Source · IMB Annual Report

Thorn Cross

Year: 2023 Published: 4 Aug 2023 Type: Prison · Cat Category D, YOI Recommendations: 16 Key concerns Positive findings

HMP/YOI Thorn Cross is a Category D open prison that maintains a very safe environment with extremely low violence levels and effective drug reduction strategies. Relationships between staff and prisoners are generally positive, fostering a rehabilitative culture. While healthcare provision is deemed excellent and rehabilitation efforts are at the heart of the prison's operations, concerns remain regarding low transfer rates for long-sentence prisoners, property transfer issues, and limitations in internet and mobile phone access for prisoners.

Safety statistics

Incidents during reporting year
IndicatorThis yearPrevious
Deaths in custody00
Self-harm incidents11
ACCT cases opened11
Prisoner assaults21
Assaults on staff03
Use of force8251
Drug finds8752

Positive findings

HMP/YOI Thorn Cross is a very safe establishment with good staff-prisoner relationships and a strong rehabilitative culture. Healthcare provision is considered excellent, comparable to or better than community services, and substance misuse support is particularly strong. Education attendance and success rates are high, with a well-stocked library and effective employment and training strategies leading to a reduction in absconds and improved post-release support.

Key concerns

16 items
Resettlement/Release The low transfer rate of lifers and IPP prisoners compared to previous levels, impacting their rehabilitation.
Other The need to reconsider the re-sentencing of IPP prisoners.
Other Repeated Continuing issues with the transfer of prisoner property, leading to items going missing and slow resolution.
Education/Purposeful Activity Lack of limited internet access for prisoners undertaking university and college courses.
Regime/Time Out of Cell Repeated Lack of mobile phone access for remote visits, especially for prisoners living far from the prison or those on the TPRS scheme.
Safety Failure to use Body Worn Video Cameras for every instance where force is used, with only 24 of 82 incidents recorded.
Safety The need to review the guidance for the use of cuffs, especially rigid cuffs, ensuring their use is based on current risk assessment rather than past events.
Food/Catering Unsuitable current proposals for central dining that will not resolve issues with food quality due to long waits in heated trolleys.
Complaints/Property Poor recording of adjudication outcomes, making it difficult to determine the justice of decisions when tariffs are outside recommendations without stated reasons.
Regime/Time Out of Cell Repeated Ineffectiveness of the Prison Council as a means of consultation and communication, with frequent cancellations and unclear follow-up.
Equality/Diversity Repeated Limited analysis of prison activity by protected characteristics and insufficient availability of such data for areas like use of force or random drug testing.
Other Irregular and untimely provision of information and evaluation of prison performance to the Board.
Food/Catering Poor facilities for prisoners who wish to cook their own meals, offering fewer resources than some Category C prisons for independent living.
Mental Health Lack of mental health provision available in the evenings and at weekends, despite an acknowledgement of the need for 7-day access.
Regime/Time Out of Cell Lack of a suitable strategy for men transferred under the Temporary Re Categorisation Scheme (TPRS), with concerns about its destabilizing impact and their inability to benefit from rehabilitation.
Education/Purposeful Activity Disruption for prisoners attending education due to being required to be elsewhere during the core day.

Recommendations

16 items · 4 repeated
#RecommendationAddresseeStatus
1 To return the transfer of lifers and IPP prisoners to previous levels when over 90% of parole board recommendations were accepted as opposed to the 11% at the end of the reporting year (3.1.4, 7.3.7).
Response
Since 17 July 2023, the Secretary of State has directed a change to the criteria by which indeterminate sentenced prisoners (ISPs) are assessed for suitability for open conditions. With immediate effect, new criteria must be met for an ISP to be judged suitable for a move. The said criteria being 1) the prisoner to have made sufficient progress in addressing and reducing risk to a level consistent with protecting the public from harm (in circumstances where the prisoner in open conditions may be in the community, unsupervised under licenced temporary release) 2) assessed as low risk of abscond and 3) there is a wholly persuasive case for transferring the ISP from closed to open conditions. If a prisoner is waiting for a decision from the Secretary of State on whether a Parole Board recommendation for a move to open conditions will be accepted or rejected, this will be considered under the new criteria, and in the coming weeks they will be updated with the outcome. If a prisoner recently received a decision about their suitability for open conditions from the Secretary of State, then that decision will remain in place as it was made using the criteria in place at that time. However, any future Parole Board hearing will be conducted using the approved criteria at that time.
Ministry of Justice Rejected
2 To look again at the re-sentencing of IPP prisoners (7.3.6).
Response
Regarding re-sentencing prisoners serving indeterminate sentences for public protection (IPP), the Justice Select Committee’s (JSC) inquiry constituted a thorough assessment of the issues surrounding the IPP sentence and the published report contained considered recommendations for change. Although the IPP sentence was abolished in 2012, it is the Government’s long-held view that retrospectively changing the sentence which was lawfully passed would give rise to an unacceptable risk to public protection. As such, the Government rejected the Committee’s main recommendation to undertake a full resentencing exercise of all remaining IPP offenders who had not yet had their license terminated. The Government’s formal response to the Committee’s report is available here: https://committees.parliament.uk/work/1509/imprisonment-for-public-protection-ipp-sentences/publications/. The Government did however, accept the Committee’s recommendation to review the existing Action Plan and shared the outcome of the review with the JSC on 26 April 2023 which can be accessed here: Letter from the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice on the Imprisonment for Public Protection Action Plan (parliament.uk). In updating the Action Plan HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) specifically focused on improved, clear work streams, with deadlines, and a robust overarching governance structure. The refreshed Action Plan will be a strong driver to build on past achievements and continue to provide the best possible opportunities for those serving an IPP sentence to progress towards a safe and sustainable release. Efforts in recent years have delivered a substantial reduction in the number of IPP prisoners who have never been released, which at its highest in 2012 was over 6000 and now stands at 1,312 at the end of June 2023. As a priority matter, the Government is now reviewing the Department’s work to date to help more IPP prisoners progress towards release and will be considering thoroughly if there are further steps that need to be taken. The Secretary of State for Justice does not want to prejudge his conclusions, but please be assured that he will be giving the matter his close personal attention.
Ministry of Justice Rejected
3 To resolve the continuing issues with the transfer of property so that less of it goes missing and, when it does, to ensure that there is a swift remedy (5.8.1). Repeated
Response
The Prisoners’ Property Policy Framework clearly sets out that Governors should ensure management checks are undertaken to have confidence that prisoners’ property has been handled correctly and with care. This includes, for example, checks on property cards to ensure they have been completed accurately and the volume of property held by prisoners does not become excessive. HMPPS is planning to undertake work in due course to establish the impact of the new Framework. HMP/YOI Thorn Cross has continued to experience issues with property, particularly, property transferred from other establishments. The Governor will continue to escalate matters at a local and prison group level.
HMPPS In progress
4 To provide limited internet access for men studying at university and college (7.1.3).
Response
As the Board is aware, secure, restricted internet access is provided which is available in all prisons across the estate. HMP/YOI Thorn Cross already provides limited internet access via HMPPS’s virtual learning environment, which allows access to approximately 70% of the internet. HMPPS recognises that access to online educational content is important to aid learning and development of prisoners. Over the next two years, HMPPS is looking to invest in additional networking capabilities through ongoing education programmes, of which HMP/YOI Thorn Cross is in scope alongside other establishments. The Prison Education Services programme to launch in April 2025 will seek to continue access at similar levels. In the meantime, the Governor will keep you informed of any developments.
HMPPS Implemented
5 To provide mobile phone access for remote visits for those who would benefit (7.4.3). Repeated
Response
As highlighted by the Board, during the Covid-19 pandemic open prisons were permitted to allow prisoners supervised video calls to their families using their own smart mobile phones in the visiting hall, as face to face visits and release on temporary licence were suspended. However, the subsequent return of in person visits along with reprofiling of staffing detail resulted in video calls being discontinued on mobile devices. Video calling continues to be available to prisoners via the third-party supplier Phonehub. Every adult prisoner and young person in custody is offered one free 30-minute video call per month and the Governor may allow additional calls for wellbeing reasons and in exceptional circumstances. Video calls can have up to four people on the call talking to a prisoner. All callers must be on the prisoner’s visitor list and the main caller must be over 18 years of age, although people under 18 can be on the video call. Mobile phone access is a local decision for the Governor. Prisoners located at HMP/YOI Thorn Cross can currently request mobile phone access/visit. The Governor will look to promote this and raise awareness locally. A ‘family champion’ Custodial Manager post has been created at HMP/YOI Thorn Cross and the role will be to understand the needs of all prisoners and shape resources to best meet these.
HMPPS Partial
6 To ensure that Body Worn Video Cameras are used for every instance where force is used (4.4.1). Governor / Director
7 To review the guidance for the use of cuffs (4.4.1). Governor / Director
8 To reconsider the current proposals for central dining (5.1.4). Governor / Director
9 To improve the recording of the outcomes of an adjudication so that it is clear why that decision was reached (5.2.2). Governor / Director
10 To make the Prison Council a more effective means of consultation and communication (5.3.2). Repeated
Response
Your comments about the relaunch of the Prison Council, increase in mandatory drug testing and the various sporting events/activities held throughout the year, were encouraging to hear.
Governor / Director Noted
11 To extend the number of areas of prison activity that are analysed in terms of protected characteristics and to make such data readily available (5.4.2). Repeated Governor / Director
12 To provide the Board with regular and timely evaluation of all aspects of the prison’s performance (5.7.1). Governor / Director
13 To provide better facilities for those men who wish to cook their own meals (5.1.3). Governor / Director
14 To make mental health provision available in the evenings and at weekends (6.3.2). Governor / Director
15 To develop a suitable strategy for men transferred under the Temporary Re Categorisation Scheme (TPRS), to monitor its impact on the men and the prison as a whole (3.1.4, 7.2.6, 7.5.4). Governor / Director
16 To minimise disruption for the men attending education by reducing their requirement to be elsewhere during core day (7.1.2). Governor / Director

Applications to the IMB

CategoryCurrentPrevious
Accommodation, including laundry, clothing, ablutions 1 1
Canteen, facility list, catalogue(s) 1 0
Discipline, including adjudications, incentives, sanctions 1 0
Equality 0 3
Finance, including pay, private monies, spends 2 1
Food and kitchens 0 0
Health, including physical, mental, social care 0 1
Letters, visits, telephones, public protection restrictions 1 0
Miscellaneous, including complaints system 0 2
Property during transfer or in another establishment or location 3 15
Property within this establishment 0 0
Purposeful activity, including education, work, training, library, regime, time out of cell 1 1
Sentence management, including HDC, release on temporary licence, parole, release dates, re-categorisation 9 8
Staff/prisoner concerns, including bullying 1 0
Total number of applications 23 36
Transfers 3 0

Related inspections & investigations

2 May 2023 HMIP · Unannounced Safety 4 · Respect 3 · Activity 4 · Release 4
PPO fatal incident Andrew Bullough · Natural causes
30 Jun 2019 PPO fatal incident Paul David Horrocks · Other non-natural
7 Oct 2018 PPO fatal incident Carl Russell · Homicide

Other reports for Thorn Cross

2025 Published 18 Jul 2025 · Self-harm 0 · Concerns
2024 Published 15 Aug 2024 · Self-harm 0 · Concerns
2022 Published 18 Jul 2022 · Self-harm 1 · Concerns
2021 Published 2 Sep 2021 · Self-harm 3 · Concerns
2020 Published 14 Jul 2020 · Self-harm 0 · Concerns

Report details

Establishment
Thorn Cross
Type
Prison · Cat Category D, YOI
Report year
2023
Published
4 August 2023
Responsible body
HMP Thorn Cross
Recommendations
16
MoJ rating (2024/25)
4 — Outstanding

Population

Operational capacity429

Service providers

Education
Novus
Healthcare
Greater Manchester Mental Health (GMMH)
Transport
GEOAmey

Source links