Source · IMB Annual Report

Wakefield

AI-generated report summary HMP Wakefield, a high-security prison, faced significant challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic, operating under severe lockdown regimes with prisoners spending only 1.5 hours out of cell daily. While violence reduced, self-harm incidents and deaths in custody increased. The Board raised serious concerns about persistent issues with mental health transfers, a lack of consultant forensic psychiatrist provision, and the absence of in-cell telephony, which impacted prisoner wellbeing and family contact. Staffing shortages and recruitment delays were also significant concerns.

Year: 2021 Published: 13 Oct 2021 Type: Prison · Cat High Security (LTHSE) Population: 705 Recommendations: 8 Key concerns Positive findings

Safety statistics

Incidents during reporting year
IndicatorThis yearPrevious
Deaths in custody148
Self-harm incidents437364
ACCT cases opened229232
Prisoner assaults18
Assaults on staff57
Use of force192

Positive findings

AI-generated summary
The Board found that HMPPS operational guidance for remote monitoring was effectively implemented. Staff were commended for their efforts to mitigate the impact of prolonged cellular confinement and for their detailed entries on the P-NOMIS system. The kitchen handled pandemic challenges well, catering to diverse dietary needs and implementing improvements. Chaplaincy and the recovery and inclusion team provided exceptional support, while the assessment and interventions centre (AIC) was commended for its interventions and insights. The Board noted generally good staff-prisoner relationships, a calm environment despite population challenges, and commitment to maintaining a safe establishment.

Key concerns

29 items
Mental Health Repeated Long-standing and yet unresolved problems with the assessment and transfer of prisoners who present with serious mental health and personality disorders from HMP Wakefield to hospital (section 47, Mental Health Act 1983).
Resettlement/Release Prisoners at HMP Wakefield who are substantially over tariff and subject to the consequences of the now discredited ‘sentences of imprisonment for public protection’ (IPP).
Complaints/Property Lack of clarity if the complaints procedure for healthcare provision at HMP Wakefield is audited in line with standard complaints made under the COMP1/2 procedures, and that PPG's internal complaints system is different from the prison's, potentially undercounting concerns. Source wording under review
Regime/Time Out of Cell Repeated Lack of a nationally available set of legal resources for prisoners, including easy access to Prison Service Orders and Instructions, hindering procedural justice.
Other Lack of clarity on progress for the integration of the SystmOne project led by the Ministry of Justice’s digital team.
Regime/Time Out of Cell We ask the Governor of HMP Wakefield to clarify if (or when) in-cell telephony will become available to prisoners.
Regime/Time Out of Cell Low minimum time out of cell (1.5 hours per day) due to COVID-19 restrictions and lack of a clear target for improvement. Source wording under review
Safety The Board is concerned with the number of staff assaults which have occurred in the segregation unit. Our concern is also the mental health issues of prisoners in segregation. The length of time for mental health issues and assessments to be processed is leading to deterioration in prisoner behaviour and wellbeing.
Mental Health The consequences of poor mental health can be harrowing; in one incident, a prisoner was taken to outside hospital following an act of extreme self-harm – one that had a profound and traumatic impact on the prisoner and the staff who provided care in the aftermath. The prisoner was taken to outside hospital for treatment, but our understanding is that he was quickly returned to prison following treatment rather than being assessed for an immediate transfer to a secure hospital under Section 47 of the Mental Health Act. Information that we have received from the prison suggests to us that the prisoner’s health needs may not have been met by the NHS.
Healthcare The care and welfare of an increasingly elderly population and the associated health and mobility challenges are concerning to the Board and will continue to be monitored.
Mental Health The Board is particularly worried about the level of clinical psychiatry offered at HMP Wakefield, and questions if the existing consultant psychiatrist provision (one day per week) is sufficient to deal with the needs of the prison.
Staffing Significant staffing challenges, including slow recruitment due to CTC clearance and seven existing vacancies for registered psychologists. Source wording under review
Other Issues regarding prisoners’ property remains a recurring problem. It is a cause of frustration for prisoners. Not only do clothing and footwear go missing in the system, but items of sentimental value are also lost.
Other Often the rules about prisoners’ property varies between establishments, which further contributes to grievances. The Board would welcome more clarity and consistency across the prison estate to address this lack of standardisation.
Mental Health The segregation unit (F wing) continues to present its own unique challenges and we will continue to monitor the long-term effects of prolonged stays on the unit. There are urgent concerns regarding the time taken to address the mental health issues of certain individuals and those who have spent an extraordinary amount of time within segregation.
Resettlement/Release We are concerned by one isolated case, a prisoner on Rule 45 who may be released direct from the segregation unit of HMP Wakefield having completed more than 1500 consecutive days in segregated conditions. We have low confidence of a successful reintegration to the community.
Equality/Diversity Disproportional outcomes for prisoners of Pakistani heritage concerning adjudications and use of force, despite investigations finding no notable trends.
Equality/Diversity A challenge that the prison has faced has related to transgender prisoners. It has proved difficult for the prison to obtain or source appropriate gender-affirming products for this group, especially in respect of make-up and clothing. This is an area of work which is constantly growing and evolving, to ensure that the needs of all prisoners are met.
Equality/Diversity Another issue facing the prison is how to effectively make reasonable adjustments for those prisoners identified as being on the autism spectrum. Several of these prisoners need special adjustments or additional resources to enable them to have equal access to the regime. The staff have consulted with external agencies (e.g. external social care) and the lead for autism accreditation at HMPYOI Feltham, in an attempt to clarify how best to support these prisoners. This work is ongoing as some of the issues facing prisoners at HMP Wakefield have not been encountered at other establishments and there does not appear to be a central resource the prison can rely on to help them to support these prisoners.
Healthcare There is a well-equipped end of life care suite. The Board is concerned about the length of time that this suite is made unavailable for use due to the long delay of its being put back into use following expected deaths in custody where prisoners were on the end-of-life care pathway. These delays, often as long as three to four weeks, can mean that extremely ill men are being looked after and can die in inappropriate surroundings.
Other A prisoner was in the same cell as a deceased man for several hours due to delays in certifying death and body release.
Safety The influx of younger prisoners continues to raise concerns amongst the more elderly population with regards to bullying and harassment and will continue to be monitored.
Regime/Time Out of Cell Communication difficulties have been exacerbated by the fact that at HMP Wakefield there is no access to prison radio, in-cell telephony or Wayout TV, which are resources widely used as communication tools in other prisons.
Safety Towards the end of the reporting period, a CSC prisoner attacked officers during the unlock with a pair of scissors. The prisoner was immediately transferred to another establishment, and an investigation is underway. The Board will monitor the progress of the investigation and encourage HMPPS to ensure that protocols surrounding the issue of in possession items to CSC prisoners are re-examined and strengthened where necessary.
Healthcare The Board remains concerned that the Governor’s ability to influence healthcare service delivery in HMP Wakefield is significantly constrained by the outsourcing of healthcare provision to an external contractor.
Healthcare The prison does not have access to a consultant forensic psychiatrist. We believe that this is because the contract does not specify provision for one. This is not consistent with the provision at other LTHSE establishments, to the best of our knowledge. We therefore do not believe that the mental health needs of prisoners who require forensic psychiatry services are being met at Wakefield.
Regime/Time Out of Cell Isolation, extreme boredom and the monotonous nature of the regime have left a lasting impact on many prisoners at Wakefield.
Healthcare Social care provision has been quite disjointed over the reporting year with prisoners waiting a long time for necessary equipment. For example, a prisoner who had a stroke and subsequently needed a wheelchair was measured and funding agreed for a suitable one in December 2020 but is still waiting at the time of this report.
Resettlement/Release We ask HMPPS to clarify the role of HMP Wakefield in the ‘Pathways to Progression’ programme.

Recommendations

8 items · 2 repeated

Recommendation 1

Addressee: Ministry of Justice

Explain how the Government intends to address long-standing and yet unresolved problems with the assessment and transfer of prisoners who present with serious mental health and personality disorders from HMP Wakefield to hospital (section 47, Mental Health Act 1983).

Repeated Source text verified

Government response
I acknowledge the Board’s repeated concerns regarding the assessment and transfer to hospital of prisoners with serious mental health and personality disorders. I wish to assure you that Ministers take your concerns very seriously. Health and justice partners are committed to providing a standard of health care in prisons equivalent to that available in the community. The NHS England/NHS Improvement (NHSE/I) Access Assessment Guidelines (2019) details the process for assessment and admission for individuals referred to and deemed appropriate for admission to Secure Mental Health Services. This includes High Secure, Medium Secure and Low Secure services. As outlined in my predecessor’s letter to the Board of 29 March 2021, a White Paper on Reforming the Mental Health Act was published earlier in the year. The Government has committed to introduce a new statutory time limit of 28 days for transfers to mental health hospitals from custody, and this will be commenced once revised NHSE/I guidance has been fully embedded in practice. In addition, a new independent role will oversee the transfer process to help reduce unnecessary delays.
I am pleased to inform you that the West Yorkshire NHS-led Provider Collaborative for adult low and medium secure services went live from 1 October 2021. The Collaborative is being led by South West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, and as the Lead Provider they remain accountable to NHS England and NHS Improvement for the commissioning of high quality specialised services. The Provider Collaborative comprises of a group of providers of specialised mental health, learning disability and autism services who have agreed to work together to improve the care pathway by taking responsibility for the budget and care pathway for the West Yorkshire adult low and medium secure population.

Recorded status: In progress

Topic: Mental Health

Recommendation 2

Addressee: Ministry of Justice

Act in respect of prisoners at HMP Wakefield who are substantially over tariff and subject to the consequences of the now discredited ‘sentences of imprisonment for public protection’ (IPP) (see Criminal Justice Act 2003).

Source text verified

Government response
I appreciate the Board’s concerns regarding prisoners serving indeterminate sentences of Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP). Covid-19 continues to present a unique set of challenges that we must address to maintain services in custody and the community. HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) remains committed to supporting prisoners serving the IPP sentence in their progression and efforts to reduce their risk to the point where the Parole Board determines that they may be safely released. This commitment is delivered by means of a bespoke and regularly refreshed IPP action plan, which includes such initiatives as case reviews of those who are struggling to progress, delivered by Psychology Services to help identify the most appropriate pathway for each individual. It also includes a work stream that oversees the establishment and delivery of specialist progression regimes, which give prisoners a chance to develop and test their ability to manage their risks and lives in an environment of increasing freedoms and responsibilities. There are a broad range of work streams in the plan, aimed at both the progression towards a safe release, and towards the sustainability of that release, following a positive parole outcome.
The latest published figures show the unreleased IPP population standing at 1,661 at the end of September 2021, a reduction from 1,895 at the end of September 2020. This is good progress considering that the population of unreleased prisoners serving IPP sentences was, at its highest in 2012, over 6,000. It is important to note that as the number of IPP prisoners who have never been released continues to decrease, the proportion of those that remain in prison who committed more serious offences and whose cases are complex grows. As the Board is aware, many of these prisoners are still assessed to pose a high risk of committing further violent or sexual offences and have a complex set of risks and needs, and these must be addressed before the Parole Board can consider release. This is not a simple task and HMPPS continues to work with these individuals to offer them opportunities to reduce their identified risks.

Recorded status: In progress

Topic: Resettlement

Recommendation 3

Addressee: HMPPS

Clarify the role of HMP Wakefield in the ‘Pathways to Progression’ programme.

Source text verified

Government response
HMP Wakefield operates two specific services within the Pathways to Progression umbrella. The Mulberry unit is a specialist service for prisoners with Autistic Spectrum Disorder traits who struggle to progress or maintain their position on normal location; a multi-disciplinary team works with prisoners on an individual basis to enable them to progress back to mainstream prison or other specialist services. This service links to the Pathways to Progression Central team, which in turn reports to the clinical and operational leads for Pathways to Progression. The Close Supervision Centre (CSC) at HMP Wakefield holds some of the most violent and disruptive prisoners in custody and provides an assessment function for those prisoners entering CSC. The unit links to the central CSC Management team, which in turn reports to the clinical and operational leads for Pathways to Progression.
HMP Wakefield also holds a number of complex prisoners both on normal location and in segregated conditions. These prisoners may have been remitted from hospital to HMP Wakefield or have been allocated from other prisons. All prisons within LTHSE have a role in accepting prisoners back from hospital through the remission process. LTHSE remits prisoners who meet LTHSE criteria direct back into their prisons rather than through the nearest reception prison to the hospital to best meet the needs of the prisoner in terms of health, risk reduction and opportunity to progress; whilst balancing the operational demands on our prisons. This process is outlined in the NHS good practice guidance for remission and the Security Category Policy Framework. For all complex cases the Pathways to Progression Complex Case Team are available to support the local management team.

Recorded status: Implemented

Topic: Progression

Recommendation 4

Addressee: HMPPS

Clarify if the complaints procedure for healthcare provision at HMP Wakefield is audited in line with standard complaints made under the COMP1/2 procedures.

Source text verified

Government response
HMPPS is not responsible for the management of healthcare complaints and concerns. Practice Plus Group (Lead Healthcare Provider) is required to manage all complaints and concerns in line with the NHSE/I National Complaints process, not HMPPS complaints policies. Complaints and concerns are reviewed on a monthly basis via Practice Plus Group’s embedded Governance Processes. Figures, themes and trends are shared with the NHSE/I Commissioning team as part of the routine quarterly contract monitoring process.

Recorded status: Implemented

Topic: Healthcare

Recommendation 5

Addressee: HMPPS

Explore the possibility of implementing a nationally available set of legal resources for prisoners, including easy access to Prison Service Orders and Instructions.

Repeated Source text verified

Government response
The Early Days in Custody Prison Service Instruction (PSI) sets out how advice on accessing legal services should be provided to newly arrived prisoners, and how similar advice should be made available to prisoners after the early days and induction period. In addition, the Residential Services PSI outlines that residential staff must assist prisoners who wish to access legal advice. The availability of PSIs is covered in PSI 02/2015 - Prison Library Service.

Recorded status: Implemented

Topic: Regime

Recommendation 6

Addressee: HMPPS

Clarify progress on the integration of the SystmOne project led by the Ministry of Justice’s digital team.

Source text verified

Recorded status:

Topic: Healthcare

Recommendation 7

Addressee: Governor / Director

Clarify if (or when) in-cell telephony will become available to prisoners.

Source text verified

Government response
HMP Wakefield is currently awaiting funding for In-Cell Telephony. A survey is planned to gain an understanding of the costs associated with the implementation, however, at present there is not a set date for installation.

Recorded status: In progress

Topic: Regime

Recommendation 8

Addressee: Governor / Director

Clarify the target minimum time out of cell for the next reporting period.

Source text verified

Recorded status:

Topic: Regime

Related inspections & investigations

27 Apr 2026 HMIP · IRP
30 Jun 2025 HMIP · Unannounced Safety 2 · Respect 3 · Activity 1 · Release 3
31 Oct 2022 HMIP · Unannounced
PPO fatal incident Jacob Chambers
PPO fatal incident Harry Hankinson
PPO fatal incident Warsami Ibrahim
PPO fatal incident Kevin Roe
PPO fatal incident Stanley Hill
23 Jun 2023 PFD Stephen Beadman · State Custody related deaths | Suicide (from 2015)| Mental Health related deaths
21 Oct 2022 PFD Carl Langdell · State Custody related deaths | Suicide (from 2015)
30 Nov 2021 PFD Connor Hoult · State Custody related deaths | Suicide (from 2015)

Other reports for Wakefield

2025 Published 27 Feb 2026 Population 793 · Concerns
2024 Published 12 Feb 2025 Population 740 · Self-harm 665 · Concerns
2023 Published 15 Mar 2024 Population 740 · Self-harm 429 · Concerns
2022 Published 3 Mar 2023 Population 717 · Self-harm 444 · Concerns
2020 Published 8 Mar 2021 Population 729 · Self-harm 364 · Concerns