Suspicion of Deliberate Harm Protocol and guidance
Thirlwall Inquiry · Thirlwall Inquiry Final Report · Issued 15 September 2026 · Addressed to: NHS England, NHS Trusts
Government responseDepartment of Health and Social Care: Under consideration (Sep 2026)
DeliveryNo statement from NHS England or NHS Trusts found
Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation, Chapter 41
Protocol
i. By 31 March 2027, NHS England must produce and distribute a one-page protocol
setting out the steps to be taken by managers when concerns or suspicions are raised
that a healthcare professional may have deliberately harmed a patient. The Suspicion
of Deliberate Harm Protocol must make explicit that:
a. It is irrelevant whether the person to whom the concerns have been expressed does
or does not believe they are true, as is the fact that the person raising the concern is
not sure.
b. Where concerns or suspicions of deliberate harm are being raised in good faith, they
must be acted upon immediately.
c. Only in cases where the concerns are obviously irrational or malicious (which
assessment must be recorded) will no further action be justified.
d. Pending investigation of a member of staff, action to protect patients by moving
the person suspected of causing harm is likely to be the first step.
e. The moving of a person suspected of causing harm and the investigation into
suspicions and concerns about a member of staff is a neutral act.
f. Safeguarding steps must be followed, as a result of which the police will become
involved.
Guidance
ii. Guidance of no more than two pages should accompany the protocol. It must set out
the factors to be considered when assessing the nature of the concerns and suspicions.
The reader should be directed to guard against their own biases, loyalties and prejudices.
The guidance should explain what should be said and when to those who are or who
may be involved with any investigation (such as patients, parents and staff). This must
include that patient safety comes first, and investigation is required. The guidance
should also explain that failure to follow the protocol will be a breach of contract by
an employee, as well as a breach of the relevant code of conduct.
Implementation
iii. Trusts must embed the Suspicion of Deliberate Harm Protocol and guidance within their
hospital.
Thirlwall Inquiry, Thirlwall Inquiry Final Report · 15 Sep 2026 Source PDF, page 4 →
Published evidence summary
AI-generated evidence summary
In September 2026, Yvette Cooper, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, addressed safeguarding recommendations including a new protocol, stating that she had asked the Chief Nursing Officer to urgently review the NHS safeguarding framework and training (Yvette Cooper response, Sep 2026). The Minister noted that although a revised safeguarding framework was published in April 2026, further urgent examination was required in light of the report (Yvette Cooper response, Sep 2026). The record holds no update since the Department of Health and Social Care's response of September 2026 (Yvette Cooper response, Sep 2026).
Sources
AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.
Government response
●Department of Health and Social Care · Under consideration · 15 Sep 2026
On the crucial issue of safeguarding, just as Lady Justice Thirlwall recommends, compulsory training, a new protocol, employment requirements.
Madam Deputy Speaker, a revised NHS safeguarding framework was published in April 2026, but I have asked the Chief Nursing Officer to urgently review the framework and the training in light of this report. We need to look urgently at this.
Extract from: Government response to the Thirlwall Inquiry
Delivery
No statement on delivery from NHS England or NHS Trusts has been found in the sources searched. This is separate from the response above.
How this page is built
The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.