Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Lucy Phelan

Ref: 2026-0209 Date: 1 Apr 2026 Coroner: David Reid Area: Worcestershire Responses identified: 1 / 3 View PDF

The use of the "latching" facility on patient monitoring equipment may contribute to alarm fatigue, making it difficult for staff to respond to different alarms; the manufacturer no longer recommends its use on Emergency Department monitors.

Date 1 Apr 2026
56-day deadline 27 May 2026
Responses identified 1 of 3
Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
The use of the "latching" facility on patient monitoring equipment may contribute to alarm fatigue, making it difficult for staff to respond to different alarms; the manufacturer no longer recommends its use on Emergency Department monitors.
View full coroner's concerns
While in the resuscitation bay within the Emergency Department at the Alexandra  Hospital, Redditch, Ms. Phelan was attached to equipment which monitored her  physical observations. These observations are visible on a screen at the patient’s  bedside and on a screen at the main nursing station. If a patient’s observations rise or fall outside acceptable parameters, the equipment generates both an audible  alarm and a visual alarm ( red – higher priority; yellow – lower priority ) on each  monitor. 

The monitoring equipment has a facility known as “latching” which, if activated,  means:  (a) an alarm will continue to be displayed and sounded even after the  conditions which generated it have ended, until it is acknowledged on the  monitor, meaning that any alarm for a new or different indication cannot be distinguished audibly; and  (b) if the alarm is not acknowledged on the monitor, and the same alarm  condition occurs again, this new alarm is not listed in the alarm review or  audit log as a new alarm.  The inquest heard evidence that “alarm fatigue” is a recognized phenomenon, and  that in a busy environment like a hospital’s Emergency Department, particularly  when patient numbers are high, staff find it increasingly difficult to react and  respond to the many different types of alarm in use. The use of the “latching”  facility on monitoring equipment is likely to contribute to this phenomenon; this  has been recognized by the equipment manufacturer which no longer recommends  its use on Emergency Department monitors, and by Worcestershire Acute Hospitals  NHS Trust who have switched it off on monitors in its Emergency Departments. 

It is not known whether, and to what extent, the “latching” facility remains in use in Emergency Departments in other hospitals in England and Wales.

Responses

1 respondent
NHS England NHS / Health Body
1 Apr 2026 PDF
Action Planned

NHS England's National Patient Safety Team is engaging with the MHRA to understand the manufacturer's position on alarm latching functionality and how it's best managed. The case learning will be shared with Integrated Care Boards, regional nursing colleagues, Trust Patient Safety Specialists, and at the Mortality Forum in June 2026. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Coroner, Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Lucy Jane Phelan who died on 14 May 2025. Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 1 April 2026 concerning the death of Lucy Jane Phelan on 14 May 2025. In advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to express my deep condolences to Lucy’s family and loved ones. NHS England is keen to assure the family and yourself that the concerns raised about Lucy’s care have been listened to and reflected upon. Your Report raises concerns around:
• ‘Alarm fatigue’ in a busy environment like a hospital’s Emergency Department, particularly when patient numbers are high, staff find it increasingly difficult to react and respond to the many different types of alarm in use.
• The use of ‘latching’ facilities on monitoring equipment is likely to contribute to the phenomenon of ‘alarm fatigue’. This has been recognised by the equipment manufacturer which no longer recommends its use on Emergency Department monitors, and by Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust who have switched it off on monitors in its Emergency Departments.
• It is not known whether, and to what extent, the ‘latching facility’ remains in use in Emergency Departments in other hospitals in England and Wales. NHS England’s National Patient Safety Team have advised that ‘alarm fatigue’ is a recognised phenomenon and the function ‘alarm latching’ is a setting that requires any triggered alarm to be manually acknowledged and resolved by a member of staff. There are however, other limitations relating to any secondary triggered alarm that may tailor use of this function. The suggestion that ‘the equipment manufacturer no longer recommends the use of alarm latching functionality on the Emergency Department monitors’ is currently subject to further investigation as such information would need to be officially communicated to all users and be part of the medical device manual and Instructions for Use (IfU) documents. The NHS England National Patient Safety Team are engaging with the regulator of medical devices, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA),

[Page 2] to explore whether this is the manufacturer position and whether these requirements have been met. The MHRA are the correct authority to advise on concerns regarding medical devices with alarm latching capabilities healthcare organisations. The NHS England National Patient Safety team will continue to engage with the MHRA to understand how latching functionality is best managed in the clinical environment. The MHRA will be coming back to us once they have gathered further information from the manufacturer regarding this specific case. Midlands regional colleagues have advised that this case will be shared with the relevant Integrated Care Board and with regional nursing colleagues for information and will suggest the possibility of sharing the learning with Trust Patient Safety Specialists. We have also been advised that learning will also be shared at the Mortality Forum due to be held in June 2026. I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Lucy, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action. Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 22 May 2025 I commenced an investigation and opened an inquest into the  death of Lucy Jane PHELAN aged 49. The investigation concluded at the end of the  inquest on 30 March 2026. The conclusion of the inquest was that Ms. Phelan “died  from complications of having taken prescribed medication with a significant amount of alcohol. Her death was contributed to by neglect.”
Circumstances of the death
On 13.5.25 Lucy Phelan, who lived with Emotionally Unstable Personality Disorder  which led her on occasion to indulge in impulsive risk-taking behaviour, was found  unresponsive at home having vomited after taking various prescribed medications  with a significant amount of alcohol. She was taken by ambulance to the Alexandra Hospital, Redditch where she was treated for likely aspiration pneumonia, but later  that evening vomited again and soon after that went into cardiopulmonary arrest.  Alarms notifying staff at the hospital of her collapse went unheeded for some nine  minutes. When an emergency was called, doctors were unable to resuscitate her,  and she was confirmed deceased shortly after midnight on 14.5.25.
Action should be taken
by reviewing the use of the “latching”  facility in hospitals in England and Wales.
Copies sent to
: The Chief Executive, Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2026-0209
Date of report
1 April 2026
Coroner
David Reid
Coroner area
Worcestershire

Responses identified

Responses identified 1 of 3
2 responses not yet linked

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 27 May 2026.

Sent to

NHS Wales
NHS England
Worcestershire Acute Hospital NHS Trust

Source links