Source · IMB Annual Report
Wakefield
AI-generated report summary HMP Wakefield largely maintains a just, consistent, and inclusive regime, deemed safe and orderly despite a challenging population. While physical health needs are generally met, the Board has significant concerns regarding inadequate mental health support, prolonged Rule 45 segregation, and delays in mental health transfers. The prison's focus remains on progression within the high-security estate rather than direct community resettlement.
Year: 2020
Published: 8 Mar 2021
Type: Prison · Cat long-term high-security
Population: 729
Recommendations: 4
Key concerns
Positive findings
Safety statistics
| Indicator | This year | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Deaths in custody | 8 | 11 |
| Self-harm incidents | 364 | 268 |
| ACCT cases opened | 232 | 202 |
| Prisoner assaults | 55 | 177 |
| Assaults on staff | 47 | — |
| Use of force | 142 | — |
Positive findings
AI-generated summaryHMP Wakefield generally provides a safe, orderly, and humane high-security regime, described as just, consistent, and inclusive. The Board commends staff for successful reintegration of challenging prisoners, high-quality palliative care, and empathy shown in segregation. Healthcare provision is good, with improvements in pharmacy staffing and an effective COVID-19 response resulting in low positive cases. Education and workshop provisions are also recognised for their quality and positive relationships.
Key concerns
Delays by West Yorkshire Police in progressing investigations into violent incidents.
Source wording under review
Prisoners are held for unacceptably long periods under Prison Rule 45, exacerbated by a lack of appropriate mental health support and a 'merry-go-round' of seg-to-seg transfers for prisoners with personality disorders without a long-term plan.
Source wording under review
The detrimental impact of prolonged segregation on mental health, particularly for those not on the mental health caseload, and significant delays in transferring prisoners with serious acute mental health conditions to appropriate accommodation within the target time of 14 days.
Inpatient healthcare provision is housed in a building whose facilities are not fit for purpose and is of grave concern to the healthcare team.
The Board remains seriously under-strength and has been unable to monitor the work of the prisoner equality action group (PEAG) for the second consecutive year.
We continue to receive representations from prisoners who are subject to indeterminate sentences for public protection (IPP; section 225 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003). We restate our concerns to the minister in the 2018/19 annual report; it is the case that some IPP prisoners are subject to mental health distress as a consequence of a failure to provide them with a degree of certainty in relation to their sentence planning. It is frustrating that we are not able to provide any meaningful responses to prisoners’ applications in relation to IPP sentences.
Some officers reported feeling ‘undervalued’ as civil servants due to worn furniture in landing offices, poor ventilation, and low starting salaries (£23,529).
The number of self-harm incidents has again significantly increased, from 268 last year to 364.
A continued lack of sufficient high-quality, active and purposeful work, coupled with no extension of the Prison Service ‘internal market’.
4 Family contact Family contact and visits are supported by ‘Partners of Prisoners’ (POPS). Our main concerns relate to the problem of a lack of in-cell telephony; we are aware of many other LTHSE establishments with this provision, and therefore ponder why there is no ambition to deliver this in Wakefield.
Recommendations
The Ministry of Justice should work with the Department of Health to ensure that – following repeated recommendations and concerns expressed by this Inspectorate and others, including the Public Accounts Committee – effective action is taken to complete transfers under the Mental Health Act within the target time of 14 days. (S37)
Government response
I acknowledge that the Board remains concerned about prisoners with severe mental health/behavioural disorders and the transfer time to an appropriate setting, and thank the Board for their continued work to support these prisoners. I am sorry if you feel your concerns are not being heard and can assure you Ministers do take your concerns very seriously. A white paper titled, Reforming the Mental Health Act, was published on 13 January 2021, which builds on recommendations made by Professor Sir Simon Wessely’s Independent Review in 2018. The white paper provides a commitment to take forward the Review’s recommendation to introduce a statutory time limit of 28 days for transfers to mental health hospitals when someone becomes unwell in custody, or experiences a relapse in an existing condition. Although this issue currently remains a national problem, with continued delays in expediting transfers, particularly to high security hospitals, I am pleased the position has improved during 2020/21 in the Yorkshire and the Humber prisons. This improvement and reduction in delays has been achieved by NHS England and NHS Improvement (NHSE&I) through a more rigorous approach to monitoring and escalating delays and robustly addressing other barriers, such as disagreements of security requirements. HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) and NHSE&I continue to work together, along with providers of secure mental health to expedite transfers wherever possible and to ensure patients are remitted back to prison as soon as possible after they complete treatment. Further guidance has also been issued to ensure arrangements are not impacted adversely by Covid-19.
Recommendation 2
The Board would, again, like to draw ministers’ attention to the requirement for additional central support on the recruitment and retention of all qualified vacancies throughout the Prison Service.
Government response
There is no doubt that hard-working prison officers play a crucial role in keeping prisons safe and transforming offenders’ lives, ultimately making sure the public is protected. This work is very much appreciated, and we recognise the need to retain motivated staff in a safe, decent and secure environment. As stated in the letter of 9 March from Michelle Jarman-Howe, Chief Operating Officer Prisons (COO), the safety and welling of staff during the Covid-19 pandemic is paramount. Although financial constraints as a result of Covid-19 have prevented any improvement to staff facilities during the past year, HMP Wakefield have prioritised staff care team availability and ensured a care team member is available during the week, with any themes or issues fed back to the Deputy Governor. As a gesture of appreciation early in the pandemic, free Barista coffee was provided to staff, and the senior management team also cooked breakfast for the staff on two days. In addition, a series of events were held in November/December as part of staff wellbeing weeks. With HMP Wakefield being of Victorian design, retrospective improvements to the ventilation are not straightforward, but where particular issues are identified, Prison Maintenance Group (PMG) will work to explore solutions and routes to address any identified work to improve the surroundings. The rate of pay for prison officers is reviewed and determined annually through the independent Prison Service Pay Review Body (PSPRB) process. That pay remains competitive with comparable labour markets is a key consideration in terms of formulating both the government proposals to the PSPRB and the eventual recommendations of the Review Body. Starting pay for newly recruited Prison Officers at HMP Wakefield is now (effective 1 April 2020) £24,118 for a 39-hour week, including 17% unsocial hours. This can rise over time, to £26,818.
Recommendation 3
we encourage the Governor to consider a review of how psychologically informed regimes at Wakefield may, or may not, be efficacious.
Government response
I acknowledge the difficult and dedicated work of those staff working with prisoners with mental ill health. To prepare and provide support for staff working in segregation units a two-week initial training package is run by the LTHSE which includes personality disorders, mental illness, trauma and staff wellbeing. Additionally, at HMP Wakefield supervision and training is provided by psychology services to segregation and close supervision centre operational staff working with prisoners with severe mental ill health, including access to a dedicated forensic psychology resource. This includes a bespoke training package on personality disorders and psychopathy and close working with staff to support their understanding of the complex needs of the men in the unit, as well as advice and guidance regarding their care and management. Psychologists also contribute to multi-disciplinary decisions about the day to day management of the unit and the men residing there. All prisoners who meet the eligibility criteria for the Offender Personality Disorder (OPD) pathway are ‘screened into’ the pathway so that their Offender Manager can access psychological consultancy to help both understand the needs of the individual, and help plan what services may be needed. In the LTHSE there are several OPD pathways depending on the need identified ranging between: preparing the person to access treatment, treatment services themselves, and support services -Psychologically Informed Planned Environments (PIPE) after treatment. Interventions are also available which focus on securing custodial stability so that the person can access mainstream interventions.
Recommendation 4
We have yet to receive further information on the new framework, and would request clarification from HMPPS on the status of its implementation.
Government response
Following a pause in the development of the new Prisoners’ Property Policy Framework project, due to Covid-19, a meeting with IMB representatives took place in August 2020. The feedback received from those members was considered alongside the comments which we received from other stakeholders, and comments from subsequent operational engagement. We have shared the draft framework with some key stakeholders, including the IMB representatives we previously consulted, and this will be followed by wider consultation shortly.
Applications to the IMB
| Category | Current | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Accommodation, including laundry, clothing, ablutions | 5 | 4 |
| Canteen, facility list, catalogue(s) | 4 | 2 |
| Discipline, including adjudications, IEP, sanctions | 11 | 10 |
| Equality | 9 | 6 |
| Finance, including pay, private monies, spends | 4 | 3 |
| Food and kitchens | 3 | 3 |
| Health, including physical, mental, social care | 19 | 12 |
| Letters, visits, telephones, public protection restrictions | 4 | 14 |
| Miscellaneous, including complaints system | 9 | 16 |
| Property during transfer or in another establishment or location | 8 | 6 |
| Property within this establishment | 8 | 10 |
| Purposeful activity, including education, work, training, library, regime, time out of cell | 8 | 18 |
| Sentence management, including home detention curfew, release on temporary licence, parole, release dates, recategorisation | 5 | 3 |
| Staff/prisoner concerns, including bullying | 15 | 27 |
| Transfers | 0 | 2 |
Related inspections & investigations
Safety 2
· Respect 3
· Activity 1
· Release 3
Stephen Beadman · State Custody related deaths | Suicide (from 2015)| Mental Health related deaths
Carl Langdell · State Custody related deaths | Suicide (from 2015)
Connor Hoult · State Custody related deaths | Suicide (from 2015)
Other reports for Wakefield
Population 793
· Concerns
Population 740
· Self-harm 665
· Concerns
Population 740
· Self-harm 429
· Concerns
Population 717
· Self-harm 444
· Concerns
Population 705
· Self-harm 437
· Concerns