Select Committee · Education Committee

Children's Homes

Status: Closed Opened: 15 Mar 2021 Closed: 16 Feb 2023 38 recommendations 21 conclusions 1 report

The inquiry will focus on children’s homes. It will examine a number of areas including educational outcomes and destinations, the quality of support provided by children’s homes, unregulated provision, rates of criminalisation, the sufficiency of children’s home places, and the impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic. Read the call for evidence for more detail about the … Show more

Clear

Reports

1 report
Title HC No. Published Items Response
Second Report - Educational poverty: how children in reside… HC 57 8 Jul 2022 59 Responded

Recommendations & Conclusions

6 items
22 Recommendation Second Report - Educational poverty: ho… Not Addressed

We have highlighted the need for clear sanctions for schools who refuse to admit looked-after...

We have highlighted the need for clear sanctions for schools who refuse to admit looked-after pupils, enforced through the impact on the school’s Ofsted judgement. We have also highlighted the need for much quicker decisions to be made by the Schools Adjudicator when the admissions code is breached. And the … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government responds by restating existing policy that looked-after children have priority in school admissions and statutory guidance advises prioritizing schools judged 'Good' or 'Outstanding' by Ofsted. It does not address the recommendations for clear sanctions, quicker Schools Adjudicator decisions, or a new backstop power.
Read full response →
Department for Education
40 Recommendation Second Report - Educational poverty: ho… Not Addressed

The Department must ensure looked-after children are quickly able to access vital mental health support...

The Department must ensure looked-after children are quickly able to access vital mental health support services in a timely way despite being placed out-of-area or moved around. The child must not be disadvantaged in terms of waiting times if they are placed out-of-area, and consideration must be given to maintaining … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government repeated the committee's recommendation without response.
Read full response →
Department for Education
42 Conclusion Second Report - Educational poverty: ho… Not Addressed

Over 90% of SEND tribunal decisions are made in favour of the parent and child.

Over 90% of SEND tribunal decisions are made in favour of the parent and child. But where a child with SEND lives in residential care, and does not have a school place or Education, Health and Care plan that meets their needs, they may effectively have no right of appeal … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government repeats the committee's conclusion without providing a response.
Read full response →
Department for Education
46 Conclusion Second Report - Educational poverty: ho… Not Addressed

41% of care leavers aged 19–21 are not in education, employment or training, up from...

41% of care leavers aged 19–21 are not in education, employment or training, up from 39% in 2020. This is a shameful reflection of an education and careers system that routinely—and without consequences—fails far too many looked-after children. Too often, the potential of care leavers is not being realised. With … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government repeated the committee's conclusion without response.
Read full response →
Department for Education

Oral evidence sessions

6 sessions
Date Witnesses
1 Mar 2022 Fran Oram · Department for Education, Will Quince · Department for Education View ↗
1 Feb 2022 Children's Home - young people session View ↗
11 Jan 2022 Dame Rachel de Souza · Inspiration Trust, Dame Rachel de Souza · Office of the Children's Commissioner for England, Juliette Cammaerts · Office of the Children's Commissioner for England, Yvette Stanley · Ofsted View ↗
16 Nov 2021 Andrew Isaac · Children’s Services Development Group, Charlotte Ramsden OBE · Association of Directors of Children’s Services, Jonathan Whalley · St Christopher’s Fellowship, Michelle Lee-Izu · Barnardo’s View ↗
19 Oct 2021 Hannah McCowen · National Care Leavers Benchmarking Forum, and Catch 22, Mark Russell · The Children’s Society, Patrick Ward · National Association of Virtual School Headteachers (NAVSH), Victoria Langer · Become View ↗
20 Jul 2021 Anne Longfield, Former Children’s Commissioner, Josh MacAlister, Independent Review of Children’s Social Care, The Rt Hon. the Lord Adonis View ↗

Who gave evidence

17 witnesses
WitnessOrganisationSessions
Andrew Isaac · Independent Chair Children’s Services Development Group 1
Anne Longfield, Former Children’s Commissioner 1
Charlotte Ramsden OBE · President Association of Directors of Children’s Services 1
Dame Rachel de Souza · Chief Executive Inspiration Trust 1
Dame Rachel de Souza · Children’s Commissioner for England Office of the Children's Commissioner for England 1
Fran Oram · Portfolio Director for Children’s Social Care Ref… Department for Education 1
Hannah McCowen · Manager National Care Leavers Benchmarking Forum, and Catch 22 1
Jonathan Whalley · Chief Executive St Christopher’s Fellowship 1
Josh MacAlister, Independent Review of Children’s Social Care 1
Juliette Cammaerts · Director of Policy and Planning Office of the Children's Commissioner for England 1
Mark Russell · Chief Executive The Children’s Society 1
Michelle Lee-Izu · Interim Co-CEO Barnardo’s 1
Patrick Ward · Chair National Association of Virtual School Headteachers (NAVSH) 1
The Rt Hon. the Lord Adonis 1
Victoria Langer · Interim Chief Executive Become 1
Will Quince · Minister for Children and Families Department for Education 1
Yvette Stanley · National Director for Regulation and Social Care Ofsted 1

Correspondence

2 letters
DateDirectionTitle
6 Sep 2022 Correspondence from the Schools Adjudicator on the Children’s Homes Report, dat…
6 Sep 2022 Correspondence from Ofsted on Calcot Children’s Homes and safeguarding procedur…