Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

David Smart

Ref: 2026-0262 Date: 22 May 2026 Coroner: Joanne Andrews Area: West Sussex, Brighton and Hove Responses identified: 3 / 3 View PDF

The emergency department continues to use corridors for patient care when at capacity, despite ongoing efforts to improve patient flow and reduce presentations.

Date 22 May 2026
56-day deadline 11 Sep 2026 est.
Responses identified 3 of 3

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
The emergency department continues to use corridors for patient care when at capacity, despite ongoing efforts to improve patient flow and reduce presentations.
View full coroner's concerns
During the inquest I heard evidence that at the of Mr Smart’s attendance to the Emergency Department of the Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton that there were around 20 patients in the corridor as the Department had reached capacity and there was no clinical area available to do so. I understand from previous  inquests  that  the  area  is  not  designated  as  a  clinical  area.

I have heard in other inquests relating to deaths prior to June 2025 that is being taken by University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust currently to (1) reduce the number of patients who present to the Emergency Department who could be seen by other services in the community and (2) to create an improved patient flow through the Royal Sussex County Hospital.

The evidence in this inquest was that, despite these actions, the corridor continues to be used when the Emergency Department reaches capacity.

I was also advised that the use of corridors to care for patients is not only an issue at the Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton but is used throughout the  country.

Prevention of Future Death reports in relation to the use of the corridor for patient care was made during investigations into deaths which occurred in December  2022  and  February  2025  and  the  use  of  the  corridor  remains ongoing.

Responses

3 respondents
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust NHS Trust
19 May 2026 PDF
Action Taken

The Trust has implemented various measures since 2022, including establishing an Acute Floor Improvement Group, introducing new roles for patient flow, enhancing streaming, and implementing daily flow calls. They have also completed the first phase of a £48 million Acute Floor Reconfiguration, opening a new Acute Medical Unit and 24/7 Medical SDEC. (AI summary)

View full response
REGULATION 29 RESPONSE TO A REPORT ON ACTION TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS Please do not include any living person names in this document, in accordance publication policy PDF. THIS RESPONSE IS BEING SENT TO: The Area Coroner, Joanne Andrews for the Coroner Area West Sussex, Brighton and Hove REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATH REGULATION 28 David John SMART, and an inquest that concluded on 19 May 2026.
1. RESPONDENT In line with our duty under Regulation 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust provides this response within 56 days of the date of the Report to Prevent Future Deaths or any extension granted.
2. DATE OF RESPONSE 19 June 2026
3.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN were identified in the report are as follows: During the inquest I heard evidence that at the of Mr Smart's attendance to the Emergency Department of the Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton that there were around 20 patients in the corridor as the Department had reached capacity and there was no clinical area available to do so. I understand from previous inquests that the area is not designated as a clinical area.

I have heard in other inquests relating to deaths prior to June 2025 that is being taken by University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust currently to (1) reduce the number of patients who present to the Emergency Department who could be seen by other services in the community and (2) to create an improved patient flow through the Royal Sussex County Hospital.

The evidence in this inquest was that, despite these actions, the corridor continues to be used when the Emergency Department reaches capacity.

I was also advised that the use of corridors to care for patients is not only an issue at the Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton but is used throughout the country.

Prevention of Future Death reports in relation to the use of the corridor for patient care was made during investigations into deaths which occurred in

December 2022 and February 2025 and the use of the corridor remains ongoing.
4. DETAILS OF ACTION TAKEN, how has the concern been addressed.

The use of Emergency Department (ED) corridors to care for patients is a significant national problem. The Executive team is working closely with very senior members of the local ICB (Integrated Care Board), CQC (Care Quality Commission), local mental health Trust, and social care providers to tackle the problem. As a Trust we cannot solve the problem without all partner organisations working together. I am so sorry you have had the need to write to us again with your concerns and I too share these concerns.

The Medicine Divisional Leadership team, the Hospital Directors, and the Executive team are continuously working on several separate but linked workstreams aiming to eradicate the use of the ED corridor. This is vital for patient care to ensure that our patients are treated in the most appropriate clinical environment, with dignity, and without delays.

who are accepted for care directly by the relevant specialty on presentation to the ED. We are continually looking to expand the acceptance criteria to ensure that we are maximising this process. Additionally, we are directing inter-hospital referrals away from the ED and transferring patients directly to the in-patient bed base. We have strengthened our Same Day Emergency Care (SDEC) medical model from a 7 day a week service to a 24/7 unit where patients can be streamed away from the ED and seen and treated on the Acute Medical Unit (AMU). These workstreams have all been overseen through the ED Quality Oversight Group. The Trust is currently exploring working with a company (NEWTON) to increase the opportunity for decompressing the EDs, further strengthening the SDECs across the Trust, and improving flow once patients do not have a criteria to reside.

All specialties in-reach to the ED and we operate a 3/2/1 bleep system to week. These allow line-by-line reviews of every patient in the corridor to ensure all appropriate pathways are considered; this is known as check and challenge and provides live escalation.

The Hospital Alternative Oversight Programme (HALO) is embedded in daily practice and continues to be reviewed regularly to ensure all opportunities are maximised. This work is aimed at the avoidance of inappropriate hospital admissions, to optimise patient flow through the hospital, and smooth discharge pathways and processes. This includes:

Unscheduled care Navigation Hub Frailty Care Home Outreach & Red Bag Launch Frailty High Weald Lewes & Havens Outreach Integrated front door therapies team RSCH (Royal Sussex County Hospital) Virtual Health, both General Virtual Ward and Respiratory Home Monitoring Services Frailty and Respiratory SDEC (Same Day Emergency Care) Optimisation Interprofessional Standards UTC (Urgent Treatment Centre) Optimisation Early Discharge Planning Deconditioning Prevention Tiered Acuity Model

These initiatives are in collaboration with our colleagues from the ICB, Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust (SCFT), South East Coast Ambulance Service (SECAmb), Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (SPFT), and Brighton & Hove City Council (BHCC).

There continues to be ongoing collaborative work with the local Mental Health Trust, SPFT to ensure that patients requiring mental health hospital admission are admitted to an appropriate mental health unit as quickly as possible or avoid ED attendance in the first place.

We continue to use ambulatory space as effectively as possible across the ED to maximise clinical space and reduce overcrowding.

The Continuous Flow Model is embedded within the Medicine Division and continues to ensure earlier movement of patients from the Acute Floor and reducing the time patients are waiting in the ED for admission to a ward. There are ongoing discussions with clinical Divisions outside the Medicine Division to implement a similar model.

We recognise that the contributory factors leading to corridor care are multi- faceted and complex. As these issues involve a multi-agency approach, working alongside our system partners, we acknowledge that eradicating care in non-clinical environments will take considerable time. Therefore, alongside these actions, the ED team is continuing to implement local measures to improve the quality and safety for patients receiving care in these areas. Examples of these are:

Digitisation, including electronic observations and prescribing Intentional Rounding Fundamental Standards of Care and Corridor standard work Weekly review of high risks Repurposing clinical space to facilitate dedicated space for monitoring patients who have been stepped down from the Resuscitation area of ED.

Our Acute Floor Reconfiguration, which is a £48 million capital improvement programme to improve patient and staff experience at the Royal Sussex County

Hospital, is well underway. The first phase has now been completed with the opening of the new Acute Medical Unit and 24/7 Medical SDEC (same day emergency care). Phase 2 is scheduled to commence in early 2027.
5. DETAILS OF FURTHER ACTION PROPOSED We all agree that corridor care must be stopped both locally and nationally. The Trust has made great progress with this and continues to work with the ICB and other organisations for their assistance to make sure flow in and out of ED is possible so when patients who do not require acute hospital care for a physical health condition, they are in appropriate mental health and social care environments outside of the acute Trust.
6. SIGNATURE Chief Executive University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust
NHS England NHS / Health Body
22 May 2026 PDF
Action Taken

NHS England published its Urgent and Emergency Care Plan for 2025/26 with a national expectation to eliminate corridor care and continues to support providers to improve patient flow. Routine publication of corridor care data began in May 2026 to increase transparency and enable targeted intervention. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Ms Andrews, Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – David John Smart who died on 14th June 2025. Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 22nd May 2026 concerning the death of David John Smart on 14th June 2025. In advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to express my deep condolences to Mr Smart’s family and loved ones. NHS England is keen to assure the family and yourself that the concerns raised about Mr Smart’s care have been listened to and reflected upon.

Your Report raises concerns that corridors are being used to treat patients when hospitals have reached capacity across the country. You were concerned that corridor care was raised as a concern in two Prevention of Future Death Reports from December 2022 and February 2025 yet the issue continues to be a concern. NHS England is clear that corridors are not designated clinical areas and their use for patient care is a symptom of significant system pressure rather than planned practice. Since your previous Reports to us, the NHS England Urgent and Emergency Care Plan for 2025/26 has been published (in June 2025) and supported by the Medium- Term Planning Framework, which sets out a national expectation that systems take coordinated action to eliminate corridor care by improving end-to-end patient flow, reducing avoidable hospital congestion and improving timely discharge from hospital. Alongside this, NHS England has been and continues to support providers and Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) to improve internal hospital flow through faster senior clinical decision-making, increased use of same day emergency care and virtual wards, and more effective management of patient pathways. The plan also aims to reduce demand on emergency departments through improved access to community and primary care alternatives and strengthened admission avoidance pathways, so that patients can be assessed and treated in the most appropriate setting. A key element of improving patient flow is reducing delays in discharging patients who no longer require acute hospital treatment. Delayed discharges contribute to high bed occupancy, reducing capacity for emergency admissions and increasing pressure on emergency departments. NHS England is supporting providers and ICBs to strengthen National Medical Director NHS England Wellington House 133-155 Waterloo Road London SE1 8UG

7 July 2026

discharge processes, including through the consistent use of criteria-led discharge and discharge to assess models. NHS England is also developing “Model Discharge” guidance to support trusts in reducing delays and improving patient flow. NHS England recognises that, despite these actions, corridor care is still used in exceptional circumstances in some providers when emergency departments are under sustained capacity pressure. This is primarily to enable ambulances to be released rapidly from hospitals, to address increased risk in the community. This reflects wider system flow challenges, including constrained bed capacity, delayed discharges and limited community care availability. To strengthen oversight and drive improvement, NHS England is working through regional teams to provide targeted support to systems experiencing the highest levels of flow pressure. From May 2026, the routine publication of corridor care data has begun, increasing transparency and enabling more focused intervention where risks to patient safety are greatest.

I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Mr Smart, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.

Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Department of Health and Social Care Central Government
8 Jun 2026 PDF
Noted

The Department of Health and Social Care acknowledges the concerns but states they are more appropriately addressed by NHS England, which will provide a direct response. DHSC confirms the government and NHS England will continue to take action to improve patient flow and will begin publishing corridor care data. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Ms Andrews,

Thank you for the Regulation 28 report of 22 May sent to the Department of Health and Social Care about the death of David John Smart. I am replying as the Minister with responsibility for urgent and emergency care.

Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Mr Smart’s death and I offer my sincere condolences to their family and loved ones. The circumstances your report describes are concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to my attention.

The report raises concerns over the continued use of corridors to care for patients at the Royal Sussex Country Hospital Brighton and more widely across the country.

We recognise the concerns surrounding corridor care and are clear that it is unacceptable and should not be allowed to become an accepted part of care delivery. Its presence reflects broader pressures across urgent and emergency care, and we are committed to tackling and eliminating it.

In considering your report, officials within the Department of Health and Social Care have made enquiries with NHS England and concluded that these concerns are more appropriately addressed by NHS England directly. I am advised that NHS England will therefore provide you with a full and comprehensive response on the concerns you have raised.

The Government and NHS England will continue to take action across the full urgent and emergency care pathway to improve patient flow, expand available capacity, and reduce avoidable demand on accident and emergency departments. This includes focused support for the most challenged trusts, alongside strengthened reporting arrangements and the introduction of a consistent national definition of corridor care to support greater transparency. We will also begin publishing data on corridor care for the first time, subject to assurance of data quality.

I hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention.

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 18 June 2025 I commenced an investigation into the death of David John Smart aged 79. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 19 May 2026.

The conclusion of the inquest was that David John Smart died on 14 June 2025  at  the  Royal  Sussex  County  Hospital,  Eastern  Road,  Brighton  from known complications of a treatment to reverse his Rivaroxaban. He needed the reversal in order to receive surgical treatment for a life-threatening rectal bleed which developed on 13 June 2025 following a polypectomy procedure on 5 June 2025.
Circumstances of the death
On 5 June 2025, David John Smart underwent a polypectomy. He was on Rivaroxaban for atrial fibrillation which was stopped prior to the procedure due to the risk of increased bleeding. He underwent the procedure without any immediate complications and was discharged with instructions to resume his Rivaroxaban after 72 hours which he did.

On Friday 13 June 2025 he developed a significant rectal bleed and was advised by the Endoscopy Unit to attend the Emergency Department at the Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton which he did that afternoon.

He was assessed in the Emergency Department and a decision was made to attempt conservative management of the bleed but he continued to experience bleeding and a decision was made the next morning that he would undergo surgical intervention to attempt to resolve the same. He was then discussed with  the  Haematologists  as  to  the  implications  of  the  Rivaroxaban  and authorised  to  have  the  only  reversal  agent  available.  There  were  no complications with the surgery which sealed the bleeding vessels around the site of his polypectomy. The reversal treatment of Andexanet Alfa is known to have recognised complications of thrombosis which Mr Smart sadly suffered after its administration. He sadly died from the complications resulting from the use of the Andexanet Alfa treatment on 14 June 2025.
Action should be taken
In my opinion unless action is taken to address the above concerns then there is a significant risk of future deaths and I believe each of you have the power to take such action.

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2026-0262
Date of report
22 May 2026
Coroner
Joanne Andrews
Coroner area
West Sussex, Brighton and Hove

Responses identified

Responses identified 3 of 3
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 11 Sep 2026 (estimated).

Sent to

Department of Health and Social Care
NHS England & NHS Improvement
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust

Source links