Public Inquiry

Brook House Inquiry

Completed · Chair: Kate Eves · Established February 2020 · Commissioned by Home Office

The Brook House Inquiry examined mistreatment of detainees at Brook House Immigration Removal Centre near Gatwick Airport between April and August 2017, following undercover footage broadcast by BBC Panorama.

More about this inquiry

The Brook House Inquiry examined mistreatment of detainees at Brook House Immigration Removal Centre near Gatwick Airport between April and August 2017, following undercover footage broadcast by BBC Panorama. The inquiry found 19 incidents of mistreatment and made 33 recommendations.

Where it stands

Public hearings were held on 48 days between September 2020 and April 2022.

The Brook House Inquiry Report was published on 19 September 2023.

The most recent government response on the record is R (D1914 and AAA) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (AVY) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, dated 22 May 2025.

Government response (33 recommendations)

Delivery (the addressees’ latest statements)

  • Home Office says in progress 16
  • Home Office says completed 14
  • Home Office says not accepted 3

Record checked against the sources 11 June 2026. Latest activity 22 May 2025.

Latest on the recommendations

All 33 recommendations

Reports

Reports and timeline

Recent milestones

  • One Year Progress Update19 September 2024
  • Government Response22 November 2023
  • Final Report Published19 September 2023
Full timeline

Costs

£284,998

Spent in the latest reported period, November 2019 to March 2020 Costs in detail

Parliament

24

mentions in Parliament Parliamentary activity

Recommendations

27 shown (filtered)
Clear filters

4: Ensure reasonable internet and computer access for detainees

Accepted, fully or in part (not specified) · Home Office says completed

Recommended

The Home Office and its contractors must ensure reasonable access to computers and the internet. Contractors must comply in full with Detention Services Order 04/2016: Detainee Access to the Internet, in particular: Computers and the internet provided for detained people's use must be maintained and fixed, if broken, within a reasonable time period, in order to allow detained people to access the internet for a minimum of seven hours per day, seven days per week. Websites containing personal internet-based email accounts must not be blocked, since this is not a prohibited category of website. Websites facilitating the provision of legal advice and representation must not be blocked, as this is not a prohibited category of website.

Since then (summary written by this site)

In a January 2025 written parliamentary answer, Dame Angela Eagle, Minister of State at the Home Office, stated that recommendation 4 had been accepted or partially accepted and was among twelve recommendations "met and closed as of October 2024" (Dame Angela Eagle response, Jan 2025; Dame Angela Eagle, Jan 2025). The department previously stated in its March 2024 response that all service contracts require adherence to Detention Services Orders, including mandatory provision of and regulated access to information technology equipment and internet services, backed by the ability to impose fines (Home Office response, Mar 2024).

Addressed to Home Office · Full record

5: Require proper cell sharing risk assessments

Accepted, fully or in part (not specified) · Home Office says in progress (22 May 2025; nothing later found)

Recommended

The Home Office must ensure that adequate risk assessment for cell sharing is carried out by contractors in relation to every detained person. This must be done at the outset of detention and then repeated at reasonable intervals (at least every 14 days) or following any relevant change in circumstances. In the event that an immigration removal centre is unable to detain someone in accordance with the outcome of a risk assessment (due to capacity or for other reasons), the Home Office must ensure that the individual does not remain at that centre.

Since then (summary written by this site)

In a May 2025 letter quoted in a High Court judgment, Dame Angela Eagle, Minister for Border Security and Asylum, stated that room sharing risk assessments are reviewed immediately following behavioural changes, incidents, or new intelligence (Dame Angela Eagle, May 2025). The Minister added that revised guidance sets out systematic reviews for detained individuals rated as high risk, with delivery monitored monthly by Home Office compliance teams (Dame Angela Eagle, May 2025). Previously, in a January 2025 parliamentary written answer, the Minister reported that the recommendation had been accepted or partially accepted and was due for closure by the end of that month (Dame Angela Eagle response, Jan 2025; Dame Angela Eagle, Jan 2025).

Addressed to Home Office · Full record

6: Review and reduce cell lock-in periods

Accepted, fully or in part (not specified) · Home Office says completed

Recommended

The Home Office, in consultation with the contractor responsible for operating each immigration removal centre, must review the current lock-in regime and determine whether the period of time during which detained people are locked in their cells could be reduced. The Inquiry does not consider cost alone to be a sufficient justification for extensive lock-in periods.

Since then (summary written by this site)

In January 2025, Minister of State Dame Angela Eagle stated in a written parliamentary answer for the Home Office that this recommendation was among twelve "met and closed as of October 2024" (Dame Angela Eagle, Jan 2025). The department had previously reported in its March 2024 response that a new staffing model had embedded a maximum night state of nine hours, limiting the amount of time detained individuals could be locked in their rooms overnight (Home Office response, Mar 2024).

Addressed to Home Office · Full record

8: Mandatory comprehensive Rule 34 and Rule 35 training

Accepted, fully or in part (not specified) · Home Office says in progress (15 January 2025; nothing later found)

Recommended

The Home Office (in collaboration with NHS England as required) must ensure that comprehensive training on Rule 34 and Rule 35 of the Detention Centre Rules 2001 is rolled out urgently across the immigration detention estate. Staff must be subject to refresher training, at least annually. Attendance must be mandatory for all staff working in immigration removal centres and those responsible for managing them, as well as GPs and relevant Home Office staff. Consideration must be given as to whether such training should be subject to an assessment.

Since then (summary written by this site)

The Inquiry recommended mandatory annual Rule 34 and Rule 35 training across the detention estate. In January 2025, Dame Angela Eagle, Minister of State at the Home Office, stated in a written parliamentary answer that the recommendation had been accepted or partially accepted and was "on track for closure by summer 2025" (Dame Angela Eagle response, Jan 2025; Dame Angela Eagle, Jan 2025). In September 2025, HM Inspectorate of Prisons found that despite training being delivered to medical professionals, the quality of most Rule 35(3) torture reports remained poor, although the quality of most Rule 35(1) reports was good (HM Inspectorate of Prisons, Sep 2025).

Addressed to Home Office · Full record

9: Ensure effective operation and auditing of all Rule 35 limbs

Accepted, fully or in part (not specified) · Home Office says in progress (22 May 2025; nothing later found)

Recommended

The Home Office must, across the immigration detention estate, assure itself that all three limbs of Rule 35 of the Detention Centre Rules 2001 (reports by a medical practitioner where: (i) it is likely that a detained person's health would be injuriously affected by continued detention (Rule 35(1)); (ii) it is suspected that a detained person has suicidal intentions (Rule 35(2)); or (iii) there is a concern that a detained person may have been a victim of torture (Rule 35(3))) are being followed, are operating effectively and are adequately resourced, in recognition of the key safeguarding role that the Rule plays. The Home Office must also regularly audit the use of Rule 35 in order to identify trends, any training needs and required improvements.

Since then (summary written by this site)

The Inquiry asked the Home Office to ensure and audit Rule 35 operations. In a letter of May 2025, quoted in a July 2025 court judgment, Dame Angela Eagle, Minister for Border Security and Asylum, stated that the Home Office was reviewing Detention Centre Rules 34 and 35 to reform safeguarding, but did not mention auditing (Dame Angela Eagle, May 2025). In December 2025, Mrs Justice Jefford in the Administrative Court found that evidence showed no progress had been made on reviewing the rule because other work was prioritised (Mrs Justice Jefford, Dec 2025). HM Inspectorate of Prisons found in September 2025 that significant weaknesses remained in Rule 35 processes, with appointment scheduling delays and routine failures to report detainees suspected of having suicidal intentions (HM Inspectorate of Prisons, Sep 2025).

Addressed to Home Office · Full record

10: Clarify authorisation for Rule 40 and Rule 42 segregation

Accepted, fully or in part (not specified) · Home Office says in progress (22 May 2025; nothing later found)

Recommended

The Home Office must amend, as a matter of urgency, Detention Services Order 02/2017: Removal from Association (Detention Centre Rule 40) and Temporary Confinement (Detention Centre Rule 42) and, if necessary, the Detention Services Operating Standards Manual for Immigration Service Removal Centres, to clarify who can authorise use of Rule 40 and Rule 42 of the Detention Centre Rules 2001, in both urgent and non-urgent circumstances, including providing a definition of the term 'manager' in Rule 40(2) and Rule 42(2). In anticipation of the update to Detention Services Order 02/2017, the Home Office must issue an immediate instruction to communicate this clarification to staff and contractors operating immigration detention centres.

Since then (summary written by this site)

In a letter of May 2025, quoted in a court judgment of July 2025, Dame Angela Eagle, Minister for Border Security and Asylum, stated that the Home Office had published an interim instruction clarifying who can authorise removal from association and temporary confinement, with a fully updated order to be supplemented by staff awareness sessions (Dame Angela Eagle, May 2025). Earlier, in January 2025 written answers, the Minister reported that the recommendation was accepted or partially accepted and was "on track for closure by summer 2025" (Dame Angela Eagle response, Jan 2025; Dame Angela Eagle, Jan 2025).

Addressed to Home Office · Full record

11: Review E Wing suitability for vulnerable detainees

Accepted, fully or in part (not specified) · Home Office says in progress (15 January 2025; nothing later found)

Recommended

The Home Office and the current operator of Brook House must keep under review the appropriateness of the multi-purpose use of E Wing, particularly in relation to its suitability as a location to detain vulnerable people.

Since then (summary written by this site)

In January 2025, Dame Angela Eagle, Minister of State at the Home Office, stated in a written parliamentary answer that the recommendation to review the suitability of E Wing for vulnerable detainees was accepted or partially accepted, and was "due for closure by the end of January 2025" (Dame Angela Eagle response, Jan 2025; Dame Angela Eagle, Jan 2025). The record holds no update since the Home Office's response of January 2025 (Dame Angela Eagle response, Jan 2025; Dame Angela Eagle, Jan 2025).

Addressed to Home Office · Full record

12: Annual training on Rule 40 and Rule 42 segregation powers

Accepted, fully or in part (not specified) · Home Office says in progress (15 January 2025; nothing later found)

Recommended

The Home Office and contractors operating immigration removal centres must provide regular training, at least annually, on the operation of Rule 40 and Rule 42 of the Detention Centre Rules 2001, which must include: that Rules 40 and 42 are the only powers under which detained people in immigration removal centres can be removed from association and/or located in temporary confinement; who is permitted to authorise use of those Rules and in what circumstances they may be authorised; that Rules 40 and 42 cannot be used as a punishment or solely for administrative convenience before a planned removal or transfer; and the need to assess any adverse effect that use of Rule 40 or Rule 42 could have on a detained person's physical or mental health, and to consider any steps that could be taken to mitigate those effects. Attendance must be mandatory for all staff working in immigration removal centres and those responsible for managing them. The training must be subject to an assessment.

Since then (summary written by this site)

In a January 2025 parliamentary written answer, Dame Angela Eagle, Minister of State at the Home Office, stated that the recommendation had been accepted or partially accepted and was "on track for closure by summer 2025" (Dame Angela Eagle response, Jan 2025; Dame Angela Eagle, Jan 2025). Previously, in its March 2024 response, the department stated that it had published interim operational guidance on the use of Rule 40 and Rule 42 segregation powers, while undertaking a substantive review to develop updated staff training and audit mechanisms (Home Office response, Mar 2024).

Addressed to Home Office · Full record

13: Quarterly auditing of Rule 40 and Rule 42 use

Accepted, fully or in part (not specified) · Home Office says in progress (15 January 2025; nothing later found)

Recommended

The Home Office must regularly (and at least quarterly) audit the use of Rule 40 and Rule 42 across the immigration detention estate, in order to identify trends, any training needs and required improvements. In addition, HM Inspectorate of Prisons and the National Chair and Management Board of Independent Monitoring Boards must review processes to consider how they fulfil their oversight role in respect of Rule 40 and Rule 42, and report on the monitoring of the use of Rules 40 and 42 going forward.

Since then (summary written by this site)

In a January 2025 parliamentary written answer, Dame Angela Eagle, Minister of State at the Home Office, stated that the recommendation had been accepted or partially accepted and was "on track for closure by summer 2025" (Dame Angela Eagle response, Jan 2025; Dame Angela Eagle, Jan 2025). The department previously stated in its March 2024 response that it had issued an interim Detention Services Order on Rules 40 and 42, and that compliance would be audited once a substantive review of the guidance was completed (Home Office response, Mar 2024).

Addressed to Home Office · Full record

14: Prohibit handcuffing behind back while seated

Accepted, fully or in part (not specified) · Home Office says completed

Recommended

The Home Office and contractors operating immigration removal centres must ensure that all staff are aware that the technique of handcuffing detained people with their hands behind their back while seated is not permitted, given its association with positional asphyxia.

Since then (summary written by this site)

In January 2025, Minister of State Dame Angela Eagle stated in a written parliamentary answer that this recommendation was accepted or partially accepted and was "met and closed as of October 2024" (Dame Angela Eagle response, Jan 2025; Dame Angela Eagle, Jan 2025). The Home Office had previously reported in March 2024 that it had communicated to all immigration removal centre and contractor staff that handcuffing individuals behind their backs while seated is not permitted, and that a new Detention Services Order on use of force was under development (Home Office response, Mar 2024).

Addressed to Home Office · Full record

15: New comprehensive use of force detention services order

Accepted, fully or in part (not specified) · Home Office says in progress (22 May 2025; nothing later found)

Recommended

The Home Office must introduce, as a matter of urgency, a new and comprehensive detention services order to address use of force in immigration removal centres. The detention services order must include the following issues: the permissible justifications for the use of force within immigration removal centres, based on the key principle that force must not be used unnecessarily and must be used only as a last resort; the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), including that it must be subject to a dynamic risk assessment before and during any use of force incident; the protection of dignity when force is used on a naked or near-naked detained person; the circumstances in which force can be used against a detained person with mental ill health; and monitoring, oversight and reporting of use of force by contractors and by the Home Office. The Home Office must ensure that training about the application of the new detention services order and use of force techniques takes place on a regular (at least annual) basis for all detention staff as well as healthcare staff. Attendance must be mandatory for all staff working in immigration removal centres and those responsible for managing them. The training must be subject to an assessment. In anticipation of a new detention services order on the use of force in immigration detention, the Home Office must issue an immediate instruction to its contractors managing immigration removal centres that force must be used only as a last resort, using approved techniques.

Since then (summary written by this site)

The Inquiry asked the Home Office to publish a new detention order on the use of force. In a letter of May 2025 quoted in a court judgment, Dame Angela Eagle, Minister for Border Security and Asylum, stated that a new detention services order addressing mental health considerations was being developed for immigration detention, though named elements including protective equipment risk assessments and mandatory training were not mentioned (Dame Angela Eagle, May 2025). The Independent Monitoring Board at Gatwick Immigration Removal Centres reported in September 2026 that the resulting order was published in December 2025 (Independent Monitoring Boards, Sep 2026).

Addressed to Home Office · Full record

16: Independent review of use of force on mentally ill detainees

Accepted, fully or in part (not specified) · Home Office says in progress (15 January 2025; nothing later found)

Recommended

The Home Office must urgently commission an independent review (with the power to make recommendations) of use of force on detained people with mental ill health within immigration removal centres. The review must consider: how, when and whether to use force on detained people with mental ill health (including the application of pain-inducing techniques); the likely effect of the use of force on a detained person's mental health; the use of individual risk assessments for detained people, which could be conducted by personal officers and healthcare professionals; and the increased use and prioritisation of de-escalation techniques for those who have mental ill health. The review must take place in consultation with relevant stakeholders, including detained people's representative groups and mental ill health experts. The recommendations of the review must be incorporated in the new detention services order regarding the use of force (see Recommendation 15), in respect of which additional, regular (at least annual) training must then be provided.

Since then (summary written by this site)

In a parliamentary written answer in January 2025, Minister of State Dame Angela Eagle stated that the Home Office had accepted or partially accepted the recommendation, with work "on track for closure by summer 2025" (Dame Angela Eagle response, Jan 2025; Dame Angela Eagle, Jan 2025). The department previously reported in March 2024 that it was consulting with healthcare and prison services to draft a new detention services order on the use of force, while prohibiting staff from handcuffing detainees behind their backs while seated (Home Office response, Mar 2024).

Addressed to Home Office · Full record

17: Mandatory use of force debrief training and multi-level review process

Accepted, fully or in part (not specified) · Home Office says in progress (15 January 2025; nothing later found)

Recommended

The Home Office must ensure, as a matter of urgency, that training is delivered on how to conduct an effective use of force incident debrief, ensuring that issues of detained person and staff welfare, as well as training needs, are covered. The training must be mandatory for all immigration removal centre contractor employees who conduct such reviews and those who manage them. The Home Office must also require that use of force incidents be reviewed, at a minimum, at the following levels: Within 36 hours of each use of force incident, the Use of Force Coordinator must conduct a thorough incident review, ensuring that all documentation and footage are collated and preserved, and with a view to taking emergency action in instances of unlawful or inappropriate force. On a weekly basis, all use of force incidents must be reviewed (including all necessary paperwork and available video footage) at a formal meeting by the Use of Force Coordinator and a suitable manager in order to review each incident and to identify any issues or further action required. On a monthly basis, immigration removal centre contractor senior management must arrange meetings with other stakeholders (including detained people and representatives of non-governmental organisations) to review use of force trends. Periodically, the Home Office (or its Professional Standards Unit if the Home Office considers it more appropriate) must review use of force at Brook House and across the immigration detention estate, to identify trends and to direct the implementation of any changes and improvements that are required. This review process must be reflected in the new detention services order regarding the use of force – see Recommendation 15 – in respect of which additional, regular (at least annual) training must then be provided.

Since then (summary written by this site)

In a January 2025 written answer, Minister of State Dame Angela Eagle stated that the Home Office had accepted or partially accepted the recommendation, with work "on track for closure by summer 2025" (Dame Angela Eagle response, Jan 2025; Dame Angela Eagle, Jan 2025). The department had previously reported in March 2024 that training around use of force reviews and a new detention services order were under development alongside an overhaul of existing assurance processes (Home Office response, Mar 2024). The record holds no update since the Home Office's response of January 2025 (Dame Angela Eagle response, Jan 2025; Dame Angela Eagle, Jan 2025).

Addressed to Home Office · Full record

18: Update DSO on food and fluid refusal management and reporting

Accepted, fully or in part (not specified) · Home Office says completed

Recommended

The Home Office must, as a matter of urgency, update Detention Services Order 03/2017: Care and Management of Detained Individuals Refusing Food and/or Fluid, to ensure that it deals with: food and fluid refusal being clearly and directly linked to consideration of the Rule 35 process and whether a detained person is defined as an 'adult at risk'; the consideration by the healthcare provider at each immigration removal centre, upon an incidence of food and fluid refusal occurring, of assessments of mental capacity, of mental state, and under Rule 35, and the conduct of these where indicated, as well as ensuring compliance with Adults at Risk in Immigration Detention policy and making sure that decisions made in relation to these are recorded; the notification to the Home Office of the numbers of detained people refusing food and fluid, and the reasons for such refusal, on a monthly basis (in the same way that incidents of self-harm are notified); and the monitoring by the Home Office of the compliance by healthcare providers with Detention Services Order 03/2017 and the numbers of detained people refusing food and fluid, and the reasons for such refusal, in order to identify any patterns of concern and take appropriate action. The Home Office must ensure that mandatory training about the application of the updated detention services order takes place on a regular (at least annual) basis for all detention staff and healthcare staff, as well as those responsible for managing them. Attendance must be mandatory for all staff working in immigration removal centres and those responsible for managing them. The training must be subject to an assessment. In anticipation of the update to Detention Services Order 03/2017, the Home Office must issue an immediate instruction to communicate this clarification to those operating immigration detention centres.

Since then (summary written by this site)

Dame Angela Eagle, Minister of State at the Home Office, stated in a January 2025 written answer that the recommendation was accepted or partially accepted, and was "met and closed as of October 2024" (Dame Angela Eagle response, Jan 2025; Dame Angela Eagle, Jan 2025). Earlier, in its March 2024 response, the department reported that an updated Detention Services Order on food and fluid refusal had been published, covering links to the Rule 35 process and adult at risk considerations, the recording of healthcare decisions, and departmental monitoring to identify trends and take appropriate action (Home Office response, Mar 2024).

Addressed to Home Office · Full record

20: Update guidance on fit to fly and fit for detention medical assessments

Accepted, fully or in part (not specified) · Home Office says in progress (22 May 2025; nothing later found)

Recommended

The Home Office must review and update Detention Services Order 01/2016: The Protection, Use and Sharing of Medical Information Relating to People Detained Under Immigration Powers, to ensure that guidance given to GPs working in the immigration detention estate in relation to their duties and responsibilities in writing 'fit to fly and fit for detention' letters is clear. It must liaise with NHS England and any relevant medical regulators as necessary. The Home Office must ensure that training about the updated guidance takes place on a regular (at least annual) basis for GPs working in the immigration detention estate and those responsible for managing them. The training must be subject to an assessment. The Home Office must monitor compliance with this updated guidance at least annually.

Since then (summary written by this site)

In a letter of May 2025, quoted in a High Court judgment of July 2025, Home Office minister Dame Angela Eagle stated that a new healthcare inquiry form had been in use since July 2024 to provide additional guidance on assessments (Dame Angela Eagle, May 2025). The Minister explained that the "impact of this change is being reviewed before the recommendation is considered for closure" (Dame Angela Eagle, May 2025). She had previously reported in a January 2025 parliamentary written answer that the recommendation was accepted or partially accepted and on track for closure by summer 2025 (Dame Angela Eagle response, Jan 2025; Dame Angela Eagle, Jan 2025).

Addressed to Home Office · Full record

21: Update mental vulnerability and mental capacity DSO guidance

Accepted, fully or in part (not specified) · Home Office says in progress (22 May 2025; nothing later found)

Recommended

The Home Office must review and update Detention Services Order 04/2020: Mental Vulnerability and Immigration Detention: Non-Clinical Guidance to set out comprehensive guidance for detention and healthcare staff where there are concerns that a detained person is suffering mental ill health or lacks mental capacity. This must include an appropriate system for: the routine handover or sharing of relevant information between detention custody staff and healthcare staff (for example, in Security Information Reports and Anti-Bullying Support Plans); the identification and follow-up of missed medical appointments; the assessment of mental capacity where indicated; and mental health assessment where indicated. The Home Office must ensure that training about the updated guidance takes place on a regular (at least annual) basis for detention and healthcare staff, as well as those responsible for managing them. The training must be subject to an assessment.

Since then (summary written by this site)

In a letter of May 2025, quoted in a High Court judgment of July 2025, Dame Angela Eagle, Minister for Border Security and Asylum, stated that the Home Office was reviewing the process for sharing medical information, with work aimed at completion in summer 2025 (Dame Angela Eagle, May 2025). Earlier, in a January 2025 parliamentary written answer, the Minister reported that the recommendation had been accepted or partially accepted and was on track for closure by summer 2025 (Dame Angela Eagle response, Jan 2025; Dame Angela Eagle, Jan 2025).

Addressed to Home Office · Full record

22: Update healthcare complaints handling guidance

Accepted, fully or in part (not specified) · Home Office says completed

Recommended

The Home Office must review and update Detention Services Order 03/2015: Handling of Complaints to ensure that appropriate guidance is given to healthcare providers on the investigation and handling of complaints specific to the provision of healthcare in an immigration detention setting. The Home Office must ensure that training about the updated guidance takes place on a regular (at least annual) basis for staff dealing with healthcare complaints, as well as those responsible for managing them. The training must be subject to an assessment. Healthcare providers in immigration removal centres must ensure that all healthcare complaints are robustly investigated in accordance with the updated guidance. The methodology and outcomes must be clearly communicated, including to the detained person. They must also ensure that appropriate, regular (at least annual) training and guidance is provided to those holding responsibility for the investigation of healthcare complaints.

Since then (summary written by this site)

In January 2025, Dame Angela Eagle, Minister of State at the Home Office, stated that recommendation 22 had been accepted or partially accepted and was "met and closed as of October 2024" (Dame Angela Eagle response, Jan 2025; Dame Angela Eagle, Jan 2025). Previously, in its March 2024 response, the department reported that a comprehensive review into complaints, including medical complaints, and whistleblowing processes was being undertaken, with Detention Services Orders to be updated once the review was complete (Home Office response, Mar 2024).

Addressed to Home Office · Full record

23: Quarterly assessment of staffing levels against population needs

Accepted, fully or in part (not specified) · Home Office says completed

Recommended

The Home Office and contractors operating immigration removal centres must ensure that there is ongoing assessment of staffing levels (at least on a quarterly basis), so that the level of staff present within each centre is appropriate for the size and needs of the detained population. The Home Office must also ensure that the detained population does not increase at any immigration centre unless staffing is at an adequate level.

Since then (summary written by this site)

The Inquiry asked the Home Office to assess removal centre staffing at least quarterly. In January 2025, Dame Angela Eagle, Minister of State at the department, stated in a written answer that the recommendation was accepted or partially accepted, and recorded it as "met and closed as of October 2024" (Dame Angela Eagle response, Jan 2025; Dame Angela Eagle, Jan 2025). In September 2025, HM Inspectorate of Prisons found that management had increased staff numbers and capabilities, resulting in greater officer visibility on the wings and reduced turnover (HM Inspectorate of Prisons, Sep 2025).

Addressed to Home Office · Full record

24: Mandatory staff training on mental health and trauma-informed approaches

Accepted, fully or in part (not specified) · Home Office says completed

Recommended

The Home Office, in conjunction with contractors, must ensure that all relevant immigration removal centre staff receive mandatory introductory and annual training on: mental health; race and diversity; a trauma-informed approach; their own resilience; drug awareness; and the purpose of immigration removal centres. This training must include the perspectives of, or be conducted in consultation with, detained people. The Home Office must also ensure, in conjunction with contractors, that new joiners must start on probation on completion of introductory training and be adequately supervised for a period of time as necessary to establish their competence to work independently.

Since then (summary written by this site)

In a January 2025 parliamentary written answer, Dame Angela Eagle, Minister of State at the Home Office, stated that the recommendation had been accepted or partially accepted and was "met and closed as of October 2024" (Dame Angela Eagle response, Jan 2025; Dame Angela Eagle, Jan 2025). The department previously stated in its March 2024 response that the initial training course for contracted staff was undergoing a full review to ensure understanding of mental health and racial awareness, followed by mentorship and annual refresher training (Home Office response, Mar 2024).

Addressed to Home Office · Full record

25: Ensure senior manager presence and accessibility to staff

Accepted, fully or in part (not specified) · Home Office says completed

Recommended

Contractors operating immigration removal centres must ensure that senior managers are regularly present and visible within the immigration removal centre and are accessible to more junior detention staff.

Since then (summary written by this site)

The Inquiry asked contractors to ensure senior managers are visible and accessible to staff. In a January 2025 written answer, Dame Angela Eagle, Minister of State at the Home Office, stated that the recommendation was accepted or partially accepted and was among twelve "met and closed as of October 2024" (Dame Angela Eagle response, Jan 2025; Dame Angela Eagle, Jan 2025). In September 2025, HM Inspectorate of Prisons found that operational managers and custody officers were more present on residential wings, staff turnover had fallen significantly, and functional leadership had been bolstered across key areas (HM Inspectorate of Prisons, Sep 2025).

Addressed to Home Office · Full record

26: Ensure Home Office staff presence and visibility in IRCs

Accepted, fully or in part (not specified) · Home Office says completed

Recommended

The Home Office must ensure that its staff are regularly present and visible within each immigration removal centre.

Since then (summary written by this site)

The Inquiry asked the Home Office to maintain a regular staff presence in removal centres. In a January 2025 written answer, Dame Angela Eagle, Minister of State at the department, stated that the recommendation was accepted or partially accepted and was among 12 recommendations "met and closed as of October 2024" (Dame Angela Eagle response, Jan 2025; Dame Angela Eagle, Jan 2025). HM Inspectorate of Prisons found in September 2025 that detainees retained good contact with the Detention Engagement Team (DET) and that provision was progressing well (HM Inspectorate of Prisons, Sep 2025).

Addressed to Home Office · Full record

27: Action plan to address staff desensitisation and secondary trauma

Accepted, fully or in part (not specified) · Home Office says completed

Recommended

Contractors operating immigration removal centres must develop and implement an action plan to ensure a safe and healthy staff culture in immigration removal centres. The action plan must address: the identification of and response to any sign of desensitisation among staff; training staff on coping mechanisms and secondary trauma awareness; and maintaining an appropriate balance between care and safety or security. The Home Office must regularly monitor each contractor's compliance with their action plans.

Since then (summary written by this site)

In a letter of May 2025, quoted in a July 2025 High Court judgment, Dame Angela Eagle, Minister for Border Security and Asylum, stated that all recommendations in this category "have been met and closed" (Dame Angela Eagle, May 2025). The Minister highlighted contract investments to improve staff culture, post-training mentorship, and an ongoing review of initial training for removal centre staff (Dame Angela Eagle, May 2025). Previously, in a January 2025 written answer, the Minister confirmed the recommendation was accepted or partially accepted and scheduled for closure by the end of that month (Dame Angela Eagle response, Jan 2025; Dame Angela Eagle, Jan 2025).

Addressed to Home Office · Full record

28: Address barriers to detainee complaints including fear of repercussions

Accepted, fully or in part (not specified) · Home Office says in progress (22 May 2025; nothing later found)

Recommended

The Home Office and its contractors operating immigration removal centres must take steps to identify and address the barriers to making complaints that are faced by detained people, including a fear of repercussions. This must include training for staff on their role in enabling detained people to overcome these barriers.

Since then (summary written by this site)

The Inquiry asked the Home Office to address barriers to detainee complaints and train staff. In a letter of May 2025, quoted in a July 2025 High Court judgment, Dame Angela Eagle, Minister for Border Security and Asylum, stated that a 2024 review informed an updated Detention Services Order published in December 2024, introducing simplified complaint forms, clearer signage, quicker translations, and complaints champions (Dame Angela Eagle, May 2025). The letter did not mention staff training or addressing detained people's fear of repercussions (Dame Angela Eagle, May 2025). Earlier, in a January 2025 parliamentary written answer, the Minister reported that the recommendation had been accepted or partially accepted and was due for closure by the end of that month (Dame Angela Eagle response, Jan 2025; Dame Angela Eagle, Jan 2025).

Addressed to Home Office · Full record

29: Improve Professional Standards Unit investigation procedures and training

Accepted, fully or in part (not specified) · Home Office says in progress (15 January 2025; nothing later found)

Recommended

The Home Office must update Detention Services Order 03/2015: Handling of Complaints to clarify that, in investigations carried out by the Professional Standards Unit into allegations of serious misconduct against contractor staff: Professional Standards Unit investigators must carry out interviews themselves and not rely on contractors to do so. All staff against whom allegations are made must be invited to interview. Where there are inconsistencies between any accounts given of events, any evidence relating to those accounts (including footage and documentation) obtained by an investigating officer must be shown to the complainant and to the subject of the complaint, prior to reaching a conclusion. The Professional Standards Unit must be given information about previous complaints made against alleged perpetrators, including unsubstantiated complaints. Previous disciplinary action against alleged perpetrators must be taken into account. Investigators must look for evidence that is both supportive and undermining of the complaint. Full reports must be sent to complainants (and their solicitors if applicable). Investigation reports and/or outcome letters must be sent directly from the PSU to complainants (and their solicitors if applicable). The Home Office Professional Standards Unit must ensure that training about the updated guidance takes place on a regular (at least annual) basis for staff dealing with investigations, as well as those responsible for managing them. The training must be subject to an assessment. The Professional Standards Unit must also review the training provided to investigators and ensure that investigators receive regular and adequate training, from a variety of perspectives, on issues including: the nature of immigration removal centres and issues that may arise; obstacles that detained people may face in making complaints; interviewing vulnerable witnesses; and use of force and assessing reasonableness of force.

Since then (summary written by this site)

In January 2025, Dame Angela Eagle, Minister of State at the Home Office, stated that the recommendation was accepted or partially accepted and was "due for closure by the end of January 2025" (Dame Angela Eagle response, Jan 2025; Dame Angela Eagle, Jan 2025). The department had previously reported in March 2024 that many recommendations relating to the work of the Professional Standards Unit were already part of its standard operating procedures, that those not included would be incorporated, and that training had been updated (Home Office response, Mar 2024). The record holds no update since the department's response of January 2025 (Dame Angela Eagle response, Jan 2025; Dame Angela Eagle, Jan 2025).

Addressed to Home Office · Full record

31: Update whistleblowing DSO with anonymous reporting mechanisms

Accepted, fully or in part (not specified) · Home Office says in progress (22 May 2025; nothing later found)

Recommended

The Home Office must update Detention Services Order 03/2020: Whistleblowing – The Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 to require contractors that run immigration removal centres to: have a whistleblowing policy and procedure that is specific to the immigration detention environment; ensure that the whistleblowing mechanism is not limited to a hotline and allows for anonymous reporting of concerns; ensure that those who receive whistleblowing concerns have an understanding of immigration removal centres; take active steps to encourage staff to use whistleblowing processes, for reasons including those set out at paragraph 10 of Detention Services Order 03/2020; and ensure that whistleblowing concerns are investigated thoroughly by someone external to the immigration removal centre, and that the Home Office is informed of the nature of the concern and the investigation carried out. The Home Office must ensure that training about the updated guidance takes place on a regular (at least annual) basis for staff dealing with whistleblowing, as well as those responsible for managing them. The training must be subject to an assessment.

Since then (summary written by this site)

In May 2025, Dame Angela Eagle, the Minister for Border Security and Asylum, stated that whistleblowing policies had been reviewed, reporting lines were tested quarterly, and the updated Detention Services Order on whistleblowing was "currently undergoing external engagement" before being supplemented by new guidance on staff conduct (Dame Angela Eagle, May 2025). In a January 2025 parliamentary answer, the Minister had previously identified the recommendation as accepted or partially accepted and on track for closure by summer 2025 (Dame Angela Eagle response, Jan 2025; Dame Angela Eagle, Jan 2025).

Addressed to Home Office · Full record

32: Strengthen Independent Monitoring Board statutory footing and responsiveness

Accepted, fully or in part (not specified) · Home Office says in progress (15 January 2025; nothing later found)

Recommended

The government must: respond to and publish responses to all concerns raised by any Independent Monitoring Board regarding immigration removal centres; take steps without further delay to amend the Detention Centre Rules 2001, in so far as they govern Independent Monitoring Boards, in order to accurately reflect their current role; and consider whether to put the National Chair and Management Board of the Independent Monitoring Boards on a statutory footing.

Since then (summary written by this site)

In January 2025, Dame Angela Eagle, Minister of State at the Home Office, stated in a parliamentary written answer that the recommendation was accepted or partially accepted and was "on track for closure by summer 2025" (Dame Angela Eagle response, Jan 2025; Dame Angela Eagle, Jan 2025). Previously, in March 2024, the department noted that the Ministry of Justice intended to pursue statutory footing for Independent Monitoring Boards when parliamentary time permits (Home Office response, Mar 2024). The record holds no update since the Home Office's response of January 2025 (Dame Angela Eagle response, Jan 2025; Dame Angela Eagle, Jan 2025).

Addressed to UK Government · Full record

33: Improve HMIP and IMB evidence gathering and reporting processes

Accepted, fully or in part (not specified) · Home Office says completed

Recommended

HM Inspectorate of Prisons and Independent Monitoring Boards working within immigration removal centres must ensure that they have robust processes for: obtaining and reporting on an enhanced range of evidence and intelligence from detained people and those who represent or support them, staff and contractors, including that which is received outside of inspections or visits; and reporting on any concerns about the Home Office and contractors.

Since then (summary written by this site)

In May 2025, Dame Angela Eagle, Minister for Border Security and Asylum, stated in a letter quoted in a High Court judgment: "The recommendations in this thematic area have been met and closed." (Dame Angela Eagle, May 2025) The Minister noted that recommendation 33 had been responded to separately by HM Inspectorate of Prisons and the Independent Monitoring Boards, with action plans being published and progress tracked via a central Home Office software system (Dame Angela Eagle, May 2025). Previously, in January 2025, the Minister stated in a written parliamentary answer that the recommendation had been accepted or partially accepted and was on track for closure by summer 2025 (Dame Angela Eagle response, Jan 2025; Dame Angela Eagle, Jan 2025).

Addressed to HM Inspectorate of Prisons; Independent Monitoring Board · Full record

Reports and timeline

Timeline

Panorama Broadcast

BBC Panorama broadcast undercover footage from Brook House IRC.

Inquiry Announced

Home Secretary announced a statutory inquiry.

Source

Chair Appointed

Kate Eves appointed as Chair.

Terms of Reference Set

Inquiry to examine treatment of detainees April-August 2017.

Source

Preliminary hearing

Source

Hearings begin (Day 1)

Source

Final Report Published

Report found "cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment" of detainees.

Source

Government Response

Home Office published response accepting recommendations.

Source

Show all 9 milestones

One Year Progress Update

Home Office published progress update one year after report.

Costs

Latest reported period: £284,998
Period Total Inquiry legal CP legal Source
Mar 2020 £284,998 £72,643 Not reported

Brook House Inquiry 2019/2020 End of Year Financial Report

Source and qualifications

Accounting period: 5 Nov 2019 to 31 Mar 2020.

Brook House Inquiry 2019/2020 End of Year Financial Report

5 Nov 2019 – 31 Mar 2020 · Brook House Inquiry 2019/2020 End of Year Financial Report

Brook House Inquiry 2019/2020 End of Year Financial Report

Source and qualifications

Accounting period: 5 Nov 2019 to 31 Mar 2020.

Brook House Inquiry 2019/2020 End of Year Financial Report

Detailed cost breakdown · to Mar 2020
Inquiry legal costs
£72,643
Panel remuneration
£26,263
Staff
£49,294
Other
£136,798

Parliamentary activity

24 mentions since Sep 2023
1 debate 19 questions 4 statements

Mistreatment of Detainees at Brook House Immigration Removal Centre Inquiry

Written Question House of Commons Bell Ribeiro-Addy · Labour

Asked: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the Answer of 9 January 2025 to Question 21024 on Migrants: Detainees, if she will specify whether each Brook House Inquiry recommendation has been (a) accepted, (b) partially accepted, (c) rejected; which are …

Answered by Home Office: 30 out of the 33 recommendations made by the Brook House Inquiry have been accepted or partially accepted. Following full consideration three recommendations (recommendations 7, 19 and 30) have been rejected. Positive progress continues to be made against the accepted recommendations, with 12 recommendations (recommendations 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 14, 18, 22, 23, 24, 25 and 26) met and …

Immigration: Detainees

Written Question House of Lords The Lord Bishop of Chelmsford · Bishops

Asked: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Hanson of Flint on 25 November (HL2389), in which he says that the Home Office review into immigration detention will not assess all areas of the Brook House Inquiry, whether they intend to …

Answered by Home Office: The previous government published a command paper on 19 March 2024 in response to the Brook House Inquiry report. Positive progress continues to be made in addressing the Inquiry’s findings. A cross departmental working group chaired by the SCS Deputy Director for Detention Services has been meeting since September 2023. The working group continues to meet monthly to consider and …

Migrants: Detainees

Written Question House of Commons Bell Ribeiro-Addy · Labour

Asked: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what progress she has made on implementing the recommendations of the Brook House Inquiry, published on 19 September 2023; and whether any of those recommendations have been completed.

Answered by Home Office: 30 out of the 33 recommendations made in the Brook House Inquiry report have been accepted or partially accepted, with 12 recommendations met and closed as of October 2024. The remaining recommendations remain on track for closure by summer 2025.

Mistreatment of Detainees at Brook House Immigration Removal Centre Inquiry

Written Question House of Commons Siân Berry · Green Party

Asked: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the Answer of 22 October 2024 to Question 8868 on Mistreatment of Detainees at Brook House Immigration Removal Centre Inquiry, whether she plans to publish a response to each of the recommendations of …

Answered by Home Office: The abuse that took place at Brook House Immigration Removal Centre (IRC) in 2017 was unacceptable. Whilst there are no plans to publish a response to each recommendation raised by the inquiry, positive progress continues to be made against the 30 accepted recommendations. The Government will continue to reflect and act on Inquiry recommendations. Specifically on recommendations 14-17, on the …

Immigration: Detainees

Written Question House of Commons Olivia Blake · Labour

Asked: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the Answer of 23 October 2024 to Question 9238 on Immigration: Detainees, whether the Adults at Risk review will consider the (a) Immigration (Guidance on Detention of Vulnerable Persons) Regulations 2024 and (b) …

Answered by Home Office: The scope of the Adults at Risk review includes the Immigration (Guidance on Detention of Vulnerable Persons) Regulations 2024. The review forms part of the response to one of the recommendations of the Brook House Inquiry (Recommendation 9: Review of the operation of Rule 35 of the Detention Centre Rules 2001). The review will not cover all areas of the …

Immigration: Detainees

Written Question House of Lords The Lord Bishop of Chelmsford · Bishops

Asked: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the remarks by Lord Hanson of Flint on 14 October (HL Deb cols 17GC–20GC), whether the review into immigration detention will consider the recommendations of the Brook House Inquiry and reassess which of its recommendations to accept.

Answered by Home Office: The Adults at Risk review forms part of the response to one of the recommendations of the Brook House Inquiry (Recommendation 9: Review of the operation of Rule 35 of the Detention Centre Rules 2001). However, it will not cover all areas of the Brook House Inquiry and will not reassess the recommendations made.

Mistreatment of Detainees at Brook House Immigration Removal Centre Inquiry

Written Question House of Lords Lord Scriven · Liberal Democrat

Asked: To ask His Majesty's Government which of the 33 recommendations in the Brook House Inquiry report they accept, and when each of these will be implemented.

Answered by Home Office: The abuse that took place at Brook House Immigration Removal Centre (IRC) in 2017 was unacceptable. The previous government published its response to the public inquiry into Brook House IRC on 19 March 2024, summarising the progress made since 2017 and addressing each of the ten key areas of concern raised in the report. Positive progress continues to be made …

Mistreatment of Detainees at Brook House Immigration Removal Centre Inquiry

Written Question House of Commons Bell Ribeiro-Addy · Labour

Asked: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, with reference to her Department's policy paper entitled Government response to the Brook House Inquiry report, published on 19 March 2024, what progress her Department has made on implementing the recommendations of that report.

Answered by Home Office: The abuse that took place at Brook House Immigration Removal Centre (IRC) in 2017 was unacceptable. The previous government published its response to the public inquiry into Brook House IRC on 19 March 2024, summarising the progress made since 2017 and addressing each of the ten key areas of concern raised in the report. The new government is carefully considering …

View all 24 mentions →

Evidence & impact

AI-generated · 26 Mar 2026
The Brook House Inquiry examined events at Brook House Immigration Removal Centre following undercover filming by BBC Panorama in 2017 which revealed mistreatment of detained people. The inquiry made 33 recommendations addressing oversight, conditions, safeguarding, use of force, healthcare, staffing, and complaints processes.

The government accepted 27 recommendations in principle, accepted one fully, placed two under consideration, and rejected three. The rejected recommendations concerned a 28-day detention time limit, NHS England responsibility for healthcare quality assurance, and changing the seniority of the Professional Standards Unit head.

According to a Written Parliamentary Answer in January 2025, the Home Office reported that 17 recommendations had been 'completed and closed as of October 2024', with a further five 'due for closure by end of January 2025', and 11 'on track for closure by summer 2025'. However, the evidence base for these assertions remains limited in the public domain.

Documented changes include new contractual arrangements for immigration removal centres, establishment of compliance and engagement teams, prohibition of specific restraint techniques, and a new staffing model. An interim Detention Services Order on Rule 40/42 has been published, with substantive revisions underway. The government has committed to legislative reform for Independent Monitoring Boards, though this awaits Parliamentary time.

A High Court ruling in December 2025 found the Home Secretary had failed to comply with Article 3 ECHR systems duty in Rule 35 safeguarding at Brook House between July 2023 and March 2024, noting only 20 Rule 35 reports were filed despite 260 ACDT care plans during this period. This suggests ongoing challenges in implementing safeguarding recommendations.

Many recommendations involve ongoing reviews and policy development work, including comprehensive reviews of complaints processes, Adults at Risk policy, and use of force protocols. While the government has indicated progress through ministerial statements, published evidence of completed implementation remains limited for most recommendations.
Reforms attributed to this inquiry · AI-generated- New contracts for immigration removal centres requiring internal audit programmes and self-reporting by service providers
- Introduction of Detention Services Compliance Teams and Detention Engagement Teams in each IRC
- Quarterly Executive Oversight Boards bringing together senior Home Office officials and service provider executives
- Publication of interim Detention Services Order clarifying Rule 40 (removal from association) and Rule 42 (temporary confinement) authorisation protocols
- Prohibition communicated to all IRC staff that handcuffing behind backs whilst seated is not permitted
- Updated Detention Services Order on food and fluid refusal linking to Rule 35 process and Adults at Risk policy
- Implementation of maximum 9-hour overnight lock-in period
- New staffing model delivering nearly double the ratio of custodial staff per detained individual compared to 2017
- Introduction of mandatory code of conduct and staff engagement strategy
- Professional Standards Unit training updated to reflect Brook House Inquiry findings
Unfinished business · AI-generated- Legislative reform to provide Independent Monitoring Boards with statutory framework (commitment made in 2021 Prisons Strategy White Paper but awaiting Parliamentary time)
- Substantive revision of Detention Services Orders on Rule 40/42 (interim order published but full revision ongoing)
- Development of new Detention Services Order on use of force in consultation with experts
- Development of operational standards for use of force on detained people with mental ill health (working with HMPPS, NHS England and DHSC)
- Review of Adults at Risk policy and Detention Centre Rules 34 and 35
- Development of NHS England interim clinical guidance to support GPs on Rule 35 assessments
- Comprehensive review of complaints and whistleblowing processes

Findings about the inquiry's recommendations as a whole

HM Inspectorate of Prisons (3 Sep 2025)
This site's summary of the finding: Rolling refurbishment of units and upgraded library described as "relaxed and welcoming space". However, cells remain inadequately ventilated with sealed windows.

Key facts

Duration: 3 years, 7 months Latest period’s cost: £285k Witnesses: 73 Hearing days: 46 Core participants: 27 Documents disclosed: 100,000