11

Medical examiners

Thirlwall Inquiry · Thirlwall Inquiry Final Report · Issued 15 September 2026

Government responseDepartment of Health and Social Care: Under consideration (Sep 2026)

DeliveryDepartment of Health and Social Care says in progress (Sep 2026)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation, Chapter 32

i. The National Medical Examiner should, by 31 March 2027, prepare and distribute a
one-page document setting out all the steps to be taken by a medical examiner when
dealing with the death of a neonate.
ii. The revised SUDIC guidelines (see Recommendation 8 above) should be set out within
the good practice guidelines for medical examiners, not merely signposted.
iii. Medical examiners should ask direct questions of the attending practitioner as to
whether there is a concern that a child has been harmed or some other safeguarding
concern. Where there may be such a concern, the medical examiner should ensure
that there is a record made that day of the contact details of every doctor or nurse
who attended to the baby during life.
iv. There should be a pool of neonatologists who can assist medical examiners with
their work until such time as it is possible to appoint the appropriate number of
regional neonatologist medical examiners. Ring-fenced funding should be provided
for this purpose.
v. The medical examiner system should be reviewed again in 2027 by DHSC. The review
should include the adequacy of funding for medical examiners and their support staff
and offices. In particular, the question of whether the funding should be ring-fenced
must be addressed. Thereafter, reviews should be as directed by DHSC and NHS
England.

Thirlwall Inquiry, Thirlwall Inquiry Final Report · 15 Sep 2026 Source PDF, page 5 →

Published evidence summary

AI-generated evidence summary

In September 2026, the Department of Health and Social Care stated that it had begun work on "strengthened guidance for medical examiners reviewing neonatal deaths" while considering the inquiry's recommendations in full (Department of Health and Social Care, Sep 2026). In an oral statement that same month, Yvette Cooper, the Secretary of State, confirmed that the government would set out further plans to strengthen neonatal expertise when publishing its full response (Yvette Cooper response, Sep 2026). The record holds no update since the department's response of September 2026 (Yvette Cooper response, Sep 2026).

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.

Government response

●Department of Health and Social Care · Under consideration · 15 Sep 2026

Words of: Yvette Cooper, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, oral statement to the House of Commons, 15 September 2026 (text as published on GOV.UK)

It welcomes the introduction of medical examiners but said it should have happened 10 years earlier. I agree. We will set out further plans to strengthen their neonatal expertise following the inquiry’s recommendations when the government sets out its full response.

Extract from: Government response to the Thirlwall Inquiry

Delivery

●Department of Health and Social Care says in progress · 15 Sep 2026

new guidance on the safe use and storage of insulin and strengthened guidance for medical examiners reviewing neonatal deaths

From: Government to act on Thirlwall patient safety recommendations

Site note: Department of Health and Social Care press release of 15 September 2026. The passage is one item in a list of measures the government says it has begun "while it considers the inquiry's recommendations in full"; the release does not number the recommendations. The release gives this item once, for insulin (recommendation 2) and medical examiners (recommendation 11) together, and the same words are recorded on each.

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.