Source · IMB Annual Report

Wakefield

Year: 2022 Published: 3 Mar 2023 Type: Prison · Cat High Security, Category A/B Population: 717 Recommendations: 15 Key concerns Positive findings

HMP Wakefield, a high-security prison for men, is generally considered safe but experienced increases in assaults and use of force. Key concerns include persistent issues with mental health transfers, a lack of robust healthcare complaints processes, and the absence of in-cell telephony. The Board also highlighted unsatisfactory property management and insufficient purposeful activity for prisoners.

Safety statistics

Incidents during reporting year
IndicatorThis yearPrevious
Deaths in custody214
Self-harm incidents444437
Prisoner assaults5144
Assaults on staff5757
Use of force241192

Positive findings

The Board generally considers HMP Wakefield to be a safe prison where prisoners are treated humanely and consistently with OPCAT expectations. The prison invested in equipment for time out of cell and its reception arrangements are robust. Staff received commendation for detailed record-keeping and transparency in handling discrimination reports. Healthcare's inpatient team achieved Macmillan accreditation, and the prison received an Autism accreditation, with positive outcomes noted for the Mulberry unit. The Board itself also received excellent resources.

Key concerns

15 items
Resettlement/Release Repeated The Board asks the minister to act in respect of prisoners at HMP Wakefield who are substantially over tariff and subject to the consequences of the now discredited ‘sentences of imprisonment for public protection’ (see Criminal Justice Act 2003).
Mental Health Repeated The Board asks the minister to explain how the government intends to address longstanding and yet unresolved problems with the assessment and transfer of prisoners who present with serious mental health and personality disorders from HMP Wakefield to hospital (section 47, Mental Health Act 1983).
Healthcare The Board asks the minister and his/her officials to explain how the ministry perceives the performance of prisoner healthcare at HMP Wakefield when compared against the performance specification in the contract.
Healthcare Repeated The Board asks HMPPS to clarify what action is being taken to remedy this and ensure that the healthcare contractor provides a robust approach to prisoner complaints and that responses are consistent with the principles of procedural fairness.
Healthcare Repeated The Board asks HMPPS to clarify progress on the integration of the SystmOne project led by the Ministry of Justice’s digital team.
Other Repeated The Board asks HMPPS to explore the possibility of implementing a nationally available set of legal resources for prisoners, including easy access to Prison Service Orders and Instructions.
Regime/Time Out of Cell The ‘astroturf’ sports pitch has been unavailable for at least two years. The pitch provides much needed opportunities for physical exercise and improved health outcomesfor prisoners. We ask HMPPS to specify what action is being taken to provide funding to recommission in sports pitch.
Regime/Time Out of Cell Repeated We repeat our request to the Governor of HMP Wakefield in the 2020-21 annual report and ask HMPPS to clarify if (or when) in-cell telephony will become available to prisoners at Wakefield.
Equality/Diversity The Board asks HMPPS to consider if it is necessary for the prisoner’s index offence to be highly visible on the opening page of the prisoner record on the Digital Prison Services systems (this was not the case with the legacy P-NOMIS system).
Safety The ACCT ‘system’ remains wholly paper based. This means that ACCT data produced by staff and IMB members in the form of contemporaneous notes and entries into a prisoner's ACCT file are disaggregated from healthcare data contained in NHS SystmOne and operational data in HMPPS Digital Prison Services (formerly C-NOMIS). This inhibits information sharing between prison officers, governors, registered nurses and allied healthcare professionals in situations where a prisoner is at risk of suicide and/or self-harm. We ask HMPPS to clarify what measures are in place to enable the efficient and timely sharing of data from disparate systems.
Other Prisoner property – we are concerned that prisoners do not receive ‘in possession’ property from reception in a timely manner. This causes avoidable frustration on the residential wings for prisoners, staff and IMB members alike.
Education/Purposeful Activity Purposeful activity – we are concerned that too many men are not meaningfully engaged in education or work opportunities.
Other Prisoners’ pay inconsistencies – we are concerned that some prisoners are in receipt of lower levels of pay than at other establishments (for similar work) or by virtue of their educational attainment.
Staffing Dirty protest additional payments for staff – a number of officers have expressed dissatisfaction with the current policy. The Board is very sympathetic to their concerns, primarily due to the poor natural ventilation on the segregation unit where dirty protest incidents are managed.
Staffing Key workers – there is some evidence of staff referring prisoners to the IMB rather than dealing with matters themselves. Keywork provides an opportunity for staff to engage with prisoners and resolve issues without the need to access the IMB. Our data (see ‘the work of the Board’) suggests that the present level of applications received by the board is unsustainable.

Recommendations

15 items · 6 repeated
#RecommendationAddresseeStatus
1 We ask the minister to act in respect of prisoners at HMP Wakefield who are substantially over tariff and subject to the consequences of the now discredited ‘sentences of imprisonment for public protection’ (see Criminal Justice Act 2003). Repeated
Response
I understand the Board’s ongoing concerns about prisoners serving indeterminate sentences of Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP). The Justice Select Committee (JSC) published their report into the IPP sentence on 28 September 2022 after a year-long inquiry which contains considered recommendations for change. The Government has published its formal response to the Committee’s report, which can be accessed at https://committees.parliament.uk/work/1509/imprisonment-for-public-protection-ipp-sentences/publications/. The JSCs main recommendation was to undertake a full resentencing exercise of all remaining IPP offenders who had not yet had their license terminated. Although the IPP sentence was abolished in 2012, it is the Government’s long-held view that retrospectively changing the sentence which was lawfully passed would give rise to an unacceptable risk to public protection and that the IPP Action Plan, suitably updated, remains the best option by which these offenders can progress towards safe release. As such, the Government has rejected this recommendation and has no plans to conduct a resentencing exercise. Any re-sentencing of IPP offenders would inevitably result in the immediate release of many offenders who have committed serious sexual or violent offences, in many cases without any period of licensed supervision. It is vital for public protection that those serving the IPP sentence in prison, whether not yet released or recalled following release, are released only where the Parole Board determines that they may be safely managed in the community. The focus remains on supporting all those continuing to serve the IPP sentence in prison by providing them with opportunities to show they can be safely released by the Parole Board and to help those serving the IPP sentence on licence in the community to work towards applying successfully, once eligible, to have their licence terminated. However, the Committee’s report does provide an opportunity for HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) to review the work being delivered via the IPP Action Plan, even though efforts in recent years have delivered substantial reductions in the number of IPP prisoners who have never been released. The latest published figures stood at 1,394 at the end of December 2022. This is reduced from 1,602 at the end of December 2021. The IPP Action Plan is therefore being reviewed and refreshed to ensure it is as robust, structured, clear, measurable, and properly targeted as possible.
Ministry of Justice Rejected
2 We ask the minister to explain how the government intends to address longstanding and yet unresolved problems with the assessment and transfer of prisoners who present with serious mental health and personality disorders from HMP Wakefield to hospital (section 47, Mental Health Act 1983). Repeated
Response
I recognise the Board’s further concerns for people in prison suffering with mental ill health who require transfer to a secure hospital. Since the last annual report response to the Board in November 2021, the Government published the draft Mental Health Bill in June 2022 which contains measures to speed up access to specialist inpatient care and treatment, as well as introducing a statutory 28-day time limit for transfers from prison to hospital. This time limit mirrors that introduced in the NHS England’s good practice guidance, published in June 2021 and together with operational improvements will reduce unnecessary delays. It is acknowledged that HMP Wakefield holds a number of complex prisoners who are awaiting assessment for transfer to a secure hospital setting or may have been remitted from hospital to HMP Wakefield. It remains the case that the Long Term and High Secure Estate has a role in accepting prisoners back from hospital through the remission process in the good practice guidance, but since the Covid-19 restrictions lifted, there has an improvement in adherence to the NHS good practice guidance for transfers from prisons to secure hospital beds.
Ministry of Justice In progress
3 We ask the minister and his/her officials to explain how the ministry perceives the performance of prisoner healthcare at HMP Wakefield when compared against the performance specification in the contract.
Response
Regarding the Board’s concerns about healthcare performance and complaints, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) and HMPPS together with health partners remain committed to ensuring that people in prison have access to an equivalent standard, range and quality of health care in prisons to that available in the wider community. All health treatment in custody is the responsibility of NHS England and NHS Wales and established governance arrangements are in place which provides an opportunity for Governors to raise concerns about local healthcare delivery with NHS Health and Justice Commissioners and providers. As the Board is aware health complaints and concerns are managed in line with the NHSE National Complaints process and in addition to the NHSE Commissioning team quarterly contract monitoring process, regular NHSE Quality and Commissioning visits have been taking place, with complaints management being one of the areas reviewed. In addition, following a change in healthcare management at HMP Wakefield, the complaints process has been reviewed and the number of outstanding complaints has now reduced.
Ministry of Justice Noted
4 In our 2020-21 annual report we asked HMPPS to clarify if the complaints procedure for healthcare provision at HMP Wakefield is audited in line with standard complaints made under the COMP1/2 procedures. The Board is not satisfied with the procedures for dealing with prisoner complaints (or concerns). We ask HMPPS to clarify what action is being taken to remedy this and ensure that the healthcare contractor provides a robust approach to prisoner complaints and that responses are consistent with the principles of procedural fairness. Repeated
Response
Regarding the Board’s concerns about healthcare performance and complaints, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) and HMPPS together with health partners remain committed to ensuring that people in prison have access to an equivalent standard, range and quality of health care in prisons to that available in the wider community. All health treatment in custody is the responsibility of NHS England and NHS Wales and established governance arrangements are in place which provides an opportunity for Governors to raise concerns about local healthcare delivery with NHS Health and Justice Commissioners and providers. As the Board is aware health complaints and concerns are managed in line with the NHSE National Complaints process and in addition to the NHSE Commissioning team quarterly contract monitoring process, regular NHSE Quality and Commissioning visits have been taking place, with complaints management being one of the areas reviewed. In addition, following a change in healthcare management at HMP Wakefield, the complaints process has been reviewed and the number of outstanding complaints has now reduced.
HMPPS In progress
5 We repeat our request in the 2020-21 annual report to ask HMPPS to clarify progress on the integration of the SystmOne project led by the Ministry of Justice’s digital team. Repeated
Response
It is important to acknowledge that integration between prison and health IT systems is technically complex and there are not clear arrangements in place on who funds the work or maintains it. However, NHS England and HMPPS Digital have engaged closely over the past few months and have agreed a technical approach for integration. The first feature to be deployed will be the automated transmission of prisoner transfers between prisons and prisoner cell moves to the GP's patient administration system. which is currently SystmOne. This will enable clinicians to have accurate, real-time visibility of a prisoner's location and allow them to perform routine healthcare tasks more efficiently and effectively.
HMPPS In progress
6 We repeat our recommendation in the 2020-21 annual report and ask HMPPS to explore the possibility of implementing a nationally available set of legal resources for prisoners, including easy access to Prison Service Orders and Instructions. Repeated
Response
The Prison Education and Library Services for adult prisons in England Policy Framework sets out a list of mandatory publications that must be made available within prison libraries for prisoners to access. These include up to date copies of Archbold’s Criminal Pleading, Evidence and Practice, The Civil Procedure Rules, and extant Prison Service Instructions, Prison Service Orders, and Policy Frameworks except for those that have restrictions placed on them. The framework can be found at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/prison-education-and-library-services-for-adult-prisons-in-england. It is noted that the Board also recognises the positive work of the prison library at HMP Wakefield which is holding legal sessions to assist prisoners in their legal investigations.
HMPPS Implemented
7 The ‘astroturf’ sports pitch has been unavailable for at least two years. The pitch provides much needed opportunities for physical exercise and improved health outcomesfor prisoners. We ask HMPPS to specify what action is being taken to provide funding to recommission in sports pitch.
Response
The Board will be aware that due to a blockage and collapse of a soil drain from the residential units, the astroturf football pitch had to have a large section removed in 2020 to allow for the repair of the drain. As a result, the pitch could not be re-laid due to its degraded condition. It is recognised that the entire pitch should be replaced with a next generation all weather playing surface and HMP Wakefield’s only alternative facility is a shared exercise yard to provide outdoor exercise opportunities. However, the prison has not been successful in bids to fund this to date via MoJ Property as this work is not currently affordable given other budgetary demands, or grant funding from the Football Association. A further bid to replace the part of the pitch affected by the drainage collapse has been submitted and a bid decision is expected shortly.
HMPPS In progress
8 We repeat our request to the Governor of HMP Wakefield in the 2020-21 annual report and ask HMPPS to clarify if (or when) in-cell telephony will become available to prisoners at Wakefield. Repeated
Response
HMPPS is in the process of planning the implementation of in-cell telephony across the dispersal estate and work specifically at HMP Wakefield commenced in January 2023. Implementation at HMP Wakefield is anticipated to be completed towards the end of 2023.
HMPPS In progress
9 We ask HMPPS to consider if it is necessary for the prisoner’s index offence to be highly visible on the opening page of the prisoner record on the Digital Prison Services systems (this was not the case with the legacy P-NOMIS system).
Response
All the Digital Prison Services (DPS) system content is based on thorough research with users, operational and policy colleagues. Features such as index offence being available on the prisoner profile page has been identified as a clear requirement. It should also be noted that DPS is a secure system with only appropriately vetted staff having access and is not accessible to prisoners.
HMPPS Rejected
10 The ACCT ‘system’ remains wholly paper based. This means that ACCT data produced by staff and IMB members in the form of contemporaneous notes and entries into a prisoner's ACCT file are disaggregated from healthcare data contained in NHS SystmOne and operational data in HMPPS Digital Prison Services (formerly C-NOMIS). This inhibits information sharing between prison officers, governors, registered nurses and allied healthcare professionals in situations where a prisoner is at risk of suicide and/or self-harm. We ask HMPPS to clarify what measures are in place to enable the efficient and timely sharing of data from disparate systems.
Response
HMPPS does not currently have the technological capability across prisons to make ACCT fully digital and whilst improvements could be made through digitisation, HMPPS is not currently funded for this, so it is essential for ACCT to be used consistently across prisons. Therefore, it was decided that as part of the introduction of ACCT v6 that some but not all elements of the ACCT would be available electronically and these provide staff with the ability to complete all forms in the ACCT document electronically, with exception of the ongoing record. This allows documents to be shared easily with other relevant departments and whilst ACCT remains a paper-based document this will continue to be reviewed as technological capabilities within prisons improve. In addition, an increased emphasis has also been placed on the importance of multi-disciplinary input into ACCT support, in particular the need for case reviews to be attended by multi-disciplinary partners who are relevant to providing support to the individual which would include healthcare staff. The escalation route for individuals with complex needs also focuses on information sharing between departments utilising a multi-disciplinary meeting approach, through the Safety Intervention Meeting.
HMPPS Partial
11 Prisoner property – we are concerned that prisoners do not receive ‘in possession’ property from reception in a timely manner. This causes avoidable frustration on the residential wings for prisoners, staff and IMB members alike. Governor / Director
12 Purposeful activity – we are concerned that too many men are not meaningfully engaged in education or work opportunities. Governor / Director
13 Prisoners’ pay inconsistencies – we are concerned that some prisoners are in receipt of lower levels of pay than at other establishments (for similar work) or by virtue of their educational attainment. Governor / Director
14 Dirty protest additional payments for staff – a number of officers have expressed dissatisfaction with the current policy. The Board is very sympathetic to their concerns, primarily due to the poor natural ventilation on the segregation unit where dirty protest incidents are managed. Governor / Director
15 Key workers – there is some evidence of staff referring prisoners to the IMB rather than dealing with matters themselves. Keywork provides an opportunity for staff to engage with prisoners and resolve issues without the need to access the IMB. Our data (see ‘the work of the Board’) suggests that the present level of applications received by the board is unsustainable. Governor / Director

Applications to the IMB

CategoryCurrentPrevious
Accommodation (including transfers) 41 38
Adjudications/Internal Complaints 72 100
Bullying/Safety 4 2
Canteen 12 13
Discrimination 2 2
Education 1 0
Employment/Work 26 21
Finance/Cash 4 8
Food 6 9
Healthcare 64 24
IEP 3 4
Mail 28 18
Other 17 10
Property 75 56
Recreation/Gym 2 4
Regime/Activities 11 22
Security 15 13
Staff Behaviour 3 3
TOTAL 371 338
Visits 5 1

Related inspections & investigations

PPO fatal incident Stanley Hill
PPO fatal incident Carl Royal · Natural causes
PPO fatal incident Akiel Flemming
PPO fatal incident Rebecca Oliver
PPO fatal incident Arthur Smith · Natural causes
21 Oct 2022 PFD Carl Langdell · State Custody related deaths | Suicide (from 2015)
30 Nov 2021 PFD Connor Hoult · State Custody related deaths | Suicide (from 2015)

Other reports for Wakefield

2025 Published 27 Feb 2026 Population 793 · Concerns
2024 Published 12 Feb 2025 Population 740 · Self-harm 665 · Concerns
2023 Published 15 Mar 2024 Population 740 · Self-harm 429 · Concerns
2021 Published 13 Oct 2021 Population 705 · Self-harm 437 · Concerns
2020 Published 8 Mar 2021 Population 729 · Self-harm 364 · Concerns

Report details

Establishment
Wakefield
Type
Prison · Cat High Security, Category A/B
Report year
2022
Published
3 March 2023
Responsible body
HMP Wakefield
Recommendations
15
MoJ rating (2024/25)
3 — Good

Population

Population717

Service providers

Education
Milton Keynes College
Healthcare
Practice Plus Group
Maintenance
Amey
Prisoner transport
GEOAmey

Source links