Completed
· Chair: Lady Justice Thirlwall
· Established October 2023
· Commissioned by Department of Health and Social Care
Statutory inquiry into events at the Countess of Chester Hospital between 2015 and 2018, following the conviction of neonatal nurse Lucy Letby for the murder of seven babies and the attempted murder of others.
More about this inquiry
Statutory inquiry into events at the Countess of Chester Hospital between 2015 and 2018, following the conviction of neonatal nurse Lucy Letby for the murder of seven babies and the attempted murder of others. Ordered as a non-statutory inquiry on 18 August 2023; statutory footing announced 30 August 2023 and confirmed to Parliament 4 September 2023; formally set up 19 October 2023; public hearings opened 10 September 2024 and concluded March 2025. Final report published 15 September 2026 in three volumes with 17 recommendations (Volume III, Part Three, Chapter 45). The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care made an oral statement to the Commons the same day and said the government will set out a full response.
All cots and incubators in all neonatal units should be fitted with baby monitors (in-cot
cameras with livestreaming video), so that parents can observe their baby remotely at
any time. The funding for this should be centrally managed and ring-fenced, to ensure
consistency and implementation across all neonatal units at speed. By 31 March 2027, NHS
England should set out a roadmap for how this will be implemented.
Since then (summary written by this site)
In September 2026, Duncan Burton, Chief Nursing Officer for England, and Sarah-Jane Marsh, NHS England Chief Operating Officer, stated that the organisation will "develop a national approach to support neonatal units to implement this", drawing on learning from places where monitors are already used (Duncan Burton; Sarah-Jane Marsh, Sep 2026). This followed an oral statement earlier that month by Yvette Cooper, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, who accepted the recommendation and directed officials to urgently develop plans for cot cameras (Yvette Cooper response, Sep 2026).
Accepted · Department of Health and Social Care says in progress
Recommended
i. Digital devices should be used to restrict access of insulin to authorised people
and record access to insulin storage units. I acknowledge that steps are being taken to
achieve this. By 31 March 2027, all neonatal units must meet the expected requirements
for access control and storage of insulin set out in the NHS England Getting It Right First
Time guide, GIRFT Neonatology: Guide to safe insulin use.
ii. Until access to insulin requires the provision of biometric data, each Trust should install
CCTV cameras focused on storage fridges, cupboards or units. The cameras should store
recordings for at least 28 days.
iii. The GIRFT Laboratory Handling of Insulin Requests in the Investigation of Hypoglycaemia
guidance for the testing and reporting of insulin and C-peptide results, issued in October
2025, must be made mandatory and of national application.
Since then (summary written by this site)
In September 2026, the Department of Health and Social Care accepted the recommendation, with the Secretary of State, Yvette Cooper, stating that the government agreed to introduce stronger controls on insulin storage while beginning work on safe storage guidance (Yvette Cooper response, Sep 2026; Department of Health and Social Care, Sep 2026). Duncan Burton, Chief Nursing Officer for England, and Sarah-Jane Marsh, NHS England Chief Operating Officer, instructed trusts that same month to urgently install CCTV monitoring insulin storage by 30 November 2026 until biometric access is in place (Duncan Burton; Sarah-Jane Marsh, Sep 2026). Under their directive, all neonatal units must meet required access control and storage standards by 31 March 2027 (Duncan Burton; Sarah-Jane Marsh, Sep 2026).
Accepted · Department of Health and Social Care says in progress
Recommended
The National Bereavement Care Pathway for neonatal death should be implemented
nationally and in all Trusts by 31 August 2027.
Since then (summary written by this site)
Yvette Cooper, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, stated in September 2026 that all NHS trusts are signed up to implement the National Bereavement Care Pathway for neonatal death by 2027, with the department confirming that rollout is in progress (Yvette Cooper response, Sep 2026; Department of Health and Social Care, Sep 2026). In a letter published that month, Duncan Burton, Chief Nursing Officer for England, and Sarah-Jane Marsh, NHS England Chief Operating Officer, found that integrated care boards and providers should take immediate action to improve care of the bereaved (Duncan Burton; Sarah-Jane Marsh, Sep 2026).
Under consideration · No statement from NHS Trusts found
Recommended
i. All Trusts must provide safeguarding training to all staff (appropriate to their role
and expertise) and Board members, including Non-Executive Directors. This training
should include how to deal with concerns and suspicions about deliberate harm caused
by staff.
ii. By March 2027, every existing contract of employment for work in an NHS hospital
must be amended to include an obligation on the employee to follow all relevant
safeguarding guidance, including the Suspicion of Deliberate Harm Protocol (at
Recommendation 9), for dealing with concerns and suspicions about deliberate harm.
Agency and bank staff contracts and all new contracts of employment must include the
same obligation.
Since then (summary written by this site)
The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, Yvette Cooper, stated in September 2026 that the recommendation was under consideration, noting that an urgent review of the NHS safeguarding framework and training had been requested (Yvette Cooper response, Sep 2026). In the same month, Duncan Burton, Chief Nursing Officer for England, and Sarah-Jane Marsh, NHS England Chief Operating Officer, directed trusts and integrated care boards to ensure staff and board members comply with safeguarding training requirements and understand how to escalate concerns (Duncan Burton; Sarah-Jane Marsh, Sep 2026).
Under consideration · No statement from NHS England found
Recommended
NHS England must provide, by 31 March 2027, a clear and timed route to ensuring that
computer systems are harmonised across the NHS by December 2028. Work on the
development of a mandatory information standard with requirements for interoperability
between systems should be taken forward and implemented as soon as possible. This
should mean that data relating to babies and neonates in hospital may be entered on a
single occasion, be reviewed in a timely manner and facilitate continuous monitoring.1
Since then (summary written by this site)
In an oral statement to the House of Commons in September 2026, Yvette Cooper, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, stated that the government had implemented the maternity outcome signal system to provide near real-time safety alerts and acknowledged regarding technology recommendations that "we must do more" (Yvette Cooper response, Sep 2026). The record holds no update since the Department of Health and Social Care's response of September 2026 (Yvette Cooper response, Sep 2026).
No response yet · No statement from NHS Trusts found
Recommended
i. By 31 March 2027, all hospital Trusts must have in place effective mechanisms for Board-
level monitoring of all deaths of children and babies.
ii. By 31 March 2027, all hospital Trusts must have in place a clear and predetermined route
to senior management for the escalation of concerning data trends or patterns.
Since then (summary written by this site)
The Inquiry asked National Health Service (NHS) hospital trusts to monitor child deaths. In an oral statement in September 2026, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care said the government "will, of course, consider the entire report and set out a full response" (Department of Health and Social Care response, Sep 2026). The Minister quoted the Inquiry's finding that the Countess of Chester Hospital board received no reports on infant deaths, but board-level monitoring and escalation routes across trusts are not mentioned in the statement (Department of Health and Social Care response, Sep 2026). The record holds nothing dated later than the response of September 2026 (Department of Health and Social Care response, Sep 2026).
Under consideration · No statement from NHS Trusts found
Recommended
i. All hospitals with a neonatal unit should name a ‘lead reporter’ with responsibility
for inputting data regularly (at least weekly) and reviewing real-time data viewers on
neonatal and maternity units in the MBRRACE system. Whilst the lead reporter does not
necessarily need to be a clinician, they must be trained to understand and interpret the
available data and able to explain and discuss it with clinicians.
ii. Save where data requires immediate action, in which case a report should be made to
the Medical Director and the Board immediately, the lead reporter should report to Trust
Boards at least every six months and advise:
a. whether any alerts or a need for investigation have arisen
b. the investigation or action plan in place.
Since then (summary written by this site)
In an oral statement to the House of Commons in September 2026, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, Yvette Cooper, stated that the government has implemented the maternity outcome signal system to provide near real-time safety alerts, but agreed regarding technology recommendations that "we must do more" (Yvette Cooper response, Sep 2026). The record holds no update since the department's response of September 2026 (Yvette Cooper response, Sep 2026).
i. NHS England must:
a. Immediately inform all Trusts with a neonatal unit that the SUDIC process applies
to the sudden and unexpected deaths of babies who have never left hospital.
b. Direct all Trusts that they must, within seven days, draw this information to the
attention of all relevant staff and the Board.
ii. DHSC must complete its review and revision of the SUDIC guidelines and ensure
the revised guidelines are distributed to all Trusts by no later than 31 March 2027.
The guidelines must include a clear statement that SUDIC applies to sudden and
unexpected deaths of babies who have never left hospital.
iii. SUDIC forms must be redesigned and shortened to keep bureaucracy to a minimum.
The focus should be on what it is essential to know.
Since then (summary written by this site)
In September 2026, Duncan Burton and Sarah-Jane Marsh of NHS England instructed all trusts with a neonatal unit to communicate to relevant staff and their boards by 28 September 2026 that the SUDIC protocol applies to unexpected deaths within those units (Duncan Burton; Sarah-Jane Marsh, Sep 2026). In September 2026, Yvette Cooper confirmed that reviewing and updating the sudden unexpected death in infancy and childhood guidance was "now underway" (Yvette Cooper response, Sep 2026).
Addressed to NHS England; Department of Health and Social Care · Full record
Under consideration · No statement from NHS England or NHS Trusts found
Recommended
Protocol
i. By 31 March 2027, NHS England must produce and distribute a one-page protocol
setting out the steps to be taken by managers when concerns or suspicions are raised
that a healthcare professional may have deliberately harmed a patient. The Suspicion
of Deliberate Harm Protocol must make explicit that:
a. It is irrelevant whether the person to whom the concerns have been expressed does
or does not believe they are true, as is the fact that the person raising the concern is
not sure.
b. Where concerns or suspicions of deliberate harm are being raised in good faith, they
must be acted upon immediately.
c. Only in cases where the concerns are obviously irrational or malicious (which
assessment must be recorded) will no further action be justified.
d. Pending investigation of a member of staff, action to protect patients by moving
the person suspected of causing harm is likely to be the first step.
e. The moving of a person suspected of causing harm and the investigation into
suspicions and concerns about a member of staff is a neutral act.
f. Safeguarding steps must be followed, as a result of which the police will become
involved.
Guidance
ii. Guidance of no more than two pages should accompany the protocol. It must set out
the factors to be considered when assessing the nature of the concerns and suspicions.
The reader should be directed to guard against their own biases, loyalties and prejudices.
The guidance should explain what should be said and when to those who are or who
may be involved with any investigation (such as patients, parents and staff). This must
include that patient safety comes first, and investigation is required. The guidance
should also explain that failure to follow the protocol will be a breach of contract by
an employee, as well as a breach of the relevant code of conduct.
Implementation
iii. Trusts must embed the Suspicion of Deliberate Harm Protocol and guidance within their
hospital.
Since then (summary written by this site)
In September 2026, Yvette Cooper, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, addressed safeguarding recommendations including a new protocol, stating that she had asked the Chief Nursing Officer to urgently review the NHS safeguarding framework and training (Yvette Cooper response, Sep 2026). The Minister noted that although a revised safeguarding framework was published in April 2026, further urgent examination was required in light of the report (Yvette Cooper response, Sep 2026). The record holds no update since the Department of Health and Social Care's response of September 2026 (Yvette Cooper response, Sep 2026).
Addressed to NHS England; NHS Trusts · Full record
No response yet · No statement from Department of Health and Social Care found
Recommended
Serious consideration should be given by DHSC to the setting up of a panel of independent
experts from all specialties to be called upon in situations where there are emerging
concerns about an individual and harm to a patient or patients. A team from any specialty
or combination of specialties would be drawn from the panel to conduct a swift, technical
investigation into the concerns raised. This may most often be necessary where there are
concerns that harm is being or has been caused inadvertently.
The precise make-up of the panel should be determined by DHSC but could include,
for example:
a. two doctors and two nurses from each clinical specialty
b. four senior managers
c. four pathologists including paediatric and perinatal pathologists
d. other experts as decided by DHSC.
Where necessary, a small team (always including clinicians from the relevant specialty/
specialties) would be drawn from the panel to carry out an independent investigation into
clinical concerns. Such investigations should always include safeguarding considerations
(including contacting the police). In addition to reporting their findings to the Trust and
DHSC, the experts would be available to be called as witnesses in any proceedings that
may follow.2
Since then (summary written by this site)
The Inquiry asked health ministers to consider creating an expert panel on clinical harm. In an oral statement in September 2026, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care said that the government "will, of course, consider the entire report and set out a full response" (Department of Health and Social Care response, Sep 2026). Made on the day the inquiry report was published, the statement named neither this recommendation nor the proposed panel of independent experts (Department of Health and Social Care response, Sep 2026). The record holds nothing dated later than the response of September 2026 (Department of Health and Social Care response, Sep 2026).
Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care · Full record
Under consideration · Department of Health and Social Care says in progress
Recommended
i. The National Medical Examiner should, by 31 March 2027, prepare and distribute a
one-page document setting out all the steps to be taken by a medical examiner when
dealing with the death of a neonate.
ii. The revised SUDIC guidelines (see Recommendation 8 above) should be set out within
the good practice guidelines for medical examiners, not merely signposted.
iii. Medical examiners should ask direct questions of the attending practitioner as to
whether there is a concern that a child has been harmed or some other safeguarding
concern. Where there may be such a concern, the medical examiner should ensure
that there is a record made that day of the contact details of every doctor or nurse
who attended to the baby during life.
iv. There should be a pool of neonatologists who can assist medical examiners with
their work until such time as it is possible to appoint the appropriate number of
regional neonatologist medical examiners. Ring-fenced funding should be provided
for this purpose.
v. The medical examiner system should be reviewed again in 2027 by DHSC. The review
should include the adequacy of funding for medical examiners and their support staff
and offices. In particular, the question of whether the funding should be ring-fenced
must be addressed. Thereafter, reviews should be as directed by DHSC and NHS
England.
Since then (summary written by this site)
In September 2026, the Department of Health and Social Care stated that it had begun work on "strengthened guidance for medical examiners reviewing neonatal deaths" while considering the inquiry's recommendations in full (Department of Health and Social Care, Sep 2026). In an oral statement that same month, Yvette Cooper, the Secretary of State, confirmed that the government would set out further plans to strengthen neonatal expertise when publishing its full response (Yvette Cooper response, Sep 2026). The record holds no update since the department's response of September 2026 (Yvette Cooper response, Sep 2026).
No response yet · No statement from Department of Health and Social Care or NHS England found
Recommended
DHSC and NHS England must ensure that, by June 2033, there are 37 doctors in training
posts as paediatric and perinatal pathologists, in line with the workforce requirement set
out by the Royal College of Pathologists in the November 2025 Paediatric and Perinatal
Pathology Workforce Report. The incentive scheme should remain in place and funded
until at least 37 doctors are in training posts as paediatric and perinatal pathologists.
Accepted in part · Department of Health and Social Care says in progress
Recommended
i. DHSC and NHS England must develop and put in place a barring system for all managers
(clinical and non-clinical) by September 2027. It should be reviewed in 2030 with a view
to moving to a full statutory regulation system by September 2032.
ii. NHS England must require any Trust seeking approval for the movement of a senior
manager to another Trust to demonstrate that:
a. The move is not proposed because of the manager’s lack of capability or misconduct.
b. The manager meets the fit and proper person test.
NHS England must not grant approval, and Trusts must not seek approval, unless they
are able to demonstrate the matters at a. and b. above.
iii. In addition to the statutory duty for organisations, all managers must be subject to an
individual duty of candour to all patients and colleagues. This should be included in the
code of conduct and in the contract of employment for all managers.
iv. The NHS Leadership and Management Framework Code, a code of conduct for
NHS managers published in July 2026, must be amended urgently to set out, at the
beginning, the uncontroversial duty of every manager to put patients first. I suggest
the following wording, with thanks to Mr Jarrold: ‘I will make the care and safety
of patients my first concern and act to protect them from risk.’ What matters is that
patients come first.
v. In the Leadership and Management Framework Standards, the competency ‘delivering
across healthcare’ should be first (it is currently third). The first and fundamental
competency under this heading is, rightly: “I put patients first and report safety
concerns and incidents.”
Since then (summary written by this site)
In September 2026, the Department of Health and Social Care stated that plans to regulate managers through a barring scheme for senior leaders were in progress (Department of Health and Social Care, Sep 2026). In an oral statement to the House of Commons that month, Secretary of State Yvette Cooper confirmed that the government would legislate to introduce the scheme "as soon as Parliamentary time allows" and consider expanding it further (Yvette Cooper response, Sep 2026). The record holds no update since the department's response of September 2026 (Yvette Cooper response, Sep 2026).
Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care; NHS England; NHS Trusts · Full record
i. CQC should conduct without-notice inspections of hospital departments. Inspection
teams should include at least two current practising experts in the relevant field (in this
case paediatrics/neonatology).
ii. Inspectors should investigate what is happening in hospital departments and not accept
what they are told at face value. Where processes are being inspected, questions must
be asked to elicit the effectiveness of those processes.3
iii. Training should make explicit that CQC is responsible for ensuring the safety
of patients in hospitals and not just for checking there are processes in place which,
if implemented, should ensure patient safety. Inspectors and team leaders must always
approach an inspection of neonatal services not as a box-ticking exercise but as a way
to determine that babies in hospital are safe.
Since then (summary written by this site)
In September 2026, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, Yvette Cooper, stated to the House of Commons that the government would ensure recommendations for regulators, including the Care Quality Commission, are "taken seriously", adding that while the maternity outcome signal system had been implemented, it agreed more must be done (Yvette Cooper response, Sep 2026). The record holds no update since the department's response of September 2026 (Yvette Cooper response, Sep 2026).
No response yet · No statement from Department of Health and Social Care found
Recommended
There must be a rigorous and consistent review and assessment of the performance of CQC
by the Health and Social Care Committee, initially once a year and, once the committee is
satisfied, once every three years, or such other frequency to be determined by the select
committee.
Since then (summary written by this site)
The Inquiry recommended regular parliamentary reviews of the Care Quality Commission (CQC). In an oral statement in September 2026 on the day the Inquiry report was published, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care noted that the report makes recommendations for regulators, including CQC (Department of Health and Social Care response, Sep 2026). Addressing further action, the Minister stated that the government "will, of course, consider the entire report and set out a full response" (Department of Health and Social Care response, Sep 2026). The record holds nothing dated later than the response of September 2026 (Department of Health and Social Care response, Sep 2026).
No response yet · No statement from The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman found
Recommended
The functions of the National Guardian’s Office should be taken over by the Parliamentary
and Health Service Ombudsman in England. The Ombudsman’s powers must be increased
to include:
a. investigating complaints that whistleblowing in the NHS has not been dealt
with adequately
b. assisting whistleblowers by referring their concerns to the relevant NHS bodies
and overseeing the response.
Since then (summary written by this site)
The Inquiry asked the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman to take over whistleblowing oversight functions. In September 2026, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care stated that the government "will, of course, consider the entire report and set out a full response" (Department of Health and Social Care response, Sep 2026). The Minister gave this oral statement on the day the report was published, naming neither this recommendation nor the Ombudsman or the National Guardian's Office (Department of Health and Social Care response, Sep 2026). The record holds nothing dated later than the response of September 2026 (Department of Health and Social Care response, Sep 2026).
Addressed to The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman · Full record
Under consideration · No statement from National Audit Office or NI Audit Office found
Recommended
A new responsibility for auditing the implementation of the recommendations of statutory
inquiries into NHS bodies should be given to the National Audit Office. Funding for
appropriate additional staffing should be made available so that it may begin its work
by September 2027.
Since then (summary written by this site)
The Inquiry recommended that the National Audit Office audit recommendations from statutory health inquiries. In September 2026, Yvette Cooper, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, stated that her department is setting up a recommendation hub to track progress internally across the National Health Service (NHS) (Yvette Cooper response, Sep 2026). She stated that the department will work with the Cabinet Office on improvements in this area to respond to the inquiry (Yvette Cooper response, Sep 2026). The record holds nothing dated later than the response of September 2026 (Yvette Cooper response, Sep 2026).
Addressed to National Audit Office; NI Audit Office · Full record
The Witness Timetable states that oral evidence from witnesses on Parts A/B/C ran from 16 September 2024 to 17 January 2025. This is distinct from the 10 September opening statements.
The Inquiry held a further evidential hearing on 24 February 2025 for Dr Susan Gilby; this was after the 59 sitting days/133 witnesses stated for the Parts A/B/C hearing period ending 17 January.
Government response to the Thirlwall Inquiry (oral statement, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care)
Oral statement to the House of Commons by the Rt Hon Yvette Cooper MP, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, delivered 15 September 2026. Verbatim opening: 'Madam Deputy Speaker, with permission, I would like to make a statement on the report of the three-year public inquiry into events at the Countess of Chester Hospital, between 2015 and 2018, led by Lady Justice Thirlwall, published today.'
Statutory inquiry into events at the Countess of Chester Hospital following conviction of Lucy Letby. Established 19 Oct 2023. Chaired by Lady Justice Thirlwall. Funded by DHSC. Hearings Sep 2024 - Jan 2025. Report expected after Easter 2026. Inquiry Legal = Counsel + Solicitor/paralegals + Experts. CP Legal = Family legal fees + non-CP legal assisting. Staff = Secretariat + Chair. Hearings = venue + AV + other. Technology = IT + Media + Office accommodation. Other = Emotional support + Publication + Admin/travel. All figures rounded to nearest £000, exclude VAT.
FY2024/25 figures re-published in FY2025/26 Inquiry report; category mapping corrected
Source and qualifications
Accounting period: 1 Apr 2024 to 31 Mar 2025.
The Inquiry FY25/26 report reproduces FY2024/25 total £13,098k. Mapped visible £000 components: secretariat 749 to staff; chair 452 to panel; counsel 1,983 plus solicitor 3,762 to inquiry legal 5,745; family legal fees 2,877 to core-participant legal; office 153 plus hearing venue 245 to accommodation 398; IT 601 plus hearing AV 1,274 to technology 1,875; experts 211, non-core-participant legal 12, emotional support 194, media 226, hearing other 344 and administration 15 to other 1,002. Safeguarding stays NULL: the source does not identify support beneficiaries for this schema. The mapped categories sum to the published £13,098k. Values are rounded to nearest £000, exclude VAT, and are not accountant-compiled accounts. Only category/source/notes fields are corrected; original period and £13,098,000 total remain.
FY2023/24 figures re-published in FY2025/26 Inquiry report; category mapping corrected
Source and qualifications
Accounting period: 4 Sep 2023 to 31 Mar 2024.
The Inquiry FY25/26 report reproduces the FY2023/24 table: total £2,834k for 4 September 2023–31 March 2024. Mapped visible components in £000: secretariat 168 to staff, chair 133 to panel, counsel 742 plus solicitor 1,397 to inquiry legal 2,139, family legal fees 216 to core-participant legal, IT 133 to technology, and emotional support 27 plus media 16 plus administration 2 to other 45. Office accommodation is a dash, so the field is NULL; safeguarding remains NULL because beneficiaries of emotional support are not specified. The rounded outer Legal costs subtotal 2,356 differs by £1k from its rounded components 742+1,397+216=2,355; component-based categories and published total are retained without inventing £1k. Source values are rounded to nearest £000, exclude VAT, and are not accountant-compiled accounts. Only category/source/notes fields are corrected; original period and £2,834,000 total remain.
Written QuestionHouse of CommonsDamian Hinds · Conservative
Asked: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, with reference to her statement of 15 September on the Thirlwall Inquiry and the “recommendation hub to properly track our implementation progress internally, not just for this inquiry but for othe
Written QuestionHouse of LordsLord McCrea of Magherafelt and Cookstown · Democratic Unionist Party
Asked: To ask His Majesty's Government what the costs are of the (1) Hamill Inquiry, and (2) Letby Inquiry.
Answered by Cabinet Office: The Robert Hamill Inquiry opened in 2005. The previous chair of the Inquiry reported that the Terms of Reference were fulfilled in 2011. However, due to legal proceedings, the Inquiry report was only published on 14 September 2026. The total amount paid for inquiry expenses since its establishment, including expenditure since 2011, will be published by the Secretary of State …
Written QuestionHouse of CommonsKim Johnson · Labour
Asked: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps her Department are taking to improve data collection into inequalities in maternal mental health outcomes for Black women and birthing people.
Answered by Department of Health and Social Care: It is a priority for the Government to ensure that all women and babies receive the high-quality care they deserve, regardless of their background, location or ethnicity. The Department has funded the PRiSMM programme through the National Institute for Health and Care Research. It will report England-wide data on severe maternal morbidity and evaluate the Maternal Care bundle, including an …
Written QuestionHouse of CommonsMike Wood · Conservative
Asked: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what has been the total cost to date of the Thirlwall Inquiry.
Answered by Department of Health and Social Care: The total cost of the Thirlwall Inquiry from its commencement in September 2023 to the end of March 2026 is £18,718,000.00. This includes March 2026 forecasted amounts.
Written Ministerial StatementHouse of CommonsKarin Smyth · Labour
Statement: Ensuring strong and accountable NHS leadership will be critical to delivering our plan for change and building an NHS fit for the future.We know the important role that high quality leadership plays in fostering a compassionate and transparent culture within the NHS and we want …