The Trust to either provide details of action taken, or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, the Trust must explain why no action is proposed. Please find below our response to your concerns detailing the actions being taken. Cont’d/… Trust Headquarters: St. Mary’s Hospital, London Road, Kettering, NN15 7PW

[Page 2] Information sharing between the Community Forensic Team and Prison Healthcare We agree with your statement in your Report that the handover of information between Community Forensic Team and Prison Healthcare is vital for the risk assessment and management of prisoners who are known to the Community Forensic Team. As you know, since Mr Thornton’s death, the responsibility for Community Forensic and Prison Healthcare teams has changed. Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust now runs the Prison Healthcare team at HMP Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust continues to run the local Community Forensic Team. We have put practical arrangements in place between the Community Forensic Team and the Prison Healthcare Team at HMP Nottingham to make sure information is shared smoothly when someone comes into custody. This includes holding named contacts in each team. The national SEAT template is completed for everyone arriving at HMP Nottingham. It prompts conversations about their mental health, any current concerns, and whether they have been involved with community services. This helps the prison healthcare team quickly connect with the right services and gather any information needed to support the person’s care. While forensic services use a different patient record system to that used by community and prison healthcare services (SystmOne), the arrangements we have put in place mean that information is now passed on more reliably and people receive better-connected care when they come into custody. If information has already been recorded on SystmOne, the team at HMP Nottingham can see this straight away when the person arrives, which helps avoid delays. Information sharing between Prison Healthcare and Operational Prison Staff From our experience providing prison healthcare services across the wider East Midlands and East of England regions, we understand the importance of effective communication and working relationships between Prison Healthcare and Operational Prison staff in maintaining the health and safety of prisons and staff at HMP Nottingham. Cont’d/… Trust Headquarters: St. Mary’s Hospital, London Road, Kettering, NN15 7PW

[Page 3] Since taking over responsibility for healthcare services at HMP Nottingham on 19 November 2025, we have put in place regular and consistent ways of sharing information within the prison. This includes routine contact through daily morning briefings, SIM meetings, drug strategy discussions, and ongoing conversations with colleagues in reception, healthcare, and across the house blocks. Alongside these planned touchpoints, staff also speak with each other by phone and email whenever concerns arise or when advice and support are needed. This mix of structured meetings and day-to-day communication helps ensure that important information is shared quickly and that any issues can be picked up and acted on without delay. Categorisation and visibility of alerts on NOMIS/DPS Your Report acknowledges that the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) is responsible for the NOMIS/DPS and states that you have sent a copy of this report to the Ministry of Justice for their response. We shall therefore defer to the MoJ in responding to your concerns about alerts within NOMIS/DPS. To the extent that our involvement is required, we shall collaborate with both the MoJ and Governor of HMP Nottingham in making the necessary changes to NOMIS/DPS to address the concerns you raised in your Report. I hope the content of this letter fully addresses the concerns you raised in your Report and provides assurance on the steps we have taken. Please contact me if you have any questions about this letter or require further information.
HM Prison and Probation Service Central Government
1 Jun 2026 PDF
Action Planned

HMPPS will ask its Information Sharing Advisory Group to review the case for learning and consider additional guidance. A dedicated program is scheduled to review and strengthen the quality and usability of alerts within the NOMIS/DPS system later this calendar year. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Ms Pountney REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS: MR JONATHAN THORNTON Thank you for your Regulation 28 report of 10 March 2026 addressed to the Ministry of Justice and the Governor of HMP Nottingham following the inquest into the death of Jonathan Thornton on 12 July 2024. I am responding on behalf of His Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) and the aforementioned recipients. I know that you will share a copy of this response with the family of Mr Thornton, and I would first like to express my condolences for their loss. Every death in custody is a tragedy and the safety of those in our care is my absolute priority. You have raised concerns regarding information sharing between healthcare and prison staff and the categorisation and visibility of alerts on NOMIS/DPS. Although your concerns about the sharing of information between healthcare and prison staff have been referred to Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust and Northampton Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust for their separate consideration and response, HMPPS has also considered whether there is any supportive action that it can take. A national Information Sharing Advisory Group (ISAG) is in place, which aims to improve information sharing between health and prisons. In order to improve practice, HMPPS Health and Care Information Sharing guidance was issued to prisons in July 2022 in two formats (A5 booklet and wallet size) and is available on the HMPPS intranet. The guidance aims to improve and achieve a more consistent approach to the sharing of information between all

[Page 2] partner agencies and to give staff confidence in decision making, to reduce risk to self and others, and to achieve better outcomes for all staff, people in prison and people under probation supervision. We will ask the ISAG to consider the circumstances of Mr Thornton’s death to identify learning and whether there is a need for additional or updated guidance. We have considered the points you have raised regarding the categorisation, visibility and accessibility of alerts within NOMIS/DPS. We recognise the seriousness of the issues identified and acknowledge the importance of ensuring that operational and healthcare staff have clear, relevant and actionable information to manage risk effectively within custodial settings. The current system already contains more granularity than a single “violent” categorisation. However, we recognise that improvements are needed in consistency, clarity and visibility. A dedicated programme of work is scheduled to review alerts later this calendar year, subject to prioritisation, and will be undertaken in collaboration with safety experts, digital and policy colleagues. This work will strengthen both the quality and usability of alerts in order to reduce risk and support safer decision-making. We will ensure that the findings from this review inform future enhancements and address the matters you have raised. Thank you again for bringing your concerns to my attention. I trust that this response provides assurance that action is being taken to address the matters raised.
Nottingham Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust NHS / Health Body
2 Jun 2026 PDF
Action Taken

The Trust has introduced a formal information-sharing guidance document, integrated it into internal instructions, agreed it with new prison healthcare providers, extended it to HMP Lincoln, and appointed a dedicated link worker. They are also exploring read-only access to patient records for prison healthcare teams. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Ms Pountney

Regulation 28 Response: Mr. Jonathan Thornton

| write in response to the inquest which was concluded on 17 February 2026 into the death of Mr. Thornton and the Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Deaths received on 8 April 2026. We extend our sincere condolences to the family of Mr Thornton. The Trust is committed to learning from this case and ensuring that the issues identified by the coroner are addressed in full to reduce the risk of future deaths.

Please find below the Trust response in relation to the relevant matter of concern and actions taken.

Information sharing between the Community Forensic Team (CFT) and Prison Healthcare

The coroner found that:

e There were barriers to information sharing between the CFT and Prison Healthcare.

e There was no formal system for handover at the time of the death or at the conclusion of the inquest.

e Prison Healthcare staff were often unavailable or uncontactable for handover discussions.

e The lack of structured information sharing created a risk of future deaths, particularly given the complexity and risk profile of individuals known to the CFT.

The Trust accepts these findings. Actions Taken to Date
1. Introduction of a Formal Information-Sharing Guidance Document (December 2025)

The Trust developed and implemented a formal guidance document titled: Community Forensic Services — Quick Reference Guide: Sharing information following transfer to prison. The document sets out the process for staff to follow in the event a patient is remanded or sentenced to prison and requires that staff share relevant risk and clinical information with the receiving healthcare professionals in the custodial setting.

-_—

8; Difference Trust Honesty Respect’ Compa

The Resource, Highbury Hospital, Bulwell, Nottingham, NG6 9DR

NHS;

Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust

2. Guidance Embedded Within the CFT Internal Working Instruction

This guidance now forms part of the CFT Internal Working Instruction and is therefore embedded within the team’s core operational framework. It is subject to annual review, ensuring that the process remains current, robust, and aligned with national standards and local operational needs.

3. Guidance Shared with all CFT Staff

The guidance has been circulated to all Community Forensic Team staff, discussed in team meetings, and incorporated into supervision and induction processes to ensure consistent understanding and application. :

4. Guidance Agreed with Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust

As Prison Healthcare at HMP Nottingham has now transferred to Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS . Foundation Trust, the guidance has been shared with and agreed by the new provider. This ensures continuity and shared expectations across organisational boundaries.

5. Guidance Shared across HMP Reception Prisons

Although the inquest related specifically to HMP Nottingham, the Trust has also extended the guidance.with HMP Lincoln, recognising that it is another reception prison where Nottinghamshire residents may be transferred. Extending the guidance ensures that the same standards of information sharing apply across both sites. Prison Healthcare at HMP Lincoln has now also transferred to Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust.

6. Clear Requirements for When and How Information Must Be Shared The guidance mandates:

Immediate liaison with Prison Healthcare upon remand or sentence

Prioritisation of contact when transfers occur outside normal hours

Use of secure email and telephone confirmation

Password-protected documents and separate password transmission

Recording the purpose and rationale for information sharing in the Electronic Patient Record

7. Standardised Documentation for Handover The following documents must now be shared as standard:

CORE Assessment

Risk and Safety Assessment

Summary and Care Plan

HCR-20

Medication Card and current prescriptions Family or carer contact information

i ote Making a * ae oe Bie EEE

®< Difference 2

Trust Honesty Respect Compassion Teamwork

The Resource, Highbury Hospital, Bulwell, Nottingham, NG6 9DR

8.

NHS}

Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust

Escalation Routes

Where contact cannot be made, staff must escalate to Service Managers and the Operational Manager, ensuring that communication failures are addressed promptly.

Actions Planned or Underway

qi

Appointment of a Dedicated CFT Link Worker

A Community Forensic Team Link Worker has been appointed as an additional, consistent point of contact for Prison Healthcare teams. This role is a qualified and registered mental health nurse

(RMN) and will: e Have oversight of information-sharing activity e Ensure timely responses to enquiries e Provide continuity when other staff (care Co-ordinators) are unavailable e Actas a reliable interface between services

The Link Worker will also arrange and chair a bimonthly interface meeting ‘with Prison Healthcare teams at HMP Nottingham. These meetings will:

2.

Review shared cases

Address communication issues

Monitor adherence to the guidance

Identify and escalate emerging risks to senior operational leads within respective organisations

Strengthen collaborative working

Embedding the Guidance Through Training and Supervision

The guidance is being embedded through:

3.

Team briefings Clinical supervision Induction for new staff

Joint Working with Prison Healthcare Providers

The Trust is working with Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust to ensure:

ea,

of” “fo Makin oa Difference

Shared understanding of roles and responsibilities Agreed expectations for availability and responsiveness Clear escalation pathway

Quarterly Audit and Reporting

Trust Honesty Respect Compassion Teamwork

The Resource, Highbury Hospital, Bulwell, Nottingham, NG6 9DR

NHS}

Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust

A quarterly audit will monitor:

e Timeliness of information sharing e Completeness of documentation e Evidence of escalation where contact was not achieved

Findings will be reported to: e Community Forensic Services Quality Safety and Experience and Performance and Accountability Group

5. Development of Read-Only RIO Access for Prison Healthcare Teams

Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust is actively exploring the feasibility of enabling read-only access to RIO Local for the Prison Healthcare mental health teams. This work is being developed collaboratively with colleagues at Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, the new provider of healthcare services at HMP Nottingham.

If achievable, this development will significantly strengthen the availability and timeliness of clinical and risk information for mental health practitioners operating within the prison environment. It will also reduce reliance on manual information-sharing processes and further support safe continuity of care for individuals transferring from the community into custody. :

This work remains in development, and the Trust will continue to progress it as a priority area for system improvement.

Assurance

The Trust recognises the critical importance of robust information sharing between community forensic services and prison healthcare. The introduction of the formal guidance, its integration into the Community Forensic Team Internal Working Instruction, its agreement with the new Prison Healthcare provider, its extension to HMP Lincoln, and the appointment of a dedicated Community Forensic Team Link Worker and the potential development of read only access collectively represent a significant strengthening of communication and risk-sharing arrangements. We are confident that these actions will materially reduce the risk of future deaths arising from gaps in information sharing.

It is hoped that this response provides you, Mr. Thornton’s family and the other parties involved with reassurance in terms of the ongoing plans to improve this important area of patient care moving forward

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
An investigation into the death of Jonathan Mark Thornton was opened on 30 March 2025, and the final inquest was heard by me, concluding on 17 February 2026.
Circumstances of the death
Jonathan Mark Thornton died at the Queens Medical Centre in Nottingham on 12th July 2024 following an attack by a fellow inmate on 28th June 2024 in the shower block on B-Wing landing 1 at HMP Nottingham, from which he sustained a severe head injury.  The inmate who attacked Jonathan had a complex psychological history and was arrested for attempted murder in the community. As a result of that arrest, he was remanded to HMP Nottingham. At the time of his arrest, the inmate was under the care of the Community Forensic Team, having been released 6 months previously into the community from a low-secure forensic unit on a s.37/41. The background to his s.37/41 was that the inmate had been charged with GBH arising out of an assault on a fellow inmate whilst serving a custodial sentence at HMP Birmingham in June 2011. He was subsequently sentenced to a Hospital Order and detained at Rampton Hospital, which is a high-secure forensic hospital. The Court imposed a Restriction Order without limit of time i.e. an indefinite restriction order. He was placed at a 24-hour staffed support living scheme in Nottingham City Centre on 17 November 2023 an was arrested for attempted murder on 29 May 2024.  This complex psychological history was either not known, or not understood, by the operational prison staff and many of the healthcare staff at the prison.

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2026-0200
Date of report
8 April 2026
Coroner
Alexandra Pountney
Coroner area
Nottingham and Nottinghamshire

Responses identified

Responses identified 3 of 5
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 3 Jun 2026.

Sent to

HMP Nottingham
Ministry of Justice
Northampton Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Nottingham Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust

Source links