11 Accepted in Part

Review E Wing suitability for vulnerable detainees

Brook House Inquiry · The Brook House Inquiry Report · Issued 19 September 2023 · Addressed to: Home Office

Source — verbatim from the inquiry

Inquiry recommendation

The Home Office and the current operator of Brook House must keep under review the appropriateness of the multi-purpose use of E Wing, particularly in relation to its suitability as a location to detain vulnerable people.

Brook House Inquiry, The Brook House Inquiry Report · 19 Sep 2023 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

Publicly available evidence relating to this recommendation:

- In March 2024, the Home Office stated that the multi-purpose use of Eden Wing at Brook House was under consideration and that learning would be applied across the estate (Government Response to the Brook House Inquiry, Home Office, March 2024).
- No subsequent published decision or outcome of the Eden Wing review has been identified to March 2026.

Response — verbatim from government

Home Office

The government stated the multi-purpose use of Eden Wing at Brook House is under consideration, and learning would be applied across the estate.

Home Office · 19 Mar 2024 Written response →

Evidence trail — what's actually happened since

  • 14 Jan 2025 Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170 (15 January 2025): 'Due for closure by end of January 2025.' Source →
  • 19 Sep 2024 · Brook House Inquiry Chair Inquiry Chair Kate Eves described government response as "inadequate" and called for a "reset" with the new government. Warned abuse "becomes a question of when, not if" it happens again. Insufficient Progress

Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.

How this page is built

Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.

This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.