Select Committee · Defence Committee

Armed Forces Readiness

Status: Closed Opened: 24 Apr 2023 Closed: 24 May 2024 10 recommendations 122 conclusions 1 report

The Committee welcomes written evidence on the following: Are the armed forces sufficiently capable, resourced and ready to protect the UK and our allies? What are the main gaps in capability and/or readiness, and what will it take to fill these gaps? Are the UK armed forces a ‘tier one fighting force’? Do they need …

Clear

Reports

1 report
Title HC No. Published Items Response
First Report - Ready for War? HC 26 4 Feb 2024 132 Responded

Recommendations & Conclusions

5 items
35 Conclusion First Report - Ready for War? Accepted in Part

Propose mechanism for annual, detailed updates to Defence Committee on UK Armed Forces readiness

In a functioning democracy, the House of Commons Defence Committee needs to be routinely informed about the planning assumptions and readiness of the nation’s armed forces. We therefore recommend that—following the Minister’s welcome commitment to work with us—the Government propose how we and our successors can receive at least annually …

Government response. The government commits to releasing headlines from current Defence Planning Assumptions (DPAs) and 'as much as possible' of future DPAs. However, it does not explicitly propose a mechanism for providing annual, detailed updates specifically to the Committee.
Ministry of Defence
36 Recommendation First Report - Ready for War? Accepted in Part

Require Government to explain readiness data classification and consult committees on future decisions.

We also recommend that the Government explain why previously unclassified information about readiness is no longer published, recognise the reduction in public and parliamentary accountability that this has brought about, and seek to rectify the situation. In future, when a decision is being considered to classify previously available information, we …

Government response. The government explains the historical evolution and classification of Defence Planning Assumptions (DPAs) and has released a version of the 2023 DPAs to enhance transparency. However, it does not commit to consulting select committees before classifying previously available information in …
Ministry of Defence
107 Recommendation First Report - Ready for War? Accepted in Part

Produce detailed breakdown of budget allocations for replenishing and increasing military stockpiles.

The commitments made to replenish and increase stockpiles made since the 2022 Autumn Budget have all been welcome. The question remains whether this is anywhere near enough to meet the potential threats we face. It is therefore disturbing to hear that the £1.95 billion awarded as part of the Spring …

Government response. The government stated that the £1.95 billion from the Spring 2023 Budget is being used to build munitions and medical stockpiles and for critical defence activities, providing examples such as 155mm munitions and Storm Shadow. It also noted nearly £1 …
Ministry of Defence
127 Conclusion First Report - Ready for War? Accepted in Part

Previous report recommended earlier MOD industry engagement, workforce development, multi-year funding, and spiral development.

In our Report on DE&S we recommended that: • The MOD should engage with industry at an earlier stage, particularly on future requirements and their feasibility; • The MOD should consider the implications of the shortage of skilled and experienced workers and draw up a plan to help develop and …

Government response. The government committed to earlier engagement with industry and accepted all Haythornthwaite Review recommendations for the workforce, with a formal response detailing implementation to be published in 2024.
Ministry of Defence
140 Recommendation First Report - Ready for War? Accepted in Part

Publish departmental responsibilities under national defence plan, naming lead Ministers

Under a national defence plan, each relevant Government Department would have its own responsibilities. We recommend that these responsibilities are published as far as possible, and—if any responsibilities cannot be published for national security reasons—these should be provided in confidence to the relevant select committee. We also recommend that, for …

Government response. The government committed to making departmental responsibilities in national defence planning as transparent as possible, following the approach for the National Risk Register, but did not address the recommendation to add these roles to the responsibilities of a named Minister.
Ministry of Defence

Oral evidence sessions

6 sessions
Date Witnesses
22 Nov 2023 General Sir Jim Hockenhull · Ministry of Defence, Rt Hon James Heappey MP · Ministry of Defence View ↗
14 Nov 2023 Admiral Sir Ben Key KCB CBE · Ministry of Defence, Rear Admiral Steve Moorhouse CBE · Ministry of Defence View ↗
7 Nov 2023 Air Chief Marshal Sir Richard Knighton KCB · Ministry of Defence, General Sir Patrick Sanders · Ministry of Defence View ↗
21 Jun 2023 General (Retd) Sir Nick Carter, Former Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) View ↗
20 Jun 2023 The Lord Houghton of Richmond GCB CBE DL View ↗
6 Jun 2023 Dr Simon Anglim · Kings College London, Nick Childs · The International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), Professor Justin Bronk · RUSI View ↗