Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Poppy Lomas

Ref: 2026-0253 Date: 30 Apr 2026 Coroner: Andrew Walker Area: North London Responses identified: 3 / 3 View PDF

Concerns are raised regarding a lack of clear risk consent forms and multidisciplinary meetings for unsafe home births, and that the term "Out of Guidance" may not convey the gravity of such decisions. The home delivery kit also lacks a maternal pulse oximeter.

Date 30 Apr 2026
56-day deadline 25 Jun 2026
Responses identified 3 of 3

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
Concerns are raised regarding a lack of clear risk consent forms and multidisciplinary meetings for unsafe home births, and that the term "Out of Guidance" may not convey the gravity of such decisions. The home delivery kit also lacks a maternal pulse oximeter.
View full coroner's concerns
The below matters all fall within the purview of NHS England and the Department of health and Social Care and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. 

It is a matter of concern that where the patient has chosen to have an unsafe birth at home and has decided to refuse to consent to the care the hospital recommend for the management of the unsafe birth, that consideration is not given to the patient signing a consent form that clearly sets out the risks.  

It is a matter of concern that where the patient has chosen to have an unsafe birth at home consideration is not given to holding a Multi-Disciplinary Team Meeting with the consultant obstetrician, hospital midwives & community midwives and the patient, to ensure that the patient receives an understanding of the risks to the baby and to themselves.

It is a matter of concern that the nationally used expression “Out of Guidance” is used in these circumstances, which may fail to convey the gravity of the decisions being taken, rather than an expression that captures all elements:- in particular that the delivery is against medical advice, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists guidance and that as a consequence it is an unsafe delivery.

It is a matter of concern that the Home Delivery kit does not include a pulse oximeter for maternal heart rate.

Responses

3 respondents
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Other
30 Apr 2026 PDF
Disputed

NICE defends its use of "birth outside of guidance" as carefully chosen to avoid implying blame, and states there is insufficient evidence to change current recommendations for a specific consent form for patients declining medical advice. They clarify that the support trusts provide and the contents of home delivery kits fall outside of NICE's remit, and no further action is proposed. (AI summary)

View full response
RESPONSE TO A REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS REGULATION 29 OF THE CORONERS (INVESTIGATIONS) REGULATIONS 2013 Please do not include any living persons’ names in this document, in accordance with the Chief Coroner’s PFD Publication Policy (2026). THIS RESPONSE IS BEING SENT TO: The Senior Coroner, Andrew Walker, for the Coroner Area of North London in response to a ‘REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATH REGULATION 28’ following an inquest into the death of [NAME OF DECEASED] that concluded on 30 April 2026.

1. RESPONDENT In line with our duty under Regulation 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence provides this response within 56 days (plus any extension granted) of the date of the Report to Prevent Future Deaths.
2. DATE OF RESPONSE 18 June 2026
3. CONFIRMATION OF CORONER’S MATTERS OF CONCERN The MATTERS OF CONCERN were identified in the report are as follows:
1. The use of expressions that may minimise the detail of the risks taken by patients who elect, following a Caesarean birth, to have a vaginal birth at home.
2. The support that can be provided by the Trust to the patient in these circumstances.
3. The absence of a consent process when such a patient chooses not to follow medical advice and the RCOG guidance, and chooses an unsafe birth.
4. The contents of the Home Delivery kit used by midwives in these circumstances. 13

3. DETAILS OF ACTION TAKEN, how has the concern been addressed. [If no action is proposed please explain why here]. Please note that any links to webpages included in the response will not be checked for sensitive information prior to publication, as the information is already online. Matter 1 The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has considered the comments made regarding the term 'birth outside of guidance'. This term has been chosen carefully to reflect the sensitivities around discussions where women have felt in the past that their care has been paternalistic and choice has been removed, and we therefore do not feel that amendments to the language within NICE guidance are appropriate. NICE is unable to make recommendations on expressions used by NHS staff as these should be case relevant and part of a professional skill set. NICE guideline NG235 section 1.3 provides recommendations regarding the planned place of birth. We do not feel these should be reconsidered as a result of this very sad case. Matters 2 and 3 Although these matters of concern appear to be for the NHS Trust to consider, and HM Coroner has not requested any further national guidance be produced in this area, I have provided full details below of the NICE guidance that exists, which I hope is of use. All NICE guidance referred to is available in full on www.nice.org.uk Home birth is covered in NICE’s guideline on intrapartum care (NG235). The risks and benefits of home birth compared to birth in an alongside midwifery unit, freestanding midwifery unit and hospital are covered, with information for counselling detailed in tables 6-9. The guideline provides comprehensive guidance on intrapartum care, including (but not limited to) home births. The guideline covers:
• Eligibility - home birth might be considered for women with low-risk, uncomplicated pregnancies. This includes those without medical or obstetric complications and differentiates in terms of risk factors between nulliparous and multiparous women (recommendation 1.3.1).
• Informed Choice: Women should be supported to make informed decisions about their place of birth. This includes discussing risks, benefits, and available support (recommendation1.3.3-5).
• Midwife Support: Care during home birth should be provided by trained midwives, with access to emergency transfer protocols if complications arise. Within the guideline, medical conditions and other factors that may affect the choice of planned place of birth are not given as contraindications to home birth but indicate where care in an obstetric unit would be expected to reduce risk to the mother or the baby. There are also recommendations that support further discussion with an appropriately trained senior or consultant midwife and/or a senior or consultant obstetrician (if there are obstetric issues) if such a discussion is wanted by the midwife or the woman. See recommendations 14

1.3.9 to 1.3.11 and tables 6-9. Intrapartum care (NG235) covers assessment in the first stage of labour in any setting, including the observations of the mother and the unborn baby that should lead to the transfer of the woman to obstetric-led care, noting also that multiple risk factors may increase the urgency of the transfer, particularly if they have a cumulative effect. The guideline notes the more frequent observations of the mother and the unborn baby that should be undertaken in the second stage. We have considered the information provided in the report, and would comment that it should be standard practice, if a patient decides not to follow advice given, that the healthcare professional should document the discussion, any professional concerns and care planned that is acceptable to the patient. NICE cannot give recommendations on alternative care where our recommendations are not followed; this would need to be addressed by the professional in the specific circumstances. The support that the NHS trust can provide to the patient in these circumstances is covered in the Royal College of Midwives guideline Care Outside Guidance. This refers to the development of a personalised care plan, informed consent, and the duties of a midwife to support women within the framework of the Human Rights Act. It does not fall within NICE’s remit as the guideline was produced by the Royal College of Midwives. At NICE we feel that it would be legally difficult to produce a specific document recording when a patient chose not to take the advice given, but as noted above, professionals are advised to document discussions and decisions on preferred care. In current NICE guidance, our recommendations guide clinical practice and support women to make informed choices about their care based on discussions with trained staff about the risks and benefits. There is insufficient evidence to suggest that a change to the current NICE recommendations is justified. Matter 4 The specific contents of home delivery kits issued to midwives for use during home births is not a matter for NICE. Other organisations such as the RCM and specialist societies are better placed to make recommendations in this area.
4. DETAILS OF FURTHER ACTION PROPOSED Please note that any links to webpages included in the response will not be checked for sensitive information prior to publication, as the information is already online. No further action proposed by NICE. 15

SIGNATURE

Chief Executive National Institute for Health and Care Excellence

16
NHS England NHS / Health Body
30 Apr 2026 PDF
Action Taken

NHS England's Chief Midwifery Officer already requested all maternity providers review homebirth service safety and quality in November 2025. They are also developing a national action plan, reviewing national guidance for 'birthing outside of guidance,' and creating a quality improvement programme, alongside planned local trust actions. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Mr. Andrew Walker,

Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Poppy Hope Lomas who died on 26th October 2022.

Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 30th April 2026 concerning the death of Poppy Hope Lomas on 26th October 2022. In advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to express my deep condolences to Poppy’s parents and family. NHS England is keen to assure the family and yourself that the concerns raised about Poppy’s care have been listened to and reflected upon.

Your Report raises the following concerns:

1. That patients who decide to have a home birth and decide to refuse the care recommended by the hospital for the management of the unsafe birth, do not have to sign a consent form clearly setting out the risks.
2. When a patient chooses to have an unsafe birth at home that a Multi- Disciplinary Team meeting is not held with the patient to ensure that the patient understands the risks to the baby and themselves.
3. The use of the term “Out of Guidance”, used nationally, fails to convey the gravity of the decision being taken, and that it is against medical advice.

On 26 November 2025 the Chief Midwifery Officer wrote to all NHS maternity providers in England asking them to urgently review the safety and quality of their homebirth services. NHS Trusts were urged to consider the following issues: a) The operational running of their service: including how it ensures that prompt midwifery care is available 24 hours a day; that staff are properly equipped, trained, prepared and skilled for providing birth and neonatal care in a home setting; that staff have senior multi-disciplinary support available to them at all times and have sufficient rest periods and that potential transfer and extraction processes are clear and planned for each birth.

b) Care planning and risk assessment: including systematic assessment of complexity and risk; how the multidisciplinary team (MDT) ensures a National Medical Director NHS England Wellington House 133-155 Waterloo Road London SE1 8UG

18th June 2026

personalised approach to women in planning care in light of any identified issues (particularly when homebirth is not recommended); how the MDT continues to maintain good communication at all stages of care with women and between all teams including ambulance services; and how dynamic risk assessment is managed and responded to throughout pregnancy, birth and the postnatal period.

c) Governance and oversight: including how governance is structured to ensure robust oversight of homebirth services by the whole organisation, so the executive board has appropriate oversight; that there is an audit programme that covers outcomes and clinical and operational guidance and leads to continual improvement; and that there is comprehensive homebirth guidance including standard operating procedures for all stages and aspects of care.

d) The National Institute for Heath and Care Excellence (NICE) uses evidence- based recommendations to develop clinical guidance to improve health and social care. While not dedicated to homebirths, the NICE guideline on intrapartum care (2023), outlines the care of women and their babies during labour and immediately after birth in all settings and addresses issues around planning place of birth. We have noted concerns raised by Coroners in previous Prevention of Future Deaths reports relating to homebirths, that this current intrapartum care guidance does not provide sufficient clarity to women, staff and services as to how to safely support requests for and provision of home birth services, particularly when significant risk factors have been identified. As a result, NHS England has started work with partners including NICE, Royal College of Midwives, Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nursing & Midwifery Council, Maternity & Newborn Safety Investigations, Care Quality Commission, and the General Medical Council to develop further resources to close this gap. By autumn 2026, we anticipate setting out the minimum standards that providers and commissioners of maternity services will be expected to meet to support the delivery of a safe, effective, equitable and personalised home birth service. The standards will include the use of appropriate and clear language in discussing women’s preferences, including review of the term “Out of Guidance”. The standards will also include detail on the assessment of safety and risk required, and the need for multi-disciplinary team working in the formulation of care plans and their documentation. This will also include consideration of the use of consent forms which are not currently used in maternity services for any place of birth. It will also include reference to the standardised equipment required for clinical care provided during homebirth. There are other national guidance and reviews relevant to the concerns you have raised, which I would like to draw to your attention:

The standards of care in relation to sharing information have in part been established through the Montgomery Judgement at the UK Supreme Court. Health professionals must take “reasonable care to ensure that the patient is aware of any material risks involved in any recommended treatment and of any reasonable alternative or variant treatments”. In addition, communication around risk should be personalised (NICE Shared Decision-Making Guideline, 2021 and NICE Intrapartum care guideline, 2023). One of the immediate and essential actions that arose from the first report of the Independent Review of Maternity Services at Shrewsbury and Telford Hospitals was that: All women must be formally risk assessed at every antenatal contact so that they have continued access to care provision by the most appropriately trained professional. Risk assessment must include ongoing review of the intended place of birth, based on the developing clinical picture. Following publication of the first report in December 2020, NHS England asked all trusts to assure themselves that this was in place in their services. There then followed two further assurance processes led by the regional teams to assess that this was being undertaken and support any necessary changes to practice. The Three year delivery plan for maternity and neonatal services (2023) which states that all women should be “offered personalised care and support plans”, where all information is recorded, including “a risk assessment updated at every contact, including when the woman is in early or established labour." The Royal College of Midwives has also issued guidance on Informed decision Making (2022). They recommend that midwives “support women’s informed decision making” including by not providing “any care without first receiving consent”, and document the information given and the discussions had with the woman. The RCM document on Care Outside Guidance (2022) discusses Personalised Care and Support Plans and sets out that decisions about care should be “documented, implemented and shared with the multi-disciplinary team”. Those decisions should be based on gaining and documenting informed consent from the service user, using evidence and assessments of risks and benefits. The General Medical Council’s guidance on Decision Making and Consent (2020), supports healthcare professionals in their conversations with patients and service users ensuring informed consent is given. As a minimum, clinicians, should keep an accurate record of “information leading to a decision in a patient’s record (which) will inform their future care”. The guidance states that while a patient can give consent verbally clinicians “should make sure this is recorded in their notes”. The Nursing & Midwifery Council’s Principles for supporting women's choices in maternity care (2025) includes that midwives should “document discussion(s) about care in the maternity records and what information has been given to the woman”. Midwives should provide care that is based on informed consent and adhere to the NMC Code of Conduct (2015).

Trusts are responsible for ensuring midwives and obstetricians practice in line with this guidance and the new homebirth standards will take these documents into account to ensure greater clarity and alignment of advice across all organisations. Regional Response NHS England’s London regional team have liaised with the Trust regarding this Report. They shared the report on the maternity investigation undertaken by Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (HSIB) in relation to Poppy’s death. As a result of that investigation an action plan has been devised to address the concerns. Actions the Trust intend to take include:
• To ensure staff are supported to recognise when to transfer a patient to the hospital from a homebirth or standalone birthing unit.
• To provide training to community midwives on providing care for mothers with a high-risk pregnancy in a low-risk birth setting.
• Updating local guidance regarding the care of Vaginal Birth After Caesarean (VBAC) patients in a low risk setting, including the management of the second stage of labour.
• To establish a pathway for early recognition and escalation to consultant/senior midwife of women requesting to birth outside of guidance.
• To ensure that birth plans for mothers who are birthing outside of guidance at home explicitly detail all aspects of the management of labour and birth and the indications for transferring to the maternity unit.
• To ensure that clinicians are supported to recognise and take timely action on adverse clinical findings when mothers are birthing outside of guidance at home, via specialised training for community midwives.

I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Poppy, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.

Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Department of Health and Social Care Central Government
25 Jun 2026 PDF
Action Planned

The DHSC notes that NHS England is developing national standards and a framework for homebirth services. They highlight a national independent investigation into NHS maternity and neonatal care, with its report due in June 2026, which will inform a new national action plan. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Mr Walker,

Thank you for the Regulation 28 report of 30th April 2026 sent to the Department of Health and Social Care about the death of Poppy Hope Lomas. I am replying as the Minister with responsibility for Women’s Health.

Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Poppy’s death, and I offer my sincere condolences to her family and loved ones. The circumstances your report describes are concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to my attention.

The report raises concerns about consideration not being given to holding a multi- disciplinary team meeting with the patient to ensure that the patient receives an understanding of the risks to the baby and to themselves, when the patient chooses to have an unsafe birth at home. It also raises concerns over patients not being given consent forms that clearly set out the risks of choosing to have unsafe births at home. The report also raises concerns around the use of the expression ‘out of guidance’ in these circumstances, as it may not convey that the delivery is against medical advice, and against the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) guidance – and is therefore an unsafe delivery.

All women deserve access to safe care during childbirth, and all staff should receive training that is tailored to their specific setting, including homebirths and how to manage emergencies at point of care. NHS England has written to all services and systems asking them to review their service provision, to prevent future tragedies and ensure that women can safely deliver babies across all settings.

In preparing this response, my officials have made enquiries with NHS England to ensure we adequately address your concerns, and I understand there is work underway to develop national standards and a clear framework for homebirth services. As responsibility for the specific matters of concern you have raised sits with NHS England, they will be issuing a substantive response addressing each of these concerns.

It is unacceptable that there was a failure to recognise and appropriately manage the risk factors during the delivery, and the subsequent absence and delay in interventions and actions. It is also unacceptable that the decelerations and a decision to return to hospital 17

were not discussed with Mrs Lomas. I recognise that it is a known difficulty to monitor the foetal heart rate during intermittent auscultation and I am extremely saddened that during the 30 minutes before Poppy’s birth, the maternal heart rate was mistakenly thought to be Poppy’s.

I recognise that there were a number of factors which impacted the care Mrs Lomas and Poppy received, which is why Baroness Amos is carrying out a national independent investigation in NHS maternity and neonatal care. The investigation will help us understand the systemic issues behind why so many women, babies and families experience unacceptable care, and the final report and recommendations are due to be published in June 2026.

The government has also set up a National Maternity and Neonatal Taskforce, chaired by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. The Taskforce will address the recommendations of the investigation by developing a new national action plan to drive improvements across maternity and neonatal care.

I hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention.

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 03 March 2025, I commenced an investigation into the death of Poppy Hope LOMAS aged 7 days. 

The medical cause of death was:- Cause of death 1a – Hypoxic-Ischaemic Encephalopathy  Cause of death 1b – Peripartum Hypoxic Ischaemic Episode

How, when and where:- Poppy Hope LOMAS died in University College hospital on the 26th October 2022 aged 7 days.

Conclusion:- Poppy died when an accumulation of risk factors were not recognised during a high risk delivery at home.
Circumstances of the death
Poppy Hope LOMAS died in University College hospital on the 26th October 2022 aged 7 days.

The Trust agreed to support Mrs Lomas with an unsafe home delivery that was against medical advice and the guidance provided by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. 

The home delivery midwives worked against a background of an accumulation of risk factors including:- a prolonged rupture of the membranes without antibiotic cover, two episodes of deceleration at around one and a half hours before delivery, the slow delivery and poor condition at birth. 

There was a failure to recognise and appropriately manage these risk factors:- The prolonged rupture of membranes without intravenous antibiotic cover, two episodes of deceleration heard around one and a half hours before delivery, the slow delivery of Poppy’s head, the fresh bleeding from her nose and mouth, the slow delivery of her body and her poor condition at birth. 

This resulted in a lack of recognition of these multiple deviations from the normal position during this time and subsequent absence or delay in interventions and actions. 

It is likely that the cause of Poppy’s death was caused by a severe hypoxic ischaemic event suffered in the 30 minutes before her birth, most likely an acute foetal bradycardia. 

It is likely that during the period of approximately 30 minutes prior to Poppy’s birth, the maternal heart rate was thought to be Poppy’s when the foetal heart was checked, and this is a known difficulty when monitoring foetal heart-rate during intermittent auscultation.  To not discuss with Mrs Lomas the decelerations and a decision to return to hospital is likely to be a really serious failure to provide basic medical care to Mrs Lomas.  

Poppy was taken to hospital in a poor condition following delivery in a pool at her home and despite medical attention could not recover from the consequences of the hypoxic ischaemic event.
Action should be taken
In my opinion unless action is taken to address the above concerns then there is a significant risk of future deaths and I believe each of you have the power to take such action.
Copies sent to
I can confirm I have sent the report to1.  NHS England2.  Department of Health and Social Care3.  National Institute for Health and Care Excellence4.  Royal Free NHS Trust5.  University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust6.  Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2026-0253
Date of report
30 April 2026
Coroner
Andrew Walker
Coroner area
North London

Responses identified

Responses identified 3 of 3
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 25 Jun 2026.

Sent to

Department of Health and Social Care
National Institute for Health and care Excellence
NHS England

Source links