Select committee: Health and Social Care Committee

Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care

Closed Opened 30 Jul 2020 Closed 22 Feb 2022 26 recommendations 7 conclusions
Inquiry scope (the committee's words)
This inquiry will focus on workforce burnout and resilience across the NHS and social care. It will look at: burnout, resilience and stress levels before and during the covid-19 pandemic the impact of workforce burnout on service delivery, staff, patients and service users workforce planning and projections the measures set out in the NHS People Plan any further measures required to tackle burnout, including how to achieve parity for the social care workforce. Read the call for evidence for more detail about the inquiry .

Where it stands

The inquiry is closed, opened 30 July 2020.

The committee has published 1 report, most recently Second Report - Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care on 8 June 2021.

The government's response

Published 17 February 2022. The deadline was 8 August 2021.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The document is the government's response, published on 15 February 2022 by the Department of Health and Social Care, to the Health and Social Care Committee's report on workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care; the page itself does not set out the government's position.

  • The response is a 36-page document (Command Paper CP 620), available in HTML and PDF formats, and it applies to England.
  • The Committee's report was published on 8 June 2021, and the government's response followed on 15 February 2022.
  • The web page provided contains no text on which recommendations the government accepts or declines, or on any commitments; readers need the full response document for those.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error

Recommendations and conclusions

All 33 recommendations and conclusions

Reports

All reports

Evidence

  • 4 oral evidence sessionsLatest 24 February 2021
  • 96 written submissions
  • 24 witnesses
All evidence

Recent activity

Recommendations and conclusions 33 shown

Conclusion 1

Conclusion · Second Report - Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
Burnout is a widespread reality in today’s NHS and has negative consequences for the mental health of individual staff, impacting on their colleagues and the patients and service users they care for. There are many causes of burnout, but chronic excessive workload is a key driver and must be tackled as a priority. This will not happen until the service has the right number of people, with the right mix of skills across both the NHS and care system.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 2

Recommendation · Second Report - Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
Understanding the scale and impact of workforce burnout can only be achieved with a metric for staff wellbeing and staff mental health that covers both the NHS and social care. We therefore recommend that the Department for Health and Social Care extends the NHS Staff Survey to cover the care sector.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 3

Recommendation · Second Report - Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We further recommend that the NHS Staff Survey and any social care equivalent includes an overall staff wellbeing measure, so that employers and national bodies can better understand staff wellbeing and take action based on that understanding. The Staff Survey already allocates a scale out of 10 for each ‘theme’ it covers, which could provide the starting point for the calculation of such a measure.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 4

Recommendation · Second Report - Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We welcome the additional support provided to health and care staff during the pandemic. However, we conclude that such additional support will need to be maintained during the recovery period and beyond to stop further staff from leaving. Furthermore simply offering support services, however important, is not on its own enough. The Department and employers need to ensure that those services are accessible to all and used by all who need them. This will require removing barriers to seeking help, and embedding a culture where staff are explicitly given permission and time away from work to seek help when it is needed.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 5

Recommendation · Second Report - Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that Integrated Care Systems (ICSs) be required to facilitate access to wellbeing support for NHS and social care workers across their systems, and that they are accountable for the accessibility and take-up of those services.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 6

Recommendation · Second Report - Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We further recommend that the level of resources allocated to mental health support for health and care staff be maintained as and when the NHS and social care return to ‘business as usual’ after the pandemic; and that the adequacy of resources allocated to that support be monitored on a regular basis.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 7

Recommendation · Second Report - Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
It is imperative staff have the opportunity and the confidence to speak up. However, this needs to be matched with a culture in which organisations demonstrate that they are not just listening to, but also acting on, staff feedback. While NHS organisations have a formal structure to raise concerns through Freedom to Speak Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care 55 Up Guardians, there is no equivalent for adult social care. We therefore recommend that the Department develops a strategy for the creation of Freedom to Speak Up Guardians in social care.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 8

Recommendation · Second Report - Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
Improvements to workplace culture have been made, but equally, there is more work to be done. Embedding and facilitating cultures which support compassionate leadership must be at the heart of that work. There is a strong appetite for that leadership from both managers and staff, but structural barriers remain. The Department, the NHS and individual trusts need to focus on removing those barriers so that their leaders can lead to their full potential. The establishment of statutory Integrated Care Systems provides an opportunity for those systems to lead a transformation of support for NHS leaders in their areas that includes mental health support, development of proper career structures, and a review of targets.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 9

Recommendation · Second Report - Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that NHS England undertake a review of the role of targets across the NHS which seeks to balance the operational grip they undoubtedly deliver to senior managers against the risks of inadvertently creating a culture which deprioritises care of both staff and patients.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 10

Recommendation · Second Report - Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We further recommend that the Department of Health and Social Care work with stakeholders to develop staff wellbeing indicators, on which NHS bodies can be judged.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 11

Recommendation · Second Report - Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
The Committee welcomes the Workforce Race Equality Standard (WRES), along with the People Plan, as an important step towards an NHS which offers equal opportunities to all its staff. We were pleased to hear in our oral evidence session that work had begun to provide similar information to the WRES in social care. This year’s WRES report concludes that ‘now is the time to translate the data to actions.’ We agree. Part of this must be to ensure that the boards of the new ICSs appropriately represent the populations they serve.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 12

Recommendation · Second Report - Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We therefore recommend that WRES data be made part of the ‘balanced basket of indicators’ we suggest for Integrated Care Systems, with the result that they become accountable for progress across their domains. As part of this process, organisations should set themselves ambitious yet achievable targets that include timings.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 13

Conclusion · Second Report - Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
We heard that colleagues from Black, Asian and minority ethnic backgrounds across the NHS and social care continue to face additional challenges. As stated above, we welcome the commitments of the People Plan to a truly inclusive workforce, and the accountability brought by the WRES. But the People Plan does not include social care, which means there are no plans in place to tackle discrimination in a workforce of over 1.6 million people.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 14

Recommendation · Second Report - Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that adult social care have its own People Plan, which includes parallel commitments to those for the NHS on diversity and inclusion.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 15

Recommendation · Second Report - Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
Staff from overseas play a key role in enabling the NHS and social care to function. Whatever role overseas staff will play in the long-term, they are essential to the health and social care system in the short-term and medium-long term because any 56 Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care move to shift to more domestic supply is likely to take time. Workforce planning, in both the NHS and social care therefore will need to include strategies for the recruitment, transition, and training of overseas workers in the health and care sector.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 16

Recommendation · Second Report - Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that the Department develops an NHS and social care national policy framework around migration to support national and local workforce planning and identify the balance between domestic and international recruitment in the short, medium and long-term.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 17

Conclusion · Second Report - Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
Covid-19 has exacerbated existing problems with staff welfare, but also brought some benefits, including higher levels of recognition and different ways of working. While enhanced recognition of the work of health and care staff is welcome, adequate and holistic support for their mental health and wellbeing is of primary importance. That support was not just needed during the waves of covid-19: it will be needed through the recovery as the health and care sector returns to ‘business as usual’.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 18

Recommendation · Second Report - Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that national bodies must continue to monitor the impact of covid-19 on the NHS and adult social care workforce and ensure that workforce planning builds in time for recovery after the pandemic is over.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 19

Recommendation · Second Report - Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that the Department of Health and Social Care, the national bodies, and individual organisations across the NHS and social care commit to capturing and disseminating the innovations—in particular giving greater levels of autonomy to staff and new forms of integrated working—during the pandemic so that they can be embedded in organisations as they return to ‘business as usual’.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 20

Recommendation · Second Report - Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
It is clear from the evidence collected by Government, the NHS and other organisations that staff from Black, Asian and minority ethnic groups have been disproportionately affected by the pandemic in a way that has shone a light on deeply worrying divisions in society. Both the Public Health England and BAME Communities Advisory Group reports set out a series of actions to address this problem. We recommend that the Department set out how it plans to implement those recommendations, with a corresponding timeframe.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 21

Recommendation · Second Report - Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We further recommend that Integrated Care Systems have a duty to report on progress made against those recommendations made to improve the support for their staff from Black, Asian and minority ethnic backgrounds.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 22

Conclusion · Second Report - Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
It is clear from our witnesses that although the People Plan presents comprehensive ambition to address the failings in the culture of the NHS, and address the needs and wellbeing of NHS staff, its delivery will depend on the level of resourcing allocated to these priorities. Without adequate funding the laudable aspirations of the People Plan will not become reality.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 23

Recommendation · Second Report - Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that the Department published regular, costed updates along with delivery timelines for all of the proposals in the People Plan.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 24

Recommendation · Second Report - Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
The absence of a People Plan for social care serves only to widen the disparity in recognition and support for the social care components of health and social care. The Government should rectify this as a matter of urgency in their upcoming work to reform the social care sector; and it is essential that it is included in the social care reforms promised this year. The adult social care workforce has stepped up to the plate during the pandemic. They deserve the same care and attention that the People Plan pledges to NHS colleagues.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 25

Recommendation · Second Report - Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We therefore recommend that, as a priority, the Department produces a People Plan for social care that is aligned to the ambitions set out in the NHS People Plan.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 26

Conclusion · Second Report - Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
We have made recommendations to the Department on the reform and funding of social care in previous Reports. We believe that they are worth restating. Those recommendations are as follow:

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 27

Recommendation · Second Report - Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
(a) Alongside […] a long term funding settlement we strongly believe the Government should publish a 10 year plan for the social care sector as it has done for the NHS. The two systems are increasingly linked and it makes no sense to put in place long term plans for one without the other. Failure to do so is also likely to inhibit reform and lead to higher costs as workforce shortages become more pronounced with higher dependency on agency staff. Reducing the 30% turnover rates typical in the sector will also require a long term, strategic approach to social care pay and conditions. (Social care: funding and workforce, Third Report of Session 2019–21, Paragraph 37).

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 28

Recommendation · Second Report - Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
(b) The social care sector needs reassurance that both the structural and financial problems it faces will be tackled by the Government in a timely way. For that reason, we recommend that a duty is included in the Bill for the Secretary of State to publish a 10-year plan with detailed costings within six months of the Bill receiving Royal Assent. (The Government’s White Paper proposals for the reform of Health and Social Care, First Report of Session 2021–22, paragraph 65).

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 29

Conclusion · Second Report - Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
The emergency that workforce burnout has become will not be solved without a total overhaul of the way the NHS does workforce planning. After the pandemic, which revealed so many critical staff shortages, the least we can do for staff is to show there is a long term solution to those shortages, ultimately the biggest driver of burnout. We may not be able to solve the issues around burnout overnight but we can at least give staff confidence that a long term solution is in place.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 30

Conclusion · Second Report - Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
The way that the NHS does workforce planning is at best opaque and at worst responsible for the unacceptable pressure on the current workforce which existed even before the pandemic.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 31

Recommendation · Second Report - Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
It is clear that workforce planning has been led by the funding envelope available to health and social care rather than by demand and the capacity required to service that demand. Furthermore, there is no accurate, public projection of what health and social care require in the workforce for the next five to ten years in each specialism. Without that level of detail, the shortages in the health and care workforce will endure, to the detriment of both the service provision and the staff who currently work in the sector. Annual, independent workforce projections would provide the NHS, social care and Government with the clarity required for long-term workforce planning.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 32

Recommendation · Second Report - Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend again, that Health Education England publish objective, transparent and independently-audited annual reports on workforce projections that cover the next five, ten and twenty years including an assessment of whether sufficient numbers are being trained. We further recommend that such workforce projections cover social care as well as the NHS given the close links between the two systems.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 33

Recommendation · Second Report - Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We further recommend that those projections: • Are informed by the future shape of services and anticipated demand. • Take into account the labour market as a whole. • Make clear the opportunity cost of not training, employing and retaining sufficient numbers of staff.

Link to this item · Read this item

Reports

1 report

Oral evidence sessions

4 sessions

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

Date Session and witnesses Source
24 Feb 2021
Oral evidence session
Anita Charlesworth · Health Foundation, Helen Whately MP · Department of Health and Social Care, Oonagh Smyth · Skills for Care, Prerana Issar · NHS England and NHS Improvement, Rob Smith · Health Education England
View ↗
12 Jan 2021
Oral evidence session
Chris Hopson · NHS England, Dr Henrietta Hughes, National Guardian, Helené Donnelly OBE · Midlands Partnership NHS, Lord Victor Adebowale · NHS Confederation, Professor Jeremy Dawson · Sheffield University, Shilpa Ross · The King's Fund, Tricia Pereira · London Borough of Merton
View ↗
17 Nov 2020
Oral evidence session
Denise Crouch, Macmillan Lead Cancer Nurse, Dr Adrian James · The Royal College of Psychiatrists, Dr Chaand Nagpaul · Council of the British Medical Association, Paul Farmer · Mind - on behalf of Our Frontline, Professor Dame Clare Gerada · NHS Practitioner Health, Vic Rayner · National Care Forum
View ↗
20 Oct 2020
Oral evidence session
Bernie Miller · Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Caroline Waterfield · NHS Employers, Claire Murdoch · NHS England, Jo Da Silva · Agincare, Prerana Issar · NHS England and NHS Improvement, Professor Martin Green · Care England, Professor Michael West · The King's Fund
View ↗

Written evidence

96 submissions recorded

Submission metadata is shown here; use the source links to read the evidence on Parliament’s website.

Showing the latest 50 of 96 recorded submissions. Written evidence in the activity timeline uses this same preview. Browse the inquiry on Parliament.

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

ReferenceDateSubmitter
WBR0112 24 May 2021 Helene Donnelly, Midlands Partnership NHS
WBR0081 12 May 2021 London South Bank University
WBR0111 11 May 2021 Transcript of interviews with health and care workers
WBR0110 13 Apr 2021 NHS England and NHS Improvement
WBR0109 13 Apr 2021 Hft
WBR0108 25 Feb 2021 Anita Charlesworth, Health Foundation
WBR0087 15 Dec 2020 Nuance Communications
WBR0107 15 Dec 2020 Ann Paul, Doctors in Distress
WBR0106 25 Nov 2020 Jane Cox, MHA (Methodist Homes)
WBR0105 25 Nov 2020 Hannah Collins, Boundless
WBR0104 25 Nov 2020 Mr Peter Hand, The Working Group of the APPG on Adult Social Care
WBR0103 25 Nov 2020 WPI Strategy
WBR0100 25 Nov 2020 Professor Jill Maben, University of Surrey
WBR0099 25 Nov 2020 Royal College of Anaesthetists
WBR0098 25 Nov 2020 The College of Podiatry
WBR0096 25 Nov 2020 Medical and Dental Defence Union of Scotland (MDDUS)
WBR0095 25 Nov 2020 Mrs Lucy Johnston, Edinburgh Napier University
WBR0094 25 Nov 2020 Bliss
WBR0093 25 Nov 2020 British Association of Social Workers
WBR0092 25 Nov 2020 St John Ambulance
WBR0091 25 Nov 2020 Sacred Space Foundation
WBR0089 25 Nov 2020 Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee
WBR0088 25 Nov 2020 OxfamGB
WBR0086 25 Nov 2020 Mesothelioma UK Research Centre Sheffield
WBR0085 25 Nov 2020 Adult Social Care Taskforce Workforce Advisory Group & National Care Forum
WBR0083 25 Nov 2020 The Disabilities Trust
WBR0082 25 Nov 2020 Dr Daniele Carrieri, University of Exeter
WBR0079 25 Nov 2020 Professor Tom Bourne, Imperial College London
WBR0080 6 Oct 2020 Nursing and Midwifery Council
WBR0078 22 Sep 2020 General Dental Council
WBR0077 22 Sep 2020 Department of Health and Social Care
WBR0076 22 Sep 2020 Royal College of GPs
WBR0015 15 Sep 2020 FirstCare
WBR0014 15 Sep 2020 Carers Trust
WBR0012 15 Sep 2020 Care England
WBR0011 15 Sep 2020 Paediatric Intensive Care Society
WBR0010 15 Sep 2020 LGA
WBR0009 15 Sep 2020 Academy of Medical Royal Colleges
WBR0008 15 Sep 2020 "Don't ever call us unskilled again! Learning from the experience of support workers during Covid-19 Sally Warren, Paradigm Training and Development Agency and the Gr8 Support Movement
WBR0007 15 Sep 2020 NHS Providers
WBR0006 15 Sep 2020 Dr Clifford Lisk, Barnet hospital, Royal Free Hospital NHS foundation trust
WBR0030 15 Sep 2020 Diocese of Rochester
WBR0029 15 Sep 2020 Anchor Hanover
WBR0028 15 Sep 2020 Association of Anaesthetists
WBR0027 15 Sep 2020 UNISON
WBR0026 15 Sep 2020 Bournemouth University
WBR0025 15 Sep 2020 Royal College of Midwives
WBR0023 15 Sep 2020 Royal College of Physicians
WBR0022 15 Sep 2020 Sue Ryder
WBR0021 15 Sep 2020 CLIC Sargent

Who gave evidence

24 witnesses

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

WitnessOrganisationSessions
Prerana Issar · Chief People Officer NHS England and NHS Improvement 2
Anita Charlesworth · Senior Economic Adviser Health Foundation 1
Bernie Miller · Clinical Lead, Discharge Lounge Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust 1
Caroline Waterfield · Director of Development and Employment NHS Employers 1
Chris Hopson · Chief Strategy Officer NHS England 1
Claire Murdoch · National Director for Mental Health NHS England 1
Denise Crouch, Macmillan Lead Cancer Nurse Not recorded 1
Dr Adrian James · President The Royal College of Psychiatrists 1
Dr Chaand Nagpaul · Chair Council of the British Medical Association 1
Dr Henrietta Hughes, National Guardian Not recorded 1
Helen Whately MP · Minister of State Department of Health and Social Care 1
Helené Donnelly OBE · Ambassador for Cultural Change / Lead Freedom to Speak Up Guardian Midlands Partnership NHS 1
Jo Da Silva · Care Worker Agincare 1
Lord Victor Adebowale · Chair NHS Confederation 1
Oonagh Smyth · Chief Executive Officer Skills for Care 1
Paul Farmer · Chief Executive Mind - on behalf of Our Frontline 1
Professor Dame Clare Gerada · Medical Director NHS Practitioner Health 1
Professor Jeremy Dawson · Professor of Health Management Sheffield University 1
Professor Martin Green · Chief Executive Care England 1
Professor Michael West · Senior Visiting Fellow The King's Fund 1
Rob Smith · Workforce Planning and Intelligence Director Health Education England 1
Shilpa Ross · Policy Fellow The King's Fund 1
Tricia Pereira · Head of Operations Adults Social Care & Adult Safeguarding London Borough of Merton 1
Vic Rayner · Executive Director National Care Forum 1

Correspondence

2 letters

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.