Source · IMB Annual Report
Preston
AI-generated report summary HMP/YOI Preston, a Category B reception prison, faces significant challenges due to its aging Victorian infrastructure, leading to inadequate reception facilities and poor cell conditions. Despite commendations for its laundry service and efforts to increase time out of cell, the prison grapples with high violence rates and persistent delays in mental health transfers. The Board highlights recurring issues with property management, the complaints system, and the limited support for remand prisoners, alongside concerns about the impact of staff vacancies on library services.
Year: 2025
Published: 20 Jan 2026
Type: Prison · Cat B, YOI, reception
Population: 670
Recommendations: 9
Key concerns
Positive findings
Safety statistics
| Indicator | This year | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Deaths in custody | 4 | — |
Positive findings
AI-generated summaryThe Board commends the continued improvement in the laundry service, which is seen as an impressive addition, and notes successful intercepts of illicit items. Positive feedback was received for the partnership with ACE Project and the Realise Potential Event, supporting resettlement. Education courses show a 96% satisfaction rate, and improvements in reception area staffing and training have led to national best performance in vehicle turnaround.
Key concerns
The fabric of this Victorian prison, including the reception area and the gatehouse, is not fit for purpose, and the offender management unit’s prefabricated structure was condemned 15 years ago. Despite previous responses acknowledging these problems, no apparent progress has been made to address this or secure alternative solutions in the past year.
The Board remains seriously concerned about the physical limitations of the reception area, an issue we have raised repeatedly in previous reports. The numbers of prisoner movements and the lack of space often make it impossible to hold confidential conversations about risk with individuals.
Lack of space in the first night centre makes it difficult for staff to carry out interviews and screenings for health and risks.
The levels of violence continued to remain high, with 18-to-25-year-olds being the main perpetrators according to data analysed by the Board.
HMP/YOI Preston is a Victorian prison and, as such, does not meet modern accommodation or access standards. Cells do not meet the standards laid out in HM Inspectorate of Prisons’ (HMIP) report, Life in Prison: Living Conditions. The Board has observed cells that are in a poor state, with evidence of mould, condensation, broken plaster and inadequate ventilation.
Kitchen and catering issues: the Board spends a lot of time looking into these problems and, despite the best efforts of the kitchen staff, it will require constant monitoring.
It is rare for prisoners to receive answers to their complaints within the specified timescale and, on occasion, there have delays of multiple months in dealing with issues.
Cell clearances and transfer of property between prisons remain problematic, leading to significant loss of property and numerous IMB applications, with some issues attributed to staff negligence and pilfering in the new laundry system.
Source wording under review
Prison PINs (personal identification numbers) remain an ongoing problem: these unique codes are assigned to prisoners and allow them to make calls only to a pre-approved list of phone numbers. Under the new public protection policy, all prisoners received into custody must undergo a public protection sift. While these checks are being completed, there can be delays in identifying and recording prisoners with public protection concerns, such as those posing a risk to children or with a history of domestic violence. The Board recognises the importance of security, particularly for vulnerable individuals; however, it remains concerned about the potential impact of such delays on family relationships.
The in-house mental health team (IMHT) is not fully staffed, currently lacking a psychologist or higher assistant psychologist.
Guidelines advise that beds should be made available within 28 days of referral, but this rarely happens.
On occasion, the Ministry of Justice does not agree with the level of security, so will not provide the prison with a movement order. The prison will then have to refer the prisoner to another setting. Currently, there are five prisoners awaiting admission to an NHS Foundation Trust's secure mental health in-patient hospital, and one prisoner awaiting admission to a psychiatric intensive care unit.
The IMHT care team does have regular contact with the community mental health teams (CMHT). However, it is sometimes difficult to hand over care to CMHT, as they will not acknowledge the clinical diagnosis of the IMHT. Often, these patients are homeless and, without an address, the CMHTs will not accept them. If they have to go to approved premises, this is identified at the last minute, delaying the referral to a CMHT.
The use of different technological systems by both the HMP Preston IMHT and the CMHTs has been highlighted as a possible contributory factor in delays in securing the appropriate care and treatment for those vulnerable prisoners with ongoing mental health issues. This means that ‘live’ data is not available at any given time to the relevant providers/areas.
The sad death of the librarian had an inevitable, but unfortunate, effect on the provision of a service highly valued by prisoners. The time needed to fill the vacancy has resulted in reduced opening hours, occasional closures for staff holiday and significant limits on the Storybook Dads sessions (a charity programme where prisoners record audio or video bedtime stories for their children to listen to or watch at home).
The OMU continues to complete offender assessments (OASys) in a timely way, in the Board’s view, and all sentenced prisoners seem to be allocated POMs appropriately. The Board is concerned that remand prisoners, who account for the 80% of the population, do not always have this level of support and guidance.
Early release programmes have led to many prisoners being recalled for short periods, due to their failure to comply with licence conditions. What strategies are being taken to improve community offender management to reduce the number of recalls for non-compliance, and how will the Minister ensure that the prison is not unduly impacted by recall rates?
The prison has been allocated bail information officers, but they can make little impact without the development of a whole network of community support. In previous years, there were bail hostels, bail support schemes and bail beds. To reduce the number of prisoners unnecessarily remanded in custody, we need to consider re-developing these facilities.
Prisoners working as orderlies in reception are not consistently given opportunities for exercise in fresh air.
Recommendations
We have repeatedly raised concerns about the fabric of this Victorian prison. The reception area and the gatehouse are not fit for purpose and the offender management unit’s prefabricated structure was condemned 15 years ago. Despite previous responses acknowledging these problems, there has been no apparent progress to address this or secure alternative solutions in the past year. What is the immediate timeline and budget for starting and completing a major refurbishment or alternative solution, and what specific steps will be taken to ensure this work is not delayed?
Government response
I acknowledge the Board’s repeated concern about the aging fabric of this Victorian prison and the impact this has on decency and operational efficiency. HMPPS Estates continues to review investment requirements across the estate and bids for HMP/YOI Preston including the refurbishment of showers, window replacement, roofing projects and reception reconfiguration. A project to raise handrail heights on wing landings is progressing and currently out to tender. It is with regret that no progress has been made in developing a project to replace the Offender Management Unit building this financial year due to funding constraints. However, an options and feasibility study has been commissioned for funding in the 2026/27 capital maintenance programme to explore replacement of the building within the prison boundary. The outcome of this study will inform future decisions on funding and project design and development. Unfortunately, perimeter wall repairs and installation of perimeter intrusion detection systems were delayed by the collapse of the original contractor, but I am pleased to report that these works are underway following the appointment of a replacement contractor. Demands for infrastructure improvements across the estate are much greater than funding available so all proposals are prioritised against available funding based on risk to life, capacity and decency which is informed by condition surveys. While funding pressures remain, these steps demonstrate our commitment to addressing the concerns you have reiterated.
Recommendation 2
Early release programmes have led to many prisoners being recalled for short periods, due to their failure to comply with licence conditions. What strategies are being taken to improve community offender management to reduce the number of recalls for non-compliance, and how will the Minister ensure that the prison is not unduly impacted by recall rates?
Government response
I acknowledge the Board’s observations on the impact of recalls following early release programmes. The Sentencing Bill currently before Parliament introduces a fixed term recall of 56 days for most standard determinate sentence offenders, replacing the current short term recalls of 14 or 28 days. This measure reflects recommendations from the Independent Sentencing Review and is designed to reduce churn, support rehabilitation and allow sufficient time to review licence conditions and risk management plans. Recall remains an essential safeguard to protect the public when risk increases but these changes will help ensure that prisons like HMP/YOI Preston are not unduly impacted by short term recalls.
Recommendation 3
The prison has been allocated bail information officers, but they can make little impact without the development of a whole network of community support. In previous years, there were bail hostels, bail support schemes and bail beds. To reduce the number of prisoners unnecessarily remanded in custody, we need to consider re-developing these facilities. Will the Minister consider re-establishing these services? If not, what specific actions will be taken to create a comprehensive community support network beyond just bail information officers?
Government response
The need for stronger community support to reduce unnecessary remand and improve resettlement is fully recognised and remains a focal point for improvement. The Bail Information Service has now been rolled out nationally with 70 prison-based Bail Information Officers producing reports to support judicial confidence in bail decisions. At HMP/YOI Preston, two officers deliver this service and work closely with courts and community teams. The Community Accommodation Service Tier 2 continues to provide gender specific accommodation for bailees and those eligible for home detention curfew with delivery in the North West region increasing from 43 beds in October 2022 to 113 beds as of November 2025. Strategic Housing Specialists are embedded in prisons including HMP/YOI Preston, to identify and remove barriers to accommodation and provide training for staff on housing pathways. Commissioned Rehabilitative Services contracts deliver specialist support for people in custody and on probation in their pre-release needs, including housing support. This complements mainstream services and duty-to-refer processes. Future men’s Community Rehabilitative Service contracts, due to go live in 2027, will offer enhanced support for housing, finance and wider pre-release needs, with Community Link Workers helping individuals build positive lifestyles free from crime and substance misuse.
Recommendation 4
Roll out of the Lancaster Farms’ staff development pilot project and the development of core capability packages.
Government response
The Enable Programme is being piloted at early adopter sites, including Lancaster Farms to strengthen capability and confidence among prison staff. This approach provides an immediate boost to operational delivery and lays the groundwork for long term transformation. It focuses on relational practice and draws on learning from the Offender Personality Disorder Pathway. Local implementation is supported by a Band 5 Implementation Coordinator and up to six Band 4 Capability Officers who mentor officers on the wing, facilitate delivery and embed learning through reflective sessions. Leadership development is a key component with Custodial Manager Leadership Portfolio modules being tested to build confidence and capability among managers. Investment in the working environment is also part of the programme, improving the sense of mattering and belonging for staff and contributing to a positive culture. Core Capability Packages have been developed to support officers with less than two years’ service, reinforcing essential skills and confidence. Six prototype packages are available nationally: • Health & Safety Matters • Five Minute Intervention Matters • Assessment, Care in Custody and Teamwork Matters • Relational Practice Matters • Procedural Justice Matters • Wellbeing Matters These packages combine face-to-face workshops, applied learning and further reading guides. Facilitator upskilling commenced in August 2025 to enable local delivery planning and delivery guidance has been provided to ensure the right people with the right skills facilitate learning. Additional capability packages will be rolled out as they are developed and informed by initial assessments. The two North West Prison Groups are subsequently working together to review and establish staff capability development initiatives based on the Core Capability Packages available for delivery.
Recommendation 5
The Governor should continue to develop the digitalisation of PINs and prisoner applications.
Recommendation 6
How does the Governor intend to improve cell clearance procedures?
Recommendation 7
The Governor should continue to explore ways of overcoming the lack of space and overcrowding in the first night centre and reception area.
Recommendation 8
Bearing in mind the demise of the YOI initiative (Time 4 Change), how will the Governor develop new initiatives for providing extra support for young offenders and target the disproportionate levels of violence amongst this group?
Recommendation 9
What steps will the Governor take to ensure that the prison provides good quality meals for prisoners, with adequate provision for special diets? This requires kitchen equipment to be functioning at optimum level.
Applications to the IMB
| Category | Current | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Accommodation (including transfers) | 45 | 38 |
| Early release | 9 | 7 |
| Family contact | 12 | 15 |
| General/miscellaneous | 41 | 35 |
| Healthcare | 36 | 31 |
| Meals/dietary | 15 | 11 |
| Property | 65 | 67 |
| Staff conduct | 28 | 22 |
| Unclassifiable (e.g., incomplete, illegible) | 5 | 3 |
| Work, education and training | 7 | 10 |
Related inspections & investigations
Safety 3
· Respect 3
· Activity 3
· Release 2
David Harrison · Natural causes
William Rogers · Natural causes
Paul Dixon · Natural causes
Thomas Moffett · State Custody related deaths
Christopher Talbot · State Custody related deaths
Other reports for Preston
Population 670
· Concerns
Population 670
· Concerns
Population 670
· Concerns
Population 675
· Concerns
Population 700
· Concerns